Valohai vs trigger.dev
Side-by-side comparison to help you choose.
| Feature | Valohai | trigger.dev |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Platform | MCP Server |
| UnfragileRank | 43/100 | 45/100 |
| Adoption | 1 | 0 |
| Quality | 0 | 0 |
| Ecosystem |
| 0 |
| 1 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Capabilities | 11 decomposed | 14 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Valohai stores ML pipeline definitions and code in Git repositories, automatically tracking complete lineage of experiments including code commits, data versions, parameters, and outputs. The platform integrates with Git workflows to version control pipeline configurations alongside application code, enabling reproducibility by linking each experiment run to specific code commits and dataset versions. This approach eliminates manual experiment logging by capturing the full computational graph at execution time.
Unique: Automatically captures complete experiment lineage by linking Git commits, data versions, and parameters at execution time rather than requiring manual logging; integrates version control as the primary source of truth for pipeline definitions and code
vs alternatives: Stronger reproducibility than MLflow or Weights & Biases because lineage is enforced through Git rather than optional logging, and pipeline code is version-controlled alongside experiments rather than stored separately
Valohai abstracts compute infrastructure through a unified orchestration layer that deploys pipelines to Kubernetes, Slurm HPC clusters, virtual machines, or on-premises data centers without code changes. The platform handles resource allocation, job scheduling, and auto-scaling across heterogeneous infrastructure, allowing teams to run the same pipeline definition on AWS, Azure, GCP, or hybrid environments. This abstraction is achieved through a container-based execution model where pipelines are packaged as Docker containers and submitted to the target infrastructure via Valohai's orchestration API.
Unique: Provides unified orchestration across Kubernetes, Slurm HPC, VMs, and on-premises infrastructure through a single pipeline definition language, eliminating the need to learn infrastructure-specific APIs or rewrite pipelines for different compute targets
vs alternatives: More infrastructure-agnostic than Kubeflow (Kubernetes-only) or cloud-native services (AWS SageMaker, Azure ML); supports HPC clusters and on-premises data centers that other platforms ignore
Valohai claims to support deploying models for 'batch and real-time inference' but provides no technical documentation on how inference is served, what frameworks are supported, or how models are exposed as APIs. The platform likely packages trained models as containers and deploys them to the same infrastructure (Kubernetes, VMs, Slurm) used for training, but inference serving details including latency, scaling behavior, and API specifications are entirely undocumented. This capability exists but is not production-ready for teams requiring detailed inference specifications.
Unique: Attempts to provide unified training and inference deployment within a single platform, but implementation is undocumented and appears to be a secondary feature compared to experiment tracking and pipeline orchestration
vs alternatives: Unknown — insufficient documentation to compare against specialized inference platforms (SageMaker, Seldon, KServe); likely weaker than dedicated inference serving platforms due to lack of optimization and monitoring features
Valohai automatically captures experiment metadata including metrics, parameters, hyperparameters, and outputs without explicit logging code. The platform provides a web UI for comparing metrics across multiple runs, visualizing performance trends, and querying experiments by tags or parameters. Metrics are stored in a structured format (implementation details undocumented) and indexed for fast retrieval, enabling teams to identify the best-performing model configurations without manual spreadsheet management.
Unique: Automatically captures experiment metadata without explicit logging code by instrumenting pipeline execution; provides built-in metrics comparison UI rather than requiring external tools like TensorBoard or Weights & Biases
vs alternatives: Lower friction than MLflow or Weights & Biases because metrics are captured automatically at execution time; tighter integration with pipeline orchestration means no separate experiment tracking setup required
Valohai implements data versioning that avoids storing duplicate copies of datasets by using content-addressable storage or similar deduplication techniques (implementation details undocumented). Teams can tag and query datasets by version, enabling reproducible experiments that reference specific data versions. The platform tracks data lineage through pipelines, showing which datasets were used in which experiments and how data transformations flowed through the pipeline.
