MS COCO (Common Objects in Context) ranks higher at 61/100 vs Qwen: Qwen3.6 Plus at 23/100. Capability-level comparison backed by match graph evidence from real search data.
| Feature | Qwen: Qwen3.6 Plus | MS COCO (Common Objects in Context) |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Model | Dataset |
| UnfragileRank | 23/100 | 61/100 |
| Adoption | 0 |
| 1 |
| Quality | 0 | 1 |
| Ecosystem | 0 | 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Paid | Free |
| Starting Price | $3.25e-7 per prompt token | — |
| Capabilities | 9 decomposed | 11 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Generates coherent multi-turn text and reasoning outputs using a hybrid architecture combining linear attention mechanisms with sparse mixture-of-experts (MoE) routing. Linear attention reduces computational complexity from O(n²) to O(n) while sparse MoE selectively activates expert subnetworks based on token routing decisions, enabling efficient scaling to longer contexts and larger model capacity without proportional inference cost increases.
Unique: Combines linear attention (O(n) complexity) with sparse MoE routing instead of dense attention or standard MoE, reducing per-token inference cost while maintaining routing flexibility — architectural choice that differentiates from GPT-4's dense attention and Mixtral's full-capacity expert selection
vs alternatives: Achieves better inference efficiency than dense models like GPT-4 Turbo on long contexts while offering more predictable routing behavior than fully-sparse MoE systems, making it ideal for cost-sensitive production workloads
Processes images alongside text prompts to perform visual understanding, analysis, and reasoning tasks. The model ingests image data (via base64 encoding or URLs) and jointly encodes visual and textual information through a unified transformer backbone, enabling tasks like visual question answering, image captioning, document OCR, and scene understanding without separate vision-language alignment layers.
Unique: Integrates vision understanding directly into the sparse-MoE text model backbone rather than using separate vision encoders + fusion layers, reducing model complexity and enabling efficient joint reasoning over visual and textual modalities within a single forward pass
vs alternatives: More efficient than GPT-4V's separate vision encoder approach while offering better visual reasoning than lightweight vision models like LLaVA, striking a balance between inference cost and visual understanding quality
Processes sequences of video frames (provided as individual images or frame arrays) to understand temporal dynamics, scene changes, and motion patterns. The model applies its multimodal understanding across multiple frames while maintaining temporal context, enabling analysis of video content without requiring specialized video encoders or temporal convolution layers.
Unique: Reuses the same multimodal backbone for video understanding without dedicated temporal layers, relying on the model's reasoning capability to infer motion and causality from frame sequences — simpler architecture than models with explicit 3D convolutions or temporal attention
vs alternatives: More flexible than specialized video models (which require specific frame rates and durations) while cheaper than running separate frame analysis + temporal fusion pipelines, though less optimized for high-FPS or long-duration video than purpose-built video encoders
Extracts and formats information into structured JSON schemas when provided with schema definitions in prompts. The model parses natural language or visual content and outputs valid JSON conforming to specified structures, enabling reliable integration with downstream systems without post-processing or regex parsing. This works through in-context learning — the model learns the desired output format from examples or explicit schema instructions in the prompt.
Unique: Relies on in-context learning and prompt engineering rather than constrained decoding or grammar-based output enforcement — gives flexibility in schema design but trades reliability for expressiveness compared to models with native structured output modes
vs alternatives: More flexible than Claude's JSON mode (which enforces strict validity) but less reliable; cheaper than fine-tuned extraction models while requiring more careful prompt engineering and validation logic
Maintains conversation state across multiple turns by accepting message histories (system, user, assistant roles) and generating contextually-aware responses. The model processes the full conversation history on each turn, enabling coherent multi-turn dialogue without external session management. The sparse-MoE architecture enables efficient processing of longer conversation histories compared to dense models.
Unique: Linear attention mechanism enables efficient processing of longer conversation histories without quadratic cost scaling — allows practical multi-turn conversations with 2-3x longer histories than dense-attention models before hitting latency walls
vs alternatives: More efficient than GPT-4 for long conversation histories due to linear attention, but requires explicit conversation history management (no built-in persistent memory like some specialized chatbot platforms)
Generates step-by-step reasoning and intermediate conclusions when prompted with reasoning-focused instructions. The model can produce explicit chain-of-thought outputs, breaking complex problems into substeps and showing work, enabling verification of reasoning and improved accuracy on multi-step tasks. This is achieved through prompt engineering and the model's training on reasoning-heavy datasets, not through specialized reasoning modules.
