StepFun: Step 3.5 Flash vs vectra
Side-by-side comparison to help you choose.
| Feature | StepFun: Step 3.5 Flash | vectra |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Model | Repository |
| UnfragileRank | 21/100 | 41/100 |
| Adoption | 0 | 0 |
| Quality | 0 | 0 |
| Ecosystem | 0 | 1 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Paid | Free |
| Starting Price | $1.00e-7 per prompt token | — |
| Capabilities | 11 decomposed | 12 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Generates text by selectively activating only 11B of 196B parameters per token using a sparse Mixture of Experts (MoE) architecture. The model routes each token through a gating network that determines which expert modules to activate, reducing computational overhead while maintaining capability. This sparse activation pattern enables efficient inference without full model evaluation, trading off some latency for dramatically reduced memory and compute requirements compared to dense models of equivalent parameter count.
Unique: Uses a 196B parameter sparse MoE architecture that activates only 11B parameters per token through learned gating, achieving dense-model capability with sparse-model efficiency. This differs from dense models (which activate all parameters) and from other MoE implementations by optimizing the expert routing mechanism specifically for language understanding and generation tasks.
vs alternatives: Delivers comparable reasoning quality to dense 70B+ models while requiring 60-70% less compute per inference token than dense alternatives, making it faster and cheaper than GPT-4 or Llama 2 70B for equivalent capability levels.
Maintains and processes multi-turn conversation history by accepting role-based message sequences (system, user, assistant) and maintaining coherent context across exchanges. The model processes the entire conversation history as a single input sequence, with special tokens demarcating role boundaries, allowing it to track conversation state, maintain consistency in persona and knowledge, and reference previous exchanges. This enables stateless conversation handling where each request includes full history, avoiding server-side session management complexity.
Unique: Implements conversation context through stateless message arrays rather than server-side session storage, allowing clients to manage full conversation history and reducing backend complexity. The sparse MoE architecture processes this history efficiently by routing tokens through relevant experts based on conversation content.
vs alternatives: Simpler to deploy and scale than models requiring session management, while maintaining conversation coherence comparable to stateful chatbot systems like ChatGPT, at lower infrastructure cost.
Summarizes long documents or conversations into concise overviews while preserving key information. The model can generate summaries at different detail levels (brief bullet points, paragraph summaries, executive summaries) and can focus on specific aspects of the source material. This is implemented through instruction-following that specifies summary length, style, and focus areas.
Unique: Implements summarization through sparse expert routing that activates compression and key-information-extraction specialists based on document type and summary requirements. This allows efficient summarization without the parameter overhead of dense models.
vs alternatives: Provides summarization quality comparable to GPT-4 while being 40-50% cheaper, making it cost-effective for high-volume document processing and knowledge management workflows.
Generates and completes code across multiple programming languages by understanding syntax, semantics, and common patterns. The model was trained on diverse code repositories and can generate syntactically valid code, complete partial implementations, suggest refactorings, and explain code logic. It handles context from surrounding code to make completion suggestions that fit the existing codebase style and architecture, though it operates without access to the actual codebase structure or type information.
Unique: Leverages sparse MoE routing to efficiently handle code generation across 40+ languages by activating language-specific expert modules based on detected syntax and patterns. This allows a single model to maintain high-quality code generation across diverse languages without the parameter overhead of dense models.
vs alternatives: Faster and cheaper than Copilot or Claude for code generation due to sparse activation, while maintaining multi-language support comparable to GPT-4, making it suitable for cost-sensitive development tool integrations.
Performs multi-step reasoning by generating intermediate thinking steps that break down complex problems into manageable sub-tasks. The model can articulate its reasoning process, identify dependencies between steps, and build solutions incrementally. This capability enables solving problems that require planning, logical deduction, or mathematical reasoning by having the model explicitly work through each step rather than jumping directly to answers.
Unique: Implements reasoning through sparse expert routing that activates reasoning-specialized modules for complex tasks while maintaining efficiency. The MoE architecture allows the model to allocate more parameters to reasoning steps when needed without the overhead of a dense model.
vs alternatives: Provides reasoning transparency comparable to GPT-4 or Claude while consuming 40-50% fewer tokens due to sparse activation, making it cost-effective for reasoning-heavy applications.
Follows detailed instructions and adapts behavior based on system prompts that define role, constraints, output format, and task-specific rules. The model interprets natural language instructions and applies them consistently across multiple turns, allowing fine-grained control over response style, tone, and content restrictions. This is implemented through the system message role in multi-turn conversations, which establishes context that influences all subsequent responses.
Unique: Implements instruction-following through the sparse MoE architecture by routing tokens through instruction-interpretation experts that specialize in understanding and applying constraints. This allows efficient instruction-following without the parameter overhead of dense models.
vs alternatives: Provides instruction-following quality comparable to GPT-4 or Claude while being 40-50% cheaper to run, making it suitable for cost-sensitive applications requiring customizable AI behavior.
Answers questions and synthesizes information by processing provided context (documents, code, data) and extracting relevant information to formulate responses. The model reads through provided context, identifies relevant passages or concepts, and generates answers grounded in that context. This enables question-answering over custom documents without requiring external retrieval systems, though it's limited by context window size and doesn't perform semantic search across large document collections.
Unique: Implements context-aware question-answering through sparse expert routing that activates retrieval and synthesis experts based on question type and context content. This allows efficient processing of context without the parameter overhead of dense models.
vs alternatives: Simpler to implement than full RAG systems while providing comparable accuracy for small-to-medium documents, at lower cost than dense models. Suitable for applications where context fits in a single prompt.
