MS COCO (Common Objects in Context) ranks higher at 61/100 vs Qwen: Qwen3.5-35B-A3B at 21/100. Capability-level comparison backed by match graph evidence from real search data.
| Feature | Qwen: Qwen3.5-35B-A3B | MS COCO (Common Objects in Context) |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Model | Dataset |
| UnfragileRank | 21/100 | 61/100 |
| Adoption |
| 0 |
| 1 |
| Quality | 0 | 1 |
| Ecosystem | 0 | 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Paid | Free |
| Starting Price | $1.63e-7 per prompt token | — |
| Capabilities | 6 decomposed | 11 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Processes images, text, and video inputs through a native vision-language architecture combining linear attention mechanisms with sparse mixture-of-experts routing. The linear attention reduces computational complexity from quadratic to linear in sequence length, while the sparse MoE selectively activates expert parameters based on input tokens, enabling efficient processing of high-resolution visual content alongside text without full model activation.
Unique: Hybrid architecture combining linear attention (O(n) complexity vs O(n²) for standard attention) with sparse mixture-of-experts routing enables 35B parameter model to achieve inference efficiency comparable to much smaller models while maintaining multimodal understanding across images, text, and video in a single native architecture rather than separate specialized encoders.
vs alternatives: More efficient than dense vision-language models like LLaVA or Qwen-VL due to sparse expert activation and linear attention, while maintaining native support for video understanding without requiring separate temporal encoding layers.
Routes each input token to a subset of expert parameters based on learned gating functions, rather than activating all 35B parameters uniformly. The sparse routing mechanism learns which experts are most relevant for different token types and contexts, with load-balancing constraints to prevent expert collapse where all tokens route to the same experts, distributing computational load across the expert pool.
Unique: Implements sparse expert routing with explicit load-balancing constraints to prevent expert collapse, using learned gating functions that specialize different experts for image patches, text tokens, and video frames — enabling the 35B model to achieve inference efficiency of a much smaller dense model while maintaining multimodal capability.
vs alternatives: More efficient than dense 35B models like Llama 2 35B because only a fraction of parameters activate per token, while maintaining better quality than smaller dense models through expert specialization and load-balanced routing.
Replaces standard softmax attention (O(n²) complexity) with linear attention kernels that compute attention scores in O(n) time by approximating the softmax attention matrix through kernel methods or feature maps. This enables processing longer sequences and higher-resolution images without quadratic memory growth, critical for video understanding where temporal context spans hundreds or thousands of frames.
Unique: Uses linear attention kernels to achieve O(n) complexity instead of O(n²), enabling the model to process longer video sequences and higher-resolution images than standard attention-based vision-language models while maintaining reasonable memory footprint during inference.
vs alternatives: Scales to longer contexts and higher resolutions than dense attention models like standard Qwen-VL or LLaVA, with significantly lower memory overhead during inference, though potentially with slight quality trade-offs in attention pattern expressivity.
Processes video frames as a sequence of image tokens within the same vision-language architecture, allowing the model to learn temporal relationships and motion patterns directly through the attention mechanism rather than requiring separate video encoders or optical flow computation. The linear attention and sparse MoE components enable efficient processing of frame sequences while maintaining spatial understanding from individual frames.
Unique: Processes video frames natively within the vision-language architecture without requiring separate video encoders, optical flow computation, or temporal pooling layers — the sparse MoE and linear attention handle both spatial frame understanding and temporal relationships in a unified model.
vs alternatives: More efficient than systems using separate video encoders (like CLIP + temporal models) because it avoids redundant encoding passes, while maintaining better temporal understanding than image-only models through native frame sequence processing.
Exposes the Qwen3.5-35B-A3B model through OpenRouter's API gateway, providing standardized HTTP endpoints for inference with request/response serialization, rate limiting, authentication via API keys, and billing integration. The API abstracts away model deployment complexity, handling load balancing across inference instances and providing consistent latency/throughput characteristics.
