| 0 |
| 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Capabilities | 6 decomposed | 9 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Enables AI agents to post messages to Slack channels through the Model Context Protocol transport layer, which abstracts away HTTP/WebSocket complexity. The server implements MCP's standardized tool schema for message composition, handling authentication via Slack Bot tokens and translating tool invocations into Slack Web API calls. This allows Claude and other MCP clients to send formatted messages (text, blocks, attachments) without managing API credentials or rate limiting directly.
Unique: Implements Slack integration as an MCP server rather than a direct SDK wrapper, meaning the protocol layer handles tool schema negotiation, error serialization, and transport abstraction — the client never directly calls Slack APIs. Uses MCP's standardized tool registry pattern to expose Slack capabilities as discoverable, composable tools.
vs alternatives: Differs from direct Slack SDK usage by removing credential management from client code and enabling AI agents to discover and use Slack tools dynamically through MCP's tool schema negotiation, reducing integration boilerplate.
Provides AI agents with the ability to query available Slack channels, retrieve channel metadata (topic, description, member count, creation date), and list channel members through MCP tool invocations. The server caches channel lists to reduce API calls and implements filtering by channel name, type (public/private), or membership status. This enables agents to make context-aware decisions about which channels to post to or monitor.
Unique: Implements channel discovery as a queryable MCP tool with built-in filtering and caching logic, rather than exposing raw Slack API pagination. The server abstracts away Slack's cursor-based pagination and presents a simplified filtered list interface that agents can reason about directly.
vs alternatives: Simpler than raw Slack SDK calls because filtering and caching are server-side, reducing the number of API calls and allowing agents to work with a clean, filtered dataset without understanding Slack's pagination model.
Allows AI agents to fetch message history from Slack channels or direct messages, with configurable limits on message count and time range. The server implements context windowing to prevent token overflow in LLM prompts by truncating or summarizing older messages. It handles message formatting (converting Slack's rich text blocks into readable text), resolving user mentions and emoji, and optionally including thread replies. This enables agents to understand channel context before taking actions.
Unique: Implements context windowing at the server level to prevent LLM token overflow, rather than leaving truncation to the client. The server converts Slack's rich block-based message format into readable text and resolves user/emoji references, presenting agents with clean, contextual conversation data.
vs alternatives: More agent-friendly than raw Slack API because it handles message formatting, mention resolution, and context windowing server-side, allowing agents to reason about conversation history without parsing Slack's complex message structure.
Enables agents to query Slack user information by user ID, email, or display name, retrieving profile data such as real name, title, department, timezone, and status. The server implements user caching to reduce API calls and supports bulk user lookups. This capability allows agents to personalize messages, route tasks to appropriate team members, or understand organizational structure.
Unique: Implements user lookup as a cached, queryable MCP tool that abstracts Slack's user.info and users.list APIs. The server handles caching and bulk lookups transparently, allowing agents to treat user information as a simple lookup service rather than managing API pagination.
vs alternatives: Simpler than direct Slack SDK calls because caching and bulk lookup logic are server-side, reducing API calls and allowing agents to query user information without understanding Slack's user management APIs.
Provides agents with the ability to add or remove emoji reactions to Slack messages, enabling non-verbal communication and message categorization. The server validates emoji names against Slack's supported emoji set and handles reaction conflicts (e.g., duplicate reactions). This allows agents to acknowledge messages, mark items as complete, or categorize discussions without posting text.
Unique: Exposes emoji reactions as a discrete MCP tool, allowing agents to use non-textual communication as a first-class capability. The server validates emoji names and handles reaction state management, abstracting Slack's reactions.add and reactions.remove APIs.
vs alternatives: Enables agents to use emoji reactions for workflow automation without writing custom logic, whereas direct Slack SDK usage requires agents to manage emoji validation and reaction state themselves.
The Slack MCP server implements the Model Context Protocol's transport layer to handle authentication, request/response serialization, and error handling for all Slack API calls. Rather than exposing raw HTTP requests, the server uses MCP's tool schema system to define Slack capabilities as discoverable, typed tools that clients can invoke. Authentication is managed server-side using environment variables or configuration files, eliminating the need for clients to handle credentials. The server implements request queuing and rate limit handling to respect Slack's API quotas.
Unique: Implements Slack integration as an MCP server rather than a direct SDK, meaning the protocol layer handles tool discovery, schema negotiation, and transport. Credentials are managed server-side, not exposed to clients. The server implements MCP's tool registry pattern to expose Slack capabilities as composable, discoverable tools.
vs alternatives: Cleaner than direct Slack SDK integration because credentials are never exposed to clients, tool capabilities are discovered dynamically, and the MCP protocol provides a standardized interface across different AI clients and tools.
