Whisper CLI vs tgpt
Side-by-side comparison to help you choose.
| Feature | Whisper CLI | tgpt |
|---|---|---|
| Type | CLI Tool | CLI Tool |
| UnfragileRank | 42/100 | 42/100 |
| Adoption | 1 | 1 |
| Quality | 0 | 0 |
| Ecosystem | 0 | 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Capabilities | 11 decomposed | 14 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Transcribes audio in 98 languages to text using a unified Transformer sequence-to-sequence architecture with a shared AudioEncoder that processes mel spectrograms and a language-agnostic TextDecoder that generates tokens autoregressively. The system handles variable-length audio by padding or trimming to 30-second segments and uses FFmpeg for format normalization, enabling end-to-end transcription without language-specific model switching.
Unique: Uses a single unified Transformer encoder-decoder trained on 680,000 hours of diverse internet audio rather than language-specific models, enabling 98-language support through task-specific tokens that signal transcription vs. translation vs. language-identification without model reloading
vs alternatives: Outperforms Google Cloud Speech-to-Text and Azure Speech Services on multilingual accuracy due to larger training dataset diversity, and avoids the latency of model switching required by language-specific competitors
Translates non-English audio directly to English text by injecting a translation task token into the decoder, bypassing intermediate transcription steps. The model learns to map audio embeddings from the shared AudioEncoder directly to English token sequences, leveraging the same Transformer decoder used for transcription but with different task conditioning.
Unique: Implements translation as a task-specific decoder behavior (via special tokens) rather than a separate model, allowing the same AudioEncoder to serve both transcription and translation by conditioning the TextDecoder with a translation task token, eliminating cascading errors from intermediate transcription
vs alternatives: Faster and more accurate than cascading transcription→translation pipelines (e.g., Whisper→Google Translate) because it avoids error propagation and performs direct audio-to-English mapping in a single forward pass
Loads audio files in any format (MP3, WAV, FLAC, OGG, OPUS, M4A) using FFmpeg, resamples to 16kHz mono, and converts to log-mel spectrogram features (80 mel bins, 25ms window, 10ms stride) for model consumption. The pipeline is implemented in whisper.load_audio() and whisper.log_mel_spectrogram(), handling format normalization and feature extraction transparently.
Unique: Abstracts FFmpeg integration and mel spectrogram computation into simple functions (load_audio, log_mel_spectrogram) that handle format detection and resampling automatically, eliminating the need for users to manage FFmpeg subprocess calls or librosa configuration. Supports any FFmpeg-compatible audio format without explicit format specification.
vs alternatives: More flexible than competitors with fixed input formats (e.g., WAV-only) because FFmpeg supports 50+ formats; simpler than manual audio preprocessing because format detection is automatic
Detects the spoken language in audio by analyzing the audio embeddings from the AudioEncoder and using the TextDecoder to predict language tokens, returning the identified language code and confidence score. This leverages the same Transformer architecture used for transcription but extracts language predictions from the first decoded token without generating full transcription.
Unique: Extracts language identification as a byproduct of the decoder's first token prediction rather than using a separate classification head, making it zero-cost when combined with transcription (language already decoded) and supporting 98 languages through the same unified model
vs alternatives: More accurate than statistical language detection (e.g., langdetect, TextCat) on noisy audio because it operates on acoustic features rather than text, and faster than cascading speech-to-text→language detection because language is identified during the first decoding step
Generates precise word-level timestamps by tracking the decoder's attention patterns and token positions during autoregressive decoding, enabling frame-accurate alignment of transcribed text to audio. The system maps each decoded token to its corresponding audio frame through the attention mechanism, producing start/end timestamps for each word without requiring separate alignment models.
Unique: Derives word timestamps from the Transformer decoder's attention weights during autoregressive generation rather than using a separate forced-alignment model, eliminating the need for external tools like Montreal Forced Aligner and enabling timestamps to be generated in a single pass alongside transcription
vs alternatives: Faster than two-pass approaches (transcription + forced alignment with tools like Kaldi or MFA) and more accurate than heuristic time-stretching methods because it uses the model's learned attention patterns to map tokens to audio frames
Provides six model variants (tiny, base, small, medium, large, turbo) with explicit parameter counts, VRAM requirements, and relative speed metrics to enable developers to select the optimal model for their latency/accuracy constraints. Each model is pre-trained and available for download; the system includes English-only variants (tiny.en, base.en, small.en, medium.en) for faster inference on English-only workloads, and turbo (809M params) as a speed-optimized variant of large-v3 with minimal accuracy loss.
