| 0 |
| 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Paid | Free |
| Capabilities | 7 decomposed | 9 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Enables users to compose, schedule, and publish content across Twitter/X with timing optimization and multi-account management. Works by integrating with Twitter's API v2 to queue posts, manage scheduling windows, and coordinate publication across multiple connected accounts with built-in analytics on post performance and engagement timing.
Unique: Integrates with Twitter API v2 for native scheduling with account-level granularity, allowing simultaneous management of multiple verified accounts with per-account analytics and timing optimization based on historical engagement patterns
vs alternatives: Provides tighter Twitter-native integration than generic social schedulers like Buffer or Hootsuite, with direct API access enabling real-time performance feedback and account-specific optimization
Tracks mentions, replies, and interactions on posted content in real-time using Twitter's streaming API or polling mechanisms. Delivers notifications to users when engagement thresholds are met (e.g., 100+ likes, specific user mentions) and aggregates engagement data into dashboards showing reply sentiment, share patterns, and audience growth metrics.
Unique: Uses Twitter API v2 streaming endpoints with configurable engagement thresholds and multi-channel notification delivery (email, webhooks, in-app), enabling real-time alerting without polling overhead
vs alternatives: Lower latency than batch-polling solutions like TweetDeck; more flexible notification routing than Twitter's native notification system
Aggregates historical performance data for published tweets including impressions, engagement rate, click-through rate, and audience demographics. Correlates post characteristics (length, hashtag count, media type, posting time) with performance metrics to identify patterns and generate recommendations for content optimization using statistical analysis or basic ML models.
Unique: Correlates post metadata with engagement metrics using statistical regression or clustering to identify content patterns, then generates actionable recommendations ranked by expected impact on future performance
vs alternatives: More granular than Twitter's native analytics dashboard; provides predictive recommendations rather than just historical reporting
Segments followers based on engagement patterns, demographics, and interaction history to enable targeted content distribution. Uses clustering algorithms or rule-based segmentation to group audiences by characteristics (e.g., 'highly engaged technical audience', 'lurkers', 'international followers') and allows scheduling different content variants for different segments or identifying which segments drive highest ROI.
Unique: Applies unsupervised clustering (k-means, hierarchical clustering) to follower engagement patterns and inferred demographics to create dynamic audience segments with automatic re-clustering and segment drift detection
vs alternatives: Enables audience-level personalization without requiring manual list management; more sophisticated than Twitter Lists which are static and manual
Provides tools to compose, organize, and publish multi-tweet threads with automatic numbering, formatting, and sequential posting. Allows users to draft thread structure, preview how threads will appear to followers, and manage thread replies/engagement as a cohesive unit rather than individual tweets. Supports scheduling entire threads with staggered posting times to maximize visibility.
Unique: Provides visual thread composition interface with automatic numbering, staggered scheduling, and thread-level engagement tracking, treating threads as first-class objects rather than collections of individual tweets
vs alternatives: More intuitive than manual thread creation; enables staggered posting for better reach compared to posting entire thread at once
Aggregates content from followed accounts, lists, and search queries into a unified feed with filtering, sorting, and prioritization capabilities. Allows users to create custom feeds based on topics, keywords, or account lists, and surfaces high-engagement content or trending topics within their network. Integrates with content discovery algorithms to surface relevant content users might have missed.
Unique: Combines Twitter's search and timeline APIs with custom ranking algorithms to create topic-specific feeds with engagement-based prioritization and trending topic detection within user's network
vs alternatives: More flexible than Twitter's native lists; enables semantic filtering and engagement-based ranking vs chronological-only feed
Enables creation of automation rules that trigger responses to specific types of interactions (mentions, replies, follows) with templated or AI-generated responses. Uses rule engines to match incoming interactions against patterns (keywords, user attributes, engagement level) and automatically post replies, retweets, or direct messages. Supports conditional logic and escalation (e.g., flag high-value mentions for manual review).
Unique: Implements rule-based automation engine with pattern matching on interaction metadata (keywords, user attributes, engagement level) and conditional escalation logic, enabling selective automation with human oversight
vs alternatives: More flexible than Twitter's native automation (which is limited); enables conditional logic and escalation vs simple templated responses
Executes SQL queries against Supabase PostgreSQL instances through the Model Context Protocol, translating natural language or structured query requests into parameterized SQL statements. Uses MCP's tool-calling interface to expose database operations as callable functions with schema validation, enabling LLM agents to perform CRUD operations, joins, and aggregations with automatic connection pooling and credential management through Supabase client SDK.
