| Ecosystem | 0 | 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Capabilities | 13 decomposed | 9 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Converts natural language descriptions into valid GraphQL queries using a LangGraph-based agent that orchestrates multi-step workflows including intent recognition, schema analysis, query construction, and validation. The agent maintains state across steps and uses OpenAI's GPT-4o model to understand user intent and map it to GraphQL operations, handling complex nested queries and field selection automatically.
Unique: Uses LangGraph state machine orchestration with explicit multi-step workflow (intent recognition → schema management → query construction → validation → execution) rather than single-pass LLM generation, enabling iterative refinement and error recovery within the agent loop
vs alternatives: Provides tighter GraphQL schema awareness and validation than generic LLM-to-SQL approaches because it introspects the actual schema and validates queries before execution, reducing hallucination of non-existent fields
Fetches and parses GraphQL schema via introspection queries, extracting type definitions, fields, arguments, and relationships. The system caches schema metadata in memory during the agent session and uses it to validate query construction, providing the agent with a ground-truth representation of available operations without requiring manual schema definition.
Unique: Integrates schema introspection directly into the agent workflow as a tool step rather than as a separate initialization phase, allowing dynamic schema updates and error recovery if schema changes mid-session
vs alternatives: More maintainable than hardcoded schema definitions because it automatically adapts to schema changes without code updates, and more reliable than regex-based schema parsing because it uses GraphQL's native introspection protocol
Implements a structured exception hierarchy for different error types (schema errors, query construction errors, validation errors, execution errors), enabling fine-grained error handling and recovery. Each exception type carries context information (error message, affected query, suggestions) that helps the agent or user understand what went wrong and how to fix it.
Unique: Defines custom exception types for each error category (schema, query, validation, execution) rather than using generic exceptions, enabling type-specific error recovery and detailed error context
vs alternatives: More maintainable than generic exception handling because error types are explicit and recovery logic can be tailored to each type, improving overall system robustness
Provides tools for handling ambiguous queries where multiple valid interpretations exist, presenting options to the user or agent and enabling selection of the intended interpretation. When a natural language query could map to multiple GraphQL operations or field selections, the system generates options and waits for disambiguation before proceeding.
Unique: Integrates disambiguation as an explicit agent step rather than making assumptions, enabling the agent to ask for clarification when needed and improving overall accuracy
vs alternatives: More user-friendly than silently choosing an interpretation because it asks for clarification when ambiguous, reducing errors and improving trust
Formats GraphQL query results for presentation to users, supporting multiple output formats (JSON, table, tree view) and handling large result sets gracefully. The system can truncate large results, highlight important fields, and provide summary statistics, making results more readable and actionable in AI assistant interfaces.
Unique: Provides multiple output formats and handles large result sets gracefully with truncation and summarization, rather than returning raw JSON which may be overwhelming in AI assistant interfaces
vs alternatives: More user-friendly than raw JSON output because it formats results for readability and handles large datasets, improving the user experience in AI assistant contexts
Analyzes natural language input to identify user intent (fetch, filter, aggregate, mutate) and maps it to GraphQL operations. Uses LLM-based reasoning to decompose complex requests into query components (root type, fields, filters, sorting, pagination) and generates a query plan before constructing the actual GraphQL syntax, enabling the agent to handle ambiguous or multi-step requests.
Unique: Separates intent recognition from query construction as distinct agent steps, allowing the LLM to reason about what the user wants before committing to GraphQL syntax, enabling error recovery if the constructed query doesn't match the recognized intent
vs alternatives: More robust than single-pass generation because it validates intent against schema before construction, reducing hallucinated queries that don't match user intent
Builds valid GraphQL query syntax from intent and schema metadata, automatically selecting appropriate fields, constructing nested selections, and handling arguments. The system uses schema-aware field selection to include only requested fields and their required sub-fields, generating syntactically valid GraphQL that matches the schema structure without manual field enumeration.
Unique: Uses schema introspection to automatically determine required fields and nested selections rather than requiring explicit field lists, reducing user input and improving query completeness
vs alternatives: More maintainable than template-based query generation because it adapts to schema changes automatically, and more complete than user-specified field lists because it includes required sub-fields automatically
Validates constructed GraphQL queries against the schema using graphql-core validation rules before execution, catching syntax errors, type mismatches, and invalid field selections. If validation fails, the agent analyzes the error and attempts recovery by reconstructing the query with corrections, providing detailed error messages to guide the user or the agent toward valid queries.
Unique: Integrates validation as an explicit agent step with error recovery logic, allowing the agent to learn from validation failures and reconstruct queries rather than failing immediately, improving overall success rates
vs alternatives: More robust than client-side validation alone because it uses graphql-core's full validation rule set, catching edge cases that regex or simple parsing would miss
+5 more capabilities
Executes SQL queries against Supabase PostgreSQL instances through the Model Context Protocol, translating natural language or structured query requests into parameterized SQL statements. Uses MCP's tool-calling interface to expose database operations as callable functions with schema validation, enabling LLM agents to perform CRUD operations, joins, and aggregations with automatic connection pooling and credential management through Supabase client SDK.
