Capability
20 artifacts provide this capability.
Want a personalized recommendation?
Find the best match →via “mathematical proof generation and verification reasoning”
OpenAI's most powerful reasoning model for complex problems.
Unique: Applies extended reasoning specifically to mathematical proof generation, exploring multiple proof strategies and backtracking on invalid paths before committing to a solution — this enables reasoning through proof correctness rather than pattern matching
vs others: Achieves competitive-level mathematics performance (87.5% on ARC-AGI) by reasoning through proof strategies and constraint satisfaction, outperforming GPT-4 and Claude which rely more on pattern matching and memorized proof structures
via “mathematical reasoning and symbolic problem-solving”
text-generation model by undefined. 1,13,49,614 downloads.
Unique: DeepSeek-V3.2 was trained on mathematical reasoning datasets with explicit step-by-step annotations, enabling it to generate coherent multi-step proofs and derivations without external symbolic engines, though with pattern-matching rather than formal verification
vs others: Achieves 55-60% accuracy on MATH benchmark (vs. 50% for Llama-2-70B) by using specialized mathematical reasoning training, though still below GPT-4's 92% due to lack of formal verification and external tool integration
via “mathematical problem solving with symbolic reasoning”
Cost-efficient reasoning model with configurable effort levels.
Unique: Implements specialized mathematical reasoning patterns with step-by-step derivation generation, achieving competition-level math performance through domain-specific training rather than general reasoning
vs others: Matches o3 on mathematical benchmarks at lower cost; outperforms standard LLMs (GPT-4, Claude) on competition-level problems due to reasoning-grade capabilities
via “multi-step mathematical proof generation and verification”
OpenAI's reasoning model with chain-of-thought problem solving.
Unique: Generates multi-step mathematical proofs through extended reasoning that explores proof strategies and backtracks when necessary, rather than pattern-matching to training examples. The reasoning phase is visible in the thinking tokens, enabling transparency into proof construction.
vs others: Outperforms standard LLMs on mathematical proof generation because the extended thinking phase allows exploration of proof strategies and verification of intermediate steps, resulting in more rigorous and correct proofs.
via “mathematical problem solving with step-by-step verification”
text-generation model by undefined. 38,71,385 downloads.
Unique: Trained via RL to optimize for mathematical correctness with explicit intermediate step generation; learns to recognize and correct errors during reasoning rather than committing to incorrect paths
vs others: Outperforms GPT-4 on MATH and AIME benchmarks (94.3% vs 80%+ on AIME) through learned reasoning allocation; provides more transparent reasoning than Gemini while maintaining higher accuracy
via “lean 4 theorem proving with llm-guided proof synthesis”
Lean 4 paper (2021): https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1007/978-3-030-79876-5_37
Unique: Combines LLM generation with Lean 4's kernel verification to create a trustworthy proof loop where every generated proof is cryptographically verified before acceptance, unlike pure LLM-based proof attempts that lack formal guarantees
vs others: Stronger than standalone LLM proof generation (GPT, Claude) because failed proof attempts trigger kernel feedback that retrains the agent's strategy, and stronger than manual Lean because it eliminates boilerplate tactic writing
via “mathematical problem solving with step-by-step derivation”
Talk to Claude, an AI assistant from Anthropic.
via “mathematical problem solving with symbolic reasoning and proof verification”
Gemini 2.5 Pro is Google’s state-of-the-art AI model designed for advanced reasoning, coding, mathematics, and scientific tasks. It employs “thinking” capabilities, enabling it to reason through responses with enhanced accuracy...
Unique: Applies extended thinking specifically to mathematical reasoning, allowing the model to explore multiple solution paths, verify intermediate steps algebraically, and backtrack if a path leads to contradiction. This produces mathematically sound solutions rather than pattern-matched approximations.
vs others: Provides reasoning-enhanced mathematical problem solving comparable to specialized tools like Wolfram Alpha, but with natural language explanation and multimodal input support; less precise than symbolic math engines but more accessible and context-aware.
via “scientific-and-mathematical-problem-solving”
Gemini 2.5 Pro is Google’s state-of-the-art AI model designed for advanced reasoning, coding, mathematics, and scientific tasks. It employs “thinking” capabilities, enabling it to reason through responses with enhanced accuracy...
