MS COCO (Common Objects in Context) ranks higher at 61/100 vs Siwalu at 40/100. Capability-level comparison backed by match graph evidence from real search data.
| Feature | Siwalu | MS COCO (Common Objects in Context) |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Product | Dataset |
| UnfragileRank | 40/100 | 61/100 |
| Adoption | 0 | 1 |
| Quality |
| 1 |
| 1 |
| Ecosystem | 0 | 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Capabilities | 6 decomposed | 11 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Processes a single photograph through a pre-trained convolutional neural network (likely ResNet or EfficientNet-based architecture) to classify the animal species and specific breed in real-time. The model performs multi-label classification across dozens of animal breeds, returning confidence scores for each predicted breed. Inference is optimized for mobile/web deployment, suggesting model quantization or distillation techniques to reduce latency and memory footprint while maintaining accuracy.
Unique: Optimized for lightweight deployment across web and mobile without requiring local GPU, suggesting aggressive model compression (quantization, pruning, or knowledge distillation) while maintaining multi-breed classification across multiple animal categories beyond just dogs/cats
vs alternatives: Faster inference latency than cloud-heavy competitors due to optimized model size, but likely trades accuracy for speed compared to premium veterinary-grade classification systems
Extends beyond single-species classification to detect and classify across multiple animal categories (dogs, cats, birds, reptiles, livestock, etc.) within a single inference pass. Uses a hierarchical classification approach where the model first identifies the broad animal category, then performs breed-specific classification within that category. This architecture reduces model size by avoiding training a single monolithic classifier across all possible breeds.
Unique: Supports identification across multiple animal categories (not just dogs/cats) in a single inference pass using hierarchical classification, suggesting a two-stage architecture that first identifies broad category then performs fine-grained breed classification within that category
vs alternatives: Broader animal coverage than single-species competitors like Fetch or Petpix, but likely with lower accuracy on exotic species compared to specialized veterinary databases
Provides unlimited free API access to breed identification with server-side rate limiting and potential inference queue management to control computational costs. The free tier likely uses shared GPU/CPU resources with batch processing of requests, meaning individual requests may experience 1-5 second latency during peak hours. Monetization strategy appears to rely on premium features (batch processing, API SLAs, health data integration) rather than blocking free access.
Unique: Zero-cost access with no API key requirement removes friction for casual users, suggesting a freemium model that monetizes through premium features rather than blocking free inference, with server-side rate limiting to manage computational costs
vs alternatives: Lower barrier to entry than competitors requiring API keys or credit cards, but with stricter rate limits and higher latency than paid tiers
Implements a lightweight inference engine suitable for deployment on mobile devices and low-bandwidth web environments, likely using model quantization (INT8 or FP16), pruning, or knowledge distillation to reduce model size from typical 100-500MB to 10-50MB. The architecture may support both cloud inference (for accuracy) and edge inference (for latency), with intelligent fallback logic. Input preprocessing is optimized for mobile cameras, including automatic orientation correction and aspect ratio handling.
Unique: Optimized for mobile deployment with model compression techniques (quantization/pruning) enabling sub-50MB model size while maintaining real-time inference, suggesting architecture that supports both cloud and edge inference paths with intelligent fallback
vs alternatives: Faster mobile inference than cloud-only competitors due to model optimization, but with lower accuracy than uncompressed models used by premium veterinary services
Returns not just a single breed prediction but a ranked list of alternative breeds with confidence scores for each, enabling users to disambiguate between similar-looking breeds. The model outputs logits or probability distributions across all breed classes, which are then sorted and filtered to show top-N alternatives (typically 3-5). This approach helps users understand model uncertainty and make informed decisions when the top prediction is ambiguous.
