| Ecosystem |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Capabilities | 5 decomposed | 9 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Accepts pasted error messages and code snippets through a VS Code status bar modal interface, sends them to OpenAI's ChatGPT API, and returns natural language explanations of what the error means and why it occurred. The extension operates as a thin wrapper around ChatGPT's conversational API with no local parsing or semantic analysis of errors — all interpretation is delegated to the LLM.
Unique: Integrates ChatGPT error explanation directly into VS Code's status bar as a modal popup, eliminating the need to switch to a browser or separate tool during debugging workflows. Unlike web-based error lookup tools, it maintains context within the IDE.
vs alternatives: Faster context-switching than web search for error explanations, but lacks the structured error database and community solutions of Stack Overflow or official documentation.
Takes error messages and code snippets provided by the developer and uses ChatGPT to generate proposed code fixes or remediation steps. The extension passes the user's input directly to OpenAI's API without analyzing code structure, AST parsing, or semantic understanding — all fix generation is LLM-based and unvalidated.
Unique: Embeds ChatGPT's code generation capability directly into the VS Code debugging workflow via a modal interface, avoiding the friction of copying errors to a separate ChatGPT tab. However, it provides no local code analysis or validation — purely a convenience wrapper.
vs alternatives: More convenient than manually querying ChatGPT in a browser, but less capable than GitHub Copilot or Codeium which provide inline suggestions with codebase awareness and real-time validation.
Accepts arbitrary developer questions (not limited to bugs despite marketing focus) through the VS Code status bar modal and routes them to ChatGPT's API for general conversational responses. The extension acts as a thin UI wrapper with no question routing, intent classification, or specialized handling — all questions receive the same generic ChatGPT treatment.
Unique: Provides a lightweight modal interface for ChatGPT queries without leaving VS Code, reducing window-switching friction. Unlike dedicated AI coding assistants, it makes no attempt to understand code context or provide specialized responses — it's a generic chat wrapper.
vs alternatives: Simpler and lighter-weight than full-featured AI coding assistants like Copilot, but lacks specialized capabilities like codebase indexing, inline suggestions, or context-aware responses.
Provides a VS Code status bar button that opens a modal dialog for text input, sends the input to ChatGPT's API, and displays the response in the same modal. The implementation uses VS Code's native modal/input box APIs with no custom UI framework — responses are rendered as plain text in a popup window that blocks further VS Code interaction until dismissed.
Unique: Uses VS Code's native status bar and modal APIs for a minimal, zero-configuration UI that requires no custom UI framework or styling. This keeps the extension lightweight but sacrifices rich formatting and advanced interaction patterns.
vs alternatives: Simpler and lighter than extensions using custom webview panels (like GitHub Copilot Chat), but less feature-rich and more blocking to the developer workflow.
Integrates with OpenAI's ChatGPT API to send user queries and receive responses. The extension handles API authentication, request formatting, and response parsing, but provides no model selection, parameter tuning, or fallback mechanisms. All requests use a fixed ChatGPT model (version unspecified) with default parameters — no configuration options are exposed to users.
Unique: Provides direct, zero-configuration integration with OpenAI's ChatGPT API from within VS Code without requiring users to manage API calls or authentication manually. However, it exposes no configuration options, model selection, or advanced features — purely a pass-through wrapper.
vs alternatives: Simpler setup than building custom ChatGPT integrations, but less flexible than frameworks like LangChain or direct API clients that allow model selection, parameter tuning, and advanced features.
Classifies input and output text for sexually explicit content using a fine-tuned Gemma language model trained on safety datasets. The model processes natural language through transformer attention mechanisms to detect explicit sexual references, imagery descriptions, and adult content across multiple languages and contexts. Returns confidence scores and categorical severity levels (e.g., safe/unsafe) that can be thresholded for different deployment scenarios.
Unique: Built on Gemma's efficient transformer architecture (2B/7B parameters) enabling on-device deployment without cloud API calls, unlike OpenAI Moderation API or Perspective API which require external requests. Provides configurable thresholds and multi-category safety scoring rather than binary pass/fail decisions.
vs alternatives: Faster and more privacy-preserving than cloud-based moderation APIs because it runs locally; more nuanced than regex-based filters because it understands semantic context through transformer attention
Identifies and classifies text containing instructions for violence, self-harm, illegal activities, or other dangerous behaviors using semantic understanding of intent and context. The model distinguishes between educational/informational content and actionable dangerous instructions through fine-tuned pattern recognition on safety-labeled datasets. Outputs severity scores and content category tags enabling graduated response policies (e.g., warning vs. blocking).