Unique: Combines extended thinking tokens with domain-specific scientific knowledge to provide verified solutions with internal reasoning validation, enabling confidence in correctness for mathematical proofs and scientific derivations without exposing intermediate steps
vs others: Provides better reasoning transparency than Wolfram Alpha for understanding derivations, while offering more mathematical rigor than general-purpose LLMs like GPT-4, though less specialized than dedicated symbolic math engines
via “mathematical reasoning and symbolic computation”
GPT-5 Pro is OpenAI’s most advanced model, offering major improvements in reasoning, code quality, and user experience. It is optimized for complex tasks that require step-by-step reasoning, instruction following, and...
Unique: GPT-5 Pro improves mathematical reasoning through training on mathematical proofs and step-by-step derivations, enabling it to handle multi-step mathematical problems with better accuracy than models trained primarily on natural language
vs others: Solves complex mathematical problems more reliably than GPT-4 Turbo, with better step-by-step reasoning and explanation, though still inferior to specialized symbolic math systems for very complex derivations
via “mathematical-problem-solving-with-step-by-step-reasoning”
DeepSeek-V3.1 is a large hybrid reasoning model (671B parameters, 37B active) that supports both thinking and non-thinking modes via prompt templates. It extends the DeepSeek-V3 base with a two-phase long-context...
Unique: Implements explicit reasoning phase specifically optimized for mathematical decomposition, allowing the model to verify intermediate steps before producing final answers, rather than generating answers directly.
vs others: More reliable for complex math than GPT-4 due to explicit verification phase, and more transparent than o1 (which hides reasoning) by allowing users to request step-by-step explanations.
via “mathematical problem-solving with step-by-step validation”
Olmo 3 32B Think is a large-scale, 32-billion-parameter model purpose-built for deep reasoning, complex logic chains and advanced instruction-following scenarios. Its capacity enables strong performance on demanding evaluation tasks and...
Unique: Olmo 3 32B Think uses its reasoning phase to validate mathematical solutions internally, enabling it to catch calculation errors and backtrack on failed solution paths. This is distinct from models that generate solutions in a single pass without validation, which are more prone to arithmetic errors.
vs others: More accurate on complex math problems than GPT-3.5 Turbo; comparable to GPT-4 on standardized math benchmarks while offering lower latency and cost
via “mathematical reasoning and symbolic computation”
This is Mistral AI's flagship model, Mistral Large 2 (version mistral-large-2407). It's a proprietary weights-available model and excels at reasoning, code, JSON, chat, and more. Read the launch announcement [here](https://mistral.ai/news/mistral-large-2407/)....
Unique: Trained on mathematical datasets with chain-of-thought reasoning to prioritize step-by-step problem solving, using attention mechanisms that track variable relationships and equation transformations
vs others: Comparable to GPT-4 on mathematical reasoning, while maintaining lower cost; outperforms Llama 2 on complex multi-step problems due to larger parameter count and specialized training
via “mathematical-reasoning-and-proof-generation”
The latest and strongest model family from OpenAI, o1 is designed to spend more time thinking before responding. The o1 model series is trained with large-scale reinforcement learning to reason...
Unique: Trained via RLHF to learn which mathematical techniques apply to different problem classes and to validate intermediate steps during reasoning, rather than applying generic problem-solving. The model learns mathematical reasoning patterns that maximize correctness on diverse problem types.
vs others: Outperforms GPT-4 and standard LLMs on mathematical reasoning benchmarks (MATH, AMC) by 10-20% because it learns to apply domain-specific techniques and validate steps, but remains slower and less symbolic than specialized mathematical software.
via “mathematical problem solving with step-by-step verification”
The o-series of models are trained with reinforcement learning to think before they answer and perform complex reasoning. The o3-pro model uses more compute to think harder and provide consistently...
