| 0 |
| Ecosystem | 1 | 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Free | Paid |
| Capabilities | 14 decomposed | 14 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Fetches OHLCV data, real-time quotes, and chip distribution across A-shares, HK, and US markets from a 7-tier provider hierarchy (EFinance → AkShare → Tushare → Pytdx → Baostock → YFinance → Longbridge) with automatic circuit-breaker failover and data validation. Each provider is prioritized by reliability and latency; if one fails or times out, the system transparently falls back to the next tier without interrupting the analysis pipeline.
Unique: Implements a 7-tier provider priority system with automatic circuit-breaker failover rather than simple round-robin or single-provider approaches; EFinance (Priority 0) is free and near real-time, eliminating the need for paid APIs for basic analysis. The system validates data quality and latency at each tier before falling back, ensuring analysis uses the freshest available data.
vs alternatives: Outperforms single-provider solutions (e.g., yfinance-only) by guaranteeing data availability across market disruptions; more cost-effective than commercial data APIs (Bloomberg, FactSet) by leveraging free Chinese data sources (AkShare, Tushare) as primary tiers.
Routes stock data through a unified LiteLLM interface to multiple LLM backends (Gemini, Claude, DeepSeek, OpenAI, Ollama) with embedded trading philosophy rules and 11 built-in strategies (Bull Trend, Golden Cross, Wave Theory, etc.). Each strategy is implemented as a 'skill' that guides the LLM's reasoning via system prompts and structured output templates, ensuring analysis adheres to quantitative trading principles rather than generating arbitrary commentary.
Unique: Embeds 11 quantitative trading strategies as reusable 'skills' with LLM-guided reasoning rather than hardcoded technical indicators; uses LiteLLM abstraction to support 5+ LLM backends (Gemini, Claude, DeepSeek, OpenAI, Ollama) with unified interface, enabling provider-agnostic analysis and cost optimization. Trading philosophy rules are enforced via system prompts, ensuring recommendations align with quantitative discipline.
vs alternatives: More flexible than rule-based technical analysis (TA-Lib) because LLM reasoning adapts to market context; more disciplined than pure LLM chat because strategies constrain reasoning to specific trading frameworks. Supports local Ollama deployment for zero-cost inference, unlike cloud-only solutions (ChatGPT, Gemini API).
Integrates with messaging platform bots (Telegram Bot API, Discord Webhooks, WeChat Work Bot API) to enable interactive analysis queries and report delivery. Users can send commands to the bot (e.g., '/analyze AAPL' or '/portfolio') and receive analysis results directly in the chat. The bot supports slash commands, inline buttons for quick actions (buy/sell/hold), and rich message formatting (embeds, cards, rich text). Bots run as separate processes and poll for messages or listen to webhooks.
Unique: Implements native bot integrations for Telegram, Discord, and WeChat Work (Chinese platform) with slash commands, inline buttons, and platform-specific rich formatting. Enables interactive analysis queries directly in chat without leaving the messaging app. Supports group chat usage with optional rate limiting to prevent abuse.
vs alternatives: More convenient than web UI because users don't need to open a browser; analysis is delivered in their existing chat workflow. More interactive than report-only notifications because users can query analysis on-demand and execute actions via inline buttons. Supports Chinese platforms (WeChat Work) natively, unlike most Western financial APIs.
Enables deployment of the analysis system to GitHub Actions, a free CI/CD platform that runs workflows on a schedule (cron) or on-demand. The system is packaged as a Docker container or Python script that runs in the GitHub Actions environment, fetches stock data, runs analysis, and sends notifications. No server hosting is required; GitHub Actions provides free compute for public repositories (2000 min/month) and paid plans for private repositories. Workflows are defined in YAML and version-controlled alongside the code.
Unique: Leverages GitHub Actions free tier (2000 min/month for private repos, unlimited for public) to run scheduled analysis without paying for cloud hosting. Workflows are defined in YAML and version-controlled alongside code, enabling reproducible deployments. Integrates with GitHub Secrets for secure credential management.
vs alternatives: More cost-effective than cloud-based scheduling (AWS Lambda, Google Cloud Scheduler) because GitHub Actions is free for public repos and cheap for private repos. More maintainable than local cron jobs because workflows are version-controlled and visible in the GitHub UI. More scalable than single-machine deployments because GitHub Actions can run multiple workflows in parallel.
Packages the entire analysis system (backend, frontend, database, notification services) as a Docker Compose stack that can be deployed locally or to cloud platforms (AWS, Google Cloud, DigitalOcean). The Compose file defines services for the FastAPI backend, React frontend, PostgreSQL database, and optional Redis cache. Deployment is as simple as 'docker-compose up', with all dependencies and configuration managed by the Compose file. Supports environment-based configuration (dev, staging, prod) via .env files.