Unique: Exposes Supabase PostgreSQL as MCP tools with automatic credential injection from Supabase client SDK, eliminating manual connection string management and enabling seamless LLM-to-database queries within Claude or compatible agents
vs alternatives: Tighter integration than generic SQL MCP servers because it leverages Supabase's built-in authentication and connection pooling rather than requiring separate database credential configuration
Exposes Supabase Auth session state and user metadata through MCP tools, allowing agents to inspect current authentication context, retrieve user profiles, and trigger auth-related operations. Integrates with Supabase's JWT-based auth system to validate sessions and access user claims without re-authenticating, using the Supabase client's built-in session management.
Unique: Integrates Supabase's JWT-based auth system directly into MCP tool interface, allowing agents to inspect and act on auth state without managing separate credential stores or re-authentication flows
vs alternatives: More seamless than generic auth MCP servers because it leverages Supabase's built-in session management and avoids redundant credential passing between agent and auth system
Invokes Supabase Edge Functions (serverless TypeScript/JavaScript functions) through MCP tools, passing parameters and receiving results with optional streaming support. Uses Supabase's edge function HTTP API to trigger functions with automatic authentication headers and response parsing, enabling agents to execute custom business logic without embedding it in the agent itself.
Supabase scores higher at 42/100 vs Text-To-GraphQL at 23/100.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
Unique: Exposes Supabase Edge Functions as MCP tools with automatic authentication and response parsing, allowing agents to invoke custom serverless logic without managing HTTP clients or credential injection
vs alternatives: More integrated than generic HTTP MCP tools because it handles Supabase-specific authentication, error handling, and response formatting automatically
Subscribes to real-time changes on Supabase tables through MCP's event streaming interface, using Supabase's PostgreSQL LISTEN/NOTIFY mechanism to push INSERT, UPDATE, and DELETE events to agents. Maintains persistent WebSocket connections and filters events by table and row-level policies, enabling agents to react to database changes without polling.
Unique: Bridges Supabase's PostgreSQL LISTEN/NOTIFY real-time system with MCP's tool interface, enabling agents to subscribe to database changes without managing WebSocket connections or event serialization
vs alternatives: More efficient than polling-based approaches because it uses Supabase's native real-time infrastructure rather than repeated database queries
Manages files in Supabase Storage buckets through MCP tools, supporting upload, download, list, and delete operations with automatic authentication and path-based access control. Uses Supabase's S3-compatible storage API with built-in support for public/private buckets and signed URLs for temporary access, enabling agents to handle file I/O without managing cloud storage credentials.
Unique: Exposes Supabase Storage's S3-compatible API as MCP tools with automatic authentication and signed URL generation, eliminating the need for agents to manage cloud storage credentials or generate temporary access tokens
vs alternatives: More integrated than generic S3 MCP tools because it leverages Supabase's built-in bucket policies and authentication rather than requiring separate AWS credentials
Performs semantic similarity searches on vector embeddings stored in Supabase PostgreSQL using pgvector extension, translating natural language queries into embedding vectors and executing cosine/L2 distance searches. Integrates with embedding providers (OpenAI, Cohere) or uses pre-computed embeddings, enabling agents to retrieve semantically similar documents or records without full-text search limitations.
Unique: Integrates pgvector directly into MCP tools with automatic embedding generation and distance calculation, enabling agents to perform semantic search without managing separate vector database infrastructure
vs alternatives: More efficient than external vector databases (Pinecone, Weaviate) for Supabase users because it colocates embeddings with relational data, reducing network latency and simplifying data synchronization
Exposes Supabase database schema information through MCP tools, allowing agents to discover table structures, column types, constraints, and relationships without manual schema documentation. Queries PostgreSQL information_schema and Supabase metadata tables to dynamically generate schema descriptions, enabling agents to construct valid queries and understand data relationships.
Unique: Queries Supabase's PostgreSQL information_schema directly through MCP tools, enabling agents to dynamically discover and adapt to database schemas without pre-configured schema definitions
vs alternatives: More flexible than static schema definitions because it reflects live database state, including recent migrations or schema changes
Enforces Supabase Row-Level Security policies within agent queries, ensuring that agents can only access rows permitted by RLS rules defined in the database. Evaluates policies based on authenticated user context (JWT claims, user ID) and applies WHERE clause filters automatically, preventing unauthorized data access at the database layer rather than application layer.
Unique: Delegates authorization enforcement to PostgreSQL RLS policies rather than implementing authorization in agent code, ensuring that data access rules are centralized and cannot be bypassed by agent logic
vs alternatives: More secure than application-level authorization because RLS is enforced at the database layer, preventing accidental data leaks even if agent code has bugs
+1 more capabilities