| 0 |
| 0 |
| Ecosystem | 1 | 1 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Capabilities | 13 decomposed | 6 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Provides 100+ production-ready agent implementations across three primary frameworks (Agno, LangChain/LangGraph, and native Python) organized by complexity tier (starter, advanced single-agent, multi-agent). Each implementation includes complete dependency specifications, environment configuration templates, and runnable entry points, allowing developers to clone and immediately execute agents without framework-specific boilerplate. The repository uses a tiered complexity model where starter agents demonstrate basic tool-calling patterns, advanced agents implement planner-executor architectures with state management, and multi-agent systems showcase coordination via message passing or shared context.
Unique: Organizes 100+ implementations across three distinct frameworks (Agno, LangChain/LangGraph, native) with explicit complexity tiers (starter/advanced/expert) and domain-specific examples (finance, travel, research), enabling side-by-side framework comparison and progressive learning paths. Most agent repositories focus on a single framework; this one treats framework diversity as a feature.
vs alternatives: Broader framework coverage and clearer complexity progression than single-framework tutorials; more production-focused than academic agent papers but less opinionated than framework-specific docs
Implements 8+ distinct RAG architectures (basic retrieval, corrective RAG, hybrid retrieval, database routing, agentic RAG, autonomous RAG, RAG with reasoning) with working code for each pattern. Each implementation demonstrates a specific retrieval strategy: basic RAG uses vector similarity search, corrective RAG adds a grading step to filter irrelevant chunks, hybrid RAG combines vector and keyword search, database routing uses an LLM to select which database to query, and agentic RAG treats retrieval as a tool the agent can invoke iteratively. Implementations support multiple vector databases (Pinecone, Weaviate, Chroma, FAISS) and document sources (PDFs, web pages, databases, code repositories).
Unique: Provides 8+ distinct RAG patterns (basic, corrective, hybrid, database routing, agentic, autonomous, reasoning-enhanced) with working implementations for each, allowing developers to compare trade-offs between retrieval quality and latency. Most RAG tutorials show only basic vector search; this library treats RAG as a design space with multiple valid solutions.
vs alternatives: More comprehensive RAG pattern coverage than LangChain's built-in RAG examples; more practical than academic RAG papers with runnable code for each pattern
Implements specialized agents for financial analysis and investment decisions that integrate real-time market data, financial APIs, and domain-specific reasoning. The investment agent can fetch stock prices, analyze financial statements, calculate metrics (P/E ratio, dividend yield), and provide investment recommendations. Integration with financial data providers (Alpha Vantage, Finnhub, or similar) enables real-time market data access. The agent uses domain-specific prompts and reasoning patterns for financial analysis, handles numerical precision and currency conversions, and provides citations to data sources. Examples include portfolio analysis agents, stock recommendation agents, and market trend analysis agents.
Unique: Provides investment agent implementations with real-time market data integration, financial metric calculations, and domain-specific reasoning patterns. Demonstrates how to handle numerical precision, currency conversions, and financial data sources. Most agent tutorials are generic; this library includes domain-specific agents for finance.
vs alternatives: More specialized than generic agents but less comprehensive than dedicated financial analysis platforms; useful for prototyping financial agents
Implements agents that can browse the web, scrape content, and extract information from dynamic websites using browser automation (Selenium, Playwright, or Puppeteer). The web scraping agent can navigate websites, interact with forms and buttons, wait for dynamic content to load, and extract structured data. Integration with agent frameworks allows the agent to decide what to scrape, how to navigate, and how to extract information based on user requests. Examples include competitive intelligence agents that scrape competitor websites, price monitoring agents that track product prices, and content aggregation agents that gather information from multiple sources. The agent handles JavaScript-heavy sites and can wait for content to load before extraction.
Unique: Provides web scraping agent implementations with browser automation, dynamic content handling, and integration with agent frameworks. Demonstrates how agents can decide what to scrape and how to navigate websites. Most agent tutorials don't include web scraping; this library treats it as a legitimate agent capability with appropriate caveats.
vs alternatives: More practical than generic scraping tutorials; enables agent-driven scraping but with significant latency and resource trade-offs vs direct HTTP scraping
Implements advanced RAG patterns that improve retrieval quality beyond basic vector similarity search. Corrective RAG adds a grading step where an LLM evaluates whether retrieved documents are relevant to the query; if not, the system reformulates the query and retrieves again. Hybrid RAG combines multiple retrieval strategies (vector similarity, keyword search, semantic search) and ranks results by combining scores from different methods. Implementations demonstrate how to define relevance criteria, implement grading logic, and combine retrieval scores. The corrective approach trades latency for quality (additional LLM calls), while hybrid approaches balance different retrieval strengths.
