| 0 |
| Quality | 0 | 0 |
| Ecosystem | 0 | 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Paid | Paid |
| Starting Price | $1.00e-6 per prompt token | $6.00e-7 per prompt token |
| Capabilities | 9 decomposed | 11 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Processes up to 1 million tokens in a single context window, enabling agents to maintain extended conversation histories, large document sets, and complex multi-step reasoning chains without context truncation. The model architecture supports this through optimized attention mechanisms and memory-efficient transformer implementations, allowing agents to reference prior interactions and accumulated knowledge across extended sessions without losing critical context.
Unique: 1M token context window with optimization specifically for agentic scenarios — most competitors max out at 128K-200K, requiring external memory systems. Xiaomi's architecture appears to use efficient attention patterns (likely sparse or hierarchical) to make this window practical without proportional latency explosion.
vs alternatives: Eliminates need for external vector databases or context management layers for many agentic workflows — agents can operate with full conversation and document history in a single model call, reducing architectural complexity vs Claude 3.5 (200K) or GPT-4 (128K)
Supports structured function calling and tool invocation within agentic loops, enabling the model to autonomously decide when to call external APIs, execute code, or delegate tasks. The model outputs structured JSON-formatted tool calls that integrate with standard agent frameworks, handling the decision logic for tool selection, parameter binding, and execution sequencing without requiring external routing layers.
Unique: Deeply optimized for agentic scenarios with native function calling — the model training appears to emphasize tool-use decision making and parameter binding accuracy. Unlike generic LLMs, MiMo-V2-Pro's architecture likely includes specialized tokens or attention patterns for tool-calling sequences.
vs alternatives: More reliable tool-calling than base GPT-4 or Claude for complex multi-step agent loops because it was explicitly trained on agentic patterns, reducing hallucinated function calls and improving parameter accuracy vs general-purpose models
Generates, completes, and analyzes code across multiple programming languages with context-aware understanding of syntax, semantics, and best practices. The model leverages its 1T parameter scale and agentic training to produce code that integrates with existing codebases, handle complex refactoring tasks, and provide architectural recommendations based on full codebase context.
Unique: 1T parameter scale enables deeper semantic understanding of code patterns and cross-file dependencies compared to smaller models. The agentic training likely improves code generation reliability by emphasizing step-by-step reasoning about implementation details and error cases.
vs alternatives: Larger parameter count and agentic training likely produce more architecturally sound code than Copilot or CodeLlama for complex multi-file refactoring, though specific benchmarks are unavailable
Maintains coherent, contextually-aware multi-turn conversations with the ability to reference prior exchanges, correct misunderstandings, and build on previous context. The 1M token window enables the model to preserve full conversation history without summarization, allowing for natural dialogue that spans dozens or hundreds of exchanges while maintaining consistency in tone, knowledge, and reasoning.
Unique: 1M context window enables true conversation history preservation without lossy summarization — most conversational AI systems truncate or summarize history after 10-20 turns, while MiMo-V2-Pro can maintain full fidelity across 100+ turns. This is architecturally significant because it eliminates information loss that typically degrades dialogue coherence.
vs alternatives: Maintains conversation coherence across 10x more turns than typical chatbots (GPT-4 at 128K, Claude at 200K) without requiring external memory systems or summarization, enabling more natural long-form dialogue
Extracts structured information from unstructured text and generates valid JSON outputs conforming to specified schemas. The model uses its reasoning capabilities to parse complex documents, identify relevant entities and relationships, and format outputs according to developer-specified schemas, with support for nested structures, arrays, and type validation.
Unique: Large parameter count and agentic training enable more accurate extraction from complex, ambiguous documents compared to smaller models. The reasoning capabilities allow the model to infer missing structure and handle edge cases in schema conformance.
vs alternatives: More reliable structured extraction than GPT-3.5 or smaller open models due to larger capacity for understanding document semantics and schema requirements, though specific extraction benchmarks are unavailable
Synthesizes information across large documents or document sets to produce coherent summaries, identify key insights, and answer questions based on comprehensive document understanding. The 1M token window allows the model to process entire books, research papers, or document collections in a single pass, enabling synthesis without intermediate summarization steps that lose nuance.
Unique: 1M token window enables single-pass synthesis of entire document collections without intermediate summarization — most systems require hierarchical or multi-stage summarization that introduces information loss. This architectural choice preserves nuance and enables more accurate cross-document reasoning.
vs alternatives: Can synthesize information from 100+ page documents in a single pass without losing detail, vs systems requiring multi-stage summarization (e.g., map-reduce approaches with smaller context windows) that introduce cumulative information loss
Decomposes complex problems into reasoning steps, providing transparent explanations for conclusions and recommendations. The model uses chain-of-thought patterns to work through multi-step logic, mathematical reasoning, and decision-making processes, outputting both final answers and the reasoning path used to arrive at them.
Unique: 1T parameter scale and agentic training enable more sophisticated multi-step reasoning than smaller models. The architecture likely includes specialized attention patterns or training objectives for reasoning transparency, improving both accuracy and explanation quality.
vs alternatives: Larger capacity enables more complex reasoning chains with fewer errors than GPT-3.5 or smaller open models, though reasoning quality still depends on problem domain and may not exceed specialized reasoning models like o1
Generates responses that adapt to context, user preferences, and communication style, maintaining consistency in tone, formality, and approach across interactions. The model uses contextual understanding to match communication style to audience (technical vs non-technical, formal vs casual) and adjusts complexity and depth based on inferred user expertise.
