| 0 |
| 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Paid | Free |
| Capabilities | 8 decomposed | 9 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Automatically generates multiple ad creative variations (images, copy, headlines) from product catalog data by analyzing product attributes, historical performance patterns, and audience segments. Uses computer vision and NLP to extract product features and generate contextually relevant messaging that maps to different audience demographics and platform requirements (Instagram, Facebook, TikTok, etc.).
Unique: Integrates product feed parsing with computer vision and NLP to generate platform-native ad formats automatically, rather than requiring manual template-based design or separate creative tools. Learns from historical campaign performance to bias generation toward high-performing creative patterns.
vs alternatives: Faster than manual creative teams or generic design tools because it understands product attributes and platform requirements natively, generating 10-50x more variations in the same time.
Monitors active campaigns across multiple ad platforms (Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, Google Ads, LinkedIn) in real-time and automatically reallocates budget between ad sets, creatives, and audiences based on performance metrics (ROAS, CPC, CTR, conversion rate). Uses reinforcement learning or multi-armed bandit algorithms to balance exploration (testing new creatives/audiences) with exploitation (scaling winners).
Unique: Implements multi-armed bandit optimization across heterogeneous ad platforms with unified metric normalization, allowing budget shifts between Facebook and TikTok campaigns despite different attribution models and API schemas. Handles platform-specific constraints (daily budget minimums, ad set hierarchies) natively.
vs alternatives: Faster ROI improvement than manual optimization because it reallocates budget continuously (hourly/daily) rather than weekly, and tests 100+ variations simultaneously instead of sequential A/B tests.
Analyzes customer data (purchase history, demographics, behavior) to identify high-value audience segments and automatically generates lookalike audiences on ad platforms. Uses clustering algorithms (k-means, hierarchical clustering) to group similar customers, then syncs segment definitions to Facebook Audiences, Google Audiences, and TikTok Custom Audiences via platform APIs. Continuously refines segments based on campaign performance feedback.
Unique: Combines customer clustering with real-time platform API syncing to create self-updating lookalike audiences that improve as campaign performance data feeds back into segment refinement. Handles privacy compliance natively (consent checking, data minimization) rather than requiring separate CDP infrastructure.
vs alternatives: More accurate than platform-native lookalike tools because it uses proprietary customer data and LTV signals, not just platform behavioral signals, resulting in 15-30% better lookalike audience quality.
Provides unified interface to create, schedule, and manage campaigns across Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, Google Ads, LinkedIn, and Pinterest simultaneously. Translates campaign specifications (budget, targeting, creatives, schedule) into platform-specific API calls, handling format conversions, validation, and constraint enforcement. Supports calendar-based scheduling with timezone awareness and platform-specific launch windows.
Unique: Implements platform-agnostic campaign schema that translates to platform-specific API payloads, handling format conversions (e.g., Facebook's nested ad set structure vs Google's flat campaign structure) and constraint enforcement (budget minimums, targeting restrictions) transparently. Supports atomic multi-platform launches with rollback on partial failures.
vs alternatives: Faster campaign launch than manual platform-by-platform setup because it eliminates context switching and handles API complexity, reducing launch time from 2-3 hours to 15-30 minutes for multi-platform campaigns.
Automatically runs structured A/B tests across creative variations (images, copy, headlines, CTAs) within live campaigns, measuring statistical significance and automatically scaling winners. Uses statistical hypothesis testing (chi-squared, t-tests) to determine when a variant is significantly better than control, with configurable confidence thresholds (90%, 95%, 99%). Handles multiple comparison corrections (Bonferroni) to avoid false positives when testing many variants.
Unique: Implements Bayesian or frequentist statistical testing with multiple comparison corrections built-in, automatically determining sample size requirements and stopping rules rather than requiring manual experiment design. Integrates test results directly into campaign optimization (auto-scaling winners) rather than just reporting.
vs alternatives: More rigorous than platform-native A/B testing because it applies proper statistical controls (Bonferroni correction, effect size calculation) and can test more variants simultaneously (10+ vs platform limit of 2-3), reducing time to find winners.
Uses historical campaign data and machine learning models (gradient boosting, neural networks) to predict campaign performance (CTR, conversion rate, ROAS) before launch, and recommends optimal bid amounts per platform. Models learn from past campaigns to identify patterns (e.g., 'video creatives outperform static by 25% on TikTok'). Continuously retrains on new campaign data to improve forecast accuracy.
Unique: Trains ensemble ML models on proprietary historical campaign data across all clients (with privacy isolation) to generate cross-client performance benchmarks, enabling predictions for new campaigns even with limited brand-specific history. Incorporates platform-specific features (algorithm changes, seasonality) into model retraining.
vs alternatives: More accurate than platform-native bid optimization because it uses cross-platform historical patterns and can predict ROAS (not just CPC), whereas platforms optimize locally without visibility into revenue impact.
Monitors active campaigns for policy violations (prohibited content, misleading claims, trademark infringement) using content moderation APIs and rule-based checks. Automatically flags or pauses campaigns that violate platform policies or brand guidelines, with detailed violation reports. Integrates with platform moderation systems (Facebook Brand Safety, Google Brand Safety) and custom rule engines for brand-specific compliance.
Unique: Combines platform-native moderation signals (Facebook Brand Safety, Google policies) with custom rule engines and content moderation APIs to enforce both platform policies and brand-specific compliance rules. Provides audit trails for regulatory compliance (GDPR, FTC, etc.).
vs alternatives: Faster violation detection than manual review because it flags violations in real-time before platform disapproval, and catches brand guideline violations that platforms don't enforce.
