| 0 |
| 1 |
| Ecosystem | 0 | 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Starting Price | — | $10/mo |
| Capabilities | 6 decomposed | 13 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Accepts natural language questions prefixed with @websearch in VS Code's Copilot chat interface, converts them to optimized search queries, executes searches via Tavily's search engine API, and returns ranked results with metadata. The extension acts as a chat participant that intercepts user intent, formats queries for Tavily's API, and streams results back into the chat context for further processing by the language model.
Unique: Integrates Tavily search engine directly into VS Code's Copilot chat participant system via the @websearch prefix, allowing developers to invoke web searches without leaving the editor. Uses VS Code's native chat participant API rather than a separate search UI, enabling seamless context injection into Copilot's language model responses.
vs alternatives: Tighter integration with Copilot chat than browser-based search tools, eliminating context-switching and enabling automatic result synthesis by the LLM; however, limited to Tavily as the search backend with no alternative engine support documented.
Processes raw Tavily search results and injects them as context into GitHub Copilot's language model, enabling the LLM to synthesize web-sourced information into natural language responses. The extension optionally post-processes results (controlled by websearch.useSearchResultsDirectly setting) before passing them to the LLM, allowing either raw result injection or filtered/summarized context.
Unique: Implements a lightweight RAG (Retrieval-Augmented Generation) pattern within VS Code's chat interface, allowing Copilot to augment its responses with real-time web context. The post-processing toggle (websearch.useSearchResultsDirectly) provides a choice between raw result injection and processed context, enabling different use cases without requiring extension configuration.
vs alternatives: More integrated than standalone RAG tools because it operates within Copilot's native chat context, avoiding separate API calls or context serialization; however, limited customization of synthesis behavior compared to frameworks like LangChain or LlamaIndex.
Exposes the web search capability as a reusable tool via VS Code's vscode.lm.invokeTool API, allowing other extensions and chat participants to programmatically invoke web searches and consume results. This enables extensions to compose web search into larger workflows without reimplementing search logic, using a standard tool-calling interface compatible with GitHub Copilot's function-calling patterns.
Unique: Implements the #websearch tool prefix pattern, allowing other chat participants and extensions to invoke web search as a composable building block via vscode.lm.invokeTool. This enables multi-tool workflows where web search is one step in a larger reasoning chain, following VS Code's emerging tool-calling standards for AI extensions.
vs alternatives: Provides a standardized tool interface that integrates with VS Code's native LM API, avoiding the need for extensions to implement their own Tavily integration; however, the tool schema is undocumented, making integration brittle and dependent on reverse-engineering.
Provides a single configuration setting (websearch.useSearchResultsDirectly) that controls whether search results are post-processed before injection into the language model or passed raw from Tavily. When enabled, raw results bypass any filtering or summarization; when disabled, results undergo unspecified post-processing (likely summarization or relevance filtering) before context injection.
Unique: Exposes a simple boolean toggle for result processing strategy rather than requiring extension configuration or code changes. This allows users to switch between raw and processed results without reloading the extension, enabling quick experimentation with different result quality/latency trade-offs.
vs alternatives: Simpler than framework-based RAG tools that require custom pipeline configuration, but less flexible than systems like LangChain that offer granular control over each processing step.
Manages Tavily API keys using VS Code's built-in secret storage API, which encrypts credentials and integrates with the system's credential manager (e.g., macOS Keychain, Windows Credential Manager, Linux Secret Service). On first use, the extension prompts for an API key, stores it securely, and retrieves it transparently for all subsequent Tavily API calls without requiring manual re-entry.
Unique: Leverages VS Code's native secret storage API instead of storing credentials in plaintext settings or requiring manual environment variable configuration. This provides transparent, system-level encryption without requiring users to understand credential management concepts.
vs alternatives: More secure than environment variables or plaintext settings files, and more user-friendly than manual credential management; however, less portable than API key rotation systems used by enterprise tools like HashiCorp Vault.
Provides an optional feature that automatically detects when a user's chat query would benefit from web search (e.g., questions about current events, recent API releases, or time-sensitive information) and invokes the web search tool without explicit @websearch prefix. The detection mechanism uses heuristics or LLM-based classification to identify web-relevant intent, though the specific algorithm is not documented.
Unique: Implements optional automatic intent detection that invokes web search without explicit user action, reducing friction for queries that would benefit from real-time context. This differs from explicit @websearch invocation by attempting to infer user intent from query content.
vs alternatives: More convenient than explicit tool invocation for frequent web-search users, but less predictable than explicit prefixes; comparable to ChatGPT's automatic web search feature but with undocumented detection logic.
Generates single-line and multi-line code suggestions in real-time as developers type, using semantic indexing of the entire codebase to retrieve relevant type definitions, function signatures, and contextual patterns. The system maintains a 1M token context window (Pro/Team tiers) that enables suggestions informed by distant code definitions and cross-file dependencies, constructed via local codebase semantic search rather than simple token-based recency. Suggestions adapt to detected coding style on Pro/Team tiers through implicit pattern learning from recent edits.
Unique: 1M token context window with codebase-wide semantic indexing enables suggestions informed by distant code definitions and cross-file patterns, versus competitors (Copilot, Tabnine) that typically use fixed context windows (4K-32K tokens) or file-local context. Claimed 250ms latency suggests optimized retrieval pipeline, though indexing mechanism and performance at scale remain undisclosed.
vs alternatives: Larger context window than GitHub Copilot (8K-32K tokens) and faster latency than unnamed competitors (250ms vs 783ms claimed), enabling suggestions on large codebases with minimal typing delay; trade-off is cloud dependency and undisclosed free tier limitations.
