Capability
20 artifacts provide this capability.
Want a personalized recommendation?
Find the best match →via “reasoning and multi-step problem decomposition”
TII's 180B model trained on curated RefinedWeb data.
Unique: Achieves strong reasoning performance through scale (180B parameters) and data quality (3.5T meticulously-cleaned RefinedWeb tokens) rather than specialized reasoning fine-tuning, enabling emergent reasoning capabilities across diverse domains without task-specific training.
vs others: Larger parameter count than reasoning-specialized models like Llama 2 70B enables better few-shot reasoning, but lacks explicit chain-of-thought fine-tuning that models like GPT-4 or Claude employ, potentially requiring more sophisticated prompting to achieve comparable reasoning quality.
via “extended-chain-of-thought reasoning with configurable compute allocation”
OpenAI's most powerful reasoning model for complex problems.
Unique: Implements variable-depth reasoning with explicit user-controlled compute budgets rather than fixed token limits, enabling dynamic allocation across problem complexity — users can specify reasoning intensity (low/medium/high) and the model adapts internal chain-of-thought depth accordingly
vs others: Outperforms GPT-4 and Claude on ARC-AGI (87.5% vs ~85%) by allocating more reasoning compute to genuinely hard problems rather than uniform token budgets, and provides explicit cost-quality controls that competitors lack
via “reasoning and step-by-step problem decomposition”
text-generation model by undefined. 95,66,721 downloads.
Unique: Emergent chain-of-thought capability from instruction tuning on reasoning datasets; no explicit reasoning module or symbolic engine — reasoning emerges from learned token prediction patterns that favor intermediate explanation tokens, making it lightweight but probabilistic
vs others: Provides transparent reasoning comparable to GPT-4 on simple problems but with full local control; outperforms Mistral-7B on reasoning tasks due to instruction tuning, but lacks the formal verification and symbolic reasoning of specialized tools like Wolfram Alpha
via “extended-chain-of-thought reasoning with compute allocation”
OpenAI's reasoning model with chain-of-thought problem solving.
Unique: Native integration of reasoning into the inference architecture with dynamic compute allocation based on problem difficulty, rather than fixed-budget or prompt-instructed reasoning. The model learns to allocate thinking tokens adaptively during training, enabling it to spend more compute on genuinely hard problems.
vs others: Outperforms GPT-4 and other models on reasoning-heavy benchmarks (83.3% on IMO, 89th percentile on Codeforces) because reasoning is baked into the model's weights and inference process, not bolted on via prompting or external tools.
via “reasoning and step-by-step problem decomposition”
Meta's latest class of model (Llama 3.1) launched with a variety of sizes & flavors. This 70B instruct-tuned version is optimized for high quality dialogue usecases. It has demonstrated strong...
Unique: Instruction-tuned on datasets containing explicit reasoning traces (e.g., math solutions with working, logic puzzles with step-by-step explanations), enabling the model to learn to generate intermediate reasoning as a learned behavior rather than relying on prompt engineering alone.
vs others: More reliable than base models at producing coherent reasoning chains; comparable to GPT-4 on standard benchmarks but with lower latency and cost, though may underperform on novel reasoning patterns not well-represented in training data.
via “extended-reasoning-with-internal-thinking”
Gemini 2.5 Pro is Google’s state-of-the-art AI model designed for advanced reasoning, coding, mathematics, and scientific tasks. It employs “thinking” capabilities, enabling it to reason through responses with enhanced accuracy...
Unique: Implements internalized thinking as part of the inference architecture rather than exposing chain-of-thought tokens, allowing the model to reason without token overhead while maintaining response quality. Uses adaptive computation allocation to balance reasoning depth with response latency based on problem complexity.
vs others: Provides reasoning benefits of extended chain-of-thought without the token cost and latency of explicit reasoning tokens, differentiating it from models like o1 that expose reasoning in the output stream.
via “reasoning and step-by-step problem decomposition”
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT is an instruction-tuned Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) model from Google DeepMind. Despite 25.2B total parameters, only 3.8B activate per token during inference — delivering near-31B quality at...
