| 0 |
| 0 |
| Quality | 0 | 0 |
| Ecosystem | 0 | 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Paid | Paid |
| Starting Price | $5.50e-7 per prompt token | $6.00e-7 per prompt token |
| Capabilities | 6 decomposed | 11 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Generates extended creative narratives and storytelling content through fine-tuning optimizations applied to Mistral Small 2501's base architecture. The model uses attention mechanisms and token prediction trained specifically on narrative datasets to maintain plot coherence, character consistency, and thematic depth across multi-paragraph outputs. Fine-tuning adjusts transformer weights to prioritize creative writing patterns over generic instruction-following, enabling nuanced prose generation with improved stylistic control.
Unique: Fine-tuned specifically on narrative and creative writing datasets to optimize Mistral Small 2501's attention patterns for plot coherence and character consistency, rather than generic instruction-following. This targeted fine-tuning approach prioritizes stylistic nuance and thematic depth over factual recall.
vs alternatives: Delivers more coherent multi-paragraph narratives than base Mistral Small 2501 or GPT-3.5 due to narrative-specific fine-tuning, while maintaining lower inference costs than larger models like GPT-4 or Claude 3
Simulates consistent character personas and role-playing scenarios through fine-tuned response patterns that maintain personality traits, speech patterns, and behavioral consistency across extended interactions. The model's transformer layers are optimized to track and reproduce character-specific linguistic markers, emotional responses, and decision-making patterns established in initial character prompts. This enables multi-turn role-play where character behavior remains internally consistent without explicit state management.
Unique: Fine-tuning optimizes transformer attention patterns to maintain character-specific linguistic and behavioral markers across multi-turn interactions, using implicit state tracking through token prediction rather than explicit character state management. This approach embeds personality consistency directly into model weights.
vs alternatives: Maintains character consistency more reliably than base language models or prompt-engineering-only approaches because personality patterns are learned during fine-tuning, not reconstructed from prompts each turn
Generates prose with fine-grained stylistic control through fine-tuning that enhances the model's ability to modulate tone, vocabulary complexity, sentence structure, and emotional resonance. The model's transformer layers are optimized to respond to subtle stylistic cues in prompts, producing writing that ranges from literary and poetic to conversational and technical. Fine-tuning adjusts token prediction probabilities to favor stylistically appropriate word choices and syntactic patterns based on context.
Unique: Fine-tuning specifically optimizes token prediction to respond to subtle stylistic cues, adjusting vocabulary selection and syntactic patterns based on tone and audience context. This enables style modulation at the token level rather than through post-processing or prompt engineering alone.
vs alternatives: Produces more stylistically nuanced prose than base Mistral Small 2501 or instruction-tuned models because fine-tuning directly optimizes for stylistic consistency and emotional resonance, not just instruction-following
Maintains coherent multi-turn conversations through fine-tuned attention mechanisms that track conversational context, participant roles, and topical continuity across extended dialogues. The model's transformer layers are optimized to weight relevant prior turns appropriately, enabling natural conversation flow without explicit conversation state management. Fine-tuning improves the model's ability to reference earlier statements, maintain topic focus, and generate contextually appropriate responses that acknowledge conversation history.
Unique: Fine-tuning optimizes transformer attention patterns to weight relevant prior conversational turns appropriately, enabling natural context tracking without explicit conversation state management. This approach embeds conversational coherence directly into model weights through training on dialogue datasets.
vs alternatives: Maintains conversational coherence more naturally than base Mistral Small 2501 because fine-tuning specifically optimizes for dialogue patterns and context retention, not just general language modeling
Provides access to the fine-tuned model through OpenRouter's API infrastructure, enabling remote inference without local GPU requirements. Requests are routed through OpenRouter's load-balanced endpoints, which handle tokenization, model execution, and response streaming. The integration abstracts underlying infrastructure complexity, providing standard REST/HTTP endpoints for model queries with configurable parameters like temperature, max_tokens, and top_p for controlling output randomness and length.
Unique: Integrates with OpenRouter's multi-model API infrastructure, which provides load-balanced routing, automatic fallback handling, and unified authentication across multiple LLM providers. This abstraction layer enables seamless provider switching and reduces infrastructure management overhead.
vs alternatives: Eliminates GPU infrastructure requirements and DevOps overhead compared to self-hosted inference, while providing lower per-token costs than direct Anthropic or OpenAI APIs for equivalent model capabilities
Supports fine-grained control over text generation behavior through configurable parameters including temperature (randomness), top_p (nucleus sampling), max_tokens (length limits), and frequency_penalty (repetition control). These parameters modify the model's token selection probabilities at inference time, allowing users to trade off between deterministic and creative outputs. Temperature scaling adjusts the softmax distribution over predicted tokens, while top_p implements nucleus sampling to restrict the vocabulary to high-probability tokens.
Unique: Exposes standard sampling parameters (temperature, top_p, frequency_penalty) through OpenRouter's API, enabling inference-time control over output characteristics without model retraining. This approach leverages transformer-native sampling mechanisms rather than post-processing.
vs alternatives: Provides more granular output control than models with fixed generation behavior, while avoiding the overhead of fine-tuning for each use case variation
GLM-4.5 uses a Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) architecture to dynamically route tokens through specialized expert networks based on input characteristics, enabling efficient processing of 128k-token contexts without proportional latency increases. The MoE design allows selective expert activation per token, reducing computational overhead while maintaining reasoning depth across extended conversations and multi-document analysis tasks typical of agent-based workflows.