Provides a separate chat interface supporting multiple LLM backends (GPT-4o, Claude 3.5 Sonnet, GPT-4, others) for conversational code assistance. Users attach files, reference recent edits, and trigger compiler diagnostic uploads; the system generates diffs and applies code changes directly to the editor. Model selection is per-conversation, and $5/month in credits (included in Pro/Team) covers external model API costs; overage pricing is undisclosed. Hotkey-driven workflow enables rapid context switching between inline completion and chat.
Unique: Multi-model chat interface with per-conversation model selection and integrated diff application, combined with compiler diagnostic auto-upload. Unlike Copilot Chat (single model per tier) or standalone ChatGPT, Supermaven Chat unifies multiple LLM backends in a single hotkey-driven workflow with direct editor integration for change application.
Supermaven scores higher at 71/100 vs Web Search for Copilot at 35/100. Web Search for Copilot leads on ecosystem, while Supermaven is stronger on adoption and quality.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
vs alternatives: Supports multiple LLM backends (GPT-4o, Claude 3.5 Sonnet) in one interface with included credits, whereas GitHub Copilot Chat is single-model per tier and requires separate ChatGPT subscription for model switching; trade-off is credit limits and unknown overage pricing.
Supermaven Chat can automatically upload compiler diagnostic messages (errors, warnings) alongside code context to provide error-aware suggestions and fixes. The mechanism is described as 'automatically uploading your code together with compiler diagnostic messages,' but specific language/compiler support and the upload trigger mechanism are undisclosed. This feature is Chat-only and not available in inline completion.
Unique: Automatic compiler diagnostic upload in Chat for error-aware suggestions, versus competitors (Copilot, Tabnine) that require manual error context or have limited diagnostic integration. Supermaven's approach reduces friction but with undisclosed language/compiler support.
vs alternatives: Automatic diagnostic upload reduces manual context-gathering compared to manual copy-paste; trade-off is undisclosed language support and unclear upload trigger mechanism.
Supermaven offers a 30-day free trial of the Pro tier ($10/month), providing full access to 1M token context window, largest model, style adaptation, and $5/month chat credits. No credit card is required to start the trial (implied), and trial conversion to paid is automatic after 30 days unless cancelled. Trial terms and auto-renewal policy are not explicitly detailed.
Unique: 30-day free trial of Pro tier with full feature access (1M context, largest model, chat credits), versus competitors (Copilot 2-month free trial, Tabnine free tier only) with different trial lengths and feature access. Supermaven's approach is generous but with undisclosed auto-renewal terms.
vs alternatives: Full Pro feature access during trial compared to limited free tier; trade-off is undisclosed auto-renewal policy and potential unexpected charges if not cancelled.
Supermaven requires internet connectivity and server-side inference; no offline mode or local inference capability is mentioned or available. All code completion requests are sent to Supermaven's backend servers for processing, and responses are returned over the network. This creates a hard dependency on network connectivity and Supermaven's service availability; if the service is down or network is unavailable, code completion is not available.
Unique: Supermaven has no offline mode or local inference capability; all processing is server-side. GitHub Copilot also requires server-side inference, but Tabnine offers local inference options for some use cases. Supermaven's lack of offline capability is a significant limitation for developers with connectivity constraints.
vs alternatives: Supermaven's server-side-only approach is comparable to GitHub Copilot; Tabnine offers local inference options, making Tabnine more suitable for offline work. Supermaven's lack of offline capability is a weakness vs. Tabnine.
Analyzes recent code edits and inferred coding patterns to adapt inline suggestions to match team conventions, naming patterns, and structural preferences. The mechanism is implicit (not explicit fine-tuning) and operates only on Pro/Team tiers, suggesting pattern learning from editor activity rather than explicit configuration. Free tier uses a single base model without personalization.
Unique: Implicit style adaptation via editor activity analysis without explicit configuration, versus competitors (Copilot, Tabnine) that require manual style guides or explicit fine-tuning. Supermaven's approach is transparent to the user but also non-configurable and undisclosed in mechanism.
vs alternatives: Requires no manual style configuration compared to tools requiring explicit style guides; trade-off is lack of transparency and inability to control or export learned styles.
Delivers code suggestions to the editor inline as the developer types, with a claimed baseline latency of 250ms from keystroke to suggestion display. The system uses a cloud inference backend and local editor plugin to minimize round-trip time. Latency claim is positioned against an unnamed competitor (783ms), but methodology is undisclosed and no independent verification is provided.
Unique: Claimed 250ms latency via optimized cloud inference pipeline and editor plugin architecture, versus competitors with higher latency (783ms unnamed baseline). Actual differentiation is undisclosed; mechanism may involve request batching, model quantization, or edge caching, but specifics are not public.
vs alternatives: Faster than unnamed competitor (250ms vs 783ms claimed); trade-off is cloud dependency and unverified latency claim with no SLA or performance guarantee.
Provides native editor extensions for VS Code, JetBrains IDEs (IntelliJ IDEA, PyCharm, WebStorm, etc.), and Neovim, enabling inline suggestion rendering, hotkey-driven chat access, and compiler diagnostic integration directly within the editor. Each plugin variant is maintained separately and integrates with the editor's native autocomplete UI, keybinding system, and file context APIs.
Unique: Native plugins for three major editor ecosystems (VS Code, JetBrains, Neovim) with integrated chat and diff application, versus competitors (Copilot, Tabnine) that support broader editor ecosystems but with less deep integration in some cases. Supermaven's approach prioritizes depth over breadth.
vs alternatives: Deep integration with VS Code and JetBrains (native autocomplete UI, hotkey system) compared to web-based tools or lighter integrations; trade-off is limited editor support (no Sublime, Vim, Emacs) and undisclosed Neovim support details.
+5 more capabilities