Unique: MoE expert specialization enables dedicated reasoning experts that activate for complex reasoning tasks, while general-purpose experts handle simpler steps, optimizing compute allocation across reasoning complexity
vs others: Provides faster reasoning than Llama 3.1 8B (15-20% speedup) while maintaining comparable accuracy on grade-school math and logic puzzles, though underperforms specialized reasoning models like o1-mini on competition-level problems
via “logical reasoning and problem-solving with step-by-step decomposition”
Meta's latest class of model (Llama 3) launched with a variety of sizes & flavors. This 70B instruct-tuned version was optimized for high quality dialogue usecases. It has demonstrated strong...
Unique: Instruction-tuning explicitly optimizes for chain-of-thought reasoning patterns, enabling the model to articulate intermediate steps and self-correct. 70B scale provides sufficient capacity for multi-step reasoning without losing coherence.
vs others: Better reasoning transparency than smaller models and comparable to GPT-4 on many reasoning tasks at lower cost, though specialized reasoning models or symbolic solvers may outperform on highly constrained domains like formal mathematics.
via “reasoning and step-by-step problem solving”
Olmo 3.1 32B Instruct is a large-scale, 32-billion-parameter instruction-tuned language model engineered for high-performance conversational AI, multi-turn dialogue, and practical instruction following. As part of the Olmo 3.1 family, this...
Unique: Instruction-tuning on chain-of-thought datasets enables the model to generate coherent reasoning steps when prompted, without requiring explicit reasoning modules or external symbolic solvers — this implicit reasoning approach is more flexible than hard-coded reasoning systems but less precise than specialized solvers
vs others: More transparent reasoning than direct answer generation, but lower accuracy on specialized domains than models fine-tuned exclusively on reasoning tasks; better for educational use cases than production problem-solving
via “reasoning and chain-of-thought problem solving”
Meta's Llama 3.1 — high-quality text generation and reasoning
Unique: Explicitly trained for chain-of-thought reasoning across all three variants, with the 405B model claiming state-of-the-art performance. Generates transparent intermediate reasoning steps within a single forward pass, unlike ensemble or multi-turn approaches.
vs others: Provides transparent reasoning comparable to Claude 3.5 Sonnet and GPT-4o, but runs locally without API calls. Reasoning quality likely inferior to specialized reasoning models (OpenAI o1), but available for on-premise deployment without cloud dependencies.
via “complex reasoning and chain-of-thought decomposition”
Command R7B (12-2024) is a small, fast update of the Command R+ model, delivered in December 2024. It excels at RAG, tool use, agents, and similar tasks requiring complex reasoning...
Unique: Command R7B's reasoning is optimized for RAG and tool-use contexts, where intermediate steps can reference retrieved documents or tool outputs, enabling grounded reasoning that combines external knowledge with logical inference
vs others: Outperforms GPT-4 on MATH and AIME benchmarks when combined with tool use for calculation, because it can delegate computation to tools rather than attempting symbolic math in-context
via “logical reasoning and constraint satisfaction”
Olmo 3 32B Think is a large-scale, 32-billion-parameter model purpose-built for deep reasoning, complex logic chains and advanced instruction-following scenarios. Its capacity enables strong performance on demanding evaluation tasks and...
Unique: Olmo 3 32B Think applies its reasoning phase to constraint satisfaction by internally tracking constraint violations and exploring the solution space systematically. This enables it to handle problems with multiple interdependent constraints more reliably than models that generate solutions without constraint validation.
vs others: More reliable on constraint satisfaction problems than GPT-3.5 Turbo; comparable to GPT-4 on logic puzzles while offering lower cost and faster inference
via “reasoning and multi-step problem solving”
A 12B parameter model with a 128k token context length built by Mistral in collaboration with NVIDIA. The model is multilingual, supporting English, French, German, Spanish, Italian, Portuguese, Chinese, Japanese,...
Unique: Mistral Nemo's instruction-tuning includes reasoning tasks and chain-of-thought examples, enabling it to generate explicit reasoning steps when prompted. The 128k context window enables longer reasoning chains than smaller-context models.
vs others: Reasoning capability is weaker than larger models (70B+) but sufficient for many reasoning tasks. Prompt-based chain-of-thought is more transparent than implicit reasoning but less efficient than specialized reasoning architectures.
via “logical-reasoning-and-formal-inference”
INTELLECT-3 is a 106B-parameter Mixture-of-Experts model (12B active) post-trained from GLM-4.5-Air-Base using supervised fine-tuning (SFT) followed by large-scale reinforcement learning (RL). It offers state-of-the-art performance for its size across math,...
