Z.ai: GLM 4.5 ranks higher at 24/100 vs Sao10K: Llama 3.3 Euryale 70B at 21/100. Capability-level comparison backed by match graph evidence from real search data.
| Feature | Sao10K: Llama 3.3 Euryale 70B | Z.ai: GLM 4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Model | Model |
| UnfragileRank | 21/100 | 24/100 |
| Adoption |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| Quality | 0 | 0 |
| Ecosystem | 0 | 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Paid | Paid |
| Starting Price | $6.50e-7 per prompt token | $6.00e-7 per prompt token |
| Capabilities | 5 decomposed | 11 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Generates detailed character personas, backstories, and dialogue patterns optimized for creative roleplay scenarios. The model uses instruction-tuning specifically calibrated for character consistency, emotional depth, and narrative coherence across multi-turn conversations. Built on Llama 3.3 70B architecture with fine-tuning weights that prioritize creative expression over factual accuracy constraints, enabling richer character embodiment and improvisation.
Unique: Successor to Euryale L3 v2.2 with architectural improvements in creative consistency and emotional nuance; specifically fine-tuned on creative roleplay datasets rather than general instruction-following, using Llama 3.3's improved context handling to maintain character coherence across longer narratives
vs alternatives: Outperforms general-purpose LLMs (GPT-4, Claude) in creative roleplay scenarios due to specialized fine-tuning, while maintaining lower inference costs than proprietary models through OpenRouter's API optimization
Maintains semantic coherence and character consistency across extended multi-turn conversations by leveraging Llama 3.3's improved attention mechanisms and context window optimization. The model tracks implicit character state, emotional arcs, and narrative continuity without explicit state management, using transformer-based attention patterns to weight recent dialogue more heavily while preserving long-range dependencies for character consistency.
Unique: Leverages Llama 3.3's improved rotary position embeddings and grouped query attention to maintain character coherence across longer contexts than Llama 3.1, with fine-tuning specifically optimized for creative narrative consistency rather than factual recall
vs alternatives: Maintains character consistency longer than GPT-3.5 due to superior attention mechanisms, while requiring less explicit prompt engineering than smaller models like Mistral 7B
Generates text that adheres to creative constraints (genre conventions, tone requirements, narrative structure) specified in system prompts or inline instructions. The model uses instruction-tuning to interpret and respect soft constraints (e.g., 'write in noir style', 'maintain comedic tone') without explicit control tokens, relying on semantic understanding of constraint language rather than hard-coded rule systems.
Unique: Fine-tuned specifically on creative roleplay datasets with diverse genre and tone examples, enabling semantic understanding of creative constraints without explicit control mechanisms; Llama 3.3's improved instruction-following enables more nuanced constraint interpretation than predecessors
vs alternatives: More flexible than rule-based constraint systems while more reliable than general-purpose models at respecting creative style constraints due to specialized training
Generates text responses in real-time token-by-token streaming format via OpenRouter's HTTP streaming API, enabling low-latency interactive experiences. The model outputs tokens sequentially as they are generated, allowing client applications to display partial responses and provide perceived responsiveness without waiting for full generation completion. Streaming is implemented via HTTP chunked transfer encoding with Server-Sent Events (SSE) protocol.
Unique: OpenRouter's streaming implementation uses HTTP chunked transfer with SSE protocol, enabling cross-browser compatibility and firewall-friendly streaming without WebSocket requirements; integrates seamlessly with Llama 3.3's token generation pipeline
vs alternatives: More accessible than direct Ollama streaming (no local infrastructure required) while maintaining lower latency than polling-based alternatives
Provides access to the Euryale 70B model via OpenRouter's managed API infrastructure with granular pay-per-token billing. Requests are routed through OpenRouter's load-balanced inference cluster, abstracting away model deployment, scaling, and infrastructure management. Pricing is calculated based on input and output tokens consumed, with no subscription or minimum commitments required.
Unique: OpenRouter's aggregation layer enables transparent routing across multiple inference providers and model versions, with unified billing and API interface; abstracts provider-specific implementation details while maintaining model-specific behavior
vs alternatives: More cost-effective than direct OpenAI/Anthropic APIs for 70B model access, while more flexible than self-hosted Ollama (no infrastructure management required)
GLM-4.5 uses a Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) architecture to dynamically route tokens through specialized expert networks based on input characteristics, enabling efficient processing of 128k-token contexts without proportional latency increases. The MoE design allows selective expert activation per token, reducing computational overhead while maintaining reasoning depth across extended conversations and multi-document analysis tasks typical of agent-based workflows.
