| Ecosystem |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Capabilities | 9 decomposed | 10 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Classifies input and output text for sexually explicit content using a fine-tuned Gemma language model trained on safety datasets. The model processes natural language through transformer attention mechanisms to detect explicit sexual references, imagery descriptions, and adult content across multiple languages and contexts. Returns confidence scores and categorical severity levels (e.g., safe/unsafe) that can be thresholded for different deployment scenarios.
Unique: Built on Gemma's efficient transformer architecture (2B/7B parameters) enabling on-device deployment without cloud API calls, unlike OpenAI Moderation API or Perspective API which require external requests. Provides configurable thresholds and multi-category safety scoring rather than binary pass/fail decisions.
vs alternatives: Faster and more privacy-preserving than cloud-based moderation APIs because it runs locally; more nuanced than regex-based filters because it understands semantic context through transformer attention
Identifies and classifies text containing instructions for violence, self-harm, illegal activities, or other dangerous behaviors using semantic understanding of intent and context. The model distinguishes between educational/informational content and actionable dangerous instructions through fine-tuned pattern recognition on safety-labeled datasets. Outputs severity scores and content category tags enabling graduated response policies (e.g., warning vs. blocking).
Unique: Gemma-based approach enables semantic understanding of dangerous intent rather than keyword matching, allowing distinction between educational/historical content and actionable instructions. Provides multi-category danger classification (violence vs. self-harm vs. illegal) rather than binary safe/unsafe.
vs alternatives: More context-aware than regex/keyword-based filters because it understands semantic intent; more deployable on-device than cloud APIs, reducing latency and privacy exposure for sensitive content
Detects targeted harassment, bullying, and abusive language directed at individuals or groups using contextual language understanding. The model identifies patterns of repeated negative targeting, personal attacks, and coordinated abuse through transformer-based semantic analysis of conversation context and user interaction history. Outputs harassment severity scores and target identification enabling context-aware moderation policies.
Unique: Incorporates conversation context and interaction patterns rather than analyzing messages in isolation, enabling detection of coordinated harassment and repeated targeting. Gemma's efficient architecture allows real-time processing of conversation threads without external API calls.
vs alternatives: More context-aware than single-message classifiers because it analyzes conversation patterns; more privacy-preserving than cloud-based harassment detection APIs because it runs on-device
Classifies text containing hate speech, discriminatory language, and slurs targeting protected characteristics (race, ethnicity, religion, gender, sexual orientation, disability, etc.) using fine-tuned semantic understanding. The model recognizes both explicit slurs and coded language/dog whistles through pattern matching on safety-labeled datasets. Outputs hate speech severity, target group identification, and language category enabling nuanced moderation policies.
Unique: Provides multi-dimensional categorization (hate speech type + target group) rather than binary classification, enabling granular moderation policies. Gemma's semantic understanding captures coded language and dog whistles beyond simple keyword matching.
vs alternatives: More nuanced than regex-based slur filters because it understands context and coded language; more deployable than cloud APIs because it runs on-device with no external dependencies
Enables fine-grained control over safety classification thresholds and policies through configuration parameters applied at inference time. Allows operators to adjust confidence score cutoffs per safety category (e.g., strict filtering for explicit content, lenient for dangerous content), define custom response policies (block/warn/log), and apply different thresholds to different user segments or content types. Implemented through post-processing of model confidence scores against configurable policy rules.
Unique: Provides runtime threshold configuration without model retraining, enabling rapid policy iteration and multi-segment deployment. Supports per-category and per-segment threshold variation, allowing nuanced safety/usability tradeoffs.
vs alternatives: More flexible than fixed-threshold classifiers because thresholds can be adjusted without retraining; more operationally efficient than maintaining separate fine-tuned models for different policies
Applies safety classification across multiple languages using Gemma's multilingual capabilities, enabling consistent content moderation policies across global platforms. The model processes text in 40+ languages through shared transformer embeddings trained on multilingual safety datasets. Outputs language-agnostic safety classifications with per-language confidence adjustments reflecting training data coverage.
Unique: Gemma's multilingual training enables single-model deployment across 40+ languages with shared safety semantics, avoiding need for language-specific fine-tuned models. Provides per-language confidence adjustments reflecting training data coverage.
vs alternatives: More efficient than maintaining separate safety models per language; more consistent than language-specific classifiers because it uses shared safety semantics across languages
Processes multiple text inputs (messages, comments, completions) in batch mode with vectorized inference, returning safety scores and classifications for all inputs simultaneously. Implemented through batching at the inference layer to maximize GPU utilization and throughput. Outputs structured results with per-input classifications, confidence scores, and category breakdowns enabling efficient content moderation pipelines.
Unique: Vectorized batch inference on GPU enables processing thousands of inputs per second, orders of magnitude faster than sequential API calls. Provides structured output with per-input classifications and aggregated statistics.
vs alternatives: Much higher throughput than sequential cloud API calls because it batches inference on local GPU; more cost-effective than per-request API pricing for high-volume moderation
Integrates safety classification into LLM application workflows by filtering both user inputs (before reaching the model) and model outputs (before returning to user). Implemented as middleware in the inference pipeline that applies safety classifiers sequentially or in parallel, with configurable blocking/warning policies. Enables end-to-end safety without modifying the base LLM.
Unique: Provides integrated input+output filtering in a single pipeline rather than separate classifiers, enabling coordinated safety policies. Supports configurable policies (block/warn/log) and maintains audit trails for compliance.
vs alternatives: More comprehensive than output-only filtering because it also prevents harmful inputs from reaching the model; more efficient than external API-based filtering because it runs locally without network latency
+1 more capabilities
Aggregates 67 TB of source code from the Software Heritage archive, filtering for permissively licensed repositories (MIT, Apache 2.0, BSD, etc.) across 600+ programming languages. Uses automated license detection and validation to ensure legal compliance for model training. Implements a rigorous deduplication pipeline at file and repository levels to eliminate redundant training data and reduce dataset bloat.
