| 0 |
| 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Capabilities | 11 decomposed | 11 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Performs static code analysis using proprietary deterministic algorithms (not LLM-based inference) to extract business rules, decision logic, validations, and control flow from source code without executing it. Analyzes code structure to identify conditional branches, loops, data transformations, and policy enforcement points, then maps these to human-readable business concepts. Works across multiple programming languages including COBOL, Java, Python, and C/C++, handling legacy and modern codebases up to 100M+ lines of code.
Unique: Uses proprietary deterministic analysis (not LLM inference) to extract 100% of business rules and decision logic without summarization or approximation, explicitly designed to handle legacy COBOL and complex financial systems where accuracy is non-negotiable
vs alternatives: More accurate than LLM-based code summarization tools (Copilot, GitHub Copilot) for extracting deterministic business logic because it performs structural analysis rather than statistical inference, making it suitable for compliance-critical systems
Automatically generates documentation in Swimm's `sw.md` Markdown format from analyzed code, embedding code snippet references with 'Smart Tokens' (superscript markers) that maintain bidirectional links to source code. Documentation is stored in the Git repository alongside code, enabling version control and automatic synchronization when code changes. CI/CD integration detects when documentation becomes stale relative to source code and flags it for review, ensuring documentation freshness without manual maintenance.
Unique: Stores documentation in Git alongside code with bidirectional Smart Token links, enabling version control and CI-based freshness checks that prevent stale documentation from being merged — a doc-as-code approach that treats documentation as a first-class artifact
vs alternatives: Superior to manual documentation and static doc generators because it maintains live links to code and enforces freshness via CI checks, preventing the documentation-code drift that plagues traditional approaches
Offers proof-of-concept (POC) programs and flexible project-based pricing for system integrators and enterprises evaluating Swimm. Sales-driven engagement model with custom quotes based on codebase size (lines of code), deployment model (cloud vs. on-premise), and LLM provider (Swimm-hosted vs. customer-managed). No public pricing available — requires contact with sales team for evaluation and pricing.
Unique: Offers flexible project-based pricing and POC programs tailored to enterprise needs, rather than standardized SaaS tiers — enabling custom engagement for large organizations with specific requirements
vs alternatives: More flexible than fixed-tier SaaS pricing for enterprise customers with custom requirements, but less transparent and more friction-heavy than self-serve tools like GitHub Copilot
Generates visual representations of user interface screens and workflows from legacy code analysis without requiring runtime execution. Extracts UI structure, field definitions, navigation flows, and screen transitions from source code (particularly effective for COBOL-based systems with embedded screen definitions), then renders these as diagrams and documentation. Enables non-technical stakeholders to understand system behavior and data flows through UI mockups derived purely from static code analysis.
Unique: Generates UI screens from static code analysis without runtime execution, specifically optimized for legacy COBOL systems where UI structure is explicitly defined in code — enabling modernization teams to understand system behavior without running decades-old systems
vs alternatives: More practical than runtime screen capture tools for air-gapped or offline legacy systems, and more accurate than manual documentation because it derives screens directly from code structure
Maps codebase structure to business functions and tracks data flows, dependencies, and system boundaries across programs, jobs, and subsystems. Creates a dependency graph showing how code modules interact, where data flows between systems, and which business functions depend on which code components. Enables architects and teams to understand system topology, identify integration points, and plan modernization or refactoring efforts with full visibility into cross-system dependencies.
Unique: Combines code analysis with business function mapping to create bidirectional links between technical code structure and business capabilities, enabling architects to reason about system topology at both technical and business levels simultaneously
vs alternatives: More comprehensive than static dependency analyzers (like Understand or Lattix) because it maps dependencies to business functions, not just code modules, making it more actionable for modernization planning
Exposes analyzed code understanding via the Model Context Protocol (MCP) standard, enabling AI agents and LLM-based tools to consume Swimm's code analysis as structured context. Provides deterministic code insights (business rules, dependencies, flows) to AI agents in a standardized format, allowing agents to make informed decisions during code modernization, refactoring, or generation tasks. Supports both Swimm-hosted LLMs and customer-managed LLM instances (Azure OpenAI, OpenAI Enterprise, or self-hosted models).