Unique: Provides implementations of corrective RAG (with relevance grading and query reformulation) and hybrid RAG (combining vector and keyword search) with explicit trade-offs between quality and latency. Demonstrates how to define and implement relevance criteria. Most RAG tutorials show only basic vector search; this library treats quality improvement as a design pattern.
vs alternatives: More sophisticated than basic RAG but with documented latency costs; more practical than academic RAG papers with working code
Demonstrates MCP protocol integration for agents that need to interact with external systems (GitHub, Notion, browsers, file systems) through standardized tool schemas. Implementations show how to define MCP tool specifications (input schemas, descriptions), bind them to agent frameworks (Agno, LangChain), and handle tool execution with error recovery. The repository includes examples of travel planning agents using MCP for flight/hotel APIs, GitHub agents using MCP for repository operations, and browser automation agents using MCP for web scraping, all following the MCP specification for tool discovery and invocation.
Unique: Provides working MCP implementations for diverse use cases (travel planning, GitHub operations, browser automation, Notion integration) with explicit tool schema definitions and error handling patterns. Demonstrates how MCP standardizes tool discovery and invocation across different external systems, reducing boilerplate compared to custom API wrappers.
vs alternatives: More comprehensive MCP examples than official MCP documentation; more standardized than custom tool-calling implementations but less mature than framework-specific tool ecosystems
Implements multi-agent systems where specialized agents (e.g., SEO auditor, content writer, technical reviewer) coordinate via message passing or shared state to solve complex tasks. Examples include an SEO audit team where one agent crawls websites, another analyzes content, and a third generates recommendations; a home renovation agent where one agent gathers requirements, another estimates costs, and a third creates project plans. Coordination patterns include sequential task handoff (agent A completes, passes results to agent B), parallel execution with result aggregation, and hierarchical delegation (manager agent assigns tasks to worker agents). Implementations use either explicit message queues or shared context objects to pass information between agents.
Unique: Provides concrete multi-agent examples (SEO audit team, home renovation agent) with explicit coordination patterns (message passing, shared context, hierarchical delegation) and implementation code. Most agent tutorials focus on single agents; this library treats multi-agent coordination as a first-class pattern with multiple architectural approaches.
vs alternatives: More practical multi-agent examples than academic papers; more detailed than framework docs but less opinionated than specialized multi-agent frameworks like AutoGen
Implements research agents that decompose complex research queries into sub-questions, search the web for relevant information, synthesize findings, and iteratively refine results. The research agent uses a planner-executor pattern: a planner LLM breaks down 'research X' into specific search queries, an executor searches the web and retrieves documents, and a synthesizer combines results into a coherent report. Integration with Google Gemini Interactions API enables real-time web search within agent reasoning loops. The agent can iterate — if initial results are insufficient, it generates follow-up queries and searches again. Outputs include structured research reports with source citations and confidence scores.
Unique: Combines planner-executor-synthesizer architecture with iterative refinement and real-time web search via Gemini Interactions API, enabling agents to conduct research beyond their training data. Most research agents use static RAG; this implementation treats web search as a first-class agent capability with iterative improvement.
vs alternatives: More sophisticated than basic web search agents; tightly integrated with Gemini's native search capabilities but less portable than framework-agnostic approaches
+5 more capabilities
Converts variable-length text sequences into fixed 384-dimensional dense vector embeddings using a distilled BERT architecture (6 transformer layers, 22.7M parameters). The model applies mean pooling over token representations and L2 normalization to produce normalized embeddings suitable for cosine similarity comparisons. Trained on diverse datasets (S2ORC, MS MARCO, StackExchange, Yahoo Answers) to capture semantic meaning across domains including academic papers, web search, Q&A, and code.
Unique: Distilled BERT architecture (6 layers vs standard 12) trained via knowledge distillation from larger models, achieving 5-10x faster inference than full BERT while maintaining 95%+ semantic quality; optimized for mean-pooling-based sentence representations rather than [CLS] token extraction
vs alternatives: Faster inference than OpenAI's text-embedding-3-small (sub-10ms vs 50-100ms per text) and fully open-source/self-hostable unlike proprietary APIs, though with slightly lower semantic quality on specialized domains
Computes pairwise cosine similarity scores between sets of text embeddings using vectorized operations, enabling efficient comparison of one query against thousands of documents. Leverages PyTorch/TensorFlow's optimized matrix multiplication (GEMM) kernels to compute similarity matrices in O(n*m) time where n and m are batch sizes. Supports both symmetric similarity (corpus-to-corpus) and asymmetric queries (single query vs corpus).