Unique: Largest open-source code dataset at 67 TB with automated opt-out governance allowing repository owners to request removal, combined with rigorous deduplication and PII removal pipeline — no other public dataset offers this scale with legal compliance and community control mechanisms
vs alternatives: Larger and more legally compliant than GitHub's CodeSearchNet (14M files) or Google's BigQuery public datasets, with explicit opt-out governance vs. implicit inclusion, and covers 600+ languages vs. Codex training data's undisclosed language distribution
Implements a community-driven opt-out system where repository owners can request removal of their code from the dataset without legal takedown notices. Maintains a registry of excluded repositories and re-applies exclusions during dataset updates. Provides transparent governance documentation and a clear submission process for removal requests, balancing open access with creator rights.
Unique: First large-scale code dataset to implement opt-out governance at dataset level rather than relying solely on license compliance, with transparent registry and community submission process — shifts power from dataset creators to code contributors
vs alternatives: More respectful of creator autonomy than GitHub Copilot's training approach (no opt-out) or academic datasets (one-time snapshot), and more scalable than individual DMCA takedowns
The Stack v2 scores higher at 61/100 vs ShieldGemma at 58/100.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
Automated pipeline that scans source code for personally identifiable information (email addresses, API keys, SSH keys, credit card patterns, phone numbers) and removes or redacts them before dataset release. Uses regex patterns, entropy-based detection for secrets, and heuristic rules to identify sensitive data. Operates at file level with configurable sensitivity thresholds to balance data utility against privacy risk.
Unique: Combines regex pattern matching, entropy-based secret detection, and heuristic rules in a unified pipeline with configurable sensitivity — more comprehensive than simple regex-only approaches, but trades off false positive rate against security coverage
vs alternatives: More thorough than GitHub's secret scanning (which only flags known patterns) because it includes entropy-based detection for unknown secret formats, but less accurate than specialized tools like TruffleHog due to language-agnostic approach
Indexes 67 TB of source code across 600+ programming languages with language-aware metadata (syntax, file extension, language family). Enables retrieval by language, license, repository, or code patterns. Uses Software Heritage's existing indexing infrastructure as foundation, augmented with language detection and classification. Supports both bulk download and filtered queries for specific language subsets.
Unique: Leverages Software Heritage's existing language detection and indexing infrastructure, then augments with BigCode-specific language classification and filtering — avoids reinventing language detection while providing dataset-specific query capabilities
vs alternatives: More comprehensive language coverage (600+ languages) than GitHub's Linguist (500+ languages) and more accessible than Software Heritage's raw API because it's pre-filtered for permissive licenses and deduplicated
Removes duplicate code files and repositories using content hashing (SHA-256 or similar) and fuzzy matching for near-duplicates. Operates in two stages: exact deduplication via hash matching, then fuzzy matching (e.g., Jaccard similarity or MinHash) to catch semantically identical code with minor formatting differences. Preserves one canonical copy of each unique code pattern while removing redundant training examples.
Unique: Two-stage deduplication combining exact hash matching with fuzzy similarity matching (likely MinHash or Jaccard) to catch both identical and near-identical code — more thorough than single-stage approaches but computationally expensive
vs alternatives: More aggressive deduplication than CodeSearchNet (which uses simple hash matching) because it catches near-duplicates, but less semantic than clone detection tools (which understand code structure) because it's content-based
Integrates with Software Heritage's comprehensive archive of 200+ million repositories and their full version control history. Extracts source code snapshots from Software Heritage's Git/Mercurial/SVN repositories, preserving repository metadata (commit history, author info, timestamps). Provides access to code at specific points in time, enabling historical analysis or training on code evolution patterns.
Unique: Leverages Software Heritage's universal code archive (200M+ repositories) as data source, providing access to code that would be impossible to collect via GitHub API alone — enables training on archived/deleted repositories and non-GitHub platforms (GitLab, Gitea, etc.)
vs alternatives: More comprehensive than GitHub-only datasets because it includes code from GitLab, Gitea, SourceForge, and other platforms archived by Software Heritage; more legally defensible than web scraping because it uses an established, community-maintained archive
Tracks and validates SPDX license identifiers for each repository, ensuring only permissively licensed code (MIT, Apache 2.0, BSD, etc.) is included. Maintains license metadata alongside code files, enabling downstream users to verify legal compliance. Implements license hierarchy and compatibility checking to handle dual-licensed or complex licensing scenarios.
Unique: Combines automated SPDX detection with manual review and maintains license metadata alongside code, enabling downstream users to verify compliance — more transparent than datasets that simply claim 'permissive licenses' without proof
vs alternatives: More legally rigorous than GitHub's CodeSearchNet (which doesn't validate licenses) and more transparent than Codex training data (which doesn't disclose license filtering at all)
Maintains versioned snapshots of the dataset (e.g., v2.0, v2.1) with documented changes between versions (new repositories added, deduplication improvements, PII removal updates). Provides checksums and manifests for reproducibility, enabling researchers to cite specific dataset versions and reproduce results. Tracks dataset lineage and transformation history.
Unique: Maintains semantic versioning and detailed changelogs for dataset releases, enabling researchers to cite specific versions and understand dataset evolution — more rigorous than one-off dataset releases without versioning
vs alternatives: More reproducible than academic datasets that are released once without versioning, and more transparent than commercial datasets (Codex) that don't disclose version history or changes
+2 more capabilities