| 0 |
| 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Free | Paid |
| Capabilities | 12 decomposed | 13 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Implements a lightweight run loop (Swarm.run() in core.py) that coordinates multiple agents by detecting when a tool call returns an Agent object, automatically switching execution context without persisting state to external servers. Unlike the Assistants API, all conversation history and context variables remain client-side, enabling full control over agent transitions and state mutations through Python function returns.
Unique: Uses Python function return values as the handoff mechanism (isinstance(result.value, Agent) check in core.py line 276) rather than explicit routing tables or configuration, making agent transitions first-class language constructs that are testable and debuggable as normal Python code.
vs alternatives: Simpler and more testable than Assistants API for multi-agent flows because state stays client-side and handoffs are explicit function returns, not opaque server-side thread transfers.
Converts Python functions into OpenAI-compatible JSON schemas via function_to_json() utility (swarm/util.py lines 31-87) using inspect module to extract parameter names, type hints, and docstrings. Automatically detects which functions require context_variables by inspecting function signatures, enabling dynamic injection of shared state without explicit parameter passing in tool definitions.
Unique: Detects context_variables requirement via inspect.signature() and automatically injects the dict into function calls without requiring explicit parameter declaration in the tool schema, reducing boilerplate while maintaining type safety through Python's native function signatures.
vs alternatives: More Pythonic than manual schema definition (vs LangChain's @tool decorator approach) because it leverages native Python introspection; less verbose than Anthropic's tool_use pattern which requires explicit parameter mapping.
Swarm includes a REPL loop (referenced in architectural overview) that allows interactive testing of agents by accepting user input, running agents, and displaying responses in a command-line interface. The REPL maintains conversation history across turns and supports agent switching, enabling rapid exploration of multi-agent behavior without writing test code.
Unique: REPL is built into the Swarm repository as a demo loop, not a separate tool; it uses the same Swarm.run() API as production code, ensuring that interactive behavior matches programmatic behavior.
vs alternatives: More integrated than external chat interfaces (vs Gradio or Streamlit) because it's part of the framework; simpler than full IDE integration because it's just a Python loop reading stdin.
Swarm includes a complete airline customer service example (referenced in Examples section) that demonstrates multi-agent patterns: a triage agent routes customers to specialized agents (rebooking, refunds, general support) based on issue type. Each agent has specific instructions and tools, and handoffs are implemented as function returns, showing how to structure real-world multi-agent applications.
Unique: Example is a complete, runnable application (not just code snippets) that demonstrates the full Swarm lifecycle: agent creation, tool definition, handoff logic, and conversation management in a realistic domain.
vs alternatives: More comprehensive than isolated code examples (vs scattered snippets) and more realistic than toy examples because it shows multi-agent routing and tool integration together.
Allows Agent instructions to be either static strings or callables that receive context_variables and return instruction strings at runtime (swarm/core.py lines 159-161). This enables instruction content to adapt based on conversation state, user metadata, or external data without re-creating Agent objects, implementing a lightweight form of dynamic prompting.
Unique: Instructions are first-class callables in the Agent type definition, allowing instruction logic to be versioned, tested, and swapped as Python functions rather than embedded in prompt strings, enabling programmatic instruction composition and A/B testing.
vs alternatives: More flexible than static system prompts (vs basic LLM APIs) and simpler than full prompt template engines (vs Langchain's PromptTemplate) because it's just Python functions with access to context_variables.
Executes tool functions returned by the LLM and wraps results in a Result object (swarm/types.py lines 11-15) that can optionally include updated context_variables. The run loop (core.py lines 250-264) detects Result objects and merges context updates back into the shared state dict, enabling functions to mutate agent context without side effects or global state.
Unique: Uses a lightweight Result type (not a full state machine) to couple return values with context mutations, allowing tools to be pure functions that explicitly declare state changes rather than relying on closures or global state, making execution flow traceable and testable.
vs alternatives: Simpler than LangChain's AgentAction/AgentFinish pattern because Result is just a dataclass, not part of a larger action/observation loop; more explicit than implicit context mutation via function side effects.
Integrates with OpenAI's streaming API to yield partial responses token-by-token via get_chat_completion() (core.py line 165), allowing callers to display agent responses in real-time. The run loop accumulates streamed tokens into full messages before processing tool calls, maintaining compatibility with the non-streaming execution path while enabling progressive output rendering.
Unique: Streaming is optional and transparent to the agent logic; the same run() method handles both streaming and non-streaming by yielding Response objects, allowing callers to choose rendering strategy without agent code changes.
vs alternatives: More integrated than manual streaming wrappers (vs calling OpenAI API directly) because the run loop handles token accumulation and tool call parsing; simpler than LangChain's streaming callbacks because it's just a generator parameter.
Maintains a conversation history as a list of dicts with 'role' and 'content' keys, automatically appending user messages and agent responses while filtering out internal tool calls from the LLM's perspective. The run loop (core.py lines 139-229) manages message ordering and ensures tool results are formatted as 'tool' role messages that the LLM can process for subsequent decisions.
Unique: Message history is a simple list of dicts passed by reference, allowing callers to inspect, modify, or persist it directly without API abstractions; tool results are formatted as 'tool' role messages that the LLM natively understands, not wrapped in custom structures.
vs alternatives: More transparent than Assistants API (which hides message history) and simpler than LangChain's BaseMemory because it's just a Python list that callers fully control.
+4 more capabilities
Manages conversation history as immutable thread objects stored server-side, where each message appends to a thread rather than requiring clients to maintain conversation state. Threads persist across API calls and sessions, enabling stateless client implementations. The architecture decouples conversation management from model invocation, allowing assistants to be reused across multiple independent threads without state collision.