Unique: Large parameter count enables nuanced understanding of communication context and style requirements. The agentic training likely improves the model's ability to infer user expertise and adapt explanations accordingly.
vs alternatives: Better at maintaining consistent tone and style across extended conversations than smaller models due to larger capacity for understanding communication context and user preferences
+1 more capabilities
GLM-4.5 uses a Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) architecture to dynamically route tokens through specialized expert networks based on input characteristics, enabling efficient processing of 128k-token contexts without proportional latency increases. The MoE design allows selective expert activation per token, reducing computational overhead while maintaining reasoning depth across extended conversations and multi-document analysis tasks typical of agent-based workflows.
Unique: Mixture-of-Experts routing specifically tuned for agent workloads rather than generic dense models; expert activation patterns are optimized for tool-use sequences and multi-step reasoning rather than general language tasks
vs alternatives: Outperforms dense models like GPT-4 Turbo on agent tasks within 128k context by routing computational budget to relevant experts, reducing latency and cost vs. models that process all tokens through identical layers
GLM-4.5 implements native function calling through a schema-based registry where tools are defined as JSON schemas with parameter constraints, type validation, and description metadata. The model learns to emit structured tool invocations that map directly to function signatures, enabling deterministic tool orchestration without post-processing or regex parsing. Integration with OpenRouter's API exposes this via standard function-calling parameters compatible with OpenAI's format.
Unique: Schema-based function calling is trained directly into the model weights rather than implemented as post-hoc decoding constraints, allowing the model to learn semantic relationships between tool purposes and input context during training
vs alternatives: More reliable than constraint-based function calling (e.g., Guidance, LMQL) because tool selection is learned rather than enforced, reducing parsing failures and enabling the model to reason about tool applicability
Z.ai: GLM 4.5 scores higher at 24/100 vs Xiaomi: MiMo-V2-Pro at 23/100.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
GLM-4.5 can be used for batch inference through OpenRouter's API, enabling cost-optimized processing of large numbers of requests. Batch processing typically offers reduced pricing compared to real-time API calls and is suitable for non-urgent inference tasks. The model can process batches of prompts efficiently, with results returned after processing completes. This is valuable for agents running scheduled tasks or processing large datasets.
Unique: Batch processing is offered through OpenRouter's unified API rather than a separate batch service, enabling seamless switching between real-time and batch modes with the same client code
vs alternatives: More cost-effective than real-time API for high-volume inference; simpler than managing separate batch infrastructure because OpenRouter handles queuing and result delivery
GLM-4.5 maintains coherent conversation state across turns by encoding prior messages into a compressed representation that persists within the 128k context window. The model uses attention mechanisms to selectively retrieve relevant prior context, enabling agents to reference earlier decisions, tool results, and user preferences without explicit memory management. This is particularly effective for agent workflows where state accumulation (e.g., task progress, discovered facts) must inform subsequent actions.
Unique: Implicit memory management through attention-based context selection rather than explicit memory modules; the model learns which prior turns are relevant without separate retrieval or summarization steps
vs alternatives: More efficient than explicit memory systems (e.g., LangChain's ConversationBufferMemory) because attention is computed once during inference rather than requiring separate retrieval and summarization passes
GLM-4.5 generates code across 40+ programming languages by leveraging training data that includes diverse codebases and syntax patterns. The model understands language-specific idioms, library conventions, and structural patterns (e.g., async/await in JavaScript, type hints in Python, generics in Java) without explicit language-specific modules. Generation is context-aware, respecting indentation, existing code style, and project conventions when completing or extending code snippets.
Unique: Language-agnostic code generation trained on diverse codebases rather than language-specific fine-tuning; the model generalizes syntax patterns across languages, enabling reasonable code generation even for less common languages
vs alternatives: Broader language coverage than specialized models like Codex (which emphasizes Python/JavaScript) but lower quality on niche languages compared to language-specific models; better for polyglot teams than single-language specialists
GLM-4.5 is trained on extensive technical documentation, API references, and code examples, enabling it to understand and reason about complex technical concepts, library APIs, and system architectures. The model can parse API schemas (OpenAPI, GraphQL, Protocol Buffers), understand parameter constraints and type systems, and generate code that correctly uses APIs based on documentation. This is particularly valuable for agent workflows that must interact with external systems.
Unique: Semantic understanding of API schemas and documentation is learned from training data rather than implemented as a separate schema parser; the model reasons about API semantics holistically
vs alternatives: More flexible than code-generation-only models because it understands API semantics and can reason about correctness; better than generic LLMs for technical tasks because training includes extensive API documentation
GLM-4.5 can generate responses that explicitly show reasoning steps, enabling transparency into how conclusions were reached. When prompted with chain-of-thought patterns, the model generates intermediate reasoning steps before final answers, making it suitable for applications requiring explainability or verification. This is implemented through training on reasoning-annotated data and prompt patterns that encourage step-by-step decomposition.
Unique: Chain-of-thought reasoning is trained directly into the model rather than implemented as a decoding strategy; the model learns to generate reasoning steps as part of its core training objective
vs alternatives: More natural and coherent reasoning steps than prompt-injection approaches (e.g., appending 'think step by step') because reasoning is learned as a first-class capability
GLM-4.5 supports multiple languages (Chinese, English, and others) with training that enables cross-lingual reasoning — understanding concepts expressed in one language and reasoning about them in another. The model can translate, summarize, and reason across languages without language-specific degradation. This is particularly valuable for global applications and agents that must operate in multilingual environments.
Unique: Cross-lingual reasoning is learned from multilingual training data rather than implemented as separate language-specific models; the model develops a shared representation across languages
vs alternatives: More efficient than maintaining separate models per language because a single model handles all languages; better for cross-lingual reasoning than language-specific models because the shared representation enables concept transfer
+3 more capabilities