Unique: Provides standardized HTTP API access to Qwen3.5-35B-A3B through OpenRouter's multi-model gateway, handling authentication, rate limiting, and billing transparently while abstracting deployment complexity — developers call a single endpoint rather than managing model serving infrastructure.
vs alternatives: Simpler integration than self-hosted inference (no Docker, VRAM management, or scaling complexity) while offering better cost control than closed APIs like GPT-4V through transparent per-token pricing and model selection flexibility.
Generates coherent, contextually-grounded text responses to queries about images and video by leveraging the vision-language architecture to ground language generation in visual content. The model produces natural language explanations, answers, and descriptions that reference specific visual elements, using the sparse MoE and linear attention to efficiently maintain visual context while generating tokens.
Unique: Grounds text generation directly in visual content through native vision-language architecture, using sparse expert routing to selectively activate language generation experts based on image content, enabling efficient generation of visually-grounded text without separate image encoding and language model stages.
vs alternatives: More efficient than cascaded systems (image encoder + separate LLM) because visual grounding happens within a single model, while maintaining better visual understanding than pure language models through native multimodal training.
Provides 2.5 million manually-annotated object instances across 330,000 images with dual segmentation encoding: polygon coordinates for precise boundary definition and RLE (run-length encoding) for efficient storage and computation. Each instance includes bounding box coordinates in [x, y, width, height] format, category label from 80 object classes, and instance-level unique identifiers enabling per-object tracking and evaluation. Annotations are structured in JSON format with hierarchical organization linking images to annotations to categories, supporting both dense object scenes and sparse single-object images.
Unique: Dual segmentation encoding (polygon + RLE) in single dataset enables both precise boundary analysis and efficient computational workflows; 2.5M instances across 330K images provides scale unmatched by contemporaneous datasets (ImageNet had ~1.2M images, PASCAL VOC had ~11K images)
vs alternatives: Larger and more densely annotated than PASCAL VOC (11K images, ~6 objects/image) and more task-diverse than ImageNet (classification-only); RLE encoding enables 10-100x faster mask loading than polygon-only formats
Provides keypoint annotations for all people in images using a standardized 17-joint skeleton model (head, shoulders, elbows, wrists, hips, knees, ankles) with (x, y, visibility) tuples per joint. Visibility flag indicates whether keypoint is annotated (1), occluded (0), or outside image bounds (0). Keypoints are linked to parent person instances via instance ID, enabling pose estimation evaluation at both individual and crowd-level scales. Annotations follow COCO Keypoints task specification with consistent coordinate system across all 330K images.
Unique: Standardized 17-joint skeleton with explicit visibility flags enables robust evaluation of pose estimation under occlusion; linked to instance segmentation masks allows joint-level accuracy analysis within person bounding boxes
MS COCO (Common Objects in Context) scores higher at 61/100 vs Qwen: Qwen3.5-35B-A3B at 21/100. MS COCO (Common Objects in Context) also has a free tier, making it more accessible.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
vs alternatives: More comprehensive than OpenPose dataset (no visibility flags) and larger scale than Human3.6M (3.6M frames vs 330K images); visibility annotations enable explicit occlusion handling unlike MPII (which lacks visibility metadata)
COCO ecosystem includes community-created extensions (COCO-Stuff, COCO DensePose, COCO Panoptic) that extend base dataset with additional annotations while maintaining compatibility with COCO API and evaluation infrastructure. Extensions follow COCO format and evaluation standards, enabling seamless integration into existing pipelines. Community contributions are vetted and published as official COCO variants, ensuring quality and standardization. Variant creation process is documented, enabling researchers to create custom extensions.
Unique: Standardized extension process enables community contributions while maintaining compatibility; official variants (Stuff, DensePose, Panoptic) are vetted and published, ensuring quality and discoverability
vs alternatives: More extensible than fixed datasets; community variants enable specialized use cases without forking; standardized format prevents fragmentation unlike ad-hoc dataset variants
Provides 1.65 million image-caption pairs (5 captions × 330K images) with natural language descriptions written by human annotators. Each caption is a free-form English sentence describing objects, actions, and scene context without enforced length limits or structured templates. Captions are stored in JSON format linked to image IDs, enabling training of vision-language models for image captioning, visual question answering, and cross-modal retrieval. Multiple captions per image capture linguistic diversity and alternative descriptions of the same visual content.