Executes SQL queries against Supabase PostgreSQL instances through the Model Context Protocol, translating natural language or structured query requests into parameterized SQL statements. Uses MCP's tool-calling interface to expose database operations as callable functions with schema validation, enabling LLM agents to perform CRUD operations, joins, and aggregations with automatic connection pooling and credential management through Supabase client SDK.
Unique: Exposes Supabase PostgreSQL as MCP tools with automatic credential injection from Supabase client SDK, eliminating manual connection string management and enabling seamless LLM-to-database queries within Claude or compatible agents
vs alternatives: Tighter integration than generic SQL MCP servers because it leverages Supabase's built-in authentication and connection pooling rather than requiring separate database credential configuration
Exposes Supabase Auth session state and user metadata through MCP tools, allowing agents to inspect current authentication context, retrieve user profiles, and trigger auth-related operations. Integrates with Supabase's JWT-based auth system to validate sessions and access user claims without re-authenticating, using the Supabase client's built-in session management.
Unique: Integrates Supabase's JWT-based auth system directly into MCP tool interface, allowing agents to inspect and act on auth state without managing separate credential stores or re-authentication flows
vs alternatives: More seamless than generic auth MCP servers because it leverages Supabase's built-in session management and avoids redundant credential passing between agent and auth system
Invokes Supabase Edge Functions (serverless TypeScript/JavaScript functions) through MCP tools, passing parameters and receiving results with optional streaming support. Uses Supabase's edge function HTTP API to trigger functions with automatic authentication headers and response parsing, enabling agents to execute custom business logic without embedding it in the agent itself.
Supabase scores higher at 42/100 vs Slack at 24/100.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
Unique: Exposes Supabase Edge Functions as MCP tools with automatic authentication and response parsing, allowing agents to invoke custom serverless logic without managing HTTP clients or credential injection
vs alternatives: More integrated than generic HTTP MCP tools because it handles Supabase-specific authentication, error handling, and response formatting automatically
Subscribes to real-time changes on Supabase tables through MCP's event streaming interface, using Supabase's PostgreSQL LISTEN/NOTIFY mechanism to push INSERT, UPDATE, and DELETE events to agents. Maintains persistent WebSocket connections and filters events by table and row-level policies, enabling agents to react to database changes without polling.
Unique: Bridges Supabase's PostgreSQL LISTEN/NOTIFY real-time system with MCP's tool interface, enabling agents to subscribe to database changes without managing WebSocket connections or event serialization
vs alternatives: More efficient than polling-based approaches because it uses Supabase's native real-time infrastructure rather than repeated database queries
Manages files in Supabase Storage buckets through MCP tools, supporting upload, download, list, and delete operations with automatic authentication and path-based access control. Uses Supabase's S3-compatible storage API with built-in support for public/private buckets and signed URLs for temporary access, enabling agents to handle file I/O without managing cloud storage credentials.
Unique: Exposes Supabase Storage's S3-compatible API as MCP tools with automatic authentication and signed URL generation, eliminating the need for agents to manage cloud storage credentials or generate temporary access tokens
vs alternatives: More integrated than generic S3 MCP tools because it leverages Supabase's built-in bucket policies and authentication rather than requiring separate AWS credentials
Performs semantic similarity searches on vector embeddings stored in Supabase PostgreSQL using pgvector extension, translating natural language queries into embedding vectors and executing cosine/L2 distance searches. Integrates with embedding providers (OpenAI, Cohere) or uses pre-computed embeddings, enabling agents to retrieve semantically similar documents or records without full-text search limitations.
Unique: Integrates pgvector directly into MCP tools with automatic embedding generation and distance calculation, enabling agents to perform semantic search without managing separate vector database infrastructure
vs alternatives: More efficient than external vector databases (Pinecone, Weaviate) for Supabase users because it colocates embeddings with relational data, reducing network latency and simplifying data synchronization
Exposes Supabase database schema information through MCP tools, allowing agents to discover table structures, column types, constraints, and relationships without manual schema documentation. Queries PostgreSQL information_schema and Supabase metadata tables to dynamically generate schema descriptions, enabling agents to construct valid queries and understand data relationships.
Unique: Queries Supabase's PostgreSQL information_schema directly through MCP tools, enabling agents to dynamically discover and adapt to database schemas without pre-configured schema definitions
vs alternatives: More flexible than static schema definitions because it reflects live database state, including recent migrations or schema changes
Enforces Supabase Row-Level Security policies within agent queries, ensuring that agents can only access rows permitted by RLS rules defined in the database. Evaluates policies based on authenticated user context (JWT claims, user ID) and applies WHERE clause filters automatically, preventing unauthorized data access at the database layer rather than application layer.
Unique: Delegates authorization enforcement to PostgreSQL RLS policies rather than implementing authorization in agent code, ensuring that data access rules are centralized and cannot be bypassed by agent logic
vs alternatives: More secure than application-level authorization because RLS is enforced at the database layer, preventing accidental data leaks even if agent code has bugs
+1 more capabilities