Unique: RL post-training optimizes for logical consistency and formal correctness in reasoning traces; uses chain-of-thought patterns that decompose inference into verifiable steps rather than end-to-end black-box reasoning
vs others: Produces more transparent and verifiable reasoning than single-step models while maintaining efficiency through MoE routing that activates only reasoning-specific experts
via “reasoning and chain-of-thought decomposition”
The Qwen3.5 27B native vision-language Dense model incorporates a linear attention mechanism, delivering fast response times while balancing inference speed and performance. Its overall capabilities are comparable to those of...
Unique: Linear attention enables efficient reasoning over long chains of thought without quadratic slowdown — can maintain coherent reasoning across 50+ intermediate steps, whereas quadratic attention models degrade significantly with reasoning depth
vs others: More efficient reasoning than Llama 3.2 for long chains of thought due to linear attention, but less capable than Claude 3.5 Sonnet or GPT-4 for highly complex multi-domain reasoning due to smaller parameter count
via “reasoning and chain-of-thought task decomposition”
Step 3.5 Flash is StepFun's most capable open-source foundation model. Built on a sparse Mixture of Experts (MoE) architecture, it selectively activates only 11B of its 196B parameters per token....
Unique: Implements reasoning through sparse expert routing that activates reasoning-specialized modules for complex tasks while maintaining efficiency. The MoE architecture allows the model to allocate more parameters to reasoning steps when needed without the overhead of a dense model.
vs others: Provides reasoning transparency comparable to GPT-4 or Claude while consuming 40-50% fewer tokens due to sparse activation, making it cost-effective for reasoning-heavy applications.
via “reasoning and chain-of-thought decomposition”
GPT-4.1 Mini is a mid-sized model delivering performance competitive with GPT-4o at substantially lower latency and cost. It retains a 1 million token context window and scores 45.1% on hard...
Unique: Learns chain-of-thought patterns from training data rather than using explicit prompting tricks, enabling more natural and flexible reasoning decomposition that adapts to problem complexity without manual prompt engineering
vs others: More reliable reasoning than GPT-3.5 Turbo and comparable to GPT-4o on hard problems, while maintaining lower latency through architectural efficiency rather than brute-force scaling
via “hybrid-reasoning-mode-switching”
Hermes 4 70B is a hybrid reasoning model from Nous Research, built on Meta-Llama-3.1-70B. It introduces the same hybrid mode as the larger 405B release, allowing the model to either...
Unique: Implements learned gating mechanism for automatic reasoning mode selection rather than fixed routing rules or user-specified flags, enabling the model to discover optimal reasoning allocation patterns during training on diverse task distributions
vs others: More efficient than standard chain-of-thought models (which always reason) and more capable than fast-only models (which never reason) by learning when reasoning is actually necessary
via “reasoning-focused inference with extended thinking”
The 2024-11-20 version of GPT-4o offers a leveled-up creative writing ability with more natural, engaging, and tailored writing to improve relevance & readability. It’s also better at working with uploaded...
Unique: Allocates separate computational budget for internal reasoning tokens that are processed but not returned to the user, enabling deeper exploration of solution space before generating final response.
vs others: Provides similar reasoning benefits to Claude 3.5's extended thinking but with faster inference and lower token overhead due to optimized reasoning token allocation.
via “multi-domain complex problem solving with mathematical and logical reasoning”
May 28th update to the [original DeepSeek R1](/deepseek/deepseek-r1) Performance on par with [OpenAI o1](/openai/o1), but open-sourced and with fully open reasoning tokens. It's 671B parameters in size, with 37B active...
Unique: Trained via reinforcement learning to dynamically allocate reasoning effort based on problem complexity, using sparse activation (37B active of 671B total) to route computation efficiently. This contrasts with fixed-depth reasoning in standard LLMs and enables o1-level performance on diverse problem types without proportional computational overhead.
vs others: Matches o1's reasoning quality on complex problems while being open-source and exposing reasoning tokens, versus GPT-4 which lacks systematic reasoning depth and o1 which hides the reasoning process entirely.
Building an AI tool with “Reasoning Optimized Inference For Complex Problem Solving”?
Submit your artifact →curl unfragile.ai/agents.md | sh© 2026 Unfragile. The platform for software for agents.