Unique: Provides explicit, pre-computed speed/accuracy/memory tradeoff metrics for six model sizes trained on the same 680K-hour dataset, allowing developers to make informed selection decisions without empirical benchmarking. Includes language-specific variants (*.en) that reduce parameters by ~10% for English-only use cases.
vs alternatives: More transparent than competitors (Google Cloud, Azure) which hide model size/speed tradeoffs behind opaque API tiers; enables local optimization decisions without vendor lock-in and supports edge deployment via tiny/base models that competitors don't offer
Processes audio longer than 30 seconds by automatically segmenting into overlapping 30-second windows, transcribing each segment independently, and merging results while handling segment boundaries to maintain context. The system uses the high-level transcribe() API which internally manages segmentation, padding, and result concatenation, avoiding manual segment management and enabling end-to-end processing of hour-long audio files.
Unique: Implements sliding-window segmentation transparently within the high-level transcribe() API rather than exposing it to the user, handling 30-second padding/trimming and segment merging internally. This abstracts away the complexity of manual chunking while maintaining the simplicity of a single function call for arbitrarily long audio.
vs alternatives: Simpler API than competitors requiring manual chunking (e.g., raw PyTorch inference) and more efficient than streaming approaches because it processes entire segments in parallel rather than token-by-token, enabling batch GPU utilization
Automatically detects CUDA-capable GPUs and offloads model computation to GPU, with built-in memory management that handles model loading, activation caching, and intermediate tensor allocation. The system uses PyTorch's device placement and automatic mixed precision (AMP) to optimize memory usage, enabling inference on GPUs with limited VRAM by trading compute precision for memory efficiency.
Unique: Leverages PyTorch's native CUDA integration with automatic device placement — developers specify device='cuda' and the system handles memory allocation, kernel dispatch, and synchronization without explicit CUDA code. Supports automatic mixed precision (AMP) to reduce memory footprint by ~50% with minimal accuracy loss.
vs alternatives: Simpler than competitors requiring manual CUDA kernel optimization (e.g., TensorRT) and more flexible than fixed-precision implementations because AMP adapts to available VRAM dynamically
+3 more capabilities
Routes user queries to free AI providers (Phind, Isou, KoboldAI) without requiring API keys by implementing a provider abstraction pattern that handles authentication, endpoint routing, and response parsing for each provider independently. The architecture maintains a provider registry in main.go (lines 66-80) that maps provider names to their respective HTTP clients and response handlers, enabling seamless switching between free and paid providers without code changes.
Unique: Implements a provider registry pattern that abstracts away authentication complexity for free providers, allowing users to switch providers via CLI flags without configuration files or environment variable management. Unlike ChatGPT CLI wrappers that require API keys, tgpt's architecture treats free and paid providers as first-class citizens with equal integration depth.
vs alternatives: Eliminates API key friction entirely for free providers while maintaining paid provider support, making it faster to get started than OpenAI CLI or Anthropic's Claude CLI which require upfront authentication.
Maintains conversation history across multiple interactions using a ThreadID-based context management system that stores previous messages in the Params structure (PrevMessages field). The interactive mode (-i/--interactive) implements a command-line REPL that preserves conversation state between user inputs, enabling the AI to reference earlier messages and maintain coherent multi-turn dialogue without manual context injection.
Unique: Uses a ThreadID-based context management system where previous messages are accumulated in the Params.PrevMessages array and sent with each new request, allowing providers to maintain conversation coherence. This differs from stateless CLI wrappers that require manual context injection or external conversation managers.
vs alternatives: Provides built-in conversation memory without requiring external tools like conversation managers or prompt engineering, making interactive debugging faster than ChatGPT CLI which requires manual context management.