Unique: Provides ranked alternative breed suggestions with confidence scores rather than single-point predictions, enabling users to disambiguate between similar breeds and understand model uncertainty
vs alternatives: More transparent than single-prediction competitors, but confidence scores likely uncalibrated compared to Bayesian or ensemble-based approaches used in research systems
Enables continuous breed identification from live camera streams rather than static images, processing video frames at 15-30 FPS with temporal smoothing to reduce jitter between frames. The implementation likely uses frame skipping (processing every Nth frame) and result caching to optimize inference frequency while maintaining responsive UI. Temporal filtering (e.g., exponential moving average of confidence scores) stabilizes predictions across frames, reducing false positives from single-frame artifacts.
Unique: Processes live camera streams with temporal smoothing and frame skipping to deliver real-time breed identification at 15-30 FPS, suggesting architecture with frame buffering, inference queueing, and exponential moving average filtering for stable predictions
vs alternatives: More responsive user experience than batch-processing competitors, but with higher computational cost and battery drain compared to single-image identification
Provides 2.5 million manually-annotated object instances across 330,000 images with dual segmentation encoding: polygon coordinates for precise boundary definition and RLE (run-length encoding) for efficient storage and computation. Each instance includes bounding box coordinates in [x, y, width, height] format, category label from 80 object classes, and instance-level unique identifiers enabling per-object tracking and evaluation. Annotations are structured in JSON format with hierarchical organization linking images to annotations to categories, supporting both dense object scenes and sparse single-object images.
Unique: Dual segmentation encoding (polygon + RLE) in single dataset enables both precise boundary analysis and efficient computational workflows; 2.5M instances across 330K images provides scale unmatched by contemporaneous datasets (ImageNet had ~1.2M images, PASCAL VOC had ~11K images)
vs alternatives: Larger and more densely annotated than PASCAL VOC (11K images, ~6 objects/image) and more task-diverse than ImageNet (classification-only); RLE encoding enables 10-100x faster mask loading than polygon-only formats
Provides keypoint annotations for all people in images using a standardized 17-joint skeleton model (head, shoulders, elbows, wrists, hips, knees, ankles) with (x, y, visibility) tuples per joint. Visibility flag indicates whether keypoint is annotated (1), occluded (0), or outside image bounds (0). Keypoints are linked to parent person instances via instance ID, enabling pose estimation evaluation at both individual and crowd-level scales. Annotations follow COCO Keypoints task specification with consistent coordinate system across all 330K images.
Unique: Standardized 17-joint skeleton with explicit visibility flags enables robust evaluation of pose estimation under occlusion; linked to instance segmentation masks allows joint-level accuracy analysis within person bounding boxes
MS COCO (Common Objects in Context) scores higher at 61/100 vs Siwalu at 40/100.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
vs alternatives: More comprehensive than OpenPose dataset (no visibility flags) and larger scale than Human3.6M (3.6M frames vs 330K images); visibility annotations enable explicit occlusion handling unlike MPII (which lacks visibility metadata)
COCO ecosystem includes community-created extensions (COCO-Stuff, COCO DensePose, COCO Panoptic) that extend base dataset with additional annotations while maintaining compatibility with COCO API and evaluation infrastructure. Extensions follow COCO format and evaluation standards, enabling seamless integration into existing pipelines. Community contributions are vetted and published as official COCO variants, ensuring quality and standardization. Variant creation process is documented, enabling researchers to create custom extensions.
Unique: Standardized extension process enables community contributions while maintaining compatibility; official variants (Stuff, DensePose, Panoptic) are vetted and published, ensuring quality and discoverability
vs alternatives: More extensible than fixed datasets; community variants enable specialized use cases without forking; standardized format prevents fragmentation unlike ad-hoc dataset variants
Provides 1.65 million image-caption pairs (5 captions × 330K images) with natural language descriptions written by human annotators. Each caption is a free-form English sentence describing objects, actions, and scene context without enforced length limits or structured templates. Captions are stored in JSON format linked to image IDs, enabling training of vision-language models for image captioning, visual question answering, and cross-modal retrieval. Multiple captions per image capture linguistic diversity and alternative descriptions of the same visual content.