Unique: Mixture-of-Experts routing specifically tuned for agent workloads rather than generic dense models; expert activation patterns are optimized for tool-use sequences and multi-step reasoning rather than general language tasks
vs alternatives: Outperforms dense models like GPT-4 Turbo on agent tasks within 128k context by routing computational budget to relevant experts, reducing latency and cost vs. models that process all tokens through identical layers
GLM-4.5 implements native function calling through a schema-based registry where tools are defined as JSON schemas with parameter constraints, type validation, and description metadata. The model learns to emit structured tool invocations that map directly to function signatures, enabling deterministic tool orchestration without post-processing or regex parsing. Integration with OpenRouter's API exposes this via standard function-calling parameters compatible with OpenAI's format.
Unique: Schema-based function calling is trained directly into the model weights rather than implemented as post-hoc decoding constraints, allowing the model to learn semantic relationships between tool purposes and input context during training
vs alternatives: More reliable than constraint-based function calling (e.g., Guidance, LMQL) because tool selection is learned rather than enforced, reducing parsing failures and enabling the model to reason about tool applicability
Z.ai: GLM 4.5 scores higher at 24/100 vs Sao10K: Llama 3.3 Euryale 70B at 21/100.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
GLM-4.5 can be used for batch inference through OpenRouter's API, enabling cost-optimized processing of large numbers of requests. Batch processing typically offers reduced pricing compared to real-time API calls and is suitable for non-urgent inference tasks. The model can process batches of prompts efficiently, with results returned after processing completes. This is valuable for agents running scheduled tasks or processing large datasets.
Unique: Batch processing is offered through OpenRouter's unified API rather than a separate batch service, enabling seamless switching between real-time and batch modes with the same client code
vs alternatives: More cost-effective than real-time API for high-volume inference; simpler than managing separate batch infrastructure because OpenRouter handles queuing and result delivery
GLM-4.5 maintains coherent conversation state across turns by encoding prior messages into a compressed representation that persists within the 128k context window. The model uses attention mechanisms to selectively retrieve relevant prior context, enabling agents to reference earlier decisions, tool results, and user preferences without explicit memory management. This is particularly effective for agent workflows where state accumulation (e.g., task progress, discovered facts) must inform subsequent actions.
Unique: Implicit memory management through attention-based context selection rather than explicit memory modules; the model learns which prior turns are relevant without separate retrieval or summarization steps
vs alternatives: More efficient than explicit memory systems (e.g., LangChain's ConversationBufferMemory) because attention is computed once during inference rather than requiring separate retrieval and summarization passes
GLM-4.5 generates code across 40+ programming languages by leveraging training data that includes diverse codebases and syntax patterns. The model understands language-specific idioms, library conventions, and structural patterns (e.g., async/await in JavaScript, type hints in Python, generics in Java) without explicit language-specific modules. Generation is context-aware, respecting indentation, existing code style, and project conventions when completing or extending code snippets.
Unique: Language-agnostic code generation trained on diverse codebases rather than language-specific fine-tuning; the model generalizes syntax patterns across languages, enabling reasonable code generation even for less common languages
vs alternatives: Broader language coverage than specialized models like Codex (which emphasizes Python/JavaScript) but lower quality on niche languages compared to language-specific models; better for polyglot teams than single-language specialists
GLM-4.5 is trained on extensive technical documentation, API references, and code examples, enabling it to understand and reason about complex technical concepts, library APIs, and system architectures. The model can parse API schemas (OpenAPI, GraphQL, Protocol Buffers), understand parameter constraints and type systems, and generate code that correctly uses APIs based on documentation. This is particularly valuable for agent workflows that must interact with external systems.
Unique: Semantic understanding of API schemas and documentation is learned from training data rather than implemented as a separate schema parser; the model reasons about API semantics holistically
vs alternatives: More flexible than code-generation-only models because it understands API semantics and can reason about correctness; better than generic LLMs for technical tasks because training includes extensive API documentation
GLM-4.5 can generate responses that explicitly show reasoning steps, enabling transparency into how conclusions were reached. When prompted with chain-of-thought patterns, the model generates intermediate reasoning steps before final answers, making it suitable for applications requiring explainability or verification. This is implemented through training on reasoning-annotated data and prompt patterns that encourage step-by-step decomposition.
Unique: Chain-of-thought reasoning is trained directly into the model rather than implemented as a decoding strategy; the model learns to generate reasoning steps as part of its core training objective
vs alternatives: More natural and coherent reasoning steps than prompt-injection approaches (e.g., appending 'think step by step') because reasoning is learned as a first-class capability
GLM-4.5 supports multiple languages (Chinese, English, and others) with training that enables cross-lingual reasoning — understanding concepts expressed in one language and reasoning about them in another. The model can translate, summarize, and reason across languages without language-specific degradation. This is particularly valuable for global applications and agents that must operate in multilingual environments.
Unique: Cross-lingual reasoning is learned from multilingual training data rather than implemented as separate language-specific models; the model develops a shared representation across languages
vs alternatives: More efficient than maintaining separate models per language because a single model handles all languages; better for cross-lingual reasoning than language-specific models because the shared representation enables concept transfer
+3 more capabilities