| 0 |
| 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Paid | Free |
| Capabilities | 10 decomposed | 9 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Analyzes ambient audio streams captured via device microphone to identify snoring acoustic signatures using machine learning models trained on snoring phoneme patterns. The system processes raw audio in real-time or batch mode, applies noise filtering to isolate snoring frequencies (typically 40-4000 Hz), and classifies detected events with confidence scoring. Detection works without requiring wearable sensors, relying instead on environmental microphone placement near the sleep area.
Unique: Uses frequency-domain acoustic analysis targeting snoring-specific phoneme patterns (40-4000 Hz range) rather than generic sound classification, enabling detection without wearables or contact sensors; implements noise-adaptive filtering to handle variable bedroom acoustics
vs alternatives: Detects snoring passively via ambient microphone rather than requiring wearable accelerometers or contact sensors, reducing friction for nightly adoption compared to wearable-dependent competitors
Aggregates nightly snoring detection events, audio quality metrics, and user-reported sleep data into temporal patterns using time-series analysis and statistical decomposition. The system identifies trends across days/weeks (e.g., Monday snoring worse than Friday), correlates snoring with reported sleep quality scores, and segments sleep into phases based on audio characteristics. Outputs visualizations and statistical summaries showing snoring distribution, variability, and trend direction.
Unique: Implements temporal decomposition to isolate snoring trends from noise, enabling detection of weekly/monthly patterns without requiring manual annotation; correlates snoring with user-reported sleep quality to surface potential relationships
vs alternatives: Provides trend analysis and pattern correlation across weeks of data, whereas generic sleep trackers typically show only nightly snapshots without temporal context or snoring-specific insights
Generates tailored snoring mitigation recommendations by analyzing individual sleep patterns, detected snoring characteristics (frequency, intensity, timing), and user profile data (age, reported triggers, lifestyle factors). The system applies rule-based logic and machine learning scoring to rank interventions (positional therapy, nasal strips, sleep hygiene adjustments, medical referral) by estimated relevance and feasibility. Recommendations are prioritized based on evidence strength and user-specific factors rather than generic one-size-fits-all advice.
Unique: Ranks interventions by individual relevance using pattern-specific scoring (e.g., if snoring peaks in supine position, positional therapy ranked higher) rather than generic population-level recommendations; includes escalation logic to flag when medical referral is warranted
vs alternatives: Tailors recommendations to individual snoring patterns and user profile rather than providing generic sleep hygiene advice; integrates escalation guidance to help users determine when professional evaluation is necessary
Correlates detected snoring events with user-reported sleep quality ratings and optional wearable/device metrics (heart rate variability, movement, sleep stage estimates) to surface relationships between snoring severity and perceived sleep outcomes. Uses statistical correlation and optional machine learning to weight which snoring characteristics (frequency, intensity, timing) most strongly associate with poor sleep quality in individual users. Outputs correlation coefficients, scatter plots, and narrative insights about snoring's impact on this specific user's sleep.
Unique: Computes individual-level correlations between snoring and sleep quality rather than population-level associations, enabling personalized insight into whether snoring is THIS user's primary sleep problem; integrates optional wearable metrics for richer multivariate analysis
vs alternatives: Provides personalized correlation analysis linking snoring to sleep quality outcomes, whereas generic sleep trackers show only nightly snapshots without causal or correlational insights
Manages audio recording and snoring detection data across multiple user devices (smartphone, tablet, dedicated sleep monitor) with cloud synchronization and local backup. The system handles device-specific audio codec differences, timestamps across devices with potential clock drift, and ensures data consistency when users switch devices or record from multiple locations. Implements conflict resolution for overlapping recordings and provides fallback to local storage if cloud sync fails.
