Stable Diffusion ranks higher at 39/100 vs Qwen: Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 at 23/100. Capability-level comparison backed by match graph evidence from real search data.
| Feature | Qwen: Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 | Stable Diffusion |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Model | Model |
| UnfragileRank | 23/100 | 39/100 |
| Adoption | 0 | 0 |
| Quality | 0 | 0 |
| Ecosystem | 0 | 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Paid | Paid |
| Starting Price | $2.60e-7 per prompt token | — |
| Capabilities | 9 decomposed | 4 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Processes images, text, and video inputs simultaneously using a hybrid architecture combining linear attention mechanisms with sparse mixture-of-experts routing. Linear attention reduces computational complexity from O(n²) to O(n) while sparse MoE selectively activates expert parameters based on input type and content, enabling efficient processing of high-resolution visual content alongside text without full model activation.
Unique: Hybrid linear attention + sparse MoE architecture reduces inference latency compared to dense transformer vision models while maintaining multimodal reasoning capability. Linear attention mechanism specifically optimized for visual token sequences, avoiding quadratic scaling that limits dense models on high-resolution images.
vs alternatives: Achieves faster inference on image-heavy workloads than GPT-4V or Claude 3.5 Vision due to linear attention complexity, while maintaining competitive accuracy through selective expert activation in MoE layers.
Processes video inputs by decomposing them into frame sequences and applying vision-language understanding across temporal boundaries. The sparse MoE architecture selectively activates video-specialized experts when video tokens are detected, enabling efficient analysis of motion, scene changes, and temporal relationships without processing every frame through the full model capacity.
Unique: Sparse MoE routing specifically activates video-expert parameters when processing frame sequences, avoiding full model computation for each frame while maintaining temporal coherence through attention across frame tokens. Linear attention enables efficient processing of long frame sequences without quadratic memory overhead.
vs alternatives: More efficient than dense video models like GPT-4V for frame-heavy analysis due to selective expert activation, while maintaining temporal reasoning capabilities comparable to specialized video understanding models.
Implements sparse mixture-of-experts routing that dynamically selects which expert parameters activate based on input content type and complexity, reducing per-token computation from full model capacity to a fraction of parameters. The routing mechanism uses learned gating functions to assign tokens to specialized experts (vision, language, multimodal), enabling high-throughput inference without loading all parameters for every request.
Unique: Sparse MoE architecture with learned gating functions routes tokens to specialized experts rather than activating full model capacity, reducing per-token FLOPs while maintaining model quality. Routing decisions are input-aware, allowing different expert combinations for text-only vs. image-heavy vs. video inputs.
vs alternatives: Achieves lower inference cost and latency than dense models like GPT-4 or Claude 3.5 for mixed-modality workloads by selectively activating only necessary expert capacity, while maintaining competitive accuracy through specialized expert training.
Processes high-resolution images using linear attention mechanisms that scale O(n) instead of O(n²), enabling efficient encoding of dense visual tokens without memory explosion. The architecture decomposes image patches into token sequences and applies linear attention transformations, allowing processing of images with significantly more pixels than quadratic-attention models while maintaining spatial reasoning capability.
Unique: Linear attention mechanism reduces image encoding complexity from O(n²) to O(n) where n is the number of image patches, enabling processing of higher-resolution images than quadratic-attention models without memory explosion. Patch-based tokenization combined with linear kernels maintains spatial coherence while scaling efficiently.
vs alternatives: Processes higher-resolution images more efficiently than GPT-4V or Claude 3.5 Vision due to linear attention scaling, enabling detail-preserving analysis of documents and technical diagrams without resolution downsampling penalties.
Generates and understands text across multiple languages using a shared token vocabulary and language-agnostic attention mechanisms. The model applies the same linear attention and sparse MoE routing to all languages, with language-specific expert routing enabling efficient multilingual inference without separate model instances per language.
Unique: Shared token vocabulary and language-agnostic linear attention enable efficient multilingual inference with language-specific expert routing, avoiding separate model instances per language while maintaining language-specific reasoning through MoE expert specialization.
vs alternatives: More efficient than maintaining separate language models or using dense multilingual models, while providing comparable quality to specialized translation models through expert-based language specialization.
