| Ecosystem | 0 | 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Starting Price | — | $25/mo |
| Capabilities | 6 decomposed | 15 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Exposes Shortcut's project management API through the Model Context Protocol, enabling Claude and other MCP-compatible AI clients to read and manipulate stories, epics, projects, and workflows. Implements MCP resource and tool schemas that map Shortcut's REST API endpoints into standardized tool definitions, allowing LLMs to query project state and trigger mutations without direct API knowledge.
Unique: Implements MCP as a bridge between Shortcut's REST API and Claude/LLM clients, using standardized MCP tool schemas to abstract Shortcut's domain model (stories, epics, workflows) into composable agent capabilities. This allows LLMs to reason about project state and trigger mutations through a protocol-agnostic interface rather than direct API calls.
vs alternatives: Provides native MCP integration for Shortcut (vs. building custom Claude plugins or REST wrappers), enabling seamless multi-turn agent workflows without context switching or manual API orchestration.
Implements read-only MCP tools that query Shortcut's story and epic endpoints with support for filtering by project, workflow state, assignee, and label. Uses Shortcut's query parameters to enable efficient server-side filtering, reducing payload size and API calls. Supports pagination to handle large result sets without overwhelming the LLM context window.
Unique: Exposes Shortcut's server-side filtering capabilities through MCP tool parameters, allowing the LLM to specify complex queries (by project, state, assignee, label) that are evaluated server-side rather than client-side, reducing data transfer and improving query performance.
vs alternatives: More efficient than fetching all stories and filtering in-memory because it leverages Shortcut's native query parameters, reducing API payload size and enabling agents to work with large projects without context window exhaustion.
Implements MCP tools for creating stories and epics in Shortcut with schema-based validation of required fields (name, project, workflow state). Validates input parameters against Shortcut's API constraints before submission, providing early error feedback to the LLM. Supports optional fields like description, estimate, assignee, and labels, allowing flexible story creation workflows.
Unique: Implements client-side schema validation before submitting to Shortcut's API, catching invalid field combinations (e.g., invalid workflow state) before making network requests. This reduces API errors and provides immediate feedback to the LLM, improving agent reliability.
vs alternatives: Validates input parameters before API submission (vs. raw REST calls that fail server-side), enabling agents to recover from validation errors without wasting API calls or creating partial/invalid stories.
Implements MCP tools for updating story/epic fields (name, description, state, estimate, assignee, labels) and deleting stories. Supports partial updates — only specified fields are modified, leaving others unchanged. Tracks which fields were modified and returns the updated object, enabling agents to confirm changes and detect conflicts.
Unique: Supports partial updates with field-level granularity, allowing agents to modify only specific story attributes without re-submitting the entire object. Returns the updated object to enable agents to verify changes and detect conflicts.
vs alternatives: More flexible than full-object replacement because it allows agents to update individual fields (e.g., just the state) without needing to fetch and re-submit the entire story, reducing API calls and enabling atomic field updates.
Implements MCP tools that query Shortcut's workflow definitions and project metadata, returning valid workflow states, project names, and team structures. Enables agents to discover valid values for constrained fields (e.g., workflow states) without hardcoding them, improving robustness across different Shortcut workspaces.
Unique: Exposes Shortcut's workspace configuration as queryable MCP tools, allowing agents to dynamically discover valid workflow states, projects, and team members rather than relying on hardcoded values. This enables agents to adapt to different workspace configurations without modification.
vs alternatives: Enables dynamic configuration discovery (vs. hardcoding workflow states and project IDs), making agents portable across different Shortcut workspaces and resilient to configuration changes.
Implements the MCP server-side protocol handler that translates between MCP tool calls (from Claude or other MCP clients) and Shortcut API requests. Uses JSON schema definitions to describe tool parameters and return types, enabling clients to understand tool capabilities without documentation. Handles MCP request/response serialization, error handling, and protocol versioning.
Unique: Implements MCP as a protocol layer that abstracts Shortcut's REST API, using JSON schemas to describe tool capabilities. This enables any MCP-compatible client (not just Claude) to interact with Shortcut through a standardized interface.
vs alternatives: Provides protocol-agnostic integration (vs. Claude-specific plugins) by implementing MCP, enabling the same Shortcut tools to work with multiple LLM clients and frameworks that support MCP.
Automatically inspects tabular data sources (Google Sheets, Airtable, Excel, CSV, SQL databases) to extract column names, infer field types (text, number, date, checkbox, etc.), and create bidirectional data bindings between UI components and source columns. Uses declarative component-to-column mappings that persist schema changes in real-time, enabling components to automatically reflect upstream data structure modifications without manual rebinding.
Unique: Glide's approach combines automatic schema introspection with declarative component binding, eliminating manual field mapping that competitors like Airtable require. The bidirectional sync model means changes to source column structure automatically propagate to UI components without developer intervention, reducing maintenance overhead for non-technical users.
vs alternatives: Faster to initial app than Airtable (which requires manual field configuration) and more flexible than rigid form builders because it adapts to evolving data structures automatically.
Provides 40+ pre-built, data-aware UI components (forms, tables, calendars, charts, buttons, text inputs, dropdowns, file uploads, maps, etc.) that automatically render responsively across mobile and desktop viewports. Components use a declarative binding syntax to connect to spreadsheet columns, with built-in support for computed fields, conditional visibility, and user-specific data filtering. Layout engine uses CSS Grid/Flexbox under the hood to adapt component sizing and positioning based on screen size without requiring manual breakpoint configuration.