Unique: Implements device-agnostic audio synchronization with codec normalization and timestamp reconciliation, enabling seamless multi-device recording without user intervention; includes local backup fallback for offline resilience
vs alternatives: Handles multi-device synchronization and codec differences transparently, whereas single-device sleep apps require manual data export/import or force users to pick one primary device
Processes audio locally on user's device for snoring detection without transmitting raw audio to cloud servers, using on-device machine learning models (TensorFlow Lite, Core ML, or ONNX Runtime). The system extracts acoustic features (spectrograms, MFCCs) locally, runs inference on compressed models, and sends only metadata (snoring event timestamps, confidence scores) to cloud for aggregation and analysis. Raw audio is retained locally with optional encryption and automatic deletion after configurable retention period.
Unique: Implements on-device audio feature extraction and inference using compressed ML models, transmitting only metadata to cloud rather than raw audio; includes local encryption and automatic audio deletion to minimize privacy exposure
vs alternatives: Preserves audio privacy by processing locally and transmitting only metadata, whereas cloud-based sleep apps require uploading raw audio for analysis, raising privacy and data retention concerns
Infers user's sleep position (supine, prone, left lateral, right lateral) during snoring episodes by analyzing audio characteristics and optional device motion data (accelerometer, gyroscope). The system uses acoustic patterns (snoring intensity and frequency vary by position) and motion signatures to estimate position without requiring wearable sensors. Outputs position-tagged snoring events and position-specific snoring statistics (e.g., 'snoring 3x worse in supine position').
Unique: Fuses audio acoustic patterns with device motion data to infer sleep position without wearables, enabling position-specific snoring analysis; uses position-snoring correlation to quantify positional therapy potential
vs alternatives: Infers sleep position from ambient audio and device motion rather than requiring wearable accelerometers or contact sensors, reducing friction for adoption while enabling position-specific snoring insights
Flags snoring patterns that warrant professional medical evaluation (sleep specialist, ENT, primary care) based on severity thresholds, frequency patterns, and user-reported symptoms. The system applies clinical decision rules (e.g., snoring >5 nights/week + daytime sleepiness = possible sleep apnea) and compares user's snoring characteristics to population-level risk profiles. Generates escalation recommendations with reasoning (e.g., 'Your snoring frequency exceeds 80% of users; recommend sleep study evaluation') and provides guidance on next steps (sleep specialist referral, home sleep apnea test, polysomnography).
Unique: Applies clinical decision rules to snoring patterns and user symptoms to flag when professional evaluation is warranted, comparing individual risk profile to population-level thresholds; provides transparent reasoning for escalation recommendations
vs alternatives: Integrates escalation logic to help users determine when professional evaluation is necessary, whereas generic sleep apps provide only data without clinical decision support or medical referral guidance
+2 more capabilities
Executes SQL queries against Supabase PostgreSQL instances through the Model Context Protocol, translating natural language or structured query requests into parameterized SQL statements. Uses MCP's tool-calling interface to expose database operations as callable functions with schema validation, enabling LLM agents to perform CRUD operations, joins, and aggregations with automatic connection pooling and credential management through Supabase client SDK.
Unique: Exposes Supabase PostgreSQL as MCP tools with automatic credential injection from Supabase client SDK, eliminating manual connection string management and enabling seamless LLM-to-database queries within Claude or compatible agents
vs alternatives: Tighter integration than generic SQL MCP servers because it leverages Supabase's built-in authentication and connection pooling rather than requiring separate database credential configuration
Exposes Supabase Auth session state and user metadata through MCP tools, allowing agents to inspect current authentication context, retrieve user profiles, and trigger auth-related operations. Integrates with Supabase's JWT-based auth system to validate sessions and access user claims without re-authenticating, using the Supabase client's built-in session management.