Unique: 5 captions per image (vs 1 in most datasets) captures linguistic diversity and enables robust evaluation of caption generation variability; 1.65M caption-image pairs provide scale for training large vision-language models
vs alternatives: 5x more captions per image than Flickr30K (1 caption/image) enabling better linguistic diversity modeling; larger scale than Visual Genome (108K images) while maintaining natural language quality vs automated alt-text
Extends base 80 object categories with 91 additional 'stuff' categories (background materials, textures, regions like sky, grass, wall) enabling dense semantic segmentation of entire images. Stuff categories are annotated as pixel-level masks without instance boundaries — all sky pixels are labeled 'sky' regardless of continuity. COCO-Stuff combines instance segmentation (80 objects) with semantic segmentation (171 total categories including stuff), stored as single-channel PNG masks where pixel value encodes category ID. Enables panoptic segmentation evaluation combining instance and stuff predictions.
Unique: 171-category taxonomy combining 80 instance objects + 91 stuff categories enables panoptic segmentation in single dataset; pixel-level masks for stuff enable dense scene understanding without instance boundaries
vs alternatives: More comprehensive than ADE20K (150 categories) and larger scale than Cityscapes (5K images); unified instance+stuff annotation enables panoptic evaluation unlike separate semantic/instance datasets
Combines instance segmentation (80 object categories with boundaries) and semantic segmentation (171 stuff categories without boundaries) into single panoptic prediction task. Evaluation uses Panoptic Quality (PQ) metric decomposed into Segmentation Quality (SQ — IoU of matched predictions) and Recognition Quality (RQ — detection rate). Panoptic masks encode both category ID and instance ID, enabling evaluation of both 'what' (category) and 'which' (instance identity) predictions. Standardized evaluation protocol with server-side metric computation ensures consistent benchmarking across submissions.
Unique: Panoptic Quality metric with explicit SQ/RQ decomposition enables fine-grained analysis of segmentation vs recognition errors; unified instance+stuff evaluation in single task forces models to handle both prediction types efficiently
vs alternatives: More comprehensive than separate instance/semantic benchmarks; PQ metric better captures real-world scene understanding than independent metrics; standardized evaluation prevents metric gaming unlike custom evaluation scripts
Provides dense 2D-to-3D correspondence maps for human bodies, mapping each pixel in a person instance to a 3D human body model surface. Annotations include UV coordinates (parameterization of 3D body surface) and body part indices enabling pixel-level body surface understanding. DensePose enables training of models that predict where each image pixel corresponds to on a canonical 3D human body, useful for pose transfer, virtual try-on, and detailed human understanding. Available from 2020 dataset version onwards, extends keypoint annotations with dense surface coverage.
Unique: Dense 2D-to-3D surface correspondence enables pixel-level body understanding beyond skeleton keypoints; UV parameterization allows transfer of appearance and shape across different people and poses
vs alternatives: More detailed than keypoint-only annotations (17 joints vs millions of surface points); enables pose transfer unlike keypoint datasets; larger scale than DensePose-specific datasets
Provides standardized evaluation metrics for each task (Average Precision for detection, IoU for segmentation, OKS for keypoints, BLEU/METEOR/CIDEr for captions, PQ for panoptic) computed server-side on held-out test set. Leaderboard system accepts structured JSON result submissions in COCO format, validates format, computes metrics, and ranks submissions by primary metric. Evaluation infrastructure ensures consistent benchmarking across all submissions and prevents metric gaming through standardized computation. Metrics are task-specific: AP/AP50/AP75 for detection, mIoU for segmentation, OKS for keypoints, CIDEr for captions.
Unique: Server-side metric computation prevents metric gaming and ensures consistency; task-specific metrics (AP, OKS, CIDEr, PQ) are standardized across all submissions enabling fair comparison; public leaderboard provides transparency and reproducibility
vs alternatives: More rigorous than self-reported metrics (prevents cherry-picking); standardized evaluation prevents metric implementation variations unlike custom evaluation scripts; public leaderboard enables community comparison unlike proprietary benchmarks
+3 more capabilities