| 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Capabilities | 12 decomposed | 14 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Implements a lightweight run loop (Swarm.run() in core.py) that coordinates multiple agents by detecting when a tool call returns an Agent object, automatically switching execution context without persisting state to external servers. Unlike the Assistants API, all conversation history and context variables remain client-side, enabling full control over agent transitions and state mutations through Python function returns.
Unique: Uses Python function return values as the handoff mechanism (isinstance(result.value, Agent) check in core.py line 276) rather than explicit routing tables or configuration, making agent transitions first-class language constructs that are testable and debuggable as normal Python code.
vs alternatives: Simpler and more testable than Assistants API for multi-agent flows because state stays client-side and handoffs are explicit function returns, not opaque server-side thread transfers.
Converts Python functions into OpenAI-compatible JSON schemas via function_to_json() utility (swarm/util.py lines 31-87) using inspect module to extract parameter names, type hints, and docstrings. Automatically detects which functions require context_variables by inspecting function signatures, enabling dynamic injection of shared state without explicit parameter passing in tool definitions.
Unique: Detects context_variables requirement via inspect.signature() and automatically injects the dict into function calls without requiring explicit parameter declaration in the tool schema, reducing boilerplate while maintaining type safety through Python's native function signatures.
vs alternatives: More Pythonic than manual schema definition (vs LangChain's @tool decorator approach) because it leverages native Python introspection; less verbose than Anthropic's tool_use pattern which requires explicit parameter mapping.
Swarm includes a REPL loop (referenced in architectural overview) that allows interactive testing of agents by accepting user input, running agents, and displaying responses in a command-line interface. The REPL maintains conversation history across turns and supports agent switching, enabling rapid exploration of multi-agent behavior without writing test code.
Unique: REPL is built into the Swarm repository as a demo loop, not a separate tool; it uses the same Swarm.run() API as production code, ensuring that interactive behavior matches programmatic behavior.
vs alternatives: More integrated than external chat interfaces (vs Gradio or Streamlit) because it's part of the framework; simpler than full IDE integration because it's just a Python loop reading stdin.
Swarm includes a complete airline customer service example (referenced in Examples section) that demonstrates multi-agent patterns: a triage agent routes customers to specialized agents (rebooking, refunds, general support) based on issue type. Each agent has specific instructions and tools, and handoffs are implemented as function returns, showing how to structure real-world multi-agent applications.
Unique: Example is a complete, runnable application (not just code snippets) that demonstrates the full Swarm lifecycle: agent creation, tool definition, handoff logic, and conversation management in a realistic domain.
vs alternatives: More comprehensive than isolated code examples (vs scattered snippets) and more realistic than toy examples because it shows multi-agent routing and tool integration together.
Allows Agent instructions to be either static strings or callables that receive context_variables and return instruction strings at runtime (swarm/core.py lines 159-161). This enables instruction content to adapt based on conversation state, user metadata, or external data without re-creating Agent objects, implementing a lightweight form of dynamic prompting.
Unique: Instructions are first-class callables in the Agent type definition, allowing instruction logic to be versioned, tested, and swapped as Python functions rather than embedded in prompt strings, enabling programmatic instruction composition and A/B testing.
vs alternatives: More flexible than static system prompts (vs basic LLM APIs) and simpler than full prompt template engines (vs Langchain's PromptTemplate) because it's just Python functions with access to context_variables.
Executes tool functions returned by the LLM and wraps results in a Result object (swarm/types.py lines 11-15) that can optionally include updated context_variables. The run loop (core.py lines 250-264) detects Result objects and merges context updates back into the shared state dict, enabling functions to mutate agent context without side effects or global state.
Unique: Uses a lightweight Result type (not a full state machine) to couple return values with context mutations, allowing tools to be pure functions that explicitly declare state changes rather than relying on closures or global state, making execution flow traceable and testable.
vs alternatives: Simpler than LangChain's AgentAction/AgentFinish pattern because Result is just a dataclass, not part of a larger action/observation loop; more explicit than implicit context mutation via function side effects.
Integrates with OpenAI's streaming API to yield partial responses token-by-token via get_chat_completion() (core.py line 165), allowing callers to display agent responses in real-time. The run loop accumulates streamed tokens into full messages before processing tool calls, maintaining compatibility with the non-streaming execution path while enabling progressive output rendering.
