Supabase ranks higher at 42/100 vs @winor30/mcp-server-datadog at 33/100. Capability-level comparison backed by match graph evidence from real search data.
| Feature | @winor30/mcp-server-datadog | Supabase |
|---|---|---|
| Type | MCP Server | MCP Server |
| UnfragileRank | 33/100 | 42/100 |
| Adoption | 0 | 0 |
| Quality | 0 |
| 0 |
| Ecosystem | 0 | 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Capabilities | 7 decomposed | 9 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Executes metric queries against Datadog's time-series database through MCP tool invocation, translating natural language or structured query parameters into Datadog API calls. Implements MCP's tool-calling interface to expose Datadog's metric query endpoint, handling authentication via API key/app key pairs and returning time-series data with timestamps and aggregated values.
Unique: Exposes Datadog metric queries as MCP tools rather than requiring direct REST API calls, enabling LLM agents to query metrics through natural language without SDK boilerplate. Uses MCP's standardized tool schema to abstract Datadog API authentication and response parsing.
vs alternatives: Simpler than building custom Datadog SDK integrations because MCP handles tool registration and invocation; more flexible than static dashboards because queries are dynamic and LLM-driven.
Creates custom events in Datadog and searches existing events through MCP tool invocation, translating event metadata (title, text, tags, priority) into Datadog API calls. Implements bidirectional event management: writing events for incident tracking or automation markers, and querying events by time range or tag filters to correlate with metrics.
Unique: Bidirectional event management through MCP tools — both creates and queries events, enabling LLM agents to log their own actions and correlate them with system events. Uses Datadog's event API to maintain a unified audit trail of both infrastructure and AI-driven changes.
vs alternatives: More integrated than manual event creation because LLM agents can autonomously log actions; more queryable than webhook-based event logging because search is built-in.
Retrieves monitor definitions, current state, and alert status from Datadog through MCP tools, translating monitor IDs or filter criteria into API calls that return monitor configuration and active alerts. Enables LLM agents to inspect which monitors are triggered, their thresholds, and associated metadata without direct API knowledge.
Unique: Exposes monitor state as queryable MCP tools, allowing LLM agents to inspect alert conditions and thresholds without parsing Datadog UI or raw API responses. Integrates monitor metadata with metric and event data for holistic incident context.
vs alternatives: More actionable than static alert notifications because LLM agents can query monitor details on-demand; more structured than webhook alerts because monitor definitions are queryable.
Retrieves host inventory, infrastructure metadata, and system information from Datadog through MCP tools, translating host queries into API calls that return host tags, metrics availability, and system details. Enables LLM agents to understand infrastructure topology and correlate hosts with metrics or alerts.
Unique: Exposes infrastructure inventory as queryable MCP tools, enabling LLM agents to discover and correlate hosts without manual infrastructure documentation. Integrates host metadata with metric and alert data for end-to-end incident context.
vs alternatives: More dynamic than static inventory files because it queries live Datadog data; more contextual than raw host lists because metadata is enriched with agent status and tags.
Implements a Model Context Protocol (MCP) server that exposes Datadog API capabilities as standardized tools, handling MCP message serialization, authentication token management, and error handling. Routes incoming MCP tool calls to appropriate Datadog API endpoints, manages session state, and returns structured responses compatible with MCP clients (Claude, LLM agents, etc.).
Unique: Implements MCP server pattern to expose Datadog as a standardized tool interface, abstracting away Datadog API complexity and authentication details. Uses MCP's tool schema to define capabilities declaratively, enabling any MCP client to discover and invoke Datadog operations.
vs alternatives: More portable than direct SDK integration because MCP clients are interchangeable; more maintainable than custom API wrappers because MCP is a standard protocol.
Manages Datadog API authentication by reading API key and application key from environment variables, constructing authenticated HTTP requests with proper headers, and handling authentication failures gracefully. Implements credential validation at server startup and includes error handling for missing or invalid credentials.
Unique: Centralizes Datadog credential management in the MCP server, eliminating the need for clients to handle authentication directly. Uses environment variables for credential injection, enabling secure deployment in containerized and cloud environments.
vs alternatives: More secure than embedding credentials in client code because secrets are managed server-side; more flexible than hardcoded credentials because it supports environment-based configuration.
Intercepts Datadog API responses, normalizes error formats into MCP-compatible error messages, and handles rate limiting, authentication failures, and malformed responses. Translates Datadog-specific error codes and messages into structured errors that MCP clients can understand and act upon.
Unique: Normalizes Datadog API errors into MCP error format, abstracting away Datadog-specific error codes and enabling clients to handle failures uniformly. Includes rate limit detection and graceful degradation.
vs alternatives: More robust than direct API calls because errors are normalized and handled consistently; more informative than generic HTTP errors because Datadog context is preserved.
Executes SQL queries against Supabase PostgreSQL instances through the Model Context Protocol, translating natural language or structured query requests into parameterized SQL statements. Uses MCP's tool-calling interface to expose database operations as callable functions with schema validation, enabling LLM agents to perform CRUD operations, joins, and aggregations with automatic connection pooling and credential management through Supabase client SDK.