Extracts structured information (JSON, tables, key-value pairs) from unstructured text and images using prompt-based schema specification and constrained decoding. The model applies vision-language understanding to identify relevant content regions, then generates structured output conforming to specified schemas, with optional validation against provided JSON schemas.
Unique: Combines vision-language understanding with prompt-based schema specification to extract structured data from both text and images, using sparse MoE routing to activate extraction-specialized experts when processing structured output generation tasks.
vs alternatives: More flexible than rule-based extraction tools (regex, XPath) for handling variable document layouts, while maintaining better accuracy than generic LLMs through schema-aware generation and expert specialization.
Analyzes and generates code across multiple programming languages using vision-language understanding to parse code syntax from images and text, combined with language-specific expert routing in the MoE layer. Supports code completion, explanation, and refactoring by maintaining semantic understanding of code structure and applying language-specific reasoning patterns.
Unique: Combines vision-language understanding to parse code from images and diagrams with language-specific expert routing, enabling code analysis and generation from both textual and visual representations while maintaining semantic correctness through specialized experts.
vs alternatives: Handles code-in-images and technical diagrams better than text-only models like GitHub Copilot, while maintaining competitive code generation quality through language-specific expert activation in the MoE architecture.
Performs multi-step reasoning and problem decomposition using chain-of-thought patterns and planning-aware expert routing. The sparse MoE architecture activates reasoning-specialized experts when processing complex queries, enabling step-by-step problem solving with explicit intermediate reasoning steps that improve accuracy on tasks requiring logical inference.
Unique: Sparse MoE routing activates reasoning-specialized experts when processing complex queries, enabling efficient multi-step reasoning without full model computation. Linear attention mechanisms allow maintaining long reasoning chains without quadratic memory overhead.
vs alternatives: Provides more efficient reasoning than dense models through expert specialization, while maintaining reasoning quality comparable to specialized reasoning models like o1 through planning-aware expert activation.
+1 more capabilities
Stable Diffusion utilizes a latent diffusion model to generate high-quality images from textual descriptions. It first encodes the input text into a latent space using a transformer architecture, then progressively refines a random noise image into a coherent image that matches the text prompt through a series of denoising steps. This approach allows for fine control over the image generation process, enabling diverse outputs from the same input prompt.
Unique: Stable Diffusion's use of a latent space for image generation allows for faster and more memory-efficient processing compared to pixel-space models, enabling the generation of high-resolution images without the need for extensive computational resources.
vs alternatives: More efficient than DALL-E for generating high-resolution images due to its latent diffusion approach, which reduces memory usage and speeds up the generation process.
Stable Diffusion supports image inpainting, which allows users to modify existing images by specifying areas to be altered and providing a new text prompt. This capability leverages the model's understanding of context and content to seamlessly blend the new elements into the original image, maintaining visual coherence. It uses masked regions in the image to guide the generation process, ensuring that the output respects the surrounding context.
Unique: The inpainting feature is integrated into the same diffusion process as the text-to-image generation, allowing for a unified model that can handle both tasks without needing separate architectures.
vs alternatives: More flexible than traditional inpainting tools because it can generate entirely new content based on textual prompts rather than relying solely on existing image data.
Stable Diffusion can perform style transfer by applying the artistic style of one image to the content of another. This is achieved by encoding both the content and style images into the latent space and then blending them according to user-defined parameters. The model then reconstructs an image that retains the content of the original while adopting the stylistic features of the reference image, allowing for creative reinterpretations of existing works.
Stable Diffusion scores higher at 39/100 vs Qwen: Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 at 23/100.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
Unique: The integration of style transfer within the same diffusion framework allows for a more coherent blending of content and style, producing results that are often more visually appealing than those generated by traditional methods.
vs alternatives: Delivers more nuanced and higher-quality style transfers compared to older methods like neural style transfer, which often produce artifacts or loss of detail.
Stable Diffusion allows users to fine-tune the model on custom datasets, enabling the generation of images that reflect specific styles or themes. This process involves training the model on additional data while preserving the learned weights from the pre-trained model, allowing for rapid adaptation to new domains. Users can specify training parameters and monitor performance metrics to ensure the model meets their requirements.
Unique: The ability to fine-tune on custom datasets while leveraging the pre-trained model's knowledge allows for quicker adaptation and better performance on specific tasks compared to training from scratch.
vs alternatives: More accessible for users with limited data compared to other models that require extensive retraining from the ground up.