Unique: Implements data versioning without duplication through content-addressable or deduplication mechanisms, avoiding the storage bloat of naive versioning systems; integrates data versioning directly into pipeline execution rather than as a separate tool
vs alternatives: More storage-efficient than DVC or Delta Lake for large datasets because deduplication is built-in; tighter integration with experiment tracking means data versions are automatically linked to experiments without manual configuration
Valohai provides a Python SDK that abstracts input/output handling, allowing pipelines to read datasets and write models without hardcoding file paths. The SDK exposes `valohai.inputs()` and `valohai.outputs()` functions that resolve to the correct storage location based on pipeline configuration, enabling the same code to run on different infrastructure (Kubernetes, Slurm, VMs) without modification. This abstraction supports any Python framework (TensorFlow, PyTorch, scikit-learn) and any external library, making Valohai framework-agnostic.
Unique: Provides a minimal SDK that abstracts I/O and parameter passing without enforcing a specific framework or execution model, allowing teams to use any Python library while maintaining portability across infrastructure
vs alternatives: More lightweight than Ray or Airflow because it doesn't require learning a new execution model or DAG syntax; more framework-agnostic than Kubeflow which assumes Kubernetes and TensorFlow
Valohai provides real-time monitoring of compute costs and resource utilization, alerting teams when infrastructure is underutilized (e.g., GPU idle time, unused VM instances). The platform tracks costs across multi-cloud environments and provides visibility into which experiments or pipelines consume the most resources. Cost data is aggregated and presented in a dashboard, enabling teams to optimize spending without manual log analysis.
Unique: Integrates cost tracking directly into the MLOps platform rather than requiring separate FinOps tools; provides underutilization alerts specific to ML workloads (GPU idle time) rather than generic cloud monitoring
vs alternatives: More ML-specific than generic cloud cost tools (CloudHealth, Flexera) because it understands experiment lifecycle and can attribute costs to specific training runs; built-in rather than requiring external integration
Valohai provides a Model Hub for tracking and versioning trained models, enabling teams to organize models by project, version, and metadata. The platform supports model handoff between team members by providing a centralized registry where models can be tagged, documented, and promoted through environments (development, staging, production). Model versions are linked to the experiments that produced them, maintaining full traceability from training to deployment.
Unique: Integrates model versioning directly with experiment tracking, automatically linking models to the experiments that produced them; provides team handoff workflows within the MLOps platform rather than requiring external model registries
vs alternatives: Tighter integration with experiment tracking than MLflow Model Registry because models are automatically versioned with their source experiments; less documented than Hugging Face Model Hub but designed for private enterprise use
+3 more capabilities
Trigger.dev provides a TypeScript SDK that allows developers to define long-running tasks as first-class functions with built-in type safety, retry policies, and concurrency controls. Tasks are defined using a fluent API that compiles to a task registry, enabling the framework to understand task signatures, dependencies, and execution requirements at build time rather than runtime. The SDK integrates with the build system to generate type definitions and validate task invocations across the codebase.
Unique: Uses a monorepo-based build system (Turborepo) with a custom build extension system that compiles task definitions at build time, generating type-safe task registries and enabling static analysis of task dependencies and signatures before runtime execution
vs alternatives: Provides stronger compile-time guarantees than Bull or RabbitMQ-based job queues by validating task signatures and dependencies during the build phase rather than discovering errors at runtime
Trigger.dev's Run Engine implements a state machine-based execution model where long-running tasks can be paused at checkpoint points, serialized to snapshots, and resumed from the exact point of interruption. The engine uses a Checkpoint System that captures the execution context (local variables, call stack state) and persists it to the database, enabling tasks to survive infrastructure failures, worker crashes, or intentional pauses without losing progress. Execution snapshots are stored in a versioned format that supports resuming across code changes.
Unique: Implements a sophisticated checkpoint system that captures not just task state but the full execution context (call stack, local variables) and stores it as versioned snapshots, enabling resumption from arbitrary points in task execution rather than just at predefined boundaries
vs alternatives: More granular than Temporal or Durable Functions because it can checkpoint at any point in execution (not just at activity boundaries), reducing the amount of work that must be retried after a failure
trigger.dev scores higher at 45/100 vs Valohai at 43/100. Valohai leads on adoption, while trigger.dev is stronger on quality and ecosystem.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
Trigger.dev integrates OpenTelemetry for distributed tracing, capturing detailed execution timelines, span data, and performance metrics across task execution. The Observability and Tracing system automatically instruments task execution, worker communication, and database operations, generating traces that can be exported to OpenTelemetry-compatible backends (Jaeger, Datadog, etc.). Traces include task start/end times, checkpoint operations, waitpoint resolutions, and error details, enabling end-to-end visibility into task execution.