Unique: Server-side thread abstraction eliminates client-side conversation state management; threads are first-class API objects with immutable append-only semantics, not just message arrays. This differs from stateless LLM APIs where clients must manage context windows and history truncation.
vs alternatives: Eliminates context window management burden compared to raw LLM APIs (e.g., Claude API, GPT-4 completions), but adds latency and cost overhead vs. in-memory conversation state in frameworks like LangChain
Provides a managed Python 3.11 execution environment accessible via the Code Interpreter tool, where assistants can write and execute arbitrary Python code with access to common libraries (pandas, numpy, matplotlib, scikit-learn). Code runs in isolated sandboxes with file I/O, plotting, and data visualization capabilities. Execution results (stdout, stderr, generated files) are returned to the assistant for further processing.
Unique: Managed Python sandbox integrated directly into the agent loop — assistants can iteratively write, execute, and refine code without external compute provisioning. Execution results feed back into the LLM context, enabling self-correcting workflows. Differs from Replit or Jupyter APIs which require explicit session management.
vs alternatives: Simpler than provisioning Jupyter kernels or Lambda functions for code execution, but slower and less flexible than local Python execution; better for lightweight analysis than heavy ML workloads
OpenAI Assistants scores higher at 76/100 vs Swarm at 58/100. However, Swarm offers a free tier which may be better for getting started.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
When an assistant calls a tool, the run enters a 'requires_action' state. Clients must submit tool call results via the submit_tool_outputs API, which resumes the run with the tool results injected into context. This enables iterative workflows where assistants can call tools, receive results, and refine responses based on results. Tool results are stored in the thread and visible to subsequent runs, enabling multi-turn tool-assisted reasoning.
Unique: Tool results are submitted explicitly via API, not returned in-band — enables clients to process, validate, or transform results before injection. Runs pause in 'requires_action' state, giving clients full control over tool execution and result handling.
vs alternatives: More flexible than automatic tool execution (clients can implement custom logic), but requires more client-side code than frameworks like LangChain where tool execution is automatic; enables external tool integration without modifying assistant code
Assistants can be created from scratch or cloned from existing assistants, copying all configuration (instructions, tools, model, file attachments). Cloning enables template-based assistant creation where a base assistant is configured once and then cloned for different use cases or users. Cloned assistants are independent — changes to one don't affect others. This reduces setup overhead for creating similar assistants.
Unique: Assistants are cloneable objects — configuration can be copied to create new assistants without manual setup. Enables template-based assistant creation and multi-tenant provisioning patterns.
vs alternatives: Simpler than manually creating assistants with identical configuration, but less flexible than parameterized templates; no built-in versioning or rollback compared to infrastructure-as-code approaches
Files uploaded to assistants are stored in OpenAI's managed file storage and associated with assistants or threads. Files can be deleted explicitly via API, and OpenAI automatically cleans up files after 30 days of inactivity. File storage is charged per file per assistant; deleting unused files reduces costs. Files can be reused across multiple assistants and threads, but each association incurs a separate storage charge.
Unique: Files are managed server-side with automatic cleanup after 30 days — no manual file system management required. Files are associated with assistants and charged per association, enabling cost tracking at the file level.
vs alternatives: Simpler than managing files in external storage (S3, GCS), but less flexible and more expensive for high-volume file usage; automatic cleanup reduces manual maintenance but limits retention control
The File Search tool indexes uploaded files (PDFs, text, code) using OpenAI's embedding model and enables assistants to retrieve relevant passages via semantic search. Files are chunked, embedded, and stored in a managed vector index. When an assistant queries the index, it retrieves the most relevant chunks based on cosine similarity, then includes them in the prompt context. This enables RAG-style retrieval without managing embeddings or vector databases.
Unique: Fully managed vector indexing and retrieval without exposing embedding or vector database layers — files are indexed automatically on upload, and search is invoked implicitly when assistants reference file_search tool. Abstracts away Pinecone/Weaviate setup but sacrifices control over chunking and embedding strategies.
vs alternatives: Faster to implement than building custom RAG with LangChain + Pinecone, but less flexible; no control over chunk size, embedding model, or retrieval parameters compared to self-managed vector databases
Assistants can invoke multiple tools (Code Interpreter, File Search, custom functions) in parallel or sequence based on task requirements. Tool calls are defined via JSON schema (OpenAI function calling format), and the assistant decides which tools to invoke and in what order. Results from tool calls are fed back into the assistant's context, enabling iterative refinement. Supports both parallel execution (multiple tools called simultaneously) and sequential chaining (tool output feeds into next tool's input).
Unique: Tool invocation is driven by the LLM's reasoning — the assistant decides which tools to call, in what order, and with what parameters based on task context. Supports both parallel and sequential execution patterns. Differs from static tool pipelines (e.g., Zapier) where execution order is pre-defined.
vs alternatives: More flexible than hardcoded tool chains, but less predictable than explicit DAGs; requires careful prompt engineering to ensure correct tool selection vs. frameworks like LangChain where tool routing can be more explicit
Assistants can receive file attachments (PDFs, images, code, data files) within messages, which are automatically indexed and made available for retrieval or analysis. Files are stored in OpenAI's managed file storage and can be referenced by subsequent messages in the thread. The assistant can analyze file content via Code Interpreter, search file content via File Search, or reference files in function calls. Files persist within a thread and are accessible across multiple turns.
Unique: Files are first-class message attachments with automatic indexing and managed storage — no separate file management API required. Files persist in thread context and are automatically made available to all tools (Code Interpreter, File Search, function calls) without explicit routing.
vs alternatives: Simpler than managing files separately and passing file paths to tools; automatic indexing reduces setup vs. manual chunking and embedding, but less control over file processing compared to custom pipelines
+5 more capabilities