Unique: Streaming is optional and transparent to the agent logic; the same run() method handles both streaming and non-streaming by yielding Response objects, allowing callers to choose rendering strategy without agent code changes.
vs alternatives: More integrated than manual streaming wrappers (vs calling OpenAI API directly) because the run loop handles token accumulation and tool call parsing; simpler than LangChain's streaming callbacks because it's just a generator parameter.
Maintains a conversation history as a list of dicts with 'role' and 'content' keys, automatically appending user messages and agent responses while filtering out internal tool calls from the LLM's perspective. The run loop (core.py lines 139-229) manages message ordering and ensures tool results are formatted as 'tool' role messages that the LLM can process for subsequent decisions.
Unique: Message history is a simple list of dicts passed by reference, allowing callers to inspect, modify, or persist it directly without API abstractions; tool results are formatted as 'tool' role messages that the LLM natively understands, not wrapped in custom structures.
vs alternatives: More transparent than Assistants API (which hides message history) and simpler than LangChain's BaseMemory because it's just a Python list that callers fully control.
+4 more capabilities
AutoGen 0.4 implements a strict three-layer architecture (autogen-core, autogen-agentchat, autogen-ext) where agents communicate via an event-driven runtime using typed message protocols. The AgentRuntime abstraction supports both SingleThreadedAgentRuntime for local execution and GrpcWorkerAgentRuntime for distributed multi-process coordination, with subscription-based message routing that decouples agent communication from implementation details. Messages are strongly typed via Pydantic models (LLMMessage, BaseChatMessage, BaseAgentEvent), enabling compile-time validation and IDE support.
Unique: Implements a protocol-based agent abstraction (Agent interface) that decouples agent implementation from runtime, enabling the same agent code to run in SingleThreadedAgentRuntime, GrpcWorkerAgentRuntime, or custom runtimes without modification. This is achieved through Pydantic-validated message types and subscription-based routing rather than direct method calls, making the system fundamentally composable.
vs alternatives: Unlike LangGraph's state machine approach or CrewAI's sequential task execution, AutoGen's event-driven architecture enables true asynchronous agent coordination with compile-time type safety and seamless distributed execution via gRPC without code changes.
The autogen-agentchat package provides high-level agent abstractions including AssistantAgent (LLM-powered reasoning), CodeExecutorAgent (sandboxed code execution), and specialized agents (WebSurferAgent, FileSurferAgent) that implement common multi-agent patterns. Each agent encapsulates a specific capability (LLM inference, code execution, web interaction) and integrates with the underlying AgentRuntime via the Agent protocol, allowing developers to compose agents into teams without managing low-level message routing.
Unique: Provides a unified Agent interface where AssistantAgent, CodeExecutorAgent, WebSurferAgent, and FileSurferAgent all implement the same protocol, enabling them to be composed into teams without adapter code. Each agent type encapsulates domain-specific logic (LLM calls, subprocess execution, web scraping) while exposing a consistent message-based interface, allowing developers to swap implementations or add custom agents.
AutoGen scores higher at 77/100 vs Swarm at 58/100.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
vs alternatives: More composable than LangGraph's node-based approach because agents are first-class runtime objects with consistent interfaces; more flexible than CrewAI's role-based agents because agents can be dynamically instantiated and reconfigured at runtime without role definitions.
AutoGen Studio provides a web-based UI for building multi-agent systems without writing code. Users define agents, configure LLM providers, design group chat workflows, and test conversations through a visual interface. The system generates AutoGen Python code that can be exported and deployed. Studio integrates with the autogen-agentchat API and provides real-time conversation testing, agent configuration management, and workflow visualization.
Unique: Provides a visual interface that generates valid AutoGen code, bridging the gap between no-code design and code-based customization. Users can design workflows visually and export runnable Python code that uses the same autogen-agentchat API, enabling gradual transition from no-code to code-based development.
vs alternatives: More integrated than separate no-code tools because generated code is directly executable AutoGen code; more flexible than pure no-code platforms because users can export and customize generated code.