Unique: Automatically instruments task execution, checkpoint operations, and waitpoint resolutions without requiring explicit tracing code; integrates with OpenTelemetry standard, enabling export to any compatible backend
vs alternatives: More comprehensive than application-level logging because it captures infrastructure-level operations (worker communication, queue operations); more standard than custom tracing because it uses OpenTelemetry, enabling integration with existing observability tools
Trigger.dev implements a TTL (Time-To-Live) System that automatically expires and cleans up old task runs based on configurable retention policies. The TTL System periodically scans the database for runs that have exceeded their TTL, marks them as expired, and removes associated data (logs, traces, snapshots). This prevents the database from growing unbounded and ensures that sensitive data is automatically deleted after a retention period.
Unique: Implements automatic TTL-based cleanup that removes not just run records but associated data (snapshots, logs, traces), preventing database bloat without requiring manual intervention
vs alternatives: More comprehensive than simple record deletion because it cleans up all associated data; more efficient than manual cleanup because it's automated and scheduled
Trigger.dev provides a CLI tool that enables local development and testing of tasks without deploying to the cloud. The CLI starts a local coordinator and worker, allowing developers to trigger tasks from their machine and see execution logs in real-time. The CLI integrates with the build system to automatically recompile tasks when code changes, enabling fast iteration. Local execution uses the same execution engine as production, ensuring that local behavior matches production behavior.
Unique: Uses the same execution engine for local and production execution, ensuring that local behavior matches production; integrates with the build system for automatic recompilation on code changes
vs alternatives: More accurate than mocking-based testing because it uses the real execution engine; faster than cloud-based testing because execution happens locally without network latency
Trigger.dev provides Lifecycle Hooks that allow developers to define initialization and cleanup logic that runs before and after task execution. Hooks are defined declaratively at task definition time and are executed by the Run Engine before task code runs (onStart) and after task code completes (onSuccess, onFailure). Hooks can access task context, perform setup operations (e.g., database connections), and cleanup resources (e.g., close connections, delete temporary files).
Unique: Provides declarative lifecycle hooks that are executed by the Run Engine, enabling resource initialization and cleanup without requiring explicit code in task functions; hooks have access to task context and can perform setup/teardown operations
vs alternatives: More reliable than try-finally blocks because hooks are guaranteed to execute even if task code throws exceptions; more flexible than constructor/destructor patterns because hooks can be defined separately from task code
Trigger.dev provides a Waitpoint System that allows tasks to pause execution and wait for external events, webhooks, or other task completions without consuming worker resources. Waitpoints are lightweight synchronization primitives that register a task as waiting for a specific condition, then resume execution when that condition is met. The system uses Redis for fast condition checking and the database for persistent waitpoint state, enabling tasks to wait for hours or days without blocking worker threads.
Unique: Decouples task execution from resource consumption by using a lightweight waitpoint registry that doesn't block worker threads; tasks can wait indefinitely without holding connections or memory, with condition resolution handled asynchronously by the coordinator
vs alternatives: More efficient than traditional job queue polling because waitpoints are event-driven rather than time-based; tasks resume immediately when conditions are met rather than waiting for the next poll cycle
Trigger.dev abstracts worker deployment across multiple infrastructure providers (Docker, Kubernetes, serverless) through a Provider Architecture that implements a common interface for worker lifecycle management. The framework includes Docker Provider and Kubernetes Provider implementations that handle worker provisioning, scaling, and health monitoring. The coordinator service manages worker registration, task assignment, and failure recovery across all providers using a unified queue and dequeue system.
Unique: Implements a pluggable provider interface that abstracts infrastructure differences, allowing the same task definitions to run on Docker, Kubernetes, or serverless platforms with provider-specific optimizations (e.g., Kubernetes label-based worker selection, Docker resource constraints)
vs alternatives: More flexible than platform-specific solutions like AWS Step Functions because providers can be swapped or combined without code changes; more integrated than generic container orchestration because it understands task semantics and can optimize scheduling
+6 more capabilities