MS COCO (Common Objects in Context) ranks higher at 61/100 vs Qwen: Qwen VL Max at 21/100. Capability-level comparison backed by match graph evidence from real search data.
| Feature | Qwen: Qwen VL Max | MS COCO (Common Objects in Context) |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Model | Dataset |
| UnfragileRank | 21/100 | 61/100 |
| Adoption | 0 |
| 1 |
| Quality | 0 | 1 |
| Ecosystem | 0 | 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Paid | Free |
| Starting Price | $5.20e-7 per prompt token | — |
| Capabilities | 6 decomposed | 11 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Processes both images and text simultaneously through a unified transformer architecture, maintaining semantic relationships across visual and linguistic modalities within a 7500-token context window. The model uses vision encoders to extract spatial and semantic features from images, then fuses them with text embeddings in a shared representation space, enabling joint reasoning about visual content and natural language queries without separate encoding passes.
Unique: Qwen VL Max combines vision encoding with extended 7500-token context specifically optimized for complex visual reasoning tasks, using a unified transformer backbone that processes visual patches and text tokens in the same representation space rather than separate encoder-decoder stacks, enabling more efficient cross-modal attention patterns
vs alternatives: Offers longer context window (7500 tokens) than GPT-4V (4096) for analyzing multiple images or documents in single request, with competitive visual understanding quality at lower API costs through OpenRouter pricing
Extracts text from images while maintaining spatial layout, formatting, and semantic relationships between text elements through vision-language fusion. Rather than pure OCR character recognition, the model understands text within visual context (e.g., table structure, document hierarchy, text positioning) and can reason about relationships between extracted text and surrounding visual elements, producing contextually-aware transcriptions rather than raw character sequences.
Unique: Performs semantic OCR by leveraging vision-language fusion to understand text meaning within visual context, rather than character-by-character recognition, allowing it to infer structure and relationships (e.g., table cells, form fields) that pure OCR engines would miss
vs alternatives: Outperforms traditional OCR (Tesseract, Paddle-OCR) on complex layouts and context-dependent text understanding, though may be slower and more expensive than specialized OCR for simple document digitization tasks
Answers natural language questions about image content through a reasoning process that combines visual feature extraction with language understanding. The model identifies relevant visual regions, extracts semantic information from those regions, and generates answers by reasoning over the extracted visual facts and the question semantics, supporting both factual questions (what is in the image) and reasoning questions (why, how, what if) about visual content.
Unique: Implements VQA through unified vision-language reasoning rather than separate visual feature extraction and language models, allowing the transformer to jointly attend to image regions and question tokens, producing more contextually-grounded answers that account for both visual and linguistic ambiguity
vs alternatives: Provides more nuanced reasoning about image content than GPT-4V for complex scenes, with better performance on questions requiring spatial reasoning or understanding of object relationships, though may be slower for simple factual questions
Analyzes complex visual documents (PDFs rendered as images, technical diagrams, infographics, flowcharts) and extracts structured information by understanding visual hierarchy, spatial relationships, and semantic meaning. The model recognizes document structure (headers, sections, tables, lists), identifies key information elements, and can output extracted data in structured formats (JSON, CSV-compatible text) based on visual layout understanding rather than relying on embedded metadata.
Unique: Combines visual understanding of document layout with semantic reasoning to extract structured information, using spatial relationships and visual hierarchy cues to identify information boundaries and relationships, rather than relying on text-only parsing or fixed template matching
vs alternatives: Handles diverse document layouts and formats better than template-based extraction systems, with no need for manual template definition, though requires more computational resources and may be slower than specialized document processing pipelines optimized for specific document types
Analyzes and compares multiple images within a single request by maintaining visual context for each image and reasoning about similarities, differences, and relationships between them. The model processes image features for each input image and performs cross-image reasoning within the shared representation space, enabling tasks like identifying matching objects across images, detecting changes between versions, or analyzing visual consistency across a series of images.
Unique: Performs cross-image reasoning by maintaining separate visual encodings for each image while enabling attention mechanisms to operate across image boundaries, allowing the model to identify correspondences and differences without requiring explicit alignment preprocessing
vs alternatives: Outperforms simple image hashing or feature matching for semantic comparison tasks, providing reasoning about why images are similar or different, though slower and more expensive than specialized computer vision algorithms for specific comparison tasks like face matching or object detection
Generates natural language descriptions and captions for images by understanding visual content and producing contextually appropriate text at varying levels of detail. The model can generate brief captions (one sentence), detailed descriptions (paragraph-length), or specialized descriptions (technical, accessibility-focused, SEO-optimized) based on implicit or explicit context about the intended use of the description, using the full 7500-token context to produce rich, nuanced descriptions.