Unique: Glide's component library is tightly integrated with data binding — components are not generic UI elements but data-aware objects that automatically sync with spreadsheet columns. This eliminates the disconnect between UI and data that exists in traditional form builders, where developers must manually wire component values to data sources.
vs alternatives: Faster to build than Bubble (which requires manual component-to-data wiring) and more mobile-optimized than Airtable's grid-centric interface, which prioritizes desktop spreadsheet metaphors over mobile-first design.
Glide scores higher at 70/100 vs @shortcut/mcp at 33/100. @shortcut/mcp leads on ecosystem, while Glide is stronger on adoption and quality.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
Enables multiple team members to edit apps simultaneously with role-based access control. Supports predefined roles (Owner, Editor, Viewer) with different permission levels: Owners can manage team members and publish apps, Editors can modify app design and data, Viewers can only view published apps. Team member limits vary by plan (2 free, 10 business, custom enterprise). Real-time collaboration on app design is not mentioned, suggesting changes may not be synchronized in real-time between editors.
Unique: Glide's team collaboration is built into the platform, meaning team members don't need separate accounts or complex permission configuration — they're invited via email and assigned roles directly in the app. This is more seamless than tools requiring external identity management.
vs alternatives: More integrated than Airtable (which requires separate workspace management) and simpler than GitHub-based collaboration (which requires version control knowledge), though less sophisticated than enterprise platforms with audit logging and approval workflows.
Provides pre-built app templates for common use cases (inventory management, CRM, project management, expense tracking, etc.) that users can clone and customize. Templates include sample data, pre-configured components, and example workflows, reducing time-to-first-app from hours to minutes. Templates are fully editable, allowing users to modify data sources, components, and workflows to match their specific needs. Template library is curated by Glide and updated regularly with new templates.
Unique: Glide's templates are fully functional apps with sample data and workflows, not just empty scaffolds. This allows users to immediately see how components work together and understand app structure before customizing, reducing the learning curve significantly.
vs alternatives: More complete than Airtable's templates (which are mostly empty bases) and more accessible than building from scratch, though less flexible than code-based frameworks where templates can be parameterized and generated programmatically.
Allows workflows to be triggered on a schedule (daily, weekly, monthly, or custom intervals) without manual intervention. Scheduled workflows execute at specified times and can perform batch operations (process pending records, send daily reports, sync data, etc.). Execution time is in UTC, and the exact scheduling mechanism (cron, quartz, custom) is undocumented. Failed scheduled tasks may or may not retry automatically (retry logic undocumented).
Unique: Glide's scheduled workflows are integrated with the workflow engine, meaning scheduled tasks can execute the same complex logic as event-triggered workflows (conditional logic, multi-step actions, API calls). This is more powerful than simple scheduled email tools because scheduled tasks can perform data transformations and cross-system synchronization.
vs alternatives: More integrated than Zapier's schedule trigger (which is limited to simple actions) and more accessible than cron jobs (which require server access and scripting knowledge), though less transparent about execution guarantees and failure handling than enterprise job schedulers.
Offers Glide Tables, a proprietary managed database alternative to external spreadsheets or databases, with automatic scaling and optimization for Glide apps. Glide Tables are stored in Glide's infrastructure and optimized for the data binding and query patterns used by Glide apps. Scaling limits are plan-dependent (25k-100k rows), with separate 'Big Tables' tier for larger datasets (exact scaling limits undocumented). Automatic backups and disaster recovery are mentioned but details are undocumented.
Unique: Glide Tables are optimized specifically for Glide's data binding and query patterns, meaning they're tightly integrated with the app builder and don't require separate database administration. This is more seamless than connecting external databases (which require schema design and optimization knowledge) but less flexible because data is locked into Glide's proprietary format.
vs alternatives: More managed than self-hosted databases (no administration required) and more integrated than external databases (no separate configuration), though less portable than standard databases because data cannot be easily exported or migrated.
Provides basic chart components (bar, line, pie, area charts) that visualize data from connected sources. Charts are configured visually by selecting data columns for axes, values, and grouping. Charts are responsive and adapt to mobile/tablet/desktop. Real-time updates are supported; charts refresh when underlying data changes. No custom chart types or advanced visualization options (3D, animations, etc.) are available.
Unique: Provides basic chart components with automatic real-time updates and responsive design, suitable for simple dashboards — most visual builders (Bubble, FlutterFlow) require chart plugins or custom code
vs alternatives: More integrated than Airtable's chart view because real-time updates are automatic; weaker than BI tools (Tableau, Looker) because no drill-down, filtering, or advanced visualization options
Allows users to query data using natural language (e.g., 'Show me all orders from last month with revenue > $5k') which is converted to structured database queries without SQL knowledge. Also includes AI-powered data extraction from unstructured text (emails, documents, images) to populate spreadsheet columns. Implementation details (LLM model, context window, fine-tuning approach) are undocumented, but the feature appears to use prompt-based query generation with fallback to manual query building if AI fails.
Unique: Glide's natural language query feature bridges the gap between spreadsheet users (who think in English) and database queries (which require SQL). Rather than teaching users SQL, it translates natural language to structured queries, lowering the barrier to data exploration. The data extraction capability extends this to unstructured sources, automating data entry from emails and documents.
vs alternatives: More accessible than Airtable's formula language or traditional SQL, and more integrated than bolt-on AI query tools because it's built directly into the data layer rather than as a separate search interface.
+7 more capabilities