Supermaven ranks higher at 71/100 vs Roo Code Chinese（原Roo Cline） at 37/100. Capability-level comparison backed by match graph evidence from real search data.
| Feature | Roo Code Chinese（原Roo Cline） | Supermaven |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Extension | Extension |
| UnfragileRank | 37/100 | 71/100 |
| Adoption | 1 | 1 |
| Quality | 0 | 1 |
| Ecosystem | 0 | 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Starting Price | — | $10/mo |
| Capabilities | 12 decomposed | 13 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Generates code completions and implementations by analyzing the current file and project context, then routing requests to configured LLM endpoints (DeepSeek, Claude, or custom APIs) with system prompts translated and optimized for Chinese language models. The extension maintains conversation history within the VS Code editor to enable multi-turn code generation workflows without losing context between requests.
Unique: Implements Chinese-language system prompts and prompt engineering optimized for Chinese LLMs (particularly DeepSeek models), whereas most code generation tools default to English-optimized prompts that may underperform on Chinese-trained models. Supports lightweight 7B-14B parameter models as primary inference targets rather than requiring large cloud models.
vs alternatives: Faster inference cost and latency than Claude-based tools when using lightweight DeepSeek models, and better Chinese language understanding than English-optimized code assistants like GitHub Copilot due to localized prompt engineering.
Provides an integrated chat panel in the VS Code sidebar that maintains multi-turn conversation history with the configured LLM. Messages are sent to the LLM endpoint with current file context automatically injected, and responses are rendered in the chat UI with syntax highlighting for code blocks. The conversation state persists within the current VS Code session.
Unique: Integrates chat directly into VS Code sidebar with automatic current-file context injection, whereas most chat-based code assistants (ChatGPT, Claude web) require manual context copying or separate browser windows. Chinese UI localization ensures native language support for Chinese developers.
vs alternatives: Eliminates context-switching overhead compared to browser-based chat tools, and provides tighter VS Code integration than generic LLM chat clients that don't understand editor state.
Maintains synchronization with the upstream Roo Code project by merging updates and bug fixes from the original repository. The extension is a localized fork that inherits core functionality from Roo Code while adding Chinese language support and optimizations. Maintenance is performed by individual developer (Leo) with explicit disclaimers about update frequency and project continuity.
Unique: Maintains a community-driven fork of Roo Code with Chinese localization and explicit maintenance disclaimers, whereas official Roo Code is maintained by the original team. Provides transparency about fork status and maintenance risks.
vs alternatives: Offers Chinese language support faster than waiting for official Roo Code localization, but with higher maintenance risk than using the official project.
Abstracts LLM provider differences behind a unified API interface, allowing support for multiple providers (SiliconFlow, OpenRouter, OpenAI-compatible APIs) without duplicating code. The extension implements a provider adapter pattern that translates between the unified internal API and provider-specific request/response formats, enabling easy addition of new providers.
Unique: Implements provider abstraction layer supporting multiple LLM providers via unified API, whereas most code assistants are tightly coupled to a single provider. Enables provider switching without workflow changes.
vs alternatives: More flexible than single-provider tools for teams with multi-provider strategies, though less integrated than purpose-built tools for specific providers.
Allows users to configure custom LLM API endpoints and select between multiple providers (SiliconFlow, OpenRouter, OpenAI-compatible APIs, or local endpoints). The extension routes all inference requests to the configured endpoint using the selected model, with API key management handled through VS Code settings. Supports both cloud-hosted and self-hosted LLM services via standard API protocols.
Unique: Supports both commercial API providers (SiliconFlow, OpenRouter) and self-hosted LLM endpoints via configurable routing, whereas most VS Code code assistants are locked to a single provider (Copilot → OpenAI, Codeium → proprietary). Enables use of lightweight Chinese LLMs (DeepSeek) as first-class citizens rather than fallback options.
vs alternatives: Provides cost and latency advantages over cloud-only tools by supporting local LLM servers and regional providers, and avoids vendor lock-in by supporting multiple API formats.
Automatically captures and injects the current file's content, file path, and language information into LLM requests without requiring manual context specification. The extension detects the active editor tab and includes this context in the system prompt or request payload, enabling the LLM to generate code that aligns with the current file's syntax, style, and imports.