Unique: Generates context-aware descriptions by leveraging the full vision-language model capacity to understand not just visual content but implied context (e.g., recognizing when an image is a product photo vs. a scientific diagram) and adapting description style accordingly, rather than producing generic captions
vs alternatives: Produces more detailed and contextually appropriate descriptions than simpler captioning models, with better performance on complex scenes and technical images, though may be slower and more expensive than lightweight captioning models for high-volume batch processing
Provides 2.5 million manually-annotated object instances across 330,000 images with dual segmentation encoding: polygon coordinates for precise boundary definition and RLE (run-length encoding) for efficient storage and computation. Each instance includes bounding box coordinates in [x, y, width, height] format, category label from 80 object classes, and instance-level unique identifiers enabling per-object tracking and evaluation. Annotations are structured in JSON format with hierarchical organization linking images to annotations to categories, supporting both dense object scenes and sparse single-object images.
Unique: Dual segmentation encoding (polygon + RLE) in single dataset enables both precise boundary analysis and efficient computational workflows; 2.5M instances across 330K images provides scale unmatched by contemporaneous datasets (ImageNet had ~1.2M images, PASCAL VOC had ~11K images)
vs alternatives: Larger and more densely annotated than PASCAL VOC (11K images, ~6 objects/image) and more task-diverse than ImageNet (classification-only); RLE encoding enables 10-100x faster mask loading than polygon-only formats
Provides keypoint annotations for all people in images using a standardized 17-joint skeleton model (head, shoulders, elbows, wrists, hips, knees, ankles) with (x, y, visibility) tuples per joint. Visibility flag indicates whether keypoint is annotated (1), occluded (0), or outside image bounds (0). Keypoints are linked to parent person instances via instance ID, enabling pose estimation evaluation at both individual and crowd-level scales. Annotations follow COCO Keypoints task specification with consistent coordinate system across all 330K images.
Unique: Standardized 17-joint skeleton with explicit visibility flags enables robust evaluation of pose estimation under occlusion; linked to instance segmentation masks allows joint-level accuracy analysis within person bounding boxes
MS COCO (Common Objects in Context) scores higher at 61/100 vs Qwen: Qwen VL Max at 21/100. MS COCO (Common Objects in Context) also has a free tier, making it more accessible.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
vs alternatives: More comprehensive than OpenPose dataset (no visibility flags) and larger scale than Human3.6M (3.6M frames vs 330K images); visibility annotations enable explicit occlusion handling unlike MPII (which lacks visibility metadata)
COCO ecosystem includes community-created extensions (COCO-Stuff, COCO DensePose, COCO Panoptic) that extend base dataset with additional annotations while maintaining compatibility with COCO API and evaluation infrastructure. Extensions follow COCO format and evaluation standards, enabling seamless integration into existing pipelines. Community contributions are vetted and published as official COCO variants, ensuring quality and standardization. Variant creation process is documented, enabling researchers to create custom extensions.
Unique: Standardized extension process enables community contributions while maintaining compatibility; official variants (Stuff, DensePose, Panoptic) are vetted and published, ensuring quality and discoverability
vs alternatives: More extensible than fixed datasets; community variants enable specialized use cases without forking; standardized format prevents fragmentation unlike ad-hoc dataset variants
Provides 1.65 million image-caption pairs (5 captions × 330K images) with natural language descriptions written by human annotators. Each caption is a free-form English sentence describing objects, actions, and scene context without enforced length limits or structured templates. Captions are stored in JSON format linked to image IDs, enabling training of vision-language models for image captioning, visual question answering, and cross-modal retrieval. Multiple captions per image capture linguistic diversity and alternative descriptions of the same visual content.
Unique: 5 captions per image (vs 1 in most datasets) captures linguistic diversity and enables robust evaluation of caption generation variability; 1.65M caption-image pairs provide scale for training large vision-language models
vs alternatives: 5x more captions per image than Flickr30K (1 caption/image) enabling better linguistic diversity modeling; larger scale than Visual Genome (108K images) while maintaining natural language quality vs automated alt-text
Extends base 80 object categories with 91 additional 'stuff' categories (background materials, textures, regions like sky, grass, wall) enabling dense semantic segmentation of entire images. Stuff categories are annotated as pixel-level masks without instance boundaries — all sky pixels are labeled 'sky' regardless of continuity. COCO-Stuff combines instance segmentation (80 objects) with semantic segmentation (171 total categories including stuff), stored as single-channel PNG masks where pixel value encodes category ID. Enables panoptic segmentation evaluation combining instance and stuff predictions.
Unique: 171-category taxonomy combining 80 instance objects + 91 stuff categories enables panoptic segmentation in single dataset; pixel-level masks for stuff enable dense scene understanding without instance boundaries
vs alternatives: More comprehensive than ADE20K (150 categories) and larger scale than Cityscapes (5K images); unified instance+stuff annotation enables panoptic evaluation unlike separate semantic/instance datasets
