| Ecosystem |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Paid | Free |
| Capabilities | 11 decomposed | 9 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Automatically scans multiple cryptocurrency trading pairs simultaneously to identify technical patterns (support/resistance levels, moving average crossovers, candlestick formations) using machine learning models trained on historical OHLCV data. The system processes real-time market feeds from connected exchanges, extracts feature vectors from price action, and classifies patterns against a learned model to surface actionable signals without manual chart analysis.
Unique: Applies supervised ML models to multi-timeframe OHLCV data for simultaneous pattern detection across dozens of pairs, rather than rule-based indicator stacking or manual visual analysis. Likely uses feature engineering on candlestick geometry, volume profiles, and momentum indicators fed into classification models.
vs alternatives: Faster than manual chart analysis and more scalable than traditional indicator-based bots, but lacks the interpretability and customization of open-source frameworks like Freqtrade or CCXT-based solutions.
Synthesizes multiple technical and market microstructure signals (pattern matches, momentum indicators, volatility regimes, order book imbalances) into unified buy/sell recommendations with attached confidence scores. The system uses an ensemble approach or weighted scoring model to combine heterogeneous signal sources, then ranks opportunities by expected risk-adjusted return or Sharpe ratio to prioritize execution.
Unique: Combines multiple heterogeneous signal sources (technical patterns, momentum, volatility, microstructure) into a single ranked recommendation with confidence scoring, rather than requiring traders to manually weight or combine indicators. Likely uses gradient boosting or neural network ensemble to learn optimal signal weighting from historical trade outcomes.
vs alternatives: More actionable than raw indicator feeds (TradingView alerts) because it synthesizes conflicting signals, but less transparent than open-source signal frameworks where users can inspect and tune individual components.
Connects to multiple cryptocurrency exchange accounts (Binance, Coinbase, Kraken, etc.) via API keys, aggregates account balances and positions, and maintains synchronized state across all exchanges. The system handles API authentication, manages rate limits, reconciles positions with trade history, and detects discrepancies (e.g., trades executed outside Wisdomise). Traders can manage all accounts from a single interface without logging into each exchange separately.
Unique: Aggregates account state from multiple exchange APIs, maintains synchronized position tracking, and provides unified portfolio visibility across all connected exchanges. Handles API authentication, rate limiting, and reconciliation without requiring traders to manage each exchange separately.
vs alternatives: More convenient than manually checking each exchange account, but introduces API key security risks and reconciliation complexity that self-hosted solutions (CCXT-based bots) can avoid by running locally.
Executes buy/sell orders directly on connected cryptocurrency exchanges (Binance, Coinbase, Kraken) based on AI-generated signals, handling order placement, partial fills, slippage management, and position sizing without manual intervention. The system maintains authenticated connections to exchange APIs, implements order routing logic (market vs limit orders, order splitting for large positions), and tracks execution metrics (fill price, fees, slippage) for post-trade analysis.
Unique: Directly integrates with exchange REST/WebSocket APIs to execute orders without user intervention, implementing order routing logic (market vs limit, order splitting) and slippage management. Maintains authenticated sessions and handles rate limiting, partial fills, and order status tracking natively rather than delegating to external execution services.
vs alternatives: Faster than manual order placement and more reliable than copy-trading services, but introduces counterparty risk with exchange APIs and lacks the transparency of self-hosted bots using open-source libraries like CCXT.
Simulates trading strategy performance against historical OHLCV data to estimate expected returns, drawdowns, win rates, and Sharpe ratios before deploying to live markets. The system replays historical price action, applies signal generation logic to each candle, executes trades at simulated prices, and accounts for slippage, fees, and position sizing to produce realistic performance metrics. Results are aggregated into equity curves, trade-by-trade P&L, and statistical summaries.
Unique: Replays historical market data with signal generation logic applied to each candle, simulating order execution with configurable slippage and fee models to produce realistic performance estimates. Likely uses vectorized OHLCV processing (NumPy/Pandas) for fast simulation across large datasets rather than tick-by-tick replay.
vs alternatives: More integrated than standalone backtesting tools (Backtrader, VectorBT) because it uses the same signal generation models as live trading, but less transparent than open-source frameworks where users can inspect and modify backtesting logic.
Continuously monitors open positions across all connected exchange accounts, calculates unrealized P&L, tracks realized gains/losses from closed trades, and displays portfolio metrics (total balance, allocation by pair, leverage ratio) with real-time updates. The system aggregates account state from multiple exchanges, reconciles positions with trade history, and computes performance attribution to identify which trades and pairs are driving overall returns.
Unique: Aggregates real-time account state from multiple exchange APIs, reconciles positions with trade history, and computes performance attribution across pairs and strategies. Maintains persistent position tracking and P&L calculations without requiring users to manually reconcile exchange statements.
vs alternatives: More convenient than manually checking each exchange account, but less comprehensive than dedicated portfolio tracking tools (CoinTracker, Koinly) which include tax reporting and cost-basis tracking.
Allows users to define custom entry/exit rules, position sizing logic, and risk management parameters through a configuration interface (likely UI-based rule builder or JSON/YAML config files). The system interprets these rules during signal generation and execution, enabling traders to encode domain knowledge and risk preferences without modifying code. Rules can reference technical indicators, account state, and market conditions to create conditional trading logic.
Unique: Provides a rule configuration interface (UI or config files) that allows traders to define custom entry/exit logic, position sizing, and risk management without code. Rules are interpreted at runtime during signal generation and execution, enabling fast iteration without redeployment.
vs alternatives: More accessible than code-based strategy frameworks (Freqtrade, Backtrader) for non-technical traders, but less flexible than full programming languages for expressing complex conditional logic.
