Capability
20 artifacts provide this capability.
Want a personalized recommendation?
Find the best match →via “role-based access control (rbac) with fine-grained permission assignment”
Enterprise SSO, SCIM, and identity management API.
Unique: Provides server-side RBAC evaluation integrated with WorkOS's identity system, allowing permission checks to be decoupled from your application's database and eliminating the need to maintain separate role/permission tables
vs others: More integrated with enterprise identity than building custom RBAC (no separate permission database needed) but less flexible than dedicated authorization services like Oso or Authz for complex attribute-based policies
via “role-based access control with granular permission enforcement”
AI platform for building internal business apps.
Unique: Enforces permissions at the server-side query layer before data is serialized, combined with attribute-based rules that evaluate user properties dynamically, ensuring that permission changes take effect immediately without requiring application redeployment
vs others: More granular than Airtable's sharing model because it supports field-level and record-level restrictions, and more flexible than Retool because it includes built-in ABAC evaluation rather than requiring custom middleware
via “role-based-access-control-with-skill-permissions”
Open-source enterprise AI workforce platform — containerized roles, declarative skills, MCP tools, policy-driven security, K8s-native scheduling
Unique: Implements declarative, fine-grained RBAC where each agent role has explicit permissions for skills and tools, with enforcement at the gateway and executor layers. Permissions are checked before execution, not after, preventing unauthorized access.
vs others: Provides stronger access control than agent-level permission checks in LangChain or AutoGen, with centralized enforcement and detailed audit trails. Requires more upfront configuration but enables enterprise-grade access governance.
via “tool call access control with role-based policies”
Vloex MCP Gateway — stdio proxy for MCP tool call governance
Unique: Implements RBAC at the MCP proxy layer, allowing centralized tool access policies without modifying individual tool implementations or requiring client-side enforcement
vs others: More maintainable than distributing access control logic across multiple MCP servers, and more reliable than client-side enforcement since policies are enforced at the protocol boundary
via “role-based access control and audit logging”
The Only AI Platform you will ever need!
Unique: unknown — unclear whether access control is workflow-level, data-level, or both; no visibility into whether it supports attribute-based policies
vs others: Positioned as platform feature, but differentiation vs. external identity/access management (Okta, Auth0) unclear without visibility into integration depth and policy expressiveness
via “role-based access control and contract visibility management”
AI powered contract management software
via “role-based access control and data isolation”
Unique: Implements real estate-specific role definitions (agent, team lead, broker, lender, title company, attorney) with transaction-aware access control where external parties see only documents relevant to their role in a specific transaction, rather than generic user/admin role models
vs others: More sophisticated than basic user/admin access control because it understands real estate transaction roles and can dynamically filter data based on stakeholder role in a specific transaction, enabling secure multi-party collaboration
via “role-based access control”
via “agent-permission-and-access-control-management”
Unique: Integrates with both ERC-20 allowance mechanisms and contract-level access control to enforce fine-grained permissions at the agent level, preventing agents from exceeding their intended authority even if compromised or misbehaving.
vs others: More granular than simple wallet-level controls because it can restrict specific functions and amounts, but less flexible than custom smart contract logic because it relies on standard permission patterns.
via “team collaboration and role-based access control”
Unique: GovCon-specific role hierarchy (proposal writer, compliance officer, contract manager, executive) with approval workflow enforcement, versus generic RBAC systems that require custom configuration for federal contracting workflows
vs others: Provides built-in compliance audit trails for CMMC and DFARS requirements, eliminating manual access logging that generic tools require and reducing audit preparation overhead
via “role-based access control”
via “role-based access control and permissions”
via “role-based-access-control”
via “role-based-access-control-for-compliance-data”
via “role-based access control and permissions”
via “role-based-access-control”
via “role-based access control and data-level permissions”
Unique: Combines role-based and record-level filtering in a single permission model, allowing both broad access control (which apps users see) and fine-grained data filtering (which records they can access)
vs others: More flexible than Airtable's sharing model because it supports field-level hiding and record-level filtering; simpler than building custom authorization logic in code
via “role-based access control with granular permission management”
Unique: Combines role-based and attribute-based access control with time-based restrictions and enterprise identity provider integration, whereas most competitors offer only basic API key-based access control
vs others: More sophisticated than OpenAI's organization-level access control because it supports attribute-based access control, time-based restrictions, and fine-grained model/dataset-level permissions
via “role-based data access control”
via “granular-access-control”
Building an AI tool with “Role Based Access Control And Contract Visibility Management”?
Submit your artifact →curl unfragile.ai/agents.md | sh© 2026 Unfragile. The layer the agent economy runs on.