NeuroClues vs TrendRadar
Side-by-side comparison to help you choose.
| Feature | NeuroClues | TrendRadar |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Product | MCP Server |
| UnfragileRank | 26/100 | 51/100 |
| Adoption | 0 | 0 |
| Quality | 0 | 1 |
| Ecosystem |
| 0 |
| 1 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Paid | Free |
| Capabilities | 9 decomposed | 13 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Captures and analyzes eye movement patterns (saccades, smooth pursuits, fixations, nystagmus) using infrared corneal reflection tracking at 60-250Hz sampling rates to quantify deviations from normative oculomotor baselines. The system applies machine learning classifiers trained on neurologically-healthy control populations to detect subclinical abnormalities in eye-movement kinematics that precede visible neurological symptoms, enabling detection of early-stage neurodegenerative conditions like Parkinson's, cerebellar ataxia, and progressive supranuclear palsy before conventional clinical signs emerge.
Unique: Uses high-frequency infrared corneal reflection eye-tracking (60-250Hz) combined with machine learning classifiers trained on normative oculomotor baselines to detect subclinical neurological abnormalities invisible to human clinical observation, rather than relying on subjective bedside neurological examination or coarse video-based gaze estimation
vs alternatives: Detects neurological abnormalities 6-18 months earlier than conventional clinical exams by quantifying subtle oculomotor changes, whereas traditional neurological testing relies on observable motor/cognitive deficits that emerge only after significant neuronal loss
Stores baseline oculomotor metrics for individual patients and compares subsequent assessments against personalized baselines using statistical process control methods (e.g., exponentially-weighted moving average, control charts) to detect statistically-significant decline trajectories. The system generates alerts when oculomotor metrics deviate beyond patient-specific confidence intervals, enabling clinicians to quantify disease progression velocity and adjust therapeutic interventions based on objective biomarker trends rather than subjective symptom reports.
Unique: Applies statistical process control methods (control charts, EWMA) to individual patient baselines rather than population-level comparisons, enabling detection of patient-specific decline trajectories that may deviate from population norms due to genetic or disease heterogeneity
vs alternatives: Provides objective, quantified disease progression metrics superior to subjective clinical rating scales (MDS-UPDRS, MMSE) which suffer from inter-rater variability and floor/ceiling effects, enabling earlier detection of therapeutic response or disease acceleration
Integrates oculomotor metrics with optional supplementary neurological data (tremor accelerometry, gait kinematics, cognitive reaction times) into ensemble machine learning classifiers (random forests, gradient boosting, neural networks) trained on clinically-diagnosed patient cohorts to generate probabilistic diagnoses for specific neurological conditions. The system outputs condition-specific probability scores (e.g., 78% Parkinson's, 12% essential tremor, 10% other) with confidence intervals, enabling clinicians to rank differential diagnoses and prioritize confirmatory testing.
Unique: Combines oculomotor metrics with optional multimodal sensor data (tremor, gait, cognition) in ensemble classifiers trained on clinically-confirmed patient cohorts, rather than relying on single-modality biomarkers or population-level diagnostic criteria that lack individual patient specificity
vs alternatives: Provides probabilistic differential diagnoses superior to rule-based diagnostic criteria (e.g., UK Parkinson's Disease Society Brain Bank criteria) which are binary and lack confidence quantification, enabling clinicians to make risk-stratified decisions about confirmatory testing
Captures raw eye-gaze coordinates and pupil diameter from infrared corneal reflection eye-tracker hardware at 60-250Hz sampling rates, applies real-time preprocessing (blink detection, saccade detection via velocity thresholding, fixation clustering, outlier removal) to clean noisy tracking data, and streams preprocessed gaze events to downstream analysis pipelines. The system implements hardware-specific calibration routines (9-point or 13-point grid calibration) and validates tracking quality metrics (gaze accuracy, precision, data loss rate) before accepting data for clinical analysis.
Unique: Implements hardware-specific calibration and real-time preprocessing pipelines (blink detection, saccade detection, fixation clustering) optimized for clinical eye-tracking hardware, with quality assurance metrics that validate tracking fidelity before data enters clinical analysis workflows
vs alternatives: Provides clinical-grade eye-tracking data acquisition with real-time quality validation, superior to consumer-grade eye-tracking (e.g., webcam-based gaze estimation) which lacks hardware calibration, has 2-5x lower accuracy, and cannot reliably detect saccades or fixations
Implements standardized visual stimulus presentation sequences (fixation tasks, smooth pursuit tasks, saccadic tasks, optokinetic nystagmus tasks) with precise timing control and stimulus geometry to elicit reproducible oculomotor responses across patients and assessment sessions. The system presents calibrated visual targets at defined eccentricities and velocities, records stimulus timing metadata, and ensures consistent task execution across different clinical sites through protocol validation and technician training modules.
