Capability
20 artifacts provide this capability.
Want a personalized recommendation?
Find the best match →via “role-based access control (rbac) with fine-grained permission assignment”
Enterprise SSO, SCIM, and identity management API.
Unique: Provides server-side RBAC evaluation integrated with WorkOS's identity system, allowing permission checks to be decoupled from your application's database and eliminating the need to maintain separate role/permission tables
vs others: More integrated with enterprise identity than building custom RBAC (no separate permission database needed) but less flexible than dedicated authorization services like Oso or Authz for complex attribute-based policies
via “role-based access control with granular permission enforcement”
AI platform for building internal business apps.
Unique: Enforces permissions at the server-side query layer before data is serialized, combined with attribute-based rules that evaluate user properties dynamically, ensuring that permission changes take effect immediately without requiring application redeployment
vs others: More granular than Airtable's sharing model because it supports field-level and record-level restrictions, and more flexible than Retool because it includes built-in ABAC evaluation rather than requiring custom middleware
via “role-based access control (rbac) with multi-user collaboration”
AI visual development with design-to-code and CMS.
Unique: Provides predefined roles (Admin, Developer, Designer, Editor) with role-specific permissions for code generation, visual editing, and publishing. Enables non-developers (designers, product managers) to collaborate without full code access.
vs others: More granular than simple owner/viewer permissions because it supports multiple specialized roles; less flexible than custom RBAC systems but simpler to set up and manage.
via “rbac and authentication with role-based access control”
Milvus is a high-performance, cloud-native vector database built for scalable vector ANN search
Unique: Implements RBAC at Proxy service layer with Root Coordinator metadata management, supporting custom role definitions and granular collection/partition-level permissions with immediate revocation without cluster restart
vs others: Provides more flexible RBAC than Pinecone's API key-based access through role definitions, while maintaining simpler deployment than Elasticsearch's complex security model
via “centralized authentication and authorization with rbac and multi-tenancy”
An AI Gateway, registry, and proxy that sits in front of any MCP, A2A, or REST/gRPC APIs, exposing a unified endpoint with centralized discovery, guardrails and management. Optimizes Agent & Tool calling, and supports plugins.
Unique: Implements RBAC at the gateway layer using a declarative permission matrix that maps (user/team, tool, server) tuples to allow/deny decisions, evaluated before requests reach downstream services. Integrates multi-tenancy through SessionRegistry that isolates session state per tenant, preventing cross-tenant tool access.
vs others: Provides centralized RBAC enforcement across all federated servers without requiring each server to implement its own auth logic, reducing security surface area and enabling consistent policy enforcement. Multi-tenant isolation is built into the session layer rather than bolted on as an afterthought.
via “azure role-based access control (rbac) policy enforcement and auditing”
Azure MCP Server - Model Context Protocol implementation for Azure
Unique: Implements RBAC policy enforcement at the MCP server layer, evaluating permissions before tool execution rather than relying on Azure SDK's implicit authorization. Maintains a local cache of role assignments to reduce latency, with periodic refresh to detect role changes.
vs others: Provides defense-in-depth by enforcing permissions at both the MCP server and Azure service levels; agents cannot bypass RBAC even if Azure SDK clients are misconfigured, improving security posture compared to relying solely on Azure's authorization.
via “tool-approval-and-security-model”
SRE Agent - CNCF Sandbox Project
Unique: Implements a fine-grained tool approval model that supports multiple approval modes (auto-approve, require-approval, deny) and integrates with Kubernetes RBAC for policy enforcement. Supports dry-run mode for previewing tool effects and maintains audit logs for compliance, enabling secure agent deployment in enterprise environments.
vs others: Provides tighter security integration than generic agent frameworks by embedding RBAC-aware tool approval and audit logging directly into the tool execution pipeline, enabling enterprise-grade security without external policy engines.
via “role-based access control with row-level data permissions”
AI低代码平台,支持「低代码 + 零代码」双模式:零代码 5 分钟搭建业务系统,低代码模式一键生成前后端代码。 内置AI 应用,支持AI聊天、知识库、流程编排、MCP与插件,支持各种模型。Skills能力实现:一句话画流程图、设计表单、生成系统。 引领 AI生成→在线配置→代码生成→手工合并的开发模式,解决Java项目80%的重复工作,快速提高效率,又不失灵活性。
Unique: Combines Spring Security RBAC with MyBatis-Plus row-level filtering for transparent data permission enforcement at the SQL layer, supporting both role-based and attribute-based access control
vs others: Enforces row-level security transparently at the database query level, whereas application-level filtering (post-query) is slower and error-prone
via “role-based access control (rbac) with resource-level granularity”
** - Enterprise MCP gateway with SSO, RBAC, audit trails, and token vaults for secure, centralized AI agent access control. Deploy via Helm charts on-premise or in your cloud. [webrix.ai](https://webrix.ai)
Unique: Implements MCP-aware RBAC where permissions are bound to specific tool operations and resources (not just API endpoints), enabling agents to be granted access to 'read from database X' without access to 'write to database X', with automatic policy evaluation at the MCP protocol layer
vs others: More granular than network-level access control (IP whitelisting) and more MCP-native than generic API gateway RBAC, allowing tool-specific permission rules without modifying tool implementations
via “role-based-access-control-with-skill-permissions”
Open-source enterprise AI workforce platform — containerized roles, declarative skills, MCP tools, policy-driven security, K8s-native scheduling
Unique: Implements declarative, fine-grained RBAC where each agent role has explicit permissions for skills and tools, with enforcement at the gateway and executor layers. Permissions are checked before execution, not after, preventing unauthorized access.