Unique: Achieves reasoning capability through training on reasoning datasets and prompt-based elicitation rather than specialized reasoning modules or tree-search algorithms — simpler architecture but more dependent on prompt quality
vs alternatives: Comparable reasoning quality to GPT-4 on many tasks while offering better cost efficiency; less specialized than dedicated reasoning models (like o1) but more practical for general-purpose applications
Generates code snippets, functions, and complete programs from natural language descriptions or partial code. The model understands programming language syntax and semantics across multiple languages, producing syntactically valid and functionally correct code for common tasks. Code generation leverages the model's training on large code corpora and works through standard text generation without specialized code-specific modules.
Unique: Supports code generation across 40+ programming languages through unified transformer architecture rather than language-specific fine-tuning — trades some per-language optimization for broad language coverage
vs alternatives: Broader language support than GitHub Copilot (which optimizes for Python/JavaScript) while offering comparable quality on mainstream languages; more cost-effective than specialized code models for one-off generation tasks
Exposes model inference through OpenAI-compatible REST API endpoints, enabling drop-in replacement of OpenAI models in existing applications. Supports both batch completion and streaming responses, with standard request/response formats (messages array, temperature, max_tokens, etc.). Streaming uses server-sent events (SSE) for real-time token delivery, enabling interactive chat UIs and progressive output rendering.
Unique: Provides OpenAI API compatibility through OpenRouter's abstraction layer rather than native implementation — enables easy switching between models but adds a thin abstraction layer that may introduce minor latency or compatibility quirks
vs alternatives: Easier migration path than native Qwen API (which uses different request formats) while offering better cost and performance than staying on OpenAI; requires less code change than switching to completely different model APIs
+1 more capabilities
Provides 2.5 million manually-annotated object instances across 330,000 images with dual segmentation encoding: polygon coordinates for precise boundary definition and RLE (run-length encoding) for efficient storage and computation. Each instance includes bounding box coordinates in [x, y, width, height] format, category label from 80 object classes, and instance-level unique identifiers enabling per-object tracking and evaluation. Annotations are structured in JSON format with hierarchical organization linking images to annotations to categories, supporting both dense object scenes and sparse single-object images.
Unique: Dual segmentation encoding (polygon + RLE) in single dataset enables both precise boundary analysis and efficient computational workflows; 2.5M instances across 330K images provides scale unmatched by contemporaneous datasets (ImageNet had ~1.2M images, PASCAL VOC had ~11K images)
vs alternatives: Larger and more densely annotated than PASCAL VOC (11K images, ~6 objects/image) and more task-diverse than ImageNet (classification-only); RLE encoding enables 10-100x faster mask loading than polygon-only formats
Provides keypoint annotations for all people in images using a standardized 17-joint skeleton model (head, shoulders, elbows, wrists, hips, knees, ankles) with (x, y, visibility) tuples per joint. Visibility flag indicates whether keypoint is annotated (1), occluded (0), or outside image bounds (0). Keypoints are linked to parent person instances via instance ID, enabling pose estimation evaluation at both individual and crowd-level scales. Annotations follow COCO Keypoints task specification with consistent coordinate system across all 330K images.
Unique: Standardized 17-joint skeleton with explicit visibility flags enables robust evaluation of pose estimation under occlusion; linked to instance segmentation masks allows joint-level accuracy analysis within person bounding boxes
MS COCO (Common Objects in Context) scores higher at 61/100 vs Qwen: Qwen3.6 Plus at 23/100. MS COCO (Common Objects in Context) also has a free tier, making it more accessible.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
vs alternatives: More comprehensive than OpenPose dataset (no visibility flags) and larger scale than Human3.6M (3.6M frames vs 330K images); visibility annotations enable explicit occlusion handling unlike MPII (which lacks visibility metadata)
COCO ecosystem includes community-created extensions (COCO-Stuff, COCO DensePose, COCO Panoptic) that extend base dataset with additional annotations while maintaining compatibility with COCO API and evaluation infrastructure. Extensions follow COCO format and evaluation standards, enabling seamless integration into existing pipelines. Community contributions are vetted and published as official COCO variants, ensuring quality and standardization. Variant creation process is documented, enabling researchers to create custom extensions.