Unique: Implements standardized oculomotor testing protocols with precise stimulus timing control and geometry validation, ensuring reproducible task execution across patients, sessions, and clinical sites — critical for longitudinal tracking and multi-site clinical trials
vs alternatives: Provides protocol-driven stimulus presentation superior to ad-hoc bedside oculomotor testing, which lacks standardization, precise timing control, and reproducibility across assessments
Compares individual patient oculomotor metrics against age-stratified, ethnicity-stratified normative reference databases using z-score calculations to quantify deviation magnitude from healthy population norms. The system applies demographic-specific normalization (accounting for age-related oculomotor decline, sex differences, ethnic variation) and generates percentile ranks and confidence intervals around deviation scores, enabling clinicians to interpret whether observed oculomotor abnormalities are statistically significant or within normal variation.
Unique: Applies demographic-stratified normative comparison (age, ethnicity, sex) rather than single population-level norms, accounting for known oculomotor variation across demographic groups and reducing false-positive abnormality detection in normal ethnic variation
vs alternatives: Provides objective, quantified abnormality detection via z-scores superior to subjective clinical interpretation of oculomotor findings, which is prone to inter-rater variability and cognitive biases
Exports oculomotor assessment results (metrics, diagnoses, longitudinal trends) in standardized clinical report formats compatible with electronic health record systems, including structured data fields (FHIR-compatible observations) and human-readable narrative summaries. The system generates PDF reports suitable for clinician review and EHR import, with embedded visualizations (metric trends, diagnostic probability charts) and recommendations for follow-up testing or therapeutic intervention.
Unique: Generates standardized clinical reports with structured FHIR-compatible data export for EHR integration, rather than standalone reports disconnected from clinical workflows — enabling seamless integration of oculomotor biomarkers into existing clinical decision-making processes
vs alternatives: Provides EHR-integrated reporting superior to standalone assessment tools that generate isolated reports requiring manual data entry into EHR systems, reducing documentation burden and enabling longitudinal tracking within clinical workflows
Monitors eye-tracking data quality metrics in real-time (gaze accuracy, precision, data loss rate, tracking confidence) and flags assessment sessions with suboptimal data quality that may compromise diagnostic validity. The system implements automated quality checks (e.g., gaze accuracy >1.5 degrees triggers recalibration alert, data loss >10% triggers session rejection) and generates quality assurance reports documenting tracking performance and protocol compliance for each assessment session.
Unique: Implements real-time quality monitoring with automated alerts and session-level quality documentation, ensuring that only high-fidelity eye-tracking data enters clinical analysis pipelines — critical for diagnostic validity in clinical settings
vs alternatives: Provides automated quality assurance superior to manual quality review, which is subjective and prone to inconsistency across technicians and sites, enabling standardized data quality across multi-site clinical trials
+1 more capabilities
Crawls 11+ Chinese social platforms (Zhihu, Weibo, Bilibili, Douyin, etc.) and RSS feeds simultaneously, normalizing heterogeneous data schemas into a unified NewsItem model with platform-agnostic metadata. Uses platform-specific adapters that extract title, URL, hotness rank, and engagement metrics, then merges results into a single deduplicated feed ordered by composite hotness score (rank × 0.6 + frequency × 0.3 + platform_hot_value × 0.1).
Unique: Implements platform-specific adapter pattern with 11+ crawlers (Zhihu, Weibo, Bilibili, Douyin, etc.) plus RSS support, normalizing heterogeneous schemas into unified NewsItem model with composite hotness scoring (rank × 0.6 + frequency × 0.3 + platform_hot_value × 0.1) rather than simple ranking
vs alternatives: Covers more Chinese platforms than generic news aggregators (Feedly, Inoreader) and uses weighted composite scoring instead of single-metric ranking, making it superior for investors tracking multi-platform sentiment
Filters aggregated news against user-defined keyword lists (frequency_words.txt) using regex pattern matching and boolean logic (required keywords AND, excluded keywords NOT). Implements a scoring engine that weights matches by keyword frequency tier and calculates relevance scores. Supports regex patterns, case-insensitive matching, and multi-language keyword sets. Articles matching filter criteria are retained; non-matching articles are discarded before analysis and notification stages.
Unique: Implements multi-tier keyword frequency weighting (high/medium/low priority keywords) with regex pattern support and boolean AND/NOT logic, scoring articles by keyword match density rather than simple presence/absence checks
vs alternatives: More flexible than simple keyword whitelisting (supports regex and exclusion rules) but simpler than ML-based relevance ranking, making it suitable for rule-driven curation without ML infrastructure
TrendRadar scores higher at 51/100 vs NeuroClues at 26/100. TrendRadar also has a free tier, making it more accessible.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
Detects newly trending topics by comparing current aggregated feed against historical baseline (previous execution results). Marks new topics with 🆕 emoji and calculates trend velocity (rate of rank change) to identify rapidly rising topics. Implements configurable sensitivity thresholds to distinguish genuine new trends from noise. Stores historical snapshots to enable trend trajectory analysis and prediction.
