Teachguin vs voyage-ai-provider
Side-by-side comparison to help you choose.
| Feature | Teachguin | voyage-ai-provider |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Agent | API |
| UnfragileRank | 27/100 | 30/100 |
| Adoption | 0 | 0 |
| Quality | 0 | 0 |
| Ecosystem |
| 0 |
| 1 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Capabilities | 5 decomposed | 5 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Generates complete lesson outlines with learning objectives, activities, and assessments by processing teacher input (topic, grade level, duration) through an LLM backbone that structures output into pedagogically-aligned components. The system likely uses prompt engineering or fine-tuned models to ensure compliance with educational standards (CCSS, state standards) and produces actionable, classroom-ready plans rather than generic text.
Unique: unknown — insufficient data on whether Teachguin uses proprietary curriculum alignment, fine-tuned models for educational content, or standard LLM prompting; no architectural details available
vs alternatives: Completely free with no paywall unlike ClassPoint or Nearpod's premium lesson planning features, but lacks evidence of deeper curriculum integration or standards compliance that paid competitors offer
Provides a widget framework enabling teachers to embed polls, quizzes, and open-ended response prompts directly into live lessons, collecting student responses in real-time and displaying aggregated results (poll percentages, quiz scores, response text) back to the classroom. The system likely uses WebSocket or polling-based architecture to push updates to all connected student devices without page refresh.
Unique: unknown — insufficient architectural detail on whether widgets use custom WebSocket infrastructure, third-party CRS platforms, or embedded iframe-based solutions; no differentiation from ClassPoint or Nearpod's response systems documented
vs alternatives: Integrated directly into Teachguin's lesson planning interface (no context-switching to separate tools), but lacks evidence of advanced features like gamification, branching logic, or AI-powered answer analysis that competitors offer
Enables teachers to broadcast their screen (desktop, browser, or application window) to all connected student devices with synchronized viewing, allowing students to follow along with demonstrations, code walkthroughs, or visual content. Implementation likely uses WebRTC or similar peer-to-peer streaming for low-latency transmission, with fallback to server-relayed streams for network constraints.
Unique: unknown — insufficient data on whether Teachguin uses WebRTC peer-to-peer, server-relayed streaming, or third-party screen sharing APIs; no architectural differentiation from Zoom, Google Meet, or ClassPoint's screen sharing documented
vs alternatives: Integrated into Teachguin's lesson interface without requiring separate tool launch, but lacks advanced features like student annotation, multi-presenter support, or recording that competitors provide
Provides a shared digital whiteboard where teachers and students can draw, write, and annotate content simultaneously, with all changes synchronized across connected devices in real-time. The system likely uses a canvas-based drawing engine (HTML5 Canvas or WebGL) with operational transformation or CRDT (Conflict-free Replicated Data Type) for conflict resolution when multiple users edit simultaneously.
Unique: unknown — insufficient architectural detail on whether Teachguin implements custom CRDT/OT algorithms, uses third-party whiteboarding APIs (Miro, Excalidraw), or embeds a lightweight canvas library; no differentiation from Zoom whiteboard or ClassPoint's annotation tools documented
vs alternatives: Integrated into Teachguin's lesson interface without context-switching, but lacks advanced features like infinite canvas, shape recognition, or AI-powered diagram suggestions that specialized whiteboarding tools offer
Manages the end-to-end lesson session lifecycle — teacher login, lesson creation/selection, student join via code or link, real-time synchronization of lesson state (current slide, active widgets, screen share status), and session termination. The system likely uses a centralized session server to coordinate state across all connected participants, with WebSocket or Server-Sent Events for push updates.
Unique: unknown — insufficient data on whether Teachguin uses custom session management, third-party classroom platforms, or standard WebSocket patterns; no architectural details on state synchronization or persistence documented
vs alternatives: Lightweight browser-based approach with minimal setup compared to LMS-integrated competitors, but lacks evidence of advanced session features like recording, attendance tracking, or asynchronous access that full platforms provide
Provides a standardized provider adapter that bridges Voyage AI's embedding API with Vercel's AI SDK ecosystem, enabling developers to use Voyage's embedding models (voyage-3, voyage-3-lite, voyage-large-2, etc.) through the unified Vercel AI interface. The provider implements Vercel's LanguageModelV1 protocol, translating SDK method calls into Voyage API requests and normalizing responses back into the SDK's expected format, eliminating the need for direct API integration code.
Unique: Implements Vercel AI SDK's LanguageModelV1 protocol specifically for Voyage AI, providing a drop-in provider that maintains API compatibility with Vercel's ecosystem while exposing Voyage's full model lineup (voyage-3, voyage-3-lite, voyage-large-2) without requiring wrapper abstractions
vs alternatives: Tighter integration with Vercel AI SDK than direct Voyage API calls, enabling seamless provider switching and consistent error handling across the SDK ecosystem
Allows developers to specify which Voyage AI embedding model to use at initialization time through a configuration object, supporting the full range of Voyage's available models (voyage-3, voyage-3-lite, voyage-large-2, voyage-2, voyage-code-2) with model-specific parameter validation. The provider validates model names against Voyage's supported list and passes model selection through to the API request, enabling performance/cost trade-offs without code changes.
Unique: Exposes Voyage's full model portfolio through Vercel AI SDK's provider pattern, allowing model selection at initialization without requiring conditional logic in embedding calls or provider factory patterns
vs alternatives: Simpler model switching than managing multiple provider instances or using conditional logic in application code
voyage-ai-provider scores higher at 30/100 vs Teachguin at 27/100. Teachguin leads on quality, while voyage-ai-provider is stronger on adoption and ecosystem.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
Handles Voyage AI API authentication by accepting an API key at provider initialization and automatically injecting it into all downstream API requests as an Authorization header. The provider manages credential lifecycle, ensuring the API key is never exposed in logs or error messages, and implements Vercel AI SDK's credential handling patterns for secure integration with other SDK components.
Unique: Implements Vercel AI SDK's credential handling pattern for Voyage AI, ensuring API keys are managed through the SDK's security model rather than requiring manual header construction in application code
vs alternatives: Cleaner credential management than manually constructing Authorization headers, with integration into Vercel AI SDK's broader security patterns
Accepts an array of text strings and returns embeddings with index information, allowing developers to correlate output embeddings back to input texts even if the API reorders results. The provider maps input indices through the Voyage API call and returns structured output with both the embedding vector and its corresponding input index, enabling safe batch processing without manual index tracking.
Unique: Preserves input indices through batch embedding requests, enabling developers to correlate embeddings back to source texts without external index tracking or manual mapping logic
vs alternatives: Eliminates the need for parallel index arrays or manual position tracking when embedding multiple texts in a single call
Implements Vercel AI SDK's LanguageModelV1 interface contract, translating Voyage API responses and errors into SDK-expected formats and error types. The provider catches Voyage API errors (authentication failures, rate limits, invalid models) and wraps them in Vercel's standardized error classes, enabling consistent error handling across multi-provider applications and allowing SDK-level error recovery strategies to work transparently.
Unique: Translates Voyage API errors into Vercel AI SDK's standardized error types, enabling provider-agnostic error handling and allowing SDK-level retry strategies to work transparently across different embedding providers
vs alternatives: Consistent error handling across multi-provider setups vs. managing provider-specific error types in application code