Unique: Bridges deterministic code analysis with agentic AI workflows via MCP, enabling AI agents to access accurate, non-hallucinated code understanding rather than relying on LLM inference — critical for code modernization where accuracy is non-negotiable
vs alternatives: More reliable than passing raw code to LLMs because it provides pre-analyzed business logic and dependencies via MCP, reducing hallucination and enabling agents to make better decisions during modernization
Integrates Swimm documentation directly into IDE environments (VSCode confirmed, others unknown) enabling developers to browse auto-generated documentation, view code-to-doc links, and edit documentation without leaving their editor. Renders `sw.md` files with Smart Token links that jump between documentation and source code, providing seamless navigation between understanding (docs) and implementation (code). Supports inline documentation viewing and editing within the development workflow.
Unique: Embeds bidirectional code-to-documentation navigation directly in VSCode via Smart Tokens, allowing developers to understand code without context switching — treating documentation as a first-class IDE artifact alongside code
vs alternatives: More convenient than external documentation tools (Confluence, Notion) because it keeps developers in their IDE and provides direct code links, reducing friction in the understand-code-read-docs workflow
Integrates with CI/CD pipelines (GitHub Actions, GitLab CI, Jenkins, etc.) to automatically detect when code changes make documentation stale and blocks merges or flags PRs until documentation is updated. Compares code changes against corresponding documentation to identify mismatches, then reports freshness status as a CI check that can be configured to block or warn. Prevents outdated documentation from being merged into the repository, enforcing documentation-as-code discipline.
Unique: Treats documentation freshness as a CI/CD quality gate, automatically detecting code-documentation mismatches and blocking merges until resolved — enforcing documentation discipline at the infrastructure level rather than relying on manual review
vs alternatives: More effective than manual code review for catching stale documentation because it's automated and consistent, preventing the common pattern where documentation lags code changes by weeks or months
+3 more capabilities
Aggregates 100+ billion deduplicated documents (30 trillion tokens) from 84 CommonCrawl dumps across 5 languages (English, German, French, Spanish, Italian). Each document is pre-annotated with 40+ quality signals including perplexity scores, deduplication hashes, content classifiers, and toxicity ratings computed via a standardized pipeline. The architecture processes raw CommonCrawl HTML through text extraction, deduplication, and multi-dimensional quality scoring, enabling downstream users to apply custom filtering strategies without reprocessing the raw data.
Unique: Processes 84 CommonCrawl dumps (claimed as most complete coverage vs. C4, Refinedweb, Dolma, SlimPajama) with 40+ pre-computed quality annotations per document, enabling fine-grained data curation research without requiring users to reprocess raw CommonCrawl. Open-source processing scripts allow reproducibility and custom filtering strategies on a standardized base dataset.
vs alternatives: Larger scale (30 trillion tokens vs. C4's 156B tokens, RedPajama-1T's 1T tokens) with richer quality annotations (40+ signals vs. minimal metadata in competitors) and multilingual coverage, making it superior for comparative curation research and training diverse language models.
Implements deduplication across 100+ billion documents using hash-based matching to identify and remove duplicate content from CommonCrawl. The pipeline computes deduplication hashes for each document and filters the raw 100+ trillion token corpus down to 30 trillion deduplicated tokens. This approach preserves document boundaries (unlike token-level deduplication) and produces deterministic, reproducible results across reprocessing runs.
Unique: Uses document-level hash-based deduplication (preserving document boundaries) rather than token-level or fuzzy matching, enabling reproducible filtering and transparent deduplication hashes that users can inspect and verify. Processes 84 CommonCrawl dumps with consistent deduplication methodology.
Document-level deduplication is more interpretable and reproducible than token-level approaches, and the published deduplication hashes enable users to understand and verify which documents were removed, unlike proprietary datasets that hide deduplication decisions.
RedPajama v2 scores higher at 61/100 vs Swimm at 56/100.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
Provides the entire 30 trillion token corpus, processing scripts, and quality annotations as free, open-source resources with no licensing restrictions. Users can download, modify, redistribute, and use the data for any purpose including commercial applications. This open approach enables broad research access and community-driven improvements without vendor lock-in.