Unique: Implements new topic detection by comparing current feed against historical baseline with configurable sensitivity thresholds. Calculates trend velocity (rank change rate) to identify rapidly rising topics and marks new trends with 🆕 emoji. Stores historical snapshots for trend trajectory analysis.
vs alternatives: More sophisticated than simple rank-based detection because it considers trend velocity and historical context; more practical than ML-based anomaly detection because it uses simple thresholding without model training; enables early-stage trend detection vs. mainstream coverage
Supports region-specific content filtering and display preferences (e.g., show only Mainland China trends, exclude Hong Kong/Taiwan content, or vice versa). Implements per-region keyword lists and notification channel routing (e.g., send Mainland China trends to WeChat, international trends to Telegram). Allows users to configure multiple region profiles and switch between them based on monitoring focus.
Unique: Implements region-specific content filtering with per-region keyword lists and channel routing. Supports multiple region profiles (Mainland China, Hong Kong, Taiwan, international) with independent keyword configurations and notification channel assignments.
vs alternatives: More flexible than single-region solutions because it supports multiple geographic markets simultaneously; more practical than manual region filtering because it automates routing based on platform metadata; enables region-specific monitoring vs. global aggregation
Abstracts deployment environment differences through unified execution mode interface. Detects runtime environment (GitHub Actions, Docker container, local Python) and applies mode-specific configuration (storage backend, notification channels, scheduling mechanism). Supports seamless migration between deployment modes without code changes. Implements environment-specific error handling and logging (e.g., GitHub Actions annotations for CI/CD visibility).
Unique: Implements execution mode abstraction detecting GitHub Actions, Docker, and local Python environments with automatic configuration switching. Applies mode-specific optimizations (storage backend, scheduling, logging) without code changes.
vs alternatives: More flexible than single-mode solutions because it supports multiple deployment options; more maintainable than separate codebases because it uses unified codebase with mode-specific configuration; more user-friendly than manual mode configuration because it auto-detects environment
Sends filtered news articles to LiteLLM, which abstracts over multiple LLM providers (OpenAI, Anthropic, Ollama, local models, etc.) to generate structured analysis including sentiment classification, key entity extraction, trend prediction, and executive summaries. Uses configurable system prompts and temperature settings per provider. Results are cached to avoid redundant API calls and formatted as structured JSON for downstream processing and notification delivery.
Unique: Uses LiteLLM abstraction layer to support 50+ LLM providers (OpenAI, Anthropic, Ollama, local models, etc.) with unified interface, allowing provider switching via config without code changes. Implements in-memory result caching and structured JSON output parsing with fallback to raw text.
vs alternatives: More flexible than single-provider solutions (e.g., direct OpenAI API) because it supports cost-effective provider switching and local model fallback; more robust than custom provider integration because LiteLLM handles retries and error handling
Translates article titles and summaries from Chinese to English (or other target languages) using LiteLLM-abstracted LLM providers with automatic fallback to alternative providers if primary provider fails. Maintains translation cache to avoid redundant API calls for identical content. Supports batch translation of multiple articles in single API call to reduce latency and cost. Integrates with notification system to deliver translated content to non-Chinese-speaking users.
Unique: Implements LiteLLM-based translation with automatic provider fallback and in-memory caching, supporting batch translation of multiple articles per API call to optimize latency and cost. Integrates seamlessly with multi-channel notification system for language-specific delivery.
vs alternatives: More cost-effective than dedicated translation APIs (Google Translate, DeepL) when using cheaper LLM providers; supports automatic fallback unlike single-provider solutions; batch processing reduces per-article cost vs. sequential translation
Distributes filtered and analyzed news to 9+ notification channels (WeChat, WeWork, Feishu, Telegram, Email, ntfy, Bark, Slack, etc.) using channel-specific adapters. Implements atomic message batching to group multiple articles into single notification payloads, respecting per-channel rate limits and message size constraints. Supports channel-specific formatting (Markdown for Slack, card format for WeWork, plain text for Email). Includes retry logic with exponential backoff for failed deliveries and delivery status tracking.
Unique: Implements channel-specific adapter pattern for 9+ notification platforms with atomic message batching that respects per-channel rate limits and message size constraints. Supports heterogeneous formatting (Markdown for Slack, card format for WeWork, plain text for Email) from single article payload.
vs alternatives: More comprehensive than single-channel solutions (e.g., email-only) and more flexible than generic webhook systems because it handles platform-specific formatting and rate limiting automatically; atomic batching reduces notification fatigue vs. per-article delivery
+5 more capabilities