Aggregates conversion and revenue data from multiple ad platforms and attributes conversions to specific campaigns, ad sets, and creatives using multi-touch attribution models (first-click, last-click, linear, time-decay, data-driven). Handles platform attribution delays and discrepancies by reconciling data from platform APIs with server-side conversion tracking. Provides unified ROI dashboard across all platforms.
Unique: Implements multiple attribution models simultaneously and allows A/B testing of models to determine which best predicts future campaign performance for a specific brand. Reconciles platform-reported conversions with server-side data to detect tracking gaps and adjust for platform-specific attribution bias.
vs alternatives: More accurate than platform-native attribution because it uses server-side conversion data (not just platform pixels) and applies multi-touch attribution instead of last-click, revealing true campaign impact across customer journeys.
Executes SQL queries against Supabase PostgreSQL instances through the Model Context Protocol, translating natural language or structured query requests into parameterized SQL statements. Uses MCP's tool-calling interface to expose database operations as callable functions with schema validation, enabling LLM agents to perform CRUD operations, joins, and aggregations with automatic connection pooling and credential management through Supabase client SDK.
Unique: Exposes Supabase PostgreSQL as MCP tools with automatic credential injection from Supabase client SDK, eliminating manual connection string management and enabling seamless LLM-to-database queries within Claude or compatible agents
vs alternatives: Tighter integration than generic SQL MCP servers because it leverages Supabase's built-in authentication and connection pooling rather than requiring separate database credential configuration
Exposes Supabase Auth session state and user metadata through MCP tools, allowing agents to inspect current authentication context, retrieve user profiles, and trigger auth-related operations. Integrates with Supabase's JWT-based auth system to validate sessions and access user claims without re-authenticating, using the Supabase client's built-in session management.
Unique: Integrates Supabase's JWT-based auth system directly into MCP tool interface, allowing agents to inspect and act on auth state without managing separate credential stores or re-authentication flows
vs alternatives: More seamless than generic auth MCP servers because it leverages Supabase's built-in session management and avoids redundant credential passing between agent and auth system
Invokes Supabase Edge Functions (serverless TypeScript/JavaScript functions) through MCP tools, passing parameters and receiving results with optional streaming support. Uses Supabase's edge function HTTP API to trigger functions with automatic authentication headers and response parsing, enabling agents to execute custom business logic without embedding it in the agent itself.
Supabase scores higher at 42/100 vs Smartly.io at 19/100. Supabase also has a free tier, making it more accessible.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
Unique: Exposes Supabase Edge Functions as MCP tools with automatic authentication and response parsing, allowing agents to invoke custom serverless logic without managing HTTP clients or credential injection
vs alternatives: More integrated than generic HTTP MCP tools because it handles Supabase-specific authentication, error handling, and response formatting automatically
Subscribes to real-time changes on Supabase tables through MCP's event streaming interface, using Supabase's PostgreSQL LISTEN/NOTIFY mechanism to push INSERT, UPDATE, and DELETE events to agents. Maintains persistent WebSocket connections and filters events by table and row-level policies, enabling agents to react to database changes without polling.
Unique: Bridges Supabase's PostgreSQL LISTEN/NOTIFY real-time system with MCP's tool interface, enabling agents to subscribe to database changes without managing WebSocket connections or event serialization
vs alternatives: More efficient than polling-based approaches because it uses Supabase's native real-time infrastructure rather than repeated database queries
Manages files in Supabase Storage buckets through MCP tools, supporting upload, download, list, and delete operations with automatic authentication and path-based access control. Uses Supabase's S3-compatible storage API with built-in support for public/private buckets and signed URLs for temporary access, enabling agents to handle file I/O without managing cloud storage credentials.
Unique: Exposes Supabase Storage's S3-compatible API as MCP tools with automatic authentication and signed URL generation, eliminating the need for agents to manage cloud storage credentials or generate temporary access tokens
vs alternatives: More integrated than generic S3 MCP tools because it leverages Supabase's built-in bucket policies and authentication rather than requiring separate AWS credentials
Performs semantic similarity searches on vector embeddings stored in Supabase PostgreSQL using pgvector extension, translating natural language queries into embedding vectors and executing cosine/L2 distance searches. Integrates with embedding providers (OpenAI, Cohere) or uses pre-computed embeddings, enabling agents to retrieve semantically similar documents or records without full-text search limitations.
Unique: Integrates pgvector directly into MCP tools with automatic embedding generation and distance calculation, enabling agents to perform semantic search without managing separate vector database infrastructure
vs alternatives: More efficient than external vector databases (Pinecone, Weaviate) for Supabase users because it colocates embeddings with relational data, reducing network latency and simplifying data synchronization
Exposes Supabase database schema information through MCP tools, allowing agents to discover table structures, column types, constraints, and relationships without manual schema documentation. Queries PostgreSQL information_schema and Supabase metadata tables to dynamically generate schema descriptions, enabling agents to construct valid queries and understand data relationships.
Unique: Queries Supabase's PostgreSQL information_schema directly through MCP tools, enabling agents to dynamically discover and adapt to database schemas without pre-configured schema definitions
vs alternatives: More flexible than static schema definitions because it reflects live database state, including recent migrations or schema changes
Enforces Supabase Row-Level Security policies within agent queries, ensuring that agents can only access rows permitted by RLS rules defined in the database. Evaluates policies based on authenticated user context (JWT claims, user ID) and applies WHERE clause filters automatically, preventing unauthorized data access at the database layer rather than application layer.
Unique: Delegates authorization enforcement to PostgreSQL RLS policies rather than implementing authorization in agent code, ensuring that data access rules are centralized and cannot be bypassed by agent logic
vs alternatives: More secure than application-level authorization because RLS is enforced at the database layer, preventing accidental data leaks even if agent code has bugs
+1 more capabilities