Unique: Gemma-based approach enables semantic understanding of dangerous intent rather than keyword matching, allowing distinction between educational/historical content and actionable instructions. Provides multi-category danger classification (violence vs. self-harm vs. illegal) rather than binary safe/unsafe.
vs alternatives: More context-aware than regex/keyword-based filters because it understands semantic intent; more deployable on-device than cloud APIs, reducing latency and privacy exposure for sensitive content
ShieldGemma scores higher at 57/100 vs Stacker at 32/100. Stacker leads on ecosystem, while ShieldGemma is stronger on adoption and quality.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
Detects targeted harassment, bullying, and abusive language directed at individuals or groups using contextual language understanding. The model identifies patterns of repeated negative targeting, personal attacks, and coordinated abuse through transformer-based semantic analysis of conversation context and user interaction history. Outputs harassment severity scores and target identification enabling context-aware moderation policies.
Unique: Incorporates conversation context and interaction patterns rather than analyzing messages in isolation, enabling detection of coordinated harassment and repeated targeting. Gemma's efficient architecture allows real-time processing of conversation threads without external API calls.
vs alternatives: More context-aware than single-message classifiers because it analyzes conversation patterns; more privacy-preserving than cloud-based harassment detection APIs because it runs on-device
Classifies text containing hate speech, discriminatory language, and slurs targeting protected characteristics (race, ethnicity, religion, gender, sexual orientation, disability, etc.) using fine-tuned semantic understanding. The model recognizes both explicit slurs and coded language/dog whistles through pattern matching on safety-labeled datasets. Outputs hate speech severity, target group identification, and language category enabling nuanced moderation policies.
Unique: Provides multi-dimensional categorization (hate speech type + target group) rather than binary classification, enabling granular moderation policies. Gemma's semantic understanding captures coded language and dog whistles beyond simple keyword matching.
vs alternatives: More nuanced than regex-based slur filters because it understands context and coded language; more deployable than cloud APIs because it runs on-device with no external dependencies
Enables fine-grained control over safety classification thresholds and policies through configuration parameters applied at inference time. Allows operators to adjust confidence score cutoffs per safety category (e.g., strict filtering for explicit content, lenient for dangerous content), define custom response policies (block/warn/log), and apply different thresholds to different user segments or content types. Implemented through post-processing of model confidence scores against configurable policy rules.
Unique: Provides runtime threshold configuration without model retraining, enabling rapid policy iteration and multi-segment deployment. Supports per-category and per-segment threshold variation, allowing nuanced safety/usability tradeoffs.
vs alternatives: More flexible than fixed-threshold classifiers because thresholds can be adjusted without retraining; more operationally efficient than maintaining separate fine-tuned models for different policies
Applies safety classification across multiple languages using Gemma's multilingual capabilities, enabling consistent content moderation policies across global platforms. The model processes text in 40+ languages through shared transformer embeddings trained on multilingual safety datasets. Outputs language-agnostic safety classifications with per-language confidence adjustments reflecting training data coverage.
Unique: Gemma's multilingual training enables single-model deployment across 40+ languages with shared safety semantics, avoiding need for language-specific fine-tuned models. Provides per-language confidence adjustments reflecting training data coverage.
vs alternatives: More efficient than maintaining separate safety models per language; more consistent than language-specific classifiers because it uses shared safety semantics across languages
Processes multiple text inputs (messages, comments, completions) in batch mode with vectorized inference, returning safety scores and classifications for all inputs simultaneously. Implemented through batching at the inference layer to maximize GPU utilization and throughput. Outputs structured results with per-input classifications, confidence scores, and category breakdowns enabling efficient content moderation pipelines.
Unique: Vectorized batch inference on GPU enables processing thousands of inputs per second, orders of magnitude faster than sequential API calls. Provides structured output with per-input classifications and aggregated statistics.
vs alternatives: Much higher throughput than sequential cloud API calls because it batches inference on local GPU; more cost-effective than per-request API pricing for high-volume moderation
Integrates safety classification into LLM application workflows by filtering both user inputs (before reaching the model) and model outputs (before returning to user). Implemented as middleware in the inference pipeline that applies safety classifiers sequentially or in parallel, with configurable blocking/warning policies. Enables end-to-end safety without modifying the base LLM.
Unique: Provides integrated input+output filtering in a single pipeline rather than separate classifiers, enabling coordinated safety policies. Supports configurable policies (block/warn/log) and maintains audit trails for compliance.
vs alternatives: More comprehensive than output-only filtering because it also prevents harmful inputs from reaching the model; more efficient than external API-based filtering because it runs locally without network latency
+1 more capabilities