Unique: 5 captions per image (vs 1 in most datasets) captures linguistic diversity and enables robust evaluation of caption generation variability; 1.65M caption-image pairs provide scale for training large vision-language models
vs alternatives: 5x more captions per image than Flickr30K (1 caption/image) enabling better linguistic diversity modeling; larger scale than Visual Genome (108K images) while maintaining natural language quality vs automated alt-text
Extends base 80 object categories with 91 additional 'stuff' categories (background materials, textures, regions like sky, grass, wall) enabling dense semantic segmentation of entire images. Stuff categories are annotated as pixel-level masks without instance boundaries — all sky pixels are labeled 'sky' regardless of continuity. COCO-Stuff combines instance segmentation (80 objects) with semantic segmentation (171 total categories including stuff), stored as single-channel PNG masks where pixel value encodes category ID. Enables panoptic segmentation evaluation combining instance and stuff predictions.
Unique: 171-category taxonomy combining 80 instance objects + 91 stuff categories enables panoptic segmentation in single dataset; pixel-level masks for stuff enable dense scene understanding without instance boundaries
vs alternatives: More comprehensive than ADE20K (150 categories) and larger scale than Cityscapes (5K images); unified instance+stuff annotation enables panoptic evaluation unlike separate semantic/instance datasets
Combines instance segmentation (80 object categories with boundaries) and semantic segmentation (171 stuff categories without boundaries) into single panoptic prediction task. Evaluation uses Panoptic Quality (PQ) metric decomposed into Segmentation Quality (SQ — IoU of matched predictions) and Recognition Quality (RQ — detection rate). Panoptic masks encode both category ID and instance ID, enabling evaluation of both 'what' (category) and 'which' (instance identity) predictions. Standardized evaluation protocol with server-side metric computation ensures consistent benchmarking across submissions.
Unique: Panoptic Quality metric with explicit SQ/RQ decomposition enables fine-grained analysis of segmentation vs recognition errors; unified instance+stuff evaluation in single task forces models to handle both prediction types efficiently
vs alternatives: More comprehensive than separate instance/semantic benchmarks; PQ metric better captures real-world scene understanding than independent metrics; standardized evaluation prevents metric gaming unlike custom evaluation scripts
Provides dense 2D-to-3D correspondence maps for human bodies, mapping each pixel in a person instance to a 3D human body model surface. Annotations include UV coordinates (parameterization of 3D body surface) and body part indices enabling pixel-level body surface understanding. DensePose enables training of models that predict where each image pixel corresponds to on a canonical 3D human body, useful for pose transfer, virtual try-on, and detailed human understanding. Available from 2020 dataset version onwards, extends keypoint annotations with dense surface coverage.
Unique: Dense 2D-to-3D surface correspondence enables pixel-level body understanding beyond skeleton keypoints; UV parameterization allows transfer of appearance and shape across different people and poses
vs alternatives: More detailed than keypoint-only annotations (17 joints vs millions of surface points); enables pose transfer unlike keypoint datasets; larger scale than DensePose-specific datasets
Provides standardized evaluation metrics for each task (Average Precision for detection, IoU for segmentation, OKS for keypoints, BLEU/METEOR/CIDEr for captions, PQ for panoptic) computed server-side on held-out test set. Leaderboard system accepts structured JSON result submissions in COCO format, validates format, computes metrics, and ranks submissions by primary metric. Evaluation infrastructure ensures consistent benchmarking across all submissions and prevents metric gaming through standardized computation. Metrics are task-specific: AP/AP50/AP75 for detection, mIoU for segmentation, OKS for keypoints, CIDEr for captions.
Unique: Server-side metric computation prevents metric gaming and ensures consistency; task-specific metrics (AP, OKS, CIDEr, PQ) are standardized across all submissions enabling fair comparison; public leaderboard provides transparency and reproducibility
vs alternatives: More rigorous than self-reported metrics (prevents cherry-picking); standardized evaluation prevents metric implementation variations unlike custom evaluation scripts; public leaderboard enables community comparison unlike proprietary benchmarks
+3 more capabilities