Whisper CLI scores higher at 42/100 vs tgpt at 42/100.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
Implements a provider registry pattern where each provider (Phind, Isou, KoboldAI, OpenAI, Gemini, etc.) is registered with its own HTTP client and response handler. The architecture uses a provider abstraction layer that decouples provider-specific logic from the core CLI, enabling new providers to be added by implementing a standard interface. The implementation in main.go (lines 66-80) shows how providers are mapped to their handlers, and each provider handles authentication, request formatting, and response parsing independently.
Unique: Uses a provider registry pattern where each provider is a self-contained module with its own HTTP client and response handler, enabling providers to be added without modifying core code. This is more modular than monolithic implementations that hardcode provider logic.
vs alternatives: Provides a clean extension point for new providers compared to tools with hardcoded provider support, making it easier to add custom or internal providers without forking the project.
Supports local AI model inference via Ollama, a self-hosted model runner that allows users to run open-source models (Llama, Mistral, etc.) on their own hardware. The implementation treats Ollama as a provider in the registry, routing requests to a local Ollama instance via HTTP API. This enables offline operation and full data privacy, as all inference happens locally without sending data to external providers.
Unique: Integrates Ollama as a first-class provider in the registry, treating local inference identically to cloud providers from the user's perspective. This enables seamless switching between cloud and local models via the --provider flag without code changes.
vs alternatives: Provides offline AI inference without external dependencies, making it more private and cost-effective than cloud providers for heavy usage, though slower on CPU-only hardware.
Supports configuration through multiple channels: command-line flags (e.g., -p/--provider, -k/--api-key), environment variables (AI_PROVIDER, AI_API_KEY), and configuration files (tgpt.json). The system implements a precedence hierarchy where CLI flags override environment variables, which override config file settings. This enables flexible configuration for different use cases (single invocation, session-wide, or persistent).
Unique: Implements a three-tier configuration system (CLI flags > environment variables > config file) that enables flexible configuration for different use cases without requiring a centralized configuration management system. The system respects standard Unix conventions (environment variables, command-line flags).
vs alternatives: More flexible than single-source configuration; respects Unix conventions unlike tools with custom configuration formats.
Supports HTTP/HTTPS proxy configuration via environment variables (HTTP_PROXY, HTTPS_PROXY) or configuration files, enabling tgpt to route requests through corporate proxies or VPNs. The system integrates proxy settings into the HTTP client initialization, allowing transparent proxy support without code changes. This is essential for users in restricted network environments.
Unique: Integrates proxy support directly into the HTTP client initialization, enabling transparent proxy routing without requiring external tools or wrapper scripts. The system respects standard environment variables (HTTP_PROXY, HTTPS_PROXY) following Unix conventions.
vs alternatives: More convenient than manually configuring proxies for each provider; simpler than using separate proxy tools like tinyproxy.
Generates executable shell commands from natural language descriptions using the -s/--shell flag, which routes requests through a specialized handler that formats prompts to produce shell-safe output. The implementation includes a preprompt mechanism that instructs the AI to generate only valid shell syntax, and the output is presented to the user for review before execution, providing a safety checkpoint against malicious or incorrect command generation.
Unique: Implements a preprompt-based approach where shell-specific instructions are injected into the request to guide the AI toward generating valid, executable commands. The safety model relies on user review rather than automated validation, making it transparent but requiring user judgment.
vs alternatives: Faster than manually typing complex shell commands or searching documentation, but requires user review unlike some shell AI tools that auto-execute (which is a safety feature, not a limitation).
Generates code snippets in response to natural language requests using the -c/--code flag, which applies syntax highlighting to the output based on detected language. The implementation uses a preprompt mechanism to instruct the AI to generate code with language markers, and the output handler parses these markers to apply terminal-compatible syntax highlighting via ANSI color codes, making generated code immediately readable and copyable.
Unique: Combines preprompt-guided code generation with client-side ANSI syntax highlighting, avoiding the need for external tools like `bat` or `pygments` while keeping the implementation lightweight. The language detection is implicit in the AI's response markers rather than explicit parsing.
vs alternatives: Provides immediate syntax highlighting without piping to external tools, making it faster for quick code generation than ChatGPT CLI + manual highlighting, though less feature-rich than IDE-based code generation.
+6 more capabilities