| Ecosystem | 1 | 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Free | Paid |
| Capabilities | 11 decomposed | 14 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
The Planner component uses an LLM to automatically decompose complex user queries into subtasks and generates a directed acyclic graph (DAG) representing task dependencies. It parses LLM outputs via StreamingGraphParser to extract task nodes, their input/output relationships, and execution constraints, enabling identification of parallelizable work without manual specification.
Unique: Uses LLM-in-the-loop planning with streaming graph parsing to generate executable task DAGs on-the-fly, rather than requiring users to manually specify task dependencies or using fixed rule-based decomposition. The Planner can generate plans incrementally and stream tasks to the executor before the full plan is complete.
vs alternatives: More flexible than rule-based task decomposition (e.g., ReAct) because it adapts to problem structure via LLM reasoning, and faster than sequential function calling because it identifies parallelizable tasks automatically.
The TaskFetchingUnit and Executor components implement a scheduler that respects task dependencies from the generated DAG, executing independent tasks concurrently while blocking dependent tasks until their inputs are available. The system maintains a task queue, tracks completion status, and collects results for aggregation, enabling wall-clock latency reduction through parallelism.
Unique: Implements a dependency-aware scheduler that extracts parallelism from task DAGs generated by the Planner, executing tasks concurrently while respecting input dependencies. Unlike sequential function calling (standard ReAct), this enables multiple independent tool calls to run simultaneously with automatic dependency resolution.
vs alternatives: Reduces latency vs sequential function calling by 2-5x on multi-hop tasks with independent branches; more efficient than naive parallel execution because it respects dependencies and doesn't execute tasks prematurely.
LLMCompiler can be integrated with ReAct (Reasoning + Acting) patterns where the agent iteratively reasons about the current state, decides on actions (tool calls), observes results, and repeats. This enables adaptive behavior where the agent can adjust its strategy based on intermediate observations.
Unique: Integrates ReAct-style iterative reasoning with LLMCompiler's parallel execution, enabling the agent to combine planned parallelism with reactive decision-making based on intermediate observations.
vs alternatives: More flexible than pure planning because it allows mid-execution strategy changes; more efficient than pure ReAct because it exploits parallelism in independent tasks.
When enabled, streaming mode allows the TaskFetchingUnit to begin executing tasks as soon as they are generated by the Planner's LLM output stream, without waiting for the complete plan. The StreamingGraphParser incrementally parses LLM tokens into task objects, enabling pipelined planning and execution that reduces time-to-first-result and overall latency.
Unique: Implements streaming graph parsing that converts LLM token streams into executable task objects on-the-fly, enabling the executor to begin work before the Planner finishes generating the full plan. This pipelined approach reduces end-to-end latency by overlapping planning and execution phases.
vs alternatives: Faster than batch planning (wait for full plan before execution) because it starts execution immediately; more responsive than traditional ReAct which waits for full LLM output before parsing.
LLMCompiler abstracts LLM provider differences through a unified model interface (src/utils/model_utils.py) that supports OpenAI, Azure OpenAI, Friendli, and vLLM backends. The framework handles provider-specific API calls, token counting, and response parsing, allowing users to swap providers without changing orchestration logic.
Unique: Provides a unified interface abstracting OpenAI, Azure OpenAI, Friendli, and vLLM with provider-agnostic method signatures, allowing the Planner and Executor to remain provider-agnostic while supporting both closed-source and open-source models.
vs alternatives: More flexible than frameworks tied to a single provider (e.g., LangChain's OpenAI-centric design); enables cost optimization by switching providers without code changes.
LLMCompiler can generate new execution plans based on results from previous attempts, incorporating execution history and intermediate results as context to the Planner. This enables the system to adapt when initial plans fail or produce unsatisfactory results, using feedback to refine task decomposition.
Unique: Enables the Planner to generate new execution plans conditioned on previous execution results and failures, treating replanning as a first-class capability rather than an error recovery afterthought. This allows the system to learn from execution and adapt decomposition strategies.
vs alternatives: More adaptive than single-shot planning because it incorporates execution feedback; more efficient than naive retry because it generates new plans rather than re-executing the same failed plan.
LLMCompiler maintains a registry of available tools with structured schemas defining inputs, outputs, and descriptions. The Planner uses these schemas to generate valid function calls, and the Executor uses them to invoke tools with proper argument binding. This schema-driven approach ensures type safety and enables the LLM to reason about tool capabilities.
Unique: Implements a schema-driven tool registry where tools are defined with structured input/output schemas that the Planner uses to generate valid function calls. This enables type-safe, schema-validated function calling without manual argument binding.
vs alternatives: More structured than string-based tool descriptions (e.g., ReAct with natural language tool specs); enables validation and type checking that reduces runtime errors.
The LLMCompilerAgent component collects results from all executed tasks and synthesizes them into a final answer using the LLM. It maintains a mapping of task IDs to results, passes this context to the LLM, and generates a coherent response that incorporates all intermediate findings.
Unique: Uses the LLM itself to synthesize results from parallel task execution, treating synthesis as an LLM-powered reasoning step rather than simple concatenation. This enables intelligent interpretation and integration of diverse task outputs.
vs alternatives: More intelligent than template-based result aggregation because it uses LLM reasoning to synthesize and interpret results; more flexible than fixed aggregation logic.
