| 0 |
| Ecosystem | 1 | 1 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Capabilities | 14 decomposed | 12 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Implements three distinct RAG strategies (NaiveRAG, ChainOfRAG, DeepSearch) that can be selected via configuration or automatically routed based on query complexity. NaiveRAG performs single-pass retrieval-generation for simple queries; ChainOfRAG decomposes complex queries into sub-questions with iterative multi-hop reasoning and early stopping; DeepSearch executes parallel searches with LLM-based reranking and reflection loops for comprehensive research tasks. The agent selection is configuration-driven through the agent provider setting, enabling runtime strategy swapping without code changes.
Unique: Implements three distinct RAG agent classes (NaiveRAG, ChainOfRAG, DeepSearch) with pluggable selection via configuration, enabling strategy swapping without code changes. DeepSearch agent specifically combines parallel search with LLM-based reranking and reflection loops — a pattern optimized for reasoning models like DeepSeek-R1 and Grok-3.
vs alternatives: Offers more granular control over reasoning strategies than monolithic RAG systems; DeepSearch agent is specifically architected for reasoning models, whereas most RAG frameworks treat all LLMs equivalently
Provides pluggable file loader and web crawler implementations for ingesting diverse data sources into the vector database. Supports local file formats (PDF, text, markdown) and web content crawling through configurable loader and crawler provider classes. The offline_loading process orchestrates chunking, embedding generation via the configured embedding provider, and vector storage into Milvus or alternative vector databases. Data ingestion is decoupled from querying, enabling batch preprocessing of large document collections.
Unique: Implements pluggable loader and crawler provider classes that decouple data ingestion from querying, enabling batch preprocessing without blocking. The offline_loading orchestration layer handles chunking, embedding generation, and vector storage in a single pipeline, with provider selection managed through configuration.
vs alternatives: Separates ingestion from querying (unlike some monolithic RAG systems), enabling efficient batch processing; supports multiple file formats and crawlers through a unified provider interface without code changes
Implements the offline_loading process that orchestrates document ingestion, chunking, embedding generation, and vector storage. The pipeline loads documents using configured file loaders and web crawlers, chunks documents into fixed-size or semantic chunks, generates embeddings for each chunk using the configured embedding provider, and inserts embeddings into the vector database with metadata. This process is decoupled from query processing, enabling batch preprocessing of large document collections without blocking user queries. The pipeline is designed for one-time or periodic execution rather than real-time ingestion.
Unique: Implements a decoupled offline_loading pipeline that orchestrates document ingestion, chunking, embedding generation, and vector storage. The pipeline is designed for batch preprocessing, enabling efficient handling of large document collections without blocking query operations.
vs alternatives: Separation of offline loading from online querying enables better performance optimization; batch processing approach is more efficient than real-time ingestion for large collections
Implements the online_query process that retrieves relevant context from the vector database and generates answers using the configured LLM. The process encodes the user query as a vector embedding, searches the vector database for similar documents, constructs a prompt with retrieved context and the original query, and calls the LLM to generate an answer. The LLM has access to retrieved context, enabling it to provide grounded answers with citations. This process is optimized for low-latency query serving and can be executed repeatedly without modifying indexed data.
Unique: Implements online_query process that retrieves context from vector database and generates answers using the configured LLM. The process is optimized for low-latency serving and supports multiple RAG strategies (NaiveRAG, ChainOfRAG, DeepSearch) through pluggable agent selection.
vs alternatives: Unified query processing interface supports multiple RAG strategies without code changes; integration with vector database and LLM providers enables flexible technology stack selection
Implements streaming response generation that yields LLM output tokens one at a time rather than waiting for complete response generation. This capability is supported by LLM providers that implement streaming APIs (OpenAI, Anthropic, DeepSeek, etc.). Streaming enables real-time feedback to users, reduces perceived latency, and allows early termination if the user stops reading. The streaming interface is available through both the FastAPI web service (Server-Sent Events) and Python API (generator functions).
Unique: Implements streaming response generation through LLM provider streaming APIs, available via both Python API (generators) and FastAPI web service (Server-Sent Events). Enables real-time token-by-token output without waiting for complete generation.
vs alternatives: Streaming support reduces perceived latency compared to batch generation; available across multiple interfaces (Python API, web service) without code duplication
Provides Docker containerization and Kubernetes deployment patterns for production deployment of DeepSearcher. The system can be containerized with all dependencies (Python, LLM clients, embedding libraries, vector database clients) and deployed as microservices. Kubernetes manifests enable horizontal scaling of query processing, load balancing across instances, and automatic failover. The FastAPI web service is designed for containerized deployment with health checks and graceful shutdown.