Automatically places stop-loss and take-profit orders based on user-defined risk parameters (max loss percentage, profit target, risk-reward ratio) when trades are executed. The system calculates stop-loss and take-profit prices from entry price and position size, submits orders to the exchange, and monitors for fills. If a stop-loss is hit, the position is closed to limit losses; if take-profit is hit, the position is closed to lock in gains.
Unique: Automatically calculates and submits stop-loss and take-profit orders to the exchange based on user-defined risk parameters, enforcing consistent risk management rules across all trades without manual intervention. Integrates with exchange order management to track and execute these protective orders.
vs alternatives: More reliable than manual stop-loss placement because it's automated and consistent, but subject to exchange execution risks (slippage, gaps) that manual traders can sometimes avoid through discretionary judgment.
+3 more capabilities
Executes SQL queries against Supabase PostgreSQL instances through the Model Context Protocol, translating natural language or structured query requests into parameterized SQL statements. Uses MCP's tool-calling interface to expose database operations as callable functions with schema validation, enabling LLM agents to perform CRUD operations, joins, and aggregations with automatic connection pooling and credential management through Supabase client SDK.
Unique: Exposes Supabase PostgreSQL as MCP tools with automatic credential injection from Supabase client SDK, eliminating manual connection string management and enabling seamless LLM-to-database queries within Claude or compatible agents
vs alternatives: Tighter integration than generic SQL MCP servers because it leverages Supabase's built-in authentication and connection pooling rather than requiring separate database credential configuration
Exposes Supabase Auth session state and user metadata through MCP tools, allowing agents to inspect current authentication context, retrieve user profiles, and trigger auth-related operations. Integrates with Supabase's JWT-based auth system to validate sessions and access user claims without re-authenticating, using the Supabase client's built-in session management.
Unique: Integrates Supabase's JWT-based auth system directly into MCP tool interface, allowing agents to inspect and act on auth state without managing separate credential stores or re-authentication flows
vs alternatives: More seamless than generic auth MCP servers because it leverages Supabase's built-in session management and avoids redundant credential passing between agent and auth system
Invokes Supabase Edge Functions (serverless TypeScript/JavaScript functions) through MCP tools, passing parameters and receiving results with optional streaming support. Uses Supabase's edge function HTTP API to trigger functions with automatic authentication headers and response parsing, enabling agents to execute custom business logic without embedding it in the agent itself.
Wisdomise scores higher at 43/100 vs Supabase at 42/100. However, Supabase offers a free tier which may be better for getting started.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
Unique: Exposes Supabase Edge Functions as MCP tools with automatic authentication and response parsing, allowing agents to invoke custom serverless logic without managing HTTP clients or credential injection
vs alternatives: More integrated than generic HTTP MCP tools because it handles Supabase-specific authentication, error handling, and response formatting automatically
Subscribes to real-time changes on Supabase tables through MCP's event streaming interface, using Supabase's PostgreSQL LISTEN/NOTIFY mechanism to push INSERT, UPDATE, and DELETE events to agents. Maintains persistent WebSocket connections and filters events by table and row-level policies, enabling agents to react to database changes without polling.
Unique: Bridges Supabase's PostgreSQL LISTEN/NOTIFY real-time system with MCP's tool interface, enabling agents to subscribe to database changes without managing WebSocket connections or event serialization
vs alternatives: More efficient than polling-based approaches because it uses Supabase's native real-time infrastructure rather than repeated database queries
Manages files in Supabase Storage buckets through MCP tools, supporting upload, download, list, and delete operations with automatic authentication and path-based access control. Uses Supabase's S3-compatible storage API with built-in support for public/private buckets and signed URLs for temporary access, enabling agents to handle file I/O without managing cloud storage credentials.
Unique: Exposes Supabase Storage's S3-compatible API as MCP tools with automatic authentication and signed URL generation, eliminating the need for agents to manage cloud storage credentials or generate temporary access tokens
vs alternatives: More integrated than generic S3 MCP tools because it leverages Supabase's built-in bucket policies and authentication rather than requiring separate AWS credentials
Performs semantic similarity searches on vector embeddings stored in Supabase PostgreSQL using pgvector extension, translating natural language queries into embedding vectors and executing cosine/L2 distance searches. Integrates with embedding providers (OpenAI, Cohere) or uses pre-computed embeddings, enabling agents to retrieve semantically similar documents or records without full-text search limitations.
Unique: Integrates pgvector directly into MCP tools with automatic embedding generation and distance calculation, enabling agents to perform semantic search without managing separate vector database infrastructure
vs alternatives: More efficient than external vector databases (Pinecone, Weaviate) for Supabase users because it colocates embeddings with relational data, reducing network latency and simplifying data synchronization
Exposes Supabase database schema information through MCP tools, allowing agents to discover table structures, column types, constraints, and relationships without manual schema documentation. Queries PostgreSQL information_schema and Supabase metadata tables to dynamically generate schema descriptions, enabling agents to construct valid queries and understand data relationships.
Unique: Queries Supabase's PostgreSQL information_schema directly through MCP tools, enabling agents to dynamically discover and adapt to database schemas without pre-configured schema definitions
vs alternatives: More flexible than static schema definitions because it reflects live database state, including recent migrations or schema changes
Enforces Supabase Row-Level Security policies within agent queries, ensuring that agents can only access rows permitted by RLS rules defined in the database. Evaluates policies based on authenticated user context (JWT claims, user ID) and applies WHERE clause filters automatically, preventing unauthorized data access at the database layer rather than application layer.
Unique: Delegates authorization enforcement to PostgreSQL RLS policies rather than implementing authorization in agent code, ensuring that data access rules are centralized and cannot be bypassed by agent logic
vs alternatives: More secure than application-level authorization because RLS is enforced at the database layer, preventing accidental data leaks even if agent code has bugs
+1 more capabilities