+3 more capabilities
Automatically loads and parses documents from diverse sources (PDFs, Word docs, HTML, Markdown, code files, databases) into a unified in-memory representation using format-specific loaders and node-based document abstractions. Each document is decomposed into Document objects containing metadata, content, and relationships, enabling downstream processing without format-specific handling in application code.
Unique: Provides a unified loader abstraction (BaseReader interface) that normalizes 100+ data source connectors into a single Document/Node API, eliminating format-specific branching logic in application code. Loaders are composable and chainable, allowing sequential transformations (e.g., load → split → extract metadata → embed).
vs alternatives: Broader out-of-the-box loader coverage than LangChain's document loaders and more structured node-based decomposition than raw text splitting, reducing boilerplate for multi-source RAG pipelines.
Splits documents into semantically coherent chunks using multiple strategies (character-based, token-aware, recursive, semantic) with configurable overlap and chunk size. Preserves document hierarchy and metadata through a node tree structure, enabling retrieval systems to maintain context relationships and enable hierarchical re-ranking or parent-document retrieval patterns.
Unique: Implements a node-tree abstraction that preserves document hierarchy and enables parent-document retrieval patterns. Supports multiple splitting strategies (recursive, semantic, code-aware) with pluggable custom splitters, and automatically propagates metadata through the node tree.
vs alternatives: More sophisticated than LangChain's text splitters because it preserves hierarchical relationships and supports semantic splitting; better for complex document structures than simple character-based splitting.
LlamaIndex scores higher at 40/100 vs LLMCompiler at 37/100. LLMCompiler leads on adoption and ecosystem, while LlamaIndex is stronger on quality. However, LLMCompiler offers a free tier which may be better for getting started.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
Processes documents containing mixed content (text, images, tables, code) by extracting and understanding each modality separately, then synthesizing information across modalities. Uses vision models for image understanding, specialized parsers for tables and code, and integrates results into a unified document representation for retrieval and generation.
Unique: Integrates vision models, table parsers, and code extractors into a unified multi-modal document processing pipeline that synthesizes information across modalities. Preserves modality-specific structure (table schemas, code formatting) while enabling cross-modal retrieval and generation.
vs alternatives: More comprehensive multi-modal support than text-only RAG; built-in vision integration reduces boilerplate for document understanding compared to manual vision API calls.
Enables streaming of LLM responses token-by-token and real-time retrieval updates, allowing applications to display partial results as they become available. Supports streaming from retrieval (progressive document discovery) and generation (token-by-token output) with backpressure handling and cancellation support for responsive user experiences.
Unique: Provides first-class streaming support for both retrieval and generation with automatic backpressure handling and cancellation. Enables progressive result display without custom async/streaming code in application layer.
vs alternatives: More integrated streaming support than manual LLM API streaming; built-in retrieval streaming and backpressure handling reduce complexity compared to custom streaming implementations.
Tracks API costs for LLM calls, embeddings, and other operations with per-query and per-session cost attribution. Provides cost optimization recommendations (e.g., batch processing, model selection, caching) and enables cost-aware query planning to balance quality and expense. Integrates with multiple LLM providers to normalize cost tracking across models.
Unique: Provides automatic cost tracking across multiple LLM providers with per-query attribution and cost optimization recommendations. Integrates with query execution to enable cost-aware planning without manual cost calculation.
vs alternatives: More integrated cost tracking than manual API billing review; built-in optimization recommendations reduce guesswork for cost reduction.
Enables building custom RAG pipelines by composing modular components (retrievers, synthesizers, agents, tools) through a declarative or programmatic API. Supports complex workflows with branching, loops, and conditional logic, with automatic dependency resolution and execution optimization. Pipelines are reusable, testable, and can be deployed as APIs or batch jobs.
Unique: Provides a flexible pipeline composition API supporting both declarative and programmatic definitions, with automatic dependency resolution and execution optimization. Enables complex workflows with branching and conditional logic without custom orchestration code.
vs alternatives: More flexible pipeline composition than fixed RAG architectures; better workflow support than manual component chaining.
Generates embeddings for documents/nodes using pluggable embedding providers (OpenAI, Hugging Face, local models) and stores them in a unified vector store interface that abstracts over multiple backends (Pinecone, Weaviate, Milvus, FAISS, Chroma, etc.). The abstraction layer enables switching vector stores without changing application code, and handles batching, retry logic, and metadata indexing.
Unique: Provides a unified VectorStore interface that abstracts 10+ vector database backends, enabling zero-code switching between providers. Handles embedding batching, retry logic, and metadata propagation automatically. Supports both cloud and local embedding models through a pluggable EmbedModel interface.
vs alternatives: Broader vector store coverage and more seamless provider switching than LangChain's vectorstore integrations; better abstraction consistency across backends than using raw vector store SDKs directly.
Retrieves semantically similar documents from vector stores using embedding-based similarity search, with optional re-ranking, filtering, and fusion strategies (hybrid search combining dense and sparse retrieval). Supports multiple retrieval modes (similarity, MMR, fusion) and enables custom retrieval logic through a pluggable Retriever interface that can combine multiple strategies.
Unique: Implements a pluggable Retriever abstraction supporting multiple retrieval strategies (similarity, MMR, fusion, custom) that can be composed and chained. Built-in support for re-ranking via LLM or cross-encoder, and hybrid search combining dense and sparse retrieval without custom integration code.
vs alternatives: More flexible retrieval composition than LangChain's retrievers; built-in re-ranking and fusion strategies reduce boilerplate for advanced retrieval pipelines.
+6 more capabilities