Unique: Provides Docker containerization and Kubernetes deployment patterns optimized for the FastAPI web service. Enables horizontal scaling of query processing and integration with managed vector database services (Zilliz Cloud).
vs alternatives: Kubernetes-native design enables horizontal scaling and high availability; integration with managed vector databases (Zilliz Cloud) simplifies infrastructure management
Provides a unified LLM provider interface that abstracts over 17+ language model providers including OpenAI, DeepSeek, Anthropic, Grok, Qwen, and local models. Each provider is implemented as a pluggable class (e.g., OpenAI, DeepSeek, AnthropicLLM, SiliconFlow, TogetherAI) with standardized method signatures for completion and streaming. Provider selection is configuration-driven via the llm_provider setting, enabling runtime swapping between cloud and local models without code changes. Supports both standard LLMs and specialized reasoning models (DeepSeek-R1, Grok-3).
Unique: Implements provider classes for 17+ LLM providers (OpenAI, DeepSeek, Anthropic, Grok, Qwen, SiliconFlow, TogetherAI, local models) with standardized method signatures, enabling configuration-driven provider swapping. Specialized support for reasoning models (DeepSeek-R1, Grok-3) that are optimized for multi-hop reasoning in RAG workflows.
vs alternatives: Broader provider coverage (17+) than most RAG frameworks; native support for reasoning models makes it better suited for deep research tasks than generic LLM abstraction layers
Provides a unified embedding provider interface supporting 15+ embedding models from cloud providers (OpenAI, Cohere, Hugging Face) and local models (Sentence Transformers, Ollama). Each provider is implemented as a pluggable class with standardized embed() methods that return vector embeddings. Provider selection is configuration-driven via the embedding_provider setting, enabling runtime swapping between cloud and local embeddings. Embeddings are generated during offline_loading and used for semantic search during query processing.
Unique: Implements provider classes for 15+ embedding models (OpenAI, Cohere, Hugging Face, Sentence Transformers, Ollama) with standardized embed() interfaces. Supports both cloud and local embeddings through the same configuration interface, enabling privacy-preserving deployments.
vs alternatives: Broader embedding provider coverage than most RAG frameworks; unified interface for cloud and local embeddings makes it easier to migrate between privacy models without code changes
+6 more capabilities
Crawls 11+ heterogeneous platforms (Zhihu, Weibo, Bilibili, Twitter, Reddit, HackerNews, etc.) and RSS feeds using platform-specific scrapers, normalizes disparate data schemas into a unified NewsItem model, and deduplicates content across sources using fuzzy title matching and URL canonicalization. The system maintains platform-specific metadata (rank, heat value, engagement metrics) while presenting a single normalized feed, enabling cross-platform trend detection that would be invisible within individual platform silos.
Unique: Implements platform-specific crawler modules with unified NewsItem schema and fuzzy deduplication across 11+ heterogeneous sources (Chinese + international), rather than relying on single-platform APIs or generic RSS parsing. Maintains platform-specific metadata (rank × 0.6 + frequency × 0.3 + platform hot value × 0.1) for weighted hotspot scoring.
vs alternatives: Covers more platforms (especially Chinese social media) with deeper metadata extraction than generic RSS aggregators, and provides unified deduplication across sources unlike single-platform monitoring tools.
Implements a multi-stage filtering pipeline that matches news items against user-defined keywords using regex patterns, required word lists, and excluded word lists. The system applies frequency-based scoring (keyword occurrence count) combined with platform hotspot weights to rank filtered results. Configuration is stored in frequency_words.txt with support for regex patterns, AND/OR/NOT boolean operators, and per-keyword weighting. Filtering occurs at collection time (reducing storage) and again at report generation time (enabling dynamic reconfiguration without re-crawling).
Unique: Combines regex pattern matching with frequency-based scoring and platform hotspot weighting (rank × 0.6 + frequency × 0.3 + platform hot value × 0.1) in a two-stage pipeline (collection-time and report-time filtering). Supports dynamic reconfiguration without re-crawling by applying filters at report generation.
TrendRadar scores higher at 58/100 vs deep-searcher at 35/100.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
vs alternatives: More flexible than simple keyword matching (supports regex and boolean logic) and more efficient than semantic filtering (no LLM overhead), making it suitable for real-time filtering at scale.
Detects newly emerged topics by comparing current crawl results against historical data stored in the system. Topics are marked as 🆕 (new) if they appear for the first time in the current crawl or if their hotspot rank increased significantly compared to previous crawls. The system tracks topic emergence velocity (how quickly a topic rises in rankings) and flags topics with unusual acceleration. New topic detection is performed at report generation time, enabling dynamic detection without re-crawling. The system maintains a historical hotspot index for comparison.