Unique: Exposes Supabase PostgreSQL as MCP tools with automatic credential injection from Supabase client SDK, eliminating manual connection string management and enabling seamless LLM-to-database queries within Claude or compatible agents
vs alternatives: Tighter integration than generic SQL MCP servers because it leverages Supabase's built-in authentication and connection pooling rather than requiring separate database credential configuration
Exposes Supabase Auth session state and user metadata through MCP tools, allowing agents to inspect current authentication context, retrieve user profiles, and trigger auth-related operations. Integrates with Supabase's JWT-based auth system to validate sessions and access user claims without re-authenticating, using the Supabase client's built-in session management.
Unique: Integrates Supabase's JWT-based auth system directly into MCP tool interface, allowing agents to inspect and act on auth state without managing separate credential stores or re-authentication flows
vs alternatives: More seamless than generic auth MCP servers because it leverages Supabase's built-in session management and avoids redundant credential passing between agent and auth system
Invokes Supabase Edge Functions (serverless TypeScript/JavaScript functions) through MCP tools, passing parameters and receiving results with optional streaming support. Uses Supabase's edge function HTTP API to trigger functions with automatic authentication headers and response parsing, enabling agents to execute custom business logic without embedding it in the agent itself.
Supabase scores higher at 42/100 vs @winor30/mcp-server-datadog at 33/100. @winor30/mcp-server-datadog leads on adoption and ecosystem, while Supabase is stronger on quality.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
Unique: Exposes Supabase Edge Functions as MCP tools with automatic authentication and response parsing, allowing agents to invoke custom serverless logic without managing HTTP clients or credential injection
vs alternatives: More integrated than generic HTTP MCP tools because it handles Supabase-specific authentication, error handling, and response formatting automatically
Subscribes to real-time changes on Supabase tables through MCP's event streaming interface, using Supabase's PostgreSQL LISTEN/NOTIFY mechanism to push INSERT, UPDATE, and DELETE events to agents. Maintains persistent WebSocket connections and filters events by table and row-level policies, enabling agents to react to database changes without polling.
Unique: Bridges Supabase's PostgreSQL LISTEN/NOTIFY real-time system with MCP's tool interface, enabling agents to subscribe to database changes without managing WebSocket connections or event serialization
vs alternatives: More efficient than polling-based approaches because it uses Supabase's native real-time infrastructure rather than repeated database queries
Manages files in Supabase Storage buckets through MCP tools, supporting upload, download, list, and delete operations with automatic authentication and path-based access control. Uses Supabase's S3-compatible storage API with built-in support for public/private buckets and signed URLs for temporary access, enabling agents to handle file I/O without managing cloud storage credentials.
Unique: Exposes Supabase Storage's S3-compatible API as MCP tools with automatic authentication and signed URL generation, eliminating the need for agents to manage cloud storage credentials or generate temporary access tokens
vs alternatives: More integrated than generic S3 MCP tools because it leverages Supabase's built-in bucket policies and authentication rather than requiring separate AWS credentials
Performs semantic similarity searches on vector embeddings stored in Supabase PostgreSQL using pgvector extension, translating natural language queries into embedding vectors and executing cosine/L2 distance searches. Integrates with embedding providers (OpenAI, Cohere) or uses pre-computed embeddings, enabling agents to retrieve semantically similar documents or records without full-text search limitations.
Unique: Integrates pgvector directly into MCP tools with automatic embedding generation and distance calculation, enabling agents to perform semantic search without managing separate vector database infrastructure
vs alternatives: More efficient than external vector databases (Pinecone, Weaviate) for Supabase users because it colocates embeddings with relational data, reducing network latency and simplifying data synchronization
Exposes Supabase database schema information through MCP tools, allowing agents to discover table structures, column types, constraints, and relationships without manual schema documentation. Queries PostgreSQL information_schema and Supabase metadata tables to dynamically generate schema descriptions, enabling agents to construct valid queries and understand data relationships.
Unique: Queries Supabase's PostgreSQL information_schema directly through MCP tools, enabling agents to dynamically discover and adapt to database schemas without pre-configured schema definitions
vs alternatives: More flexible than static schema definitions because it reflects live database state, including recent migrations or schema changes
Enforces Supabase Row-Level Security policies within agent queries, ensuring that agents can only access rows permitted by RLS rules defined in the database. Evaluates policies based on authenticated user context (JWT claims, user ID) and applies WHERE clause filters automatically, preventing unauthorized data access at the database layer rather than application layer.
Unique: Delegates authorization enforcement to PostgreSQL RLS policies rather than implementing authorization in agent code, ensuring that data access rules are centralized and cannot be bypassed by agent logic
vs alternatives: More secure than application-level authorization because RLS is enforced at the database layer, preventing accidental data leaks even if agent code has bugs
+1 more capabilities