Unique: Mixture-of-Experts routing specifically tuned for agent workloads rather than generic dense models; expert activation patterns are optimized for tool-use sequences and multi-step reasoning rather than general language tasks
vs alternatives: Outperforms dense models like GPT-4 Turbo on agent tasks within 128k context by routing computational budget to relevant experts, reducing latency and cost vs. models that process all tokens through identical layers
GLM-4.5 implements native function calling through a schema-based registry where tools are defined as JSON schemas with parameter constraints, type validation, and description metadata. The model learns to emit structured tool invocations that map directly to function signatures, enabling deterministic tool orchestration without post-processing or regex parsing. Integration with OpenRouter's API exposes this via standard function-calling parameters compatible with OpenAI's format.
Unique: Schema-based function calling is trained directly into the model weights rather than implemented as post-hoc decoding constraints, allowing the model to learn semantic relationships between tool purposes and input context during training
vs alternatives: More reliable than constraint-based function calling (e.g., Guidance, LMQL) because tool selection is learned rather than enforced, reducing parsing failures and enabling the model to reason about tool applicability
Z.ai: GLM 4.5 scores higher at 24/100 vs TheDrummer: Skyfall 36B V2 at 22/100.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
GLM-4.5 can be used for batch inference through OpenRouter's API, enabling cost-optimized processing of large numbers of requests. Batch processing typically offers reduced pricing compared to real-time API calls and is suitable for non-urgent inference tasks. The model can process batches of prompts efficiently, with results returned after processing completes. This is valuable for agents running scheduled tasks or processing large datasets.
Unique: Batch processing is offered through OpenRouter's unified API rather than a separate batch service, enabling seamless switching between real-time and batch modes with the same client code
vs alternatives: More cost-effective than real-time API for high-volume inference; simpler than managing separate batch infrastructure because OpenRouter handles queuing and result delivery
GLM-4.5 maintains coherent conversation state across turns by encoding prior messages into a compressed representation that persists within the 128k context window. The model uses attention mechanisms to selectively retrieve relevant prior context, enabling agents to reference earlier decisions, tool results, and user preferences without explicit memory management. This is particularly effective for agent workflows where state accumulation (e.g., task progress, discovered facts) must inform subsequent actions.
Unique: Implicit memory management through attention-based context selection rather than explicit memory modules; the model learns which prior turns are relevant without separate retrieval or summarization steps
vs alternatives: More efficient than explicit memory systems (e.g., LangChain's ConversationBufferMemory) because attention is computed once during inference rather than requiring separate retrieval and summarization passes
GLM-4.5 generates code across 40+ programming languages by leveraging training data that includes diverse codebases and syntax patterns. The model understands language-specific idioms, library conventions, and structural patterns (e.g., async/await in JavaScript, type hints in Python, generics in Java) without explicit language-specific modules. Generation is context-aware, respecting indentation, existing code style, and project conventions when completing or extending code snippets.
Unique: Language-agnostic code generation trained on diverse codebases rather than language-specific fine-tuning; the model generalizes syntax patterns across languages, enabling reasonable code generation even for less common languages
vs alternatives: Broader language coverage than specialized models like Codex (which emphasizes Python/JavaScript) but lower quality on niche languages compared to language-specific models; better for polyglot teams than single-language specialists
GLM-4.5 is trained on extensive technical documentation, API references, and code examples, enabling it to understand and reason about complex technical concepts, library APIs, and system architectures. The model can parse API schemas (OpenAPI, GraphQL, Protocol Buffers), understand parameter constraints and type systems, and generate code that correctly uses APIs based on documentation. This is particularly valuable for agent workflows that must interact with external systems.
Unique: Semantic understanding of API schemas and documentation is learned from training data rather than implemented as a separate schema parser; the model reasons about API semantics holistically
vs alternatives: More flexible than code-generation-only models because it understands API semantics and can reason about correctness; better than generic LLMs for technical tasks because training includes extensive API documentation
GLM-4.5 can generate responses that explicitly show reasoning steps, enabling transparency into how conclusions were reached. When prompted with chain-of-thought patterns, the model generates intermediate reasoning steps before final answers, making it suitable for applications requiring explainability or verification. This is implemented through training on reasoning-annotated data and prompt patterns that encourage step-by-step decomposition.
Unique: Chain-of-thought reasoning is trained directly into the model rather than implemented as a decoding strategy; the model learns to generate reasoning steps as part of its core training objective
vs alternatives: More natural and coherent reasoning steps than prompt-injection approaches (e.g., appending 'think step by step') because reasoning is learned as a first-class capability
GLM-4.5 supports multiple languages (Chinese, English, and others) with training that enables cross-lingual reasoning — understanding concepts expressed in one language and reasoning about them in another. The model can translate, summarize, and reason across languages without language-specific degradation. This is particularly valuable for global applications and agents that must operate in multilingual environments.
Unique: Cross-lingual reasoning is learned from multilingual training data rather than implemented as separate language-specific models; the model develops a shared representation across languages
vs alternatives: More efficient than maintaining separate models per language because a single model handles all languages; better for cross-lingual reasoning than language-specific models because the shared representation enables concept transfer
+3 more capabilities