| Ecosystem | 0 | 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Free | Paid |
| Capabilities | 15 decomposed | 14 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Enables developers to define long-running background tasks as TypeScript functions with built-in type safety, automatic serialization, and declarative scheduling (cron, delays, intervals). Uses a decorator-based or function-wrapper pattern that captures task metadata at definition time and integrates with the SDK's task registry, allowing IDE autocomplete and compile-time validation of task parameters and return types.
Unique: Combines TypeScript's type system with task definition via a decorator/wrapper pattern that captures metadata at definition time, enabling compile-time validation of task parameters and return types — unlike Bull or RabbitMQ which require runtime schema validation or manual type guards.
vs alternatives: Provides full end-to-end type safety from task definition through invocation, whereas Celery (Python) and Bull (Node.js) require separate schema definitions or runtime validation.
Executes tasks across distributed workers with built-in retry logic, exponential backoff, and configurable failure policies. The Run Engine (internal-packages/run-engine) implements a state machine that tracks task execution attempts, persists retry state to the database, and coordinates dequeue/execution flow across multiple worker instances using distributed locking and queue management systems to prevent duplicate execution.
Unique: Implements a state machine-based retry system (via Run Engine's runAttemptSystem and dequeueSystem) that persists retry state to the database and uses distributed locking to prevent duplicate execution across workers, rather than in-memory retry queues like Bull which lose state on process restart.
vs alternatives: Provides database-backed retry durability and distributed coordination, making it more reliable than Bull for multi-worker setups, while offering simpler configuration than Temporal or Cadence.
Automatically expires and cleans up old task execution records based on configurable TTL (time-to-live) policies. Implemented via the ttlSystem in the Run Engine, which periodically scans for expired runs and deletes their associated records (logs, snapshots, attempts) from the database. Prevents unbounded database growth while maintaining configurable retention periods for compliance or debugging.
Unique: Implements automatic TTL-based cleanup via the ttlSystem with configurable retention policies per environment, preventing unbounded database growth — unlike traditional job queues that require manual log rotation or external cleanup jobs.
vs alternatives: Provides built-in automatic cleanup comparable to managed services like AWS SQS, without requiring external log management tools.
Provides a type-safe SDK for invoking tasks from application code, with automatic parameter serialization and validation. The SDK generates type definitions from task definitions, enabling IDE autocomplete and compile-time type checking when invoking tasks. Supports both immediate invocation and scheduled invocation with delay/cron parameters.
Unique: Generates type-safe SDK methods from task definitions, enabling compile-time validation of task invocation parameters and IDE autocomplete — unlike REST API approaches that require manual type guards or schema validation.
vs alternatives: Provides better developer experience than REST APIs with full type safety, comparable to Temporal's TypeScript SDK but simpler to set up.
Supports lifecycle hooks (onStart, onSuccess, onFailure, onCompletion) that execute at specific points in a task's execution lifecycle. Hooks are defined at task definition time and executed by the Run Engine with access to task context and execution results. Enables common patterns like resource cleanup, notification sending, and metrics recording without cluttering task code.
Unique: Implements task lifecycle hooks (onStart, onSuccess, onFailure, onCompletion) that execute at specific points in the Run Engine's state machine, enabling cross-cutting concerns without task code modification — unlike traditional job queues that require manual event handling.
vs alternatives: Provides simpler lifecycle management than Temporal's activity lifecycle, with hooks executed directly by the engine rather than requiring separate activity implementations.
Supports build extensions that customize how tasks are bundled and compiled before deployment. Extensions can modify the build process (e.g., add custom webpack loaders, tree-shake dependencies, inline assets) and are executed during the build phase before workers are deployed. Enables optimization for specific use cases (e.g., minimizing bundle size for Lambda, including native modules for GPU tasks).
Unique: Implements a pluggable build extension system that customizes task bundling and compilation, allowing environment-specific optimizations (e.g., GPU support, bundle size reduction) without modifying core task code — unlike traditional job queues that use fixed bundling strategies.
vs alternatives: Provides more flexibility than Temporal's build system, allowing arbitrary build customization for specialized deployment scenarios.
Trigger.dev uses ClickHouse as an analytics database to store and query task execution metrics, enabling high-performance analytics on large volumes of task data. The system exports task execution events (duration, status, retry count, etc.) to ClickHouse, allowing users to query execution patterns, identify performance bottlenecks, and generate reports. ClickHouse's columnar storage and compression enable efficient queries over billions of task runs.
Unique: Exports task execution events to ClickHouse for high-performance analytics, enabling efficient queries over billions of task runs without impacting operational database performance. ClickHouse's columnar storage and compression enable sub-second queries on large datasets.
vs alternatives: More scalable than querying PostgreSQL directly because ClickHouse is optimized for analytical queries, and more flexible than pre-aggregated metrics because raw events are stored and can be queried ad-hoc
Allows tasks to pause execution at checkpoints, persist their state to the database, and resume from that exact point without re-executing prior steps. Implemented via the checkpointSystem in the Run Engine, which serializes task execution context (variables, call stack state) into execution snapshots stored in the database, enabling tasks to survive worker crashes or be paused indefinitely and resumed later.
Unique: Implements a checkpoint/resume system via execution snapshots that serialize the entire task execution context (not just input/output) to the database, enabling true mid-execution pause and resume — unlike traditional job queues that only support task-level retries.
vs alternatives: Provides finer-grained execution control than Temporal (which checkpoints at activity boundaries) by allowing checkpoints at arbitrary code points, while being simpler to implement than Durable Functions.