Unique: Detects new topics by comparing current hotspot rankings against historical data, marking topics with significant rank increases as 🆕. Tracks emergence velocity to distinguish breaking news from sustained trends.
vs alternatives: More efficient than semantic similarity detection (no LLM overhead) and more accurate than simple first-appearance detection (accounts for re-emerging topics), but requires historical baseline data.
Provides a web-based UI for editing TrendRadar configuration files (config.yaml, frequency_words.txt, timeline.yaml) with real-time validation and preview. The editor supports: (1) syntax highlighting for YAML and regex, (2) validation of keyword patterns (regex compilation check), (3) preview of filtered results based on current keyword configuration, (4) drag-and-drop channel configuration, (5) schedule preview (shows next 10 execution times). Changes are validated before saving, preventing configuration errors. The editor is optional; users can edit config files directly.
Unique: Provides web-based configuration editor with real-time validation, regex preview, and schedule visualization. Enables non-technical users to configure TrendRadar without editing YAML files.
vs alternatives: More user-friendly than manual YAML editing and provides validation feedback, but adds operational complexity compared to file-based configuration.
Integrates LiteLLM to provide vendor-agnostic AI analysis and summarization of filtered news items. Users configure their preferred LLM provider (OpenAI, Anthropic, Ollama, local models, etc.) once in config.yaml, and the system automatically routes analysis requests to that provider. The AI analysis capability includes: (1) automated summarization of long articles into key points, (2) sentiment analysis (positive/negative/neutral), (3) trend prediction based on historical patterns, and (4) custom analysis prompts. Analysis results are cached to avoid redundant API calls and can be pushed directly to notification channels.
Unique: Uses LiteLLM abstraction layer to support any LLM provider (OpenAI, Anthropic, Ollama, local models) with single configuration, enabling provider switching without code changes. Caches analysis results to reduce redundant API calls and costs.
vs alternatives: More flexible than hardcoded OpenAI integration (supports any LiteLLM provider) and cheaper than dedicated sentiment analysis APIs (can use local models), but slower than rule-based sentiment analysis.
Leverages LiteLLM to translate news content from source languages (primarily Chinese) to target languages (English, etc.) on-demand. The system detects source language automatically (via langdetect or similar), caches translations to avoid re-translating identical content, and batches translation requests to reduce API calls. Translations are stored alongside original content, enabling bilingual reports and multi-language notification delivery. Translation can be triggered at collection time (all news) or report time (only filtered news).
Unique: Implements provider-agnostic translation via LiteLLM with automatic language detection, content-based caching, and batch request optimization. Stores translations alongside originals for bilingual report generation.
vs alternatives: More flexible than dedicated translation APIs (supports any LiteLLM provider) and cheaper than commercial translation services when using local models, but slower than specialized translation APIs.
Implements a notification abstraction layer supporting 9+ delivery channels (WeChat, WeWork, Feishu, Telegram, Email, ntfy, Bark, Slack, etc.). Each channel has a provider-specific formatter that converts normalized news items into channel-appropriate messages (e.g., WeChat card format, Telegram markdown, email HTML). The system batches notifications atomically—all news items for a report are sent as a single batch to each channel, ensuring consistency and reducing API calls. Message formatting respects channel constraints (character limits, attachment limits, etc.) and supports templating for customization.
Unique: Implements atomic message batching across 9+ heterogeneous channels with provider-specific formatters and constraint-aware truncation. Single configuration enables simultaneous delivery to WeChat, WeWork, Feishu, Telegram, Email, ntfy, Bark, Slack, etc. without code changes.
vs alternatives: Supports more channels (especially Chinese platforms like WeWork, Feishu) than generic notification services, and batching reduces API calls and spam compared to per-item notifications.
Exposes TrendRadar's data and analysis capabilities as an MCP server, enabling AI agents and LLM applications to query trends, perform analysis, and generate insights through natural language. The MCP server implements tools for: (1) querying filtered news by keyword/date/platform, (2) retrieving trend statistics and hotspot rankings, (3) running custom analysis on news subsets, (4) generating reports in various formats. Clients (Claude, other LLM agents) can invoke these tools via MCP protocol, enabling conversational exploration of trends without direct database access. The server maintains state across multiple requests, allowing multi-turn conversations about trends.
Unique: Implements full MCP server exposing trend data and analysis tools to LLM agents, enabling conversational queries and multi-turn analysis workflows. Maintains state across requests and supports complex tool invocations (filtering, analysis, report generation).
vs alternatives: Enables conversational access to trends (vs. API-only access) and integrates with LLM agent workflows (vs. standalone tools), but adds operational complexity compared to simple REST APIs.
+4 more capabilities