Unique: Automatically injects current file context into every LLM request without user action, whereas most code assistants require explicit context specification or rely on implicit context from cursor position. Enables seamless multi-language support by detecting language from file extension.
vs alternatives: Reduces friction compared to tools requiring manual context copying, and provides better code style alignment than generic LLM chat interfaces that lack file awareness.
Implements prompt engineering and system message optimization specifically for lightweight Chinese LLMs (7B-14B parameters), particularly DeepSeek-R1-Distill series. The extension translates system prompts to Chinese and adjusts instruction formatting to match the training patterns of Chinese-optimized models, enabling better code generation quality from smaller models compared to using English prompts.
Unique: Implements Chinese-specific prompt engineering for lightweight models (7B-14B), whereas most code assistants assume large English-trained models (70B+) and don't optimize for smaller Chinese-trained alternatives. Treats lightweight models as primary targets rather than fallbacks.
vs alternatives: Achieves comparable code generation quality to large models with 5-10x lower latency and cost by using Chinese-optimized prompts for DeepSeek, whereas generic tools using English prompts on Chinese models may underperform.
Exposes AI capabilities through VS Code command palette, allowing users to trigger code generation, refactoring, and chat actions via keyboard shortcuts or command search. Commands are registered in the extension's activation context and can be invoked without using the sidebar chat interface, enabling power users to work entirely through keyboard-driven workflows.
Unique: Integrates AI actions into VS Code command palette for keyboard-driven workflows, whereas many code assistants rely primarily on sidebar UI or inline suggestions. Enables power users to avoid mouse interaction entirely.
vs alternatives: Faster for keyboard-driven developers compared to mouse-based sidebar chat, and integrates with existing VS Code keybinding customization workflows.
+4 more capabilities
Generates single-line and multi-line code suggestions in real-time as developers type, using semantic indexing of the entire codebase to retrieve relevant type definitions, function signatures, and contextual patterns. The system maintains a 1M token context window (Pro/Team tiers) that enables suggestions informed by distant code definitions and cross-file dependencies, constructed via local codebase semantic search rather than simple token-based recency. Suggestions adapt to detected coding style on Pro/Team tiers through implicit pattern learning from recent edits.
Unique: 1M token context window with codebase-wide semantic indexing enables suggestions informed by distant code definitions and cross-file patterns, versus competitors (Copilot, Tabnine) that typically use fixed context windows (4K-32K tokens) or file-local context. Claimed 250ms latency suggests optimized retrieval pipeline, though indexing mechanism and performance at scale remain undisclosed.
vs alternatives: Larger context window than GitHub Copilot (8K-32K tokens) and faster latency than unnamed competitors (250ms vs 783ms claimed), enabling suggestions on large codebases with minimal typing delay; trade-off is cloud dependency and undisclosed free tier limitations.
Provides a separate chat interface supporting multiple LLM backends (GPT-4o, Claude 3.5 Sonnet, GPT-4, others) for conversational code assistance. Users attach files, reference recent edits, and trigger compiler diagnostic uploads; the system generates diffs and applies code changes directly to the editor. Model selection is per-conversation, and $5/month in credits (included in Pro/Team) covers external model API costs; overage pricing is undisclosed. Hotkey-driven workflow enables rapid context switching between inline completion and chat.
Unique: Multi-model chat interface with per-conversation model selection and integrated diff application, combined with compiler diagnostic auto-upload. Unlike Copilot Chat (single model per tier) or standalone ChatGPT, Supermaven Chat unifies multiple LLM backends in a single hotkey-driven workflow with direct editor integration for change application.
Supermaven scores higher at 71/100 vs Roo Code Chinese（原Roo Cline） at 37/100. Roo Code Chinese（原Roo Cline） leads on ecosystem, while Supermaven is stronger on adoption and quality.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
vs alternatives: Supports multiple LLM backends (GPT-4o, Claude 3.5 Sonnet) in one interface with included credits, whereas GitHub Copilot Chat is single-model per tier and requires separate ChatGPT subscription for model switching; trade-off is credit limits and unknown overage pricing.
Supermaven Chat can automatically upload compiler diagnostic messages (errors, warnings) alongside code context to provide error-aware suggestions and fixes. The mechanism is described as 'automatically uploading your code together with compiler diagnostic messages,' but specific language/compiler support and the upload trigger mechanism are undisclosed. This feature is Chat-only and not available in inline completion.