+7 more capabilities
Automatically loads and parses documents from diverse sources (PDFs, Word docs, HTML, Markdown, code files, databases) into a unified in-memory representation using format-specific loaders and node-based document abstractions. Each document is decomposed into Document objects containing metadata, content, and relationships, enabling downstream processing without format-specific handling in application code.
Unique: Provides a unified loader abstraction (BaseReader interface) that normalizes 100+ data source connectors into a single Document/Node API, eliminating format-specific branching logic in application code. Loaders are composable and chainable, allowing sequential transformations (e.g., load → split → extract metadata → embed).
vs alternatives: Broader out-of-the-box loader coverage than LangChain's document loaders and more structured node-based decomposition than raw text splitting, reducing boilerplate for multi-source RAG pipelines.
Splits documents into semantically coherent chunks using multiple strategies (character-based, token-aware, recursive, semantic) with configurable overlap and chunk size. Preserves document hierarchy and metadata through a node tree structure, enabling retrieval systems to maintain context relationships and enable hierarchical re-ranking or parent-document retrieval patterns.
Unique: Implements a node-tree abstraction that preserves document hierarchy and enables parent-document retrieval patterns. Supports multiple splitting strategies (recursive, semantic, code-aware) with pluggable custom splitters, and automatically propagates metadata through the node tree.
vs alternatives: More sophisticated than LangChain's text splitters because it preserves hierarchical relationships and supports semantic splitting; better for complex document structures than simple character-based splitting.
Trigger.dev scores higher at 58/100 vs LlamaIndex at 40/100. Trigger.dev also has a free tier, making it more accessible.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
Processes documents containing mixed content (text, images, tables, code) by extracting and understanding each modality separately, then synthesizing information across modalities. Uses vision models for image understanding, specialized parsers for tables and code, and integrates results into a unified document representation for retrieval and generation.
Unique: Integrates vision models, table parsers, and code extractors into a unified multi-modal document processing pipeline that synthesizes information across modalities. Preserves modality-specific structure (table schemas, code formatting) while enabling cross-modal retrieval and generation.
vs alternatives: More comprehensive multi-modal support than text-only RAG; built-in vision integration reduces boilerplate for document understanding compared to manual vision API calls.
Enables streaming of LLM responses token-by-token and real-time retrieval updates, allowing applications to display partial results as they become available. Supports streaming from retrieval (progressive document discovery) and generation (token-by-token output) with backpressure handling and cancellation support for responsive user experiences.
Unique: Provides first-class streaming support for both retrieval and generation with automatic backpressure handling and cancellation. Enables progressive result display without custom async/streaming code in application layer.
vs alternatives: More integrated streaming support than manual LLM API streaming; built-in retrieval streaming and backpressure handling reduce complexity compared to custom streaming implementations.
Tracks API costs for LLM calls, embeddings, and other operations with per-query and per-session cost attribution. Provides cost optimization recommendations (e.g., batch processing, model selection, caching) and enables cost-aware query planning to balance quality and expense. Integrates with multiple LLM providers to normalize cost tracking across models.
Unique: Provides automatic cost tracking across multiple LLM providers with per-query attribution and cost optimization recommendations. Integrates with query execution to enable cost-aware planning without manual cost calculation.
vs alternatives: More integrated cost tracking than manual API billing review; built-in optimization recommendations reduce guesswork for cost reduction.
Enables building custom RAG pipelines by composing modular components (retrievers, synthesizers, agents, tools) through a declarative or programmatic API. Supports complex workflows with branching, loops, and conditional logic, with automatic dependency resolution and execution optimization. Pipelines are reusable, testable, and can be deployed as APIs or batch jobs.
Unique: Provides a flexible pipeline composition API supporting both declarative and programmatic definitions, with automatic dependency resolution and execution optimization. Enables complex workflows with branching and conditional logic without custom orchestration code.
vs alternatives: More flexible pipeline composition than fixed RAG architectures; better workflow support than manual component chaining.
Generates embeddings for documents/nodes using pluggable embedding providers (OpenAI, Hugging Face, local models) and stores them in a unified vector store interface that abstracts over multiple backends (Pinecone, Weaviate, Milvus, FAISS, Chroma, etc.). The abstraction layer enables switching vector stores without changing application code, and handles batching, retry logic, and metadata indexing.
Unique: Provides a unified VectorStore interface that abstracts 10+ vector database backends, enabling zero-code switching between providers. Handles embedding batching, retry logic, and metadata propagation automatically. Supports both cloud and local embedding models through a pluggable EmbedModel interface.
vs alternatives: Broader vector store coverage and more seamless provider switching than LangChain's vectorstore integrations; better abstraction consistency across backends than using raw vector store SDKs directly.
Retrieves semantically similar documents from vector stores using embedding-based similarity search, with optional re-ranking, filtering, and fusion strategies (hybrid search combining dense and sparse retrieval). Supports multiple retrieval modes (similarity, MMR, fusion) and enables custom retrieval logic through a pluggable Retriever interface that can combine multiple strategies.
Unique: Implements a pluggable Retriever abstraction supporting multiple retrieval strategies (similarity, MMR, fusion, custom) that can be composed and chained. Built-in support for re-ranking via LLM or cross-encoder, and hybrid search combining dense and sparse retrieval without custom integration code.
vs alternatives: More flexible retrieval composition than LangChain's retrievers; built-in re-ranking and fusion strategies reduce boilerplate for advanced retrieval pipelines.
+6 more capabilities