Unique: Provides a complete Docker Compose stack (backend, frontend, database, cache) that enables single-command deployment ('docker-compose up') without manual service setup. Supports environment-based configuration (dev/staging/prod) via .env files. Enables local development with the same stack as production, reducing environment drift.
vs alternatives: More convenient than manual service setup because all dependencies are defined in a single file. More reproducible than cloud-native deployments because the stack is version-controlled and can be deployed identically across environments. More accessible than Kubernetes because Docker Compose has a lower learning curve and is suitable for small to medium deployments.
Enables deployment of the analysis system as a systemd service (Linux) or cron job that runs on a local machine or VPS. The system runs continuously as a background service, polling for scheduled analysis times and executing them. Systemd provides service management (start, stop, restart, status) and automatic restart on failure. Cron provides simple time-based scheduling without a persistent service. Both approaches require minimal infrastructure (just a Linux machine) and zero cloud hosting costs.
Unique: Provides both systemd service and cron job deployment options for Linux, enabling simple self-hosted scheduling without cloud infrastructure. Systemd provides service management (start/stop/restart) and automatic restart on failure. Cron provides simple time-based scheduling. Both approaches require minimal setup and zero cloud hosting costs.
vs alternatives: More cost-effective than cloud-based scheduling because it runs on a cheap VPS or local machine. More reliable than manual script execution because systemd provides automatic restart and monitoring. More flexible than GitHub Actions because it supports long-running services and persistent state.
Aggregates news, risk alerts, earnings data, and capital flow from 4+ specialized search APIs (Anspire, Tavily, Bocha, SerpAPI) and enriches the LLM analysis context with up-to-date fundamental information. The search service queries for stock-specific news, regulatory filings, insider trading, and market sentiment, then embeds results into the LLM prompt as structured context to ground recommendations in real-world events rather than historical price patterns alone.
Unique: Implements a multi-API search strategy (Anspire, Tavily, Bocha, SerpAPI) with fallback logic similar to data fetching, ensuring news availability even if primary search API fails. Structures search results as context blocks for LLM prompts, enabling the AI to cite specific news events in recommendations. Supports market-specific search (A-shares, HK, US) with appropriate query formatting per market.
vs alternatives: More comprehensive than single-source news APIs (e.g., NewsAPI alone) because it aggregates multiple providers and includes earnings/risk data. More efficient than manual news monitoring because search is automated and results are pre-structured for LLM consumption. Supports Chinese market news (via Anspire, Bocha) unlike most Western financial APIs.
Implements a multi-agent system that decomposes complex investment questions into sub-tasks, each handled by specialized agents (technical analyst, fundamental analyst, risk manager, sentiment analyzer). Agents communicate via a shared context store and iteratively refine recommendations through multi-turn reasoning. The orchestrator routes user queries to appropriate agents, aggregates their outputs, and synthesizes a final recommendation with consensus scoring and dissent tracking.
Unique: Implements agent specialization with explicit role separation (technical analyst, fundamental analyst, risk manager, sentiment analyzer) rather than a single monolithic LLM; agents share context via a structured store and produce scored outputs that are aggregated with dissent tracking. This enables explainable AI where users can see which agents support/oppose a recommendation and why.
vs alternatives: More transparent than single-LLM analysis because users see reasoning from multiple specialized perspectives. More robust than simple prompt engineering because agent disagreement surfaces uncertainty. Enables cost optimization by routing simple queries to cheaper agents and complex queries to more capable (expensive) models.
+6 more capabilities
Automatically loads and parses documents from diverse sources (PDFs, Word docs, HTML, Markdown, code files, databases) into a unified in-memory representation using format-specific loaders and node-based document abstractions. Each document is decomposed into Document objects containing metadata, content, and relationships, enabling downstream processing without format-specific handling in application code.
Unique: Provides a unified loader abstraction (BaseReader interface) that normalizes 100+ data source connectors into a single Document/Node API, eliminating format-specific branching logic in application code. Loaders are composable and chainable, allowing sequential transformations (e.g., load → split → extract metadata → embed).
vs alternatives: Broader out-of-the-box loader coverage than LangChain's document loaders and more structured node-based decomposition than raw text splitting, reducing boilerplate for multi-source RAG pipelines.