Unique: Provides complete 30 trillion token corpus with processing scripts as free, open-source resources with no licensing restrictions, whereas competitors (C4, RefinedWeb) may have usage restrictions or require commercial licensing
vs alternatives: Eliminates licensing costs and vendor lock-in through open-source distribution, enabling broad access for academic and commercial use versus competitors with restricted access or licensing requirements
Computes perplexity scores for each document using a reference language model, enabling quantitative assessment of text quality and language model fitness. The perplexity metric measures how well a pre-trained model predicts the document; lower perplexity indicates higher-quality, more coherent text. These pre-computed scores allow users to filter documents by quality threshold without running inference themselves, and to study the relationship between perplexity and downstream model performance.
Unique: Pre-computes perplexity scores for 100+ billion documents, eliminating the computational cost of running inference for quality assessment. Enables comparative studies of how perplexity thresholds affect training outcomes without requiring users to implement their own scoring pipeline.
vs alternatives: Provides pre-computed perplexity scores (eliminating inference cost) whereas competitors like C4 use heuristic filters (URL patterns, line-ending ratios); perplexity is a more principled, model-based quality metric but requires understanding of the reference model used.
Annotates each document with content classifiers and toxicity ratings, enabling category-based filtering and safety-aware data curation. The pipeline applies pre-trained classifiers to categorize document content (e.g., news, forums, documentation) and compute toxicity scores. These annotations are pre-computed and stored with each document, allowing users to filter by content type or toxicity threshold without running inference themselves.
Unique: Pre-computes both content classifiers and toxicity ratings for 100+ billion documents, enabling multi-dimensional safety and content-based filtering without requiring users to implement or run their own classifiers. Supports comparative studies of how content filtering affects model behavior.
vs alternatives: Provides pre-computed toxicity and content annotations (eliminating inference cost) whereas most web datasets require downstream filtering; enables safety-aware curation at scale without custom classifier implementation.
Publishes end-to-end processing scripts on GitHub that convert raw CommonCrawl HTML to deduplicated, annotated documents. The pipeline is fully open-source, enabling users to understand, verify, and reproduce the data processing methodology. Scripts handle HTML-to-text conversion, deduplication, quality signal computation, and filtering, allowing researchers to reprocess data with custom parameters or apply the same methodology to new CommonCrawl dumps.
Unique: Publishes complete, open-source processing scripts enabling full reproducibility and transparency of data processing methodology. Users can inspect, verify, and reapply the pipeline to new data, unlike proprietary datasets where processing is opaque.
vs alternatives: Open-source pipeline enables reproducibility and auditability vs. proprietary datasets (C4, Refinedweb) where processing methodology is proprietary or partially documented; enables research on data processing methodology itself.
Enables users to apply custom filtering strategies by combining 40+ pre-computed quality signals (perplexity, toxicity, content classifiers, deduplication hashes, etc.). Rather than providing pre-filtered 'ready-to-train' datasets, RedPajama v2 provides the raw signals and lets users define their own filtering logic. This architecture supports comparative studies of curation strategies and enables organizations to apply domain-specific or value-aligned filtering without reprocessing the base dataset.
Unique: Provides 40+ pre-computed quality signals enabling fine-grained, user-defined curation strategies rather than pre-filtered datasets. This architecture supports comparative research on curation methodology and enables organizations to apply custom filtering without reprocessing the base dataset.
vs alternatives: Enables comparative curation research (studying how different filtering strategies affect outcomes) whereas competitors provide pre-filtered datasets; gives users control over filtering logic but requires more implementation effort.
Provides 30 trillion tokens across 5 languages (English, German, French, Spanish, Italian) with consistent quality signal annotations applied uniformly across all languages. The architecture processes each language through the same deduplication, quality scoring, and classification pipeline, enabling comparative studies of language-specific data characteristics and training multilingual models on a standardized base dataset. Language-specific processing details are not documented, but the consistent annotation methodology enables cross-language analysis.
Unique: Provides 30 trillion tokens across 5 languages with identical quality signal annotations, enabling comparative studies of language-specific data characteristics and training multilingual models on a standardized base. Consistent annotation methodology across languages enables cross-language analysis.
vs alternatives: Larger multilingual coverage (5 languages, 30 trillion tokens) than RedPajama-1T (English-only, 1 trillion tokens) and most competitors; consistent annotation enables comparative language research, but limited to European languages vs. competitors with broader language coverage.
+3 more capabilities