AutoGen supports both Python and .NET (C#) ecosystems with cross-language interoperability through gRPC. The .NET SDK provides equivalent abstractions (Agent, AgentRuntime, ChatCompletionClient) that communicate with Python agents via gRPC workers. This enables mixed-language agent teams where Python agents and .NET agents operate in the same system, with transparent message passing and shared runtime infrastructure.
Unique: Implements cross-language support through GrpcWorkerAgentRuntime that treats .NET agents as remote workers communicating via gRPC, enabling the same Agent protocol to work across language boundaries. This is achieved through protocol buffer definitions that define message schemas language-agnostically.
vs alternatives: More integrated than separate Python and .NET frameworks because agents are truly interoperable; more flexible than language-specific frameworks because teams can choose the best language for each agent.
AutoGen's memory system manages agent context and conversation history through configurable storage backends (in-memory, file-based, database). The system supports context windowing strategies (sliding window, summarization) to manage token usage in long conversations. Memory is integrated with the Agent protocol, allowing agents to access conversation history and maintain state across multiple interactions. The system supports both short-term memory (current conversation) and long-term memory (persistent storage).
Unique: Implements memory as a pluggable component with multiple storage backends, enabling agents to work with different memory strategies without code changes. Context windowing is configurable and can use different strategies (sliding window, summarization, semantic pruning) depending on application needs.
vs alternatives: More flexible than LangGraph's built-in memory because it supports multiple backends and strategies; more comprehensive than CrewAI's memory because it includes both short-term and long-term storage with configurable windowing.
AutoGen integrates with OpenTelemetry to provide comprehensive observability of agent execution, including traces of agent interactions, LLM calls, tool invocations, and message routing. The system exports traces to OpenTelemetry-compatible backends (Jaeger, Datadog, etc.) for visualization and analysis. Telemetry is built into the core runtime, requiring no agent code changes to enable tracing.
Unique: Integrates OpenTelemetry at the core runtime level, enabling automatic tracing of all agent interactions without requiring agent code changes. Traces capture the full execution graph including message routing, LLM calls, and tool invocations, providing comprehensive visibility into agent behavior.
vs alternatives: More comprehensive than LangGraph's logging because it captures the full execution graph; more standardized than custom logging because it uses OpenTelemetry, enabling integration with any observability platform.
AutoGen's BaseGroupChat abstraction enables multi-agent conversations where agents take turns or participate based on routing logic, with pluggable termination conditions (MaxMessageTermination, TextMentionTermination, custom predicates) that determine when a conversation ends. The group chat maintains conversation history, manages agent selection for each turn, and integrates with the AgentRuntime to coordinate message passing between agents. Termination conditions are evaluated after each agent response, enabling early exit when goals are met or token limits approached.
Unique: Implements termination conditions as composable predicates (MaxMessageTermination, TextMentionTermination, custom functions) that are evaluated after each agent turn, decoupling conversation flow control from agent logic. This enables developers to mix-and-match termination strategies without modifying agent code, and to add new conditions by implementing a simple interface.
vs alternatives: More flexible than CrewAI's task-based termination because conditions are evaluated dynamically per turn; more explicit than LangGraph's conditional edges because termination is a first-class concept with dedicated abstractions rather than embedded in routing logic.
AutoGen's code execution system (via CodeExecutorAgent and autogen-ext) supports multiple execution backends including local subprocess execution, Docker containers, and Jupyter notebooks, all exposed through a unified CodeExecutor interface. Code is executed in isolated environments with configurable timeouts, resource limits, and output capture. The system integrates with the agent runtime to return execution results as typed messages, enabling agents to reason about code output and iterate on implementations.
Unique: Abstracts code execution through a CodeExecutor protocol with multiple implementations (LocalCommandLineCodeExecutor, DockerCommandLineCodeExecutor, JupyterCodeExecutor), allowing the same agent code to run against different backends by swapping the executor instance. This is achieved through dependency injection at agent initialization, enabling seamless environment switching.
vs alternatives: More flexible than LangGraph's built-in code execution because it supports multiple backends and isolation levels; more secure than CrewAI's subprocess execution because it provides Docker containerization as a first-class option with explicit timeout and resource management.
+6 more capabilities