Splits documents into semantically coherent chunks using multiple strategies (character-based, token-aware, recursive, semantic) with configurable overlap and chunk size. Preserves document hierarchy and metadata through a node tree structure, enabling retrieval systems to maintain context relationships and enable hierarchical re-ranking or parent-document retrieval patterns.
Unique: Implements a node-tree abstraction that preserves document hierarchy and enables parent-document retrieval patterns. Supports multiple splitting strategies (recursive, semantic, code-aware) with pluggable custom splitters, and automatically propagates metadata through the node tree.
vs alternatives: More sophisticated than LangChain's text splitters because it preserves hierarchical relationships and supports semantic splitting; better for complex document structures than simple character-based splitting.
daily_stock_analysis scores higher at 41/100 vs LlamaIndex at 40/100. daily_stock_analysis also has a free tier, making it more accessible.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
Processes documents containing mixed content (text, images, tables, code) by extracting and understanding each modality separately, then synthesizing information across modalities. Uses vision models for image understanding, specialized parsers for tables and code, and integrates results into a unified document representation for retrieval and generation.
Unique: Integrates vision models, table parsers, and code extractors into a unified multi-modal document processing pipeline that synthesizes information across modalities. Preserves modality-specific structure (table schemas, code formatting) while enabling cross-modal retrieval and generation.
vs alternatives: More comprehensive multi-modal support than text-only RAG; built-in vision integration reduces boilerplate for document understanding compared to manual vision API calls.
Enables streaming of LLM responses token-by-token and real-time retrieval updates, allowing applications to display partial results as they become available. Supports streaming from retrieval (progressive document discovery) and generation (token-by-token output) with backpressure handling and cancellation support for responsive user experiences.
Unique: Provides first-class streaming support for both retrieval and generation with automatic backpressure handling and cancellation. Enables progressive result display without custom async/streaming code in application layer.
vs alternatives: More integrated streaming support than manual LLM API streaming; built-in retrieval streaming and backpressure handling reduce complexity compared to custom streaming implementations.
Tracks API costs for LLM calls, embeddings, and other operations with per-query and per-session cost attribution. Provides cost optimization recommendations (e.g., batch processing, model selection, caching) and enables cost-aware query planning to balance quality and expense. Integrates with multiple LLM providers to normalize cost tracking across models.
Unique: Provides automatic cost tracking across multiple LLM providers with per-query attribution and cost optimization recommendations. Integrates with query execution to enable cost-aware planning without manual cost calculation.
vs alternatives: More integrated cost tracking than manual API billing review; built-in optimization recommendations reduce guesswork for cost reduction.
Enables building custom RAG pipelines by composing modular components (retrievers, synthesizers, agents, tools) through a declarative or programmatic API. Supports complex workflows with branching, loops, and conditional logic, with automatic dependency resolution and execution optimization. Pipelines are reusable, testable, and can be deployed as APIs or batch jobs.
Unique: Provides a flexible pipeline composition API supporting both declarative and programmatic definitions, with automatic dependency resolution and execution optimization. Enables complex workflows with branching and conditional logic without custom orchestration code.
vs alternatives: More flexible pipeline composition than fixed RAG architectures; better workflow support than manual component chaining.
Generates embeddings for documents/nodes using pluggable embedding providers (OpenAI, Hugging Face, local models) and stores them in a unified vector store interface that abstracts over multiple backends (Pinecone, Weaviate, Milvus, FAISS, Chroma, etc.). The abstraction layer enables switching vector stores without changing application code, and handles batching, retry logic, and metadata indexing.
Unique: Provides a unified VectorStore interface that abstracts 10+ vector database backends, enabling zero-code switching between providers. Handles embedding batching, retry logic, and metadata propagation automatically. Supports both cloud and local embedding models through a pluggable EmbedModel interface.
vs alternatives: Broader vector store coverage and more seamless provider switching than LangChain's vectorstore integrations; better abstraction consistency across backends than using raw vector store SDKs directly.
Retrieves semantically similar documents from vector stores using embedding-based similarity search, with optional re-ranking, filtering, and fusion strategies (hybrid search combining dense and sparse retrieval). Supports multiple retrieval modes (similarity, MMR, fusion) and enables custom retrieval logic through a pluggable Retriever interface that can combine multiple strategies.
Unique: Implements a pluggable Retriever abstraction supporting multiple retrieval strategies (similarity, MMR, fusion, custom) that can be composed and chained. Built-in support for re-ranking via LLM or cross-encoder, and hybrid search combining dense and sparse retrieval without custom integration code.
vs alternatives: More flexible retrieval composition than LangChain's retrievers; built-in re-ranking and fusion strategies reduce boilerplate for advanced retrieval pipelines.
+6 more capabilities