Unique: Standardized extension process enables community contributions while maintaining compatibility; official variants (Stuff, DensePose, Panoptic) are vetted and published, ensuring quality and discoverability
vs alternatives: More extensible than fixed datasets; community variants enable specialized use cases without forking; standardized format prevents fragmentation unlike ad-hoc dataset variants
Provides 1.65 million image-caption pairs (5 captions × 330K images) with natural language descriptions written by human annotators. Each caption is a free-form English sentence describing objects, actions, and scene context without enforced length limits or structured templates. Captions are stored in JSON format linked to image IDs, enabling training of vision-language models for image captioning, visual question answering, and cross-modal retrieval. Multiple captions per image capture linguistic diversity and alternative descriptions of the same visual content.
Unique: 5 captions per image (vs 1 in most datasets) captures linguistic diversity and enables robust evaluation of caption generation variability; 1.65M caption-image pairs provide scale for training large vision-language models
vs alternatives: 5x more captions per image than Flickr30K (1 caption/image) enabling better linguistic diversity modeling; larger scale than Visual Genome (108K images) while maintaining natural language quality vs automated alt-text
Extends base 80 object categories with 91 additional 'stuff' categories (background materials, textures, regions like sky, grass, wall) enabling dense semantic segmentation of entire images. Stuff categories are annotated as pixel-level masks without instance boundaries — all sky pixels are labeled 'sky' regardless of continuity. COCO-Stuff combines instance segmentation (80 objects) with semantic segmentation (171 total categories including stuff), stored as single-channel PNG masks where pixel value encodes category ID. Enables panoptic segmentation evaluation combining instance and stuff predictions.
Unique: 171-category taxonomy combining 80 instance objects + 91 stuff categories enables panoptic segmentation in single dataset; pixel-level masks for stuff enable dense scene understanding without instance boundaries
vs alternatives: More comprehensive than ADE20K (150 categories) and larger scale than Cityscapes (5K images); unified instance+stuff annotation enables panoptic evaluation unlike separate semantic/instance datasets
Combines instance segmentation (80 object categories with boundaries) and semantic segmentation (171 stuff categories without boundaries) into single panoptic prediction task. Evaluation uses Panoptic Quality (PQ) metric decomposed into Segmentation Quality (SQ — IoU of matched predictions) and Recognition Quality (RQ — detection rate). Panoptic masks encode both category ID and instance ID, enabling evaluation of both 'what' (category) and 'which' (instance identity) predictions. Standardized evaluation protocol with server-side metric computation ensures consistent benchmarking across submissions.
Unique: Panoptic Quality metric with explicit SQ/RQ decomposition enables fine-grained analysis of segmentation vs recognition errors; unified instance+stuff evaluation in single task forces models to handle both prediction types efficiently
vs alternatives: More comprehensive than separate instance/semantic benchmarks; PQ metric better captures real-world scene understanding than independent metrics; standardized evaluation prevents metric gaming unlike custom evaluation scripts
Provides dense 2D-to-3D correspondence maps for human bodies, mapping each pixel in a person instance to a 3D human body model surface. Annotations include UV coordinates (parameterization of 3D body surface) and body part indices enabling pixel-level body surface understanding. DensePose enables training of models that predict where each image pixel corresponds to on a canonical 3D human body, useful for pose transfer, virtual try-on, and detailed human understanding. Available from 2020 dataset version onwards, extends keypoint annotations with dense surface coverage.
Unique: Dense 2D-to-3D surface correspondence enables pixel-level body understanding beyond skeleton keypoints; UV parameterization allows transfer of appearance and shape across different people and poses
vs alternatives: More detailed than keypoint-only annotations (17 joints vs millions of surface points); enables pose transfer unlike keypoint datasets; larger scale than DensePose-specific datasets
Provides standardized evaluation metrics for each task (Average Precision for detection, IoU for segmentation, OKS for keypoints, BLEU/METEOR/CIDEr for captions, PQ for panoptic) computed server-side on held-out test set. Leaderboard system accepts structured JSON result submissions in COCO format, validates format, computes metrics, and ranks submissions by primary metric. Evaluation infrastructure ensures consistent benchmarking across all submissions and prevents metric gaming through standardized computation. Metrics are task-specific: AP/AP50/AP75 for detection, mIoU for segmentation, OKS for keypoints, CIDEr for captions.
Unique: Server-side metric computation prevents metric gaming and ensures consistency; task-specific metrics (AP, OKS, CIDEr, PQ) are standardized across all submissions enabling fair comparison; public leaderboard provides transparency and reproducibility
vs alternatives: More rigorous than self-reported metrics (prevents cherry-picking); standardized evaluation prevents metric implementation variations unlike custom evaluation scripts; public leaderboard enables community comparison unlike proprietary benchmarks
+3 more capabilities