Unique: Integrates Supabase's JWT-based auth system directly into MCP tool interface, allowing agents to inspect and act on auth state without managing separate credential stores or re-authentication flows
vs alternatives: More seamless than generic auth MCP servers because it leverages Supabase's built-in session management and avoids redundant credential passing between agent and auth system
Invokes Supabase Edge Functions (serverless TypeScript/JavaScript functions) through MCP tools, passing parameters and receiving results with optional streaming support. Uses Supabase's edge function HTTP API to trigger functions with automatic authentication headers and response parsing, enabling agents to execute custom business logic without embedding it in the agent itself.
Supabase scores higher at 42/100 vs Sleep.ai at 41/100. Sleep.ai leads on adoption and quality, while Supabase is stronger on ecosystem. Supabase also has a free tier, making it more accessible.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
Unique: Exposes Supabase Edge Functions as MCP tools with automatic authentication and response parsing, allowing agents to invoke custom serverless logic without managing HTTP clients or credential injection
vs alternatives: More integrated than generic HTTP MCP tools because it handles Supabase-specific authentication, error handling, and response formatting automatically
Subscribes to real-time changes on Supabase tables through MCP's event streaming interface, using Supabase's PostgreSQL LISTEN/NOTIFY mechanism to push INSERT, UPDATE, and DELETE events to agents. Maintains persistent WebSocket connections and filters events by table and row-level policies, enabling agents to react to database changes without polling.
Unique: Bridges Supabase's PostgreSQL LISTEN/NOTIFY real-time system with MCP's tool interface, enabling agents to subscribe to database changes without managing WebSocket connections or event serialization
vs alternatives: More efficient than polling-based approaches because it uses Supabase's native real-time infrastructure rather than repeated database queries
Manages files in Supabase Storage buckets through MCP tools, supporting upload, download, list, and delete operations with automatic authentication and path-based access control. Uses Supabase's S3-compatible storage API with built-in support for public/private buckets and signed URLs for temporary access, enabling agents to handle file I/O without managing cloud storage credentials.
Unique: Exposes Supabase Storage's S3-compatible API as MCP tools with automatic authentication and signed URL generation, eliminating the need for agents to manage cloud storage credentials or generate temporary access tokens
vs alternatives: More integrated than generic S3 MCP tools because it leverages Supabase's built-in bucket policies and authentication rather than requiring separate AWS credentials
Performs semantic similarity searches on vector embeddings stored in Supabase PostgreSQL using pgvector extension, translating natural language queries into embedding vectors and executing cosine/L2 distance searches. Integrates with embedding providers (OpenAI, Cohere) or uses pre-computed embeddings, enabling agents to retrieve semantically similar documents or records without full-text search limitations.
Unique: Integrates pgvector directly into MCP tools with automatic embedding generation and distance calculation, enabling agents to perform semantic search without managing separate vector database infrastructure
vs alternatives: More efficient than external vector databases (Pinecone, Weaviate) for Supabase users because it colocates embeddings with relational data, reducing network latency and simplifying data synchronization
Exposes Supabase database schema information through MCP tools, allowing agents to discover table structures, column types, constraints, and relationships without manual schema documentation. Queries PostgreSQL information_schema and Supabase metadata tables to dynamically generate schema descriptions, enabling agents to construct valid queries and understand data relationships.
Unique: Queries Supabase's PostgreSQL information_schema directly through MCP tools, enabling agents to dynamically discover and adapt to database schemas without pre-configured schema definitions
vs alternatives: More flexible than static schema definitions because it reflects live database state, including recent migrations or schema changes
Enforces Supabase Row-Level Security policies within agent queries, ensuring that agents can only access rows permitted by RLS rules defined in the database. Evaluates policies based on authenticated user context (JWT claims, user ID) and applies WHERE clause filters automatically, preventing unauthorized data access at the database layer rather than application layer.
Unique: Delegates authorization enforcement to PostgreSQL RLS policies rather than implementing authorization in agent code, ensuring that data access rules are centralized and cannot be bypassed by agent logic
vs alternatives: More secure than application-level authorization because RLS is enforced at the database layer, preventing accidental data leaks even if agent code has bugs
+1 more capabilities