Unique: Applies extended reasoning to mathematical problem-solving, enabling explicit step-by-step verification and error-checking within the reasoning phase. Unlike standard LLMs that may skip steps or make calculation errors, o3-pro's reasoning allows it to catch and correct mistakes before output.
vs others: Achieves 90%+ accuracy on AIME and MATH benchmarks compared to 50-70% for GPT-4, due to reasoning-enabled verification and multi-path exploration.
via “mathematical-reasoning-and-step-by-step-derivation”
Llama-3.3-Nemotron-Super-49B-v1.5 is a 49B-parameter, English-centric reasoning/chat model derived from Meta’s Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct with a 128K context. It’s post-trained for agentic workflows (RAG, tool calling) via SFT across math, code, science, and...
Unique: Post-trained on mathematical reasoning tasks as part of agentic workflow optimization, enabling more reliable step-by-step derivations than base Llama-3.3-70B, though without symbolic computation integration
vs others: Better mathematical reasoning than GPT-3.5-Turbo at comparable latency, though less capable than specialized math models like Wolfram Alpha or Mathematica for symbolic computation
via “mathematical problem solving with step-by-step verification”
DeepSeek R1 is here: Performance on par with [OpenAI o1](/openai/o1), but open-sourced and with fully open reasoning tokens. It's 671B parameters in size, with 37B active in an inference pass....
Unique: Achieves o1-level mathematical reasoning performance with fully transparent step-by-step verification, enabling educators and students to validate each calculation. The 671B parameter model with sparse activation maintains reasoning coherence across multi-step proofs while keeping inference costs lower than dense alternatives.
vs others: Superior to GPT-4 on complex math problems due to explicit reasoning, and more transparent than o1 which hides intermediate steps, making it ideal for educational and verification use cases.
via “mathematical and logical reasoning with step-by-step derivation”
Cogito v2.1 671B MoE represents one of the strongest open models globally, matching performance of frontier closed and open models. This model is trained using self play with reinforcement learning...
Unique: Self-play RL training specifically optimizes for correctness in multi-step logical chains, creating a model that learns to verify its own intermediate steps and catch errors within derivations. The MoE architecture routes mathematical reasoning through specialized experts, improving accuracy on complex problems compared to general-purpose models.
vs others: Provides more rigorous step-by-step reasoning than general LLMs, with self-play RL training creating better error-catching behavior, though still less reliable than symbolic math systems like Mathematica for exact computation.
via “mathematical problem solving with step-by-step derivations”
OpenAI o3-mini is a cost-efficient language model optimized for STEM reasoning tasks, particularly excelling in science, mathematics, and coding. This model supports the `reasoning_effort` parameter, which can be set to...
Unique: Applies reasoning_effort to control derivation depth and detail, enabling educators to generate solutions at varying levels of explanation without prompt changes. This differs from static math solvers (Wolfram Alpha) by providing reasoning traces and educational explanations.
vs others: More educational than symbolic solvers (shows reasoning); more flexible than static problem banks; enables personalized explanation depth through reasoning_effort parameter.
via “scientific-and-mathematical-problem-solving”
o3 is a well-rounded and powerful model across domains. It sets a new standard for math, science, coding, and visual reasoning tasks. It also excels at technical writing and instruction-following....
Unique: Trained on curated mathematical and scientific problem datasets with verification against ground-truth solutions, enabling the model to learn domain-specific reasoning patterns (e.g., substitution methods, dimensional analysis) that are applied during inference. This is distinct from general LLMs that treat math as pattern matching.
vs others: Achieves 92% accuracy on AIME (American Invitational Mathematics Examination) problems compared to 50% for GPT-4 and 65% for Claude 3.5, demonstrating superior mathematical reasoning through specialized training and extended thinking
Building an AI tool with “Multi Step Mathematical Proof Generation And Verification”?
Submit your artifact →curl unfragile.ai/agents.md | sh© 2026 Unfragile. The platform for software for agents.