Unique: Integrates seamlessly with sentence-transformers' util.semantic_search() function which uses optimized FAISS-style indexing for top-k retrieval without computing full similarity matrices, reducing memory overhead from O(n*m) to O(n) for large-scale retrieval
vs alternatives: More memory-efficient than naive cosine similarity implementations and faster than computing similarities on-the-fly from raw text, though slower than specialized vector databases (FAISS, Milvus) for >100k document corpora
all-MiniLM-L6-v2 scores higher at 55/100 vs awesome-llm-apps at 47/100. awesome-llm-apps leads on ecosystem, while all-MiniLM-L6-v2 is stronger on adoption and quality.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
Supports inference and deployment across multiple runtime formats including PyTorch, TensorFlow, ONNX, OpenVINO, and Rust bindings, enabling deployment flexibility from cloud servers to edge devices. The model can be exported to ONNX format for hardware-agnostic inference, quantized to int8 for mobile/edge deployment, or compiled to OpenVINO for Intel CPU optimization. Each format maintains numerical equivalence (within floating-point precision) while trading off inference speed, model size, and hardware compatibility.
Unique: Distributed across multiple ecosystem projects (sentence-transformers for PyTorch, ONNX community for format conversion, OpenVINO toolkit for Intel optimization) rather than single unified export pipeline; enables best-in-class optimization per format but requires manual orchestration
vs alternatives: More deployment flexibility than proprietary embedding APIs (OpenAI, Cohere) which lock you into their inference infrastructure; more mature ONNX support than newer models due to wide adoption in sentence-transformers ecosystem
Applies embeddings trained on diverse datasets (academic papers, web search, Q&A, code search, StackExchange) to new domains without fine-tuning, leveraging learned semantic representations that generalize across task boundaries. The model was trained via multi-task learning on 8+ datasets with different semantic properties, enabling it to capture domain-agnostic semantic relationships. Works effectively on out-of-domain text due to broad training coverage, though with degraded performance on highly specialized domains (medical, legal, scientific jargon).
Unique: Trained via multi-task learning on 8+ heterogeneous datasets (S2ORC papers, MS MARCO web search, StackExchange Q&A, Yahoo Answers, CodeSearchNet, SearchQA, ELI5) rather than single-domain optimization, creating a 'semantic commons' that generalizes across task boundaries at the cost of domain-specific peak performance
vs alternatives: Better zero-shot transfer to unseen domains than domain-specific embeddings (e.g., SciBERT for papers only), though 5-15% lower performance than fine-tuned models on specialized tasks; more practical for multi-domain applications than maintaining separate embedding models
Achieves 5-10x faster inference than full BERT models through knowledge distillation, where a 6-layer student model learns to replicate the behavior of larger teacher models while maintaining 95%+ semantic quality. The distilled architecture reduces parameters from 110M (BERT-base) to 22.7M, enabling sub-10ms inference on CPU and sub-1ms on GPU. Distillation preserves semantic understanding while eliminating redundant transformer layers, making it suitable for latency-sensitive applications.
Unique: Uses asymmetric distillation where student (6 layers) learns from teacher (12 layers) via MSE loss on hidden states and attention patterns, not just final embeddings; preserves semantic structure while reducing depth, enabling both speed and quality retention
vs alternatives: Faster inference than full BERT-base (5-10x) and smaller than full models (22.7M vs 110M params), though slower than extreme compression techniques (TinyBERT, MobileBERT) which sacrifice more quality; better quality-to-speed trade-off than quantization-only approaches
Produces L2-normalized embeddings where all vectors have unit length (norm = 1), enabling direct cosine similarity computation via simple dot product without explicit normalization. The normalization is applied post-pooling in the model architecture, ensuring embeddings are always in the unit hypersphere. This design choice enables efficient similarity scoring and makes embeddings compatible with specialized vector databases (FAISS, Pinecone) that assume normalized vectors.
Unique: Applies L2 normalization as final layer in model architecture (not post-processing), ensuring all embeddings are guaranteed normalized without additional computation; enables direct dot-product similarity computation with mathematical equivalence to cosine similarity
vs alternatives: More efficient than post-hoc normalization of unnormalized embeddings; ensures compatibility with vector databases that assume normalized inputs; enables faster similarity computation (dot product vs cosine) on GPU