Unique: Automatic compiler diagnostic upload in Chat for error-aware suggestions, versus competitors (Copilot, Tabnine) that require manual error context or have limited diagnostic integration. Supermaven's approach reduces friction but with undisclosed language/compiler support.
vs alternatives: Automatic diagnostic upload reduces manual context-gathering compared to manual copy-paste; trade-off is undisclosed language support and unclear upload trigger mechanism.
Supermaven offers a 30-day free trial of the Pro tier ($10/month), providing full access to 1M token context window, largest model, style adaptation, and $5/month chat credits. No credit card is required to start the trial (implied), and trial conversion to paid is automatic after 30 days unless cancelled. Trial terms and auto-renewal policy are not explicitly detailed.
Unique: 30-day free trial of Pro tier with full feature access (1M context, largest model, chat credits), versus competitors (Copilot 2-month free trial, Tabnine free tier only) with different trial lengths and feature access. Supermaven's approach is generous but with undisclosed auto-renewal terms.
vs alternatives: Full Pro feature access during trial compared to limited free tier; trade-off is undisclosed auto-renewal policy and potential unexpected charges if not cancelled.
Supermaven requires internet connectivity and server-side inference; no offline mode or local inference capability is mentioned or available. All code completion requests are sent to Supermaven's backend servers for processing, and responses are returned over the network. This creates a hard dependency on network connectivity and Supermaven's service availability; if the service is down or network is unavailable, code completion is not available.
Unique: Supermaven has no offline mode or local inference capability; all processing is server-side. GitHub Copilot also requires server-side inference, but Tabnine offers local inference options for some use cases. Supermaven's lack of offline capability is a significant limitation for developers with connectivity constraints.
vs alternatives: Supermaven's server-side-only approach is comparable to GitHub Copilot; Tabnine offers local inference options, making Tabnine more suitable for offline work. Supermaven's lack of offline capability is a weakness vs. Tabnine.
Analyzes recent code edits and inferred coding patterns to adapt inline suggestions to match team conventions, naming patterns, and structural preferences. The mechanism is implicit (not explicit fine-tuning) and operates only on Pro/Team tiers, suggesting pattern learning from editor activity rather than explicit configuration. Free tier uses a single base model without personalization.
Unique: Implicit style adaptation via editor activity analysis without explicit configuration, versus competitors (Copilot, Tabnine) that require manual style guides or explicit fine-tuning. Supermaven's approach is transparent to the user but also non-configurable and undisclosed in mechanism.
vs alternatives: Requires no manual style configuration compared to tools requiring explicit style guides; trade-off is lack of transparency and inability to control or export learned styles.
Delivers code suggestions to the editor inline as the developer types, with a claimed baseline latency of 250ms from keystroke to suggestion display. The system uses a cloud inference backend and local editor plugin to minimize round-trip time. Latency claim is positioned against an unnamed competitor (783ms), but methodology is undisclosed and no independent verification is provided.
Unique: Claimed 250ms latency via optimized cloud inference pipeline and editor plugin architecture, versus competitors with higher latency (783ms unnamed baseline). Actual differentiation is undisclosed; mechanism may involve request batching, model quantization, or edge caching, but specifics are not public.
vs alternatives: Faster than unnamed competitor (250ms vs 783ms claimed); trade-off is cloud dependency and unverified latency claim with no SLA or performance guarantee.
Provides native editor extensions for VS Code, JetBrains IDEs (IntelliJ IDEA, PyCharm, WebStorm, etc.), and Neovim, enabling inline suggestion rendering, hotkey-driven chat access, and compiler diagnostic integration directly within the editor. Each plugin variant is maintained separately and integrates with the editor's native autocomplete UI, keybinding system, and file context APIs.
Unique: Native plugins for three major editor ecosystems (VS Code, JetBrains, Neovim) with integrated chat and diff application, versus competitors (Copilot, Tabnine) that support broader editor ecosystems but with less deep integration in some cases. Supermaven's approach prioritizes depth over breadth.
vs alternatives: Deep integration with VS Code and JetBrains (native autocomplete UI, hotkey system) compared to web-based tools or lighter integrations; trade-off is limited editor support (no Sublime, Vim, Emacs) and undisclosed Neovim support details.
+5 more capabilities