vs others: Provides stronger access control than agent-level permission checks in LangChain or AutoGen, with centralized enforcement and detailed audit trails. Requires more upfront configuration but enables enterprise-grade access governance.
via “multi-agent tool access control with role-based enforcement”
Security Proxy for Model Context Protocol — Govern any MCP tool call with ABS Core NRaaS (Non-Repudiation as a Service)
Unique: Implements role-based access control at the MCP gateway layer, allowing fine-grained tool access decisions based on actor identity without requiring changes to individual agent code. Integrates with ABS Core identity management to support centralized role definitions across multiple agents and teams.
vs others: Unlike agent-level tool restrictions (which require per-agent configuration) or LLM-based access control (which is not cryptographically enforceable), gateway-level RBAC provides centralized, auditable, and tamper-proof tool access control.
via “access control and permission scoping per tool and module”
Teleton: Autonomous AI Agent for Telegram & TON Blockchain
Unique: Combines tool-level scope declarations with workspace-level access control policies and input sanitization, enabling fine-grained permission enforcement while defending against prompt injection attacks that might attempt to bypass controls
vs others: Most agent frameworks lack built-in access control; Teleton's scope-based system with RBAC and audit logging provides production-grade permission management out of the box
via “security and access control enforcement with role-based policies”
** - A collection of tools for managing the platform, addressing data quality and reading and writing to [Teradata](https://www.teradata.com/) Database.
Unique: Implements security as a cross-cutting concern across all MCP tools through a centralized access control layer that enforces role-based policies defined in configuration files. Provides audit logging hooks for tracking all database operations and access patterns.
vs others: Provides finer-grained access control than generic database adapters by enforcing policies at the MCP tool level, preventing unauthorized tool invocation even if database credentials are compromised. Configuration-driven policies reduce the need for code changes when security requirements evolve.
via “configurable policy engine for tool access control”
Pre-execution governance for AI agents. Intercepts MCP tool calls before execution with deterministic blocking, human-in-the-loop holds, and behavioral drift detection.
Unique: Provides a declarative policy engine at the MCP server level, allowing organizations to define tool access control policies in configuration without modifying agent or tool code, with policies evaluated uniformly across all tool calls
vs others: Centralizes access control policy in one place rather than scattered across tool implementations, making policies easier to audit, update, and enforce consistently across all tools
via “per-tool access control policies”
Security gateway for MCP servers. Shadow-mode logs, per-tool policies, optional Ed25519-signed receipts. npx protect-mcp -- node server.js
Unique: Provides tool-level granularity for access control at the MCP protocol layer rather than requiring each tool to implement its own authorization logic. Centralizes policy enforcement in the gateway rather than distributing it across multiple tool implementations.
vs others: Simpler than implementing authorization in each individual tool, and works with any MCP server without requiring server-side code changes, unlike application-level access control frameworks
via “role-based access control (rbac)”
Auth0 delivers a flexible identity and access management solution, offering authentication, authorization, and secure login flows to help developers protect applications across various platforms effectively
Unique: Offers a policy-driven model for RBAC that allows for dynamic role assignment and integration with existing user databases.
vs others: More customizable than AWS IAM due to its user-friendly interface and ease of integration with various applications.
via “tool call access control with role-based policies”
Vloex MCP Gateway — stdio proxy for MCP tool call governance
Unique: Implements RBAC at the MCP proxy layer, allowing centralized tool access policies without modifying individual tool implementations or requiring client-side enforcement
vs others: More maintainable than distributing access control logic across multiple MCP servers, and more reliable than client-side enforcement since policies are enforced at the protocol boundary
via “role-based access control (rbac) for agent tool permissions”
Enforceable authorization for MCP tool calls
Unique: Applies RBAC specifically to MCP tool access, enabling role-based governance of agent capabilities at the protocol level rather than requiring application-level role checks in each tool implementation.
vs others: Simpler to understand and implement than attribute-based access control (ABAC) for teams new to authorization; more scalable than per-agent tool whitelists because roles can be reused across many agents.
via “role-based access control and sso integration for team governance”
** - No-code MCP client for team chat platforms, such as Slack, Microsoft Teams, and Discord.
Unique: Runbear integrates RBAC with MCP tool invocation, enforcing permissions at the agent and tool level rather than just at the Slack workspace level, and supports enterprise SSO for centralized identity management
vs others: More granular than Slack's native permission model because it controls access to specific agents and tools; more secure than API key-based access because it uses centralized identity management and enforces permissions consistently
via “role-based access control (rbac) for server and tool governance”
** - A hosted registry and control plane to install & run secure + portable MCP Servers.
Unique: Combines RBAC with mandatory admin approval workflow for server registration, creating a two-layer governance model. Most MCP implementations lack built-in approval gates; mcp.run enforces organizational review before tool exposure.
vs others: Provides governance-first approach with approval workflows and role-based filtering, whereas raw MCP server deployment offers no built-in access control or approval mechanisms.
Building an AI tool with “Role Based Access Control Rbac For Server And Tool Governance”?
Submit your artifact →curl unfragile.ai/agents.md | sh© 2026 Unfragile. The platform for software for agents.