Generates creative content (stories, poetry, marketing copy, dialogue) with controllable style and tone through natural language instructions. The model can adapt its writing style to match specified tones (formal, casual, humorous, etc.), genres, and audience levels. This is implemented through instruction-following capabilities combined with the model's training on diverse creative content, allowing fine-grained control over output characteristics without requiring fine-tuning.
Unique: Leverages sparse MoE routing to activate creative-writing specialists based on detected genre and style cues, allowing efficient generation of diverse creative content without the parameter overhead of dense models trained on all writing styles.
vs alternatives: Provides creative quality comparable to GPT-4 or Claude while being 40-50% cheaper, making it cost-effective for high-volume creative content generation in marketing and content creation workflows.
+3 more capabilities
Stores vector embeddings and metadata in JSON files on disk while maintaining an in-memory index for fast similarity search. Uses a hybrid architecture where the file system serves as the persistent store and RAM holds the active search index, enabling both durability and performance without requiring a separate database server. Supports automatic index persistence and reload cycles.
Unique: Combines file-backed persistence with in-memory indexing, avoiding the complexity of running a separate database service while maintaining reasonable performance for small-to-medium datasets. Uses JSON serialization for human-readable storage and easy debugging.
vs alternatives: Lighter weight than Pinecone or Weaviate for local development, but trades scalability and concurrent access for simplicity and zero infrastructure overhead.
Implements vector similarity search using cosine distance calculation on normalized embeddings, with support for alternative distance metrics. Performs brute-force similarity computation across all indexed vectors, returning results ranked by distance score. Includes configurable thresholds to filter results below a minimum similarity threshold.
Unique: Implements pure cosine similarity without approximation layers, making it deterministic and debuggable but trading performance for correctness. Suitable for datasets where exact results matter more than speed.
vs alternatives: More transparent and easier to debug than approximate methods like HNSW, but significantly slower for large-scale retrieval compared to Pinecone or Milvus.
Accepts vectors of configurable dimensionality and automatically normalizes them for cosine similarity computation. Validates that all vectors have consistent dimensions and rejects mismatched vectors. Supports both pre-normalized and unnormalized input, with automatic L2 normalization applied during insertion.
vectra scores higher at 41/100 vs StepFun: Step 3.5 Flash at 21/100. vectra also has a free tier, making it more accessible.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
Unique: Automatically normalizes vectors during insertion, eliminating the need for users to handle normalization manually. Validates dimensionality consistency.
vs alternatives: More user-friendly than requiring manual normalization, but adds latency compared to accepting pre-normalized vectors.
Exports the entire vector database (embeddings, metadata, index) to standard formats (JSON, CSV) for backup, analysis, or migration. Imports vectors from external sources in multiple formats. Supports format conversion between JSON, CSV, and other serialization formats without losing data.
Unique: Supports multiple export/import formats (JSON, CSV) with automatic format detection, enabling interoperability with other tools and databases. No proprietary format lock-in.
vs alternatives: More portable than database-specific export formats, but less efficient than binary dumps. Suitable for small-to-medium datasets.
Implements BM25 (Okapi BM25) lexical search algorithm for keyword-based retrieval, then combines BM25 scores with vector similarity scores using configurable weighting to produce hybrid rankings. Tokenizes text fields during indexing and performs term frequency analysis at query time. Allows tuning the balance between semantic and lexical relevance.
Unique: Combines BM25 and vector similarity in a single ranking framework with configurable weighting, avoiding the need for separate lexical and semantic search pipelines. Implements BM25 from scratch rather than wrapping an external library.
vs alternatives: Simpler than Elasticsearch for hybrid search but lacks advanced features like phrase queries, stemming, and distributed indexing. Better integrated with vector search than bolting BM25 onto a pure vector database.
Supports filtering search results using a Pinecone-compatible query syntax that allows boolean combinations of metadata predicates (equality, comparison, range, set membership). Evaluates filter expressions against metadata objects during search, returning only vectors that satisfy the filter constraints. Supports nested metadata structures and multiple filter operators.
Unique: Implements Pinecone's filter syntax natively without requiring a separate query language parser, enabling drop-in compatibility for applications already using Pinecone. Filters are evaluated in-memory against metadata objects.
vs alternatives: More compatible with Pinecone workflows than generic vector databases, but lacks the performance optimizations of Pinecone's server-side filtering and index-accelerated predicates.
Integrates with multiple embedding providers (OpenAI, Azure OpenAI, local transformer models via Transformers.js) to generate vector embeddings from text. Abstracts provider differences behind a unified interface, allowing users to swap providers without changing application code. Handles API authentication, rate limiting, and batch processing for efficiency.
Unique: Provides a unified embedding interface supporting both cloud APIs and local transformer models, allowing users to choose between cost/privacy trade-offs without code changes. Uses Transformers.js for browser-compatible local embeddings.
vs alternatives: More flexible than single-provider solutions like LangChain's OpenAI embeddings, but less comprehensive than full embedding orchestration platforms. Local embedding support is unique for a lightweight vector database.
Runs entirely in the browser using IndexedDB for persistent storage, enabling client-side vector search without a backend server. Synchronizes in-memory index with IndexedDB on updates, allowing offline search and reducing server load. Supports the same API as the Node.js version for code reuse across environments.
Unique: Provides a unified API across Node.js and browser environments using IndexedDB for persistence, enabling code sharing and offline-first architectures. Avoids the complexity of syncing client-side and server-side indices.
vs alternatives: Simpler than building separate client and server vector search implementations, but limited by browser storage quotas and IndexedDB performance compared to server-side databases.
+4 more capabilities