Unique: Exposes Supabase PostgreSQL as MCP tools with automatic credential injection from Supabase client SDK, eliminating manual connection string management and enabling seamless LLM-to-database queries within Claude or compatible agents
vs alternatives: Tighter integration than generic SQL MCP servers because it leverages Supabase's built-in authentication and connection pooling rather than requiring separate database credential configuration
Exposes Supabase Auth session state and user metadata through MCP tools, allowing agents to inspect current authentication context, retrieve user profiles, and trigger auth-related operations. Integrates with Supabase's JWT-based auth system to validate sessions and access user claims without re-authenticating, using the Supabase client's built-in session management.
Unique: Integrates Supabase's JWT-based auth system directly into MCP tool interface, allowing agents to inspect and act on auth state without managing separate credential stores or re-authentication flows
vs alternatives: More seamless than generic auth MCP servers because it leverages Supabase's built-in session management and avoids redundant credential passing between agent and auth system
Invokes Supabase Edge Functions (serverless TypeScript/JavaScript functions) through MCP tools, passing parameters and receiving results with optional streaming support. Uses Supabase's edge function HTTP API to trigger functions with automatic authentication headers and response parsing, enabling agents to execute custom business logic without embedding it in the agent itself.
Supabase scores higher at 42/100 vs Twitter at 19/100. Supabase also has a free tier, making it more accessible.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
Unique: Exposes Supabase Edge Functions as MCP tools with automatic authentication and response parsing, allowing agents to invoke custom serverless logic without managing HTTP clients or credential injection
vs alternatives: More integrated than generic HTTP MCP tools because it handles Supabase-specific authentication, error handling, and response formatting automatically
Subscribes to real-time changes on Supabase tables through MCP's event streaming interface, using Supabase's PostgreSQL LISTEN/NOTIFY mechanism to push INSERT, UPDATE, and DELETE events to agents. Maintains persistent WebSocket connections and filters events by table and row-level policies, enabling agents to react to database changes without polling.
Unique: Bridges Supabase's PostgreSQL LISTEN/NOTIFY real-time system with MCP's tool interface, enabling agents to subscribe to database changes without managing WebSocket connections or event serialization
vs alternatives: More efficient than polling-based approaches because it uses Supabase's native real-time infrastructure rather than repeated database queries
Manages files in Supabase Storage buckets through MCP tools, supporting upload, download, list, and delete operations with automatic authentication and path-based access control. Uses Supabase's S3-compatible storage API with built-in support for public/private buckets and signed URLs for temporary access, enabling agents to handle file I/O without managing cloud storage credentials.
Unique: Exposes Supabase Storage's S3-compatible API as MCP tools with automatic authentication and signed URL generation, eliminating the need for agents to manage cloud storage credentials or generate temporary access tokens
vs alternatives: More integrated than generic S3 MCP tools because it leverages Supabase's built-in bucket policies and authentication rather than requiring separate AWS credentials
Performs semantic similarity searches on vector embeddings stored in Supabase PostgreSQL using pgvector extension, translating natural language queries into embedding vectors and executing cosine/L2 distance searches. Integrates with embedding providers (OpenAI, Cohere) or uses pre-computed embeddings, enabling agents to retrieve semantically similar documents or records without full-text search limitations.
Unique: Integrates pgvector directly into MCP tools with automatic embedding generation and distance calculation, enabling agents to perform semantic search without managing separate vector database infrastructure
vs alternatives: More efficient than external vector databases (Pinecone, Weaviate) for Supabase users because it colocates embeddings with relational data, reducing network latency and simplifying data synchronization
Exposes Supabase database schema information through MCP tools, allowing agents to discover table structures, column types, constraints, and relationships without manual schema documentation. Queries PostgreSQL information_schema and Supabase metadata tables to dynamically generate schema descriptions, enabling agents to construct valid queries and understand data relationships.
Unique: Queries Supabase's PostgreSQL information_schema directly through MCP tools, enabling agents to dynamically discover and adapt to database schemas without pre-configured schema definitions
vs alternatives: More flexible than static schema definitions because it reflects live database state, including recent migrations or schema changes
Enforces Supabase Row-Level Security policies within agent queries, ensuring that agents can only access rows permitted by RLS rules defined in the database. Evaluates policies based on authenticated user context (JWT claims, user ID) and applies WHERE clause filters automatically, preventing unauthorized data access at the database layer rather than application layer.
Unique: Delegates authorization enforcement to PostgreSQL RLS policies rather than implementing authorization in agent code, ensuring that data access rules are centralized and cannot be bypassed by agent logic
vs alternatives: More secure than application-level authorization because RLS is enforced at the database layer, preventing accidental data leaks even if agent code has bugs
+1 more capabilities