Stable Diffusion ranks higher at 39/100 vs Qwen: Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking at 22/100. Capability-level comparison backed by match graph evidence from real search data.
| Feature | Qwen: Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking | Stable Diffusion |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Model | Model |
| UnfragileRank | 22/100 | 39/100 |
| Adoption | 0 |
| 0 |
| Quality | 0 | 0 |
| Ecosystem | 0 | 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Paid | Paid |
| Starting Price | $2.60e-7 per prompt token | — |
| Capabilities | 9 decomposed | 4 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Implements a chain-of-thought reasoning architecture that processes both text and visual inputs (images, video frames) through a unified transformer backbone, with extended thinking tokens that allow the model to perform step-by-step mathematical derivations and logical decomposition before generating final answers. The thinking mechanism operates as an intermediate representation layer that reasons over visual and textual context simultaneously, enabling structured problem-solving in domains requiring symbolic manipulation and proof generation.
Unique: Unifies visual and textual reasoning through a single 235B parameter model with explicit thinking tokens, rather than treating vision and language as separate processing streams. The architecture uses a shared transformer backbone with vision-language fusion at intermediate layers, allowing mathematical reasoning to operate directly over visual features (e.g., reasoning about graph structure while reading axis labels).
vs alternatives: Outperforms GPT-4V and Claude 3.5 Sonnet on STEM benchmarks (MATH-Vision, SciQA) because thinking tokens enable explicit symbolic reasoning over visual content, whereas competitors rely on implicit visual understanding without intermediate reasoning artifacts.
Processes video inputs by automatically sampling key frames using a temporal attention mechanism that identifies semantically important moments (scene changes, object interactions, text appearance). The model maintains temporal context across frames, allowing it to reason about causality, motion, and sequence of events. Internally, frames are encoded through a vision transformer (ViT) backbone and fused with temporal positional embeddings that preserve frame ordering information.
Unique: Uses learned temporal attention to select key frames rather than uniform sampling, and maintains temporal positional embeddings across the sequence, enabling the model to reason about causality and event ordering. This differs from competitors who either sample uniformly or treat frames independently without temporal context.
vs alternatives: Handles temporal reasoning better than GPT-4V (which processes frames independently) because explicit temporal embeddings allow the model to understand sequence and causality, making it superior for analyzing instructional videos or event sequences.
Accepts multiple images in a single request and performs cross-image reasoning by building a unified visual context representation. The model can compare objects across images, track visual elements across a sequence, and answer questions that require synthesizing information from multiple visual sources. Internally, images are encoded through a shared vision backbone and their representations are fused through cross-attention mechanisms that allow the model to identify correspondences and relationships between images.
Unique: Implements cross-attention fusion between image encodings, allowing the model to build explicit correspondences between visual elements across images rather than processing each image independently. This enables true comparative reasoning rather than sequential analysis of isolated images.
vs alternatives: Superior to GPT-4V for multi-image comparison because it uses cross-attention mechanisms to explicitly model relationships between images, whereas GPT-4V processes images sequentially without dedicated fusion layers, making it slower and less accurate for comparative tasks.
Extracts text from images with specialized handling for mathematical notation (LaTeX, handwritten equations), scientific diagrams, and technical drawings. The model uses a hybrid approach combining traditional OCR-style character recognition with semantic understanding of mathematical symbols and spatial relationships. Handwritten content is recognized through a dedicated handwriting recognition module trained on mathematical notation, and spatial relationships between symbols are preserved to maintain equation structure.
Unique: Combines traditional OCR with semantic understanding of mathematical notation through a specialized handwriting recognition module and equation-aware parsing. Unlike generic OCR tools, it preserves mathematical structure and can output LaTeX directly, treating equations as semantic objects rather than character sequences.
vs alternatives: Outperforms Tesseract and Google Cloud Vision on mathematical content because it uses domain-specific training for equation recognition and can output LaTeX directly, whereas generic OCR tools treat equations as character sequences and lose structural information.
Analyzes images and video frames to detect and classify potentially harmful, inappropriate, or policy-violating content. The model uses a multi-label classification approach that identifies specific categories of concern (violence, explicit content, hate symbols, misinformation indicators) with confidence scores. The classification operates through a dedicated safety classifier head trained on moderation datasets, separate from the main vision-language backbone, allowing it to make moderation decisions without generating descriptive text about harmful content.
Unique: Uses a dedicated safety classifier head separate from the main vision-language backbone, preventing the model from generating descriptive text about harmful content while still making accurate moderation decisions. This architectural separation is critical for safety — the model can classify without describing.
vs alternatives: More accurate than Perspective API or AWS Rekognition on nuanced moderation decisions because it combines visual understanding with semantic reasoning, allowing it to distinguish between, for example, violence in historical context vs. glorification of violence.
Extracts structured information from images (forms, invoices, tables, receipts) and validates the output against a provided JSON schema. The model uses a schema-aware extraction approach where the schema is embedded in the prompt context, guiding the model to extract only relevant fields and format them according to specification. The extraction process involves visual understanding of document layout, text recognition, and semantic mapping of visual elements to schema fields, with built-in validation that flags missing or invalid fields.
Unique: Embeds schema awareness directly into the extraction process, using the schema to guide visual understanding and constrain output format. This differs from generic document understanding by treating the schema as a first-class constraint that shapes both extraction and validation.
vs alternatives: More accurate than rule-based document extraction (e.g., regex or template matching) on varied document layouts because it uses semantic understanding of document structure, and more flexible than specialized OCR tools because it can adapt to custom schemas without retraining.
Converts images of user interfaces, wireframes, or design mockups into functional code (HTML/CSS, React, Vue, or other frameworks). The model analyzes the visual layout, component hierarchy, and styling to generate code that reproduces the design. The process involves visual understanding of spatial relationships, color extraction, typography analysis, and semantic identification of UI components (buttons, forms, cards, etc.), followed by code generation that respects the visual hierarchy and responsive design principles.
Unique: Combines visual understanding of layout and styling with code generation, using spatial relationships and color analysis to inform code structure. The model understands that visual hierarchy should map to component hierarchy, and uses this to generate semantically meaningful code rather than just pixel-matching.
vs alternatives: More semantically aware than screenshot-to-code tools like Pix2Code because it understands UI component types and generates code that respects design patterns, whereas pixel-based approaches generate code that matches appearance but lacks semantic structure.
Analyzes images or video streams to identify visual anomalies (defects, unusual patterns, out-of-place objects) and provides contextual explanations for why something is anomalous. The model uses a combination of visual feature extraction and reasoning to compare observed content against learned patterns of normality, then generates natural language explanations of detected anomalies. The approach involves implicit anomaly scoring (learned through contrastive training on normal vs. anomalous examples) and explicit reasoning about why something deviates from expected patterns.
Unique: Combines anomaly detection with contextual reasoning, generating explanations for why something is anomalous rather than just flagging it. This requires the model to reason about expected patterns and articulate deviations, making it more useful for human-in-the-loop workflows than simple binary anomaly classifiers.
vs alternatives: More interpretable than statistical anomaly detection (e.g., isolation forests) because it provides natural language explanations, and more flexible than rule-based systems because it can adapt to new anomaly types through prompting without code changes.
+1 more capabilities
Stable Diffusion utilizes a latent diffusion model to generate high-quality images from textual descriptions. It first encodes the input text into a latent space using a transformer architecture, then progressively refines a random noise image into a coherent image that matches the text prompt through a series of denoising steps. This approach allows for fine control over the image generation process, enabling diverse outputs from the same input prompt.
Unique: Stable Diffusion's use of a latent space for image generation allows for faster and more memory-efficient processing compared to pixel-space models, enabling the generation of high-resolution images without the need for extensive computational resources.
vs alternatives: More efficient than DALL-E for generating high-resolution images due to its latent diffusion approach, which reduces memory usage and speeds up the generation process.
Stable Diffusion supports image inpainting, which allows users to modify existing images by specifying areas to be altered and providing a new text prompt. This capability leverages the model's understanding of context and content to seamlessly blend the new elements into the original image, maintaining visual coherence. It uses masked regions in the image to guide the generation process, ensuring that the output respects the surrounding context.
Unique: The inpainting feature is integrated into the same diffusion process as the text-to-image generation, allowing for a unified model that can handle both tasks without needing separate architectures.
vs alternatives: More flexible than traditional inpainting tools because it can generate entirely new content based on textual prompts rather than relying solely on existing image data.
Stable Diffusion can perform style transfer by applying the artistic style of one image to the content of another. This is achieved by encoding both the content and style images into the latent space and then blending them according to user-defined parameters. The model then reconstructs an image that retains the content of the original while adopting the stylistic features of the reference image, allowing for creative reinterpretations of existing works.
Stable Diffusion scores higher at 39/100 vs Qwen: Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking at 22/100.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
Unique: The integration of style transfer within the same diffusion framework allows for a more coherent blending of content and style, producing results that are often more visually appealing than those generated by traditional methods.
vs alternatives: Delivers more nuanced and higher-quality style transfers compared to older methods like neural style transfer, which often produce artifacts or loss of detail.
Stable Diffusion allows users to fine-tune the model on custom datasets, enabling the generation of images that reflect specific styles or themes. This process involves training the model on additional data while preserving the learned weights from the pre-trained model, allowing for rapid adaptation to new domains. Users can specify training parameters and monitor performance metrics to ensure the model meets their requirements.
Unique: The ability to fine-tune on custom datasets while leveraging the pre-trained model's knowledge allows for quicker adaptation and better performance on specific tasks compared to training from scratch.
vs alternatives: More accessible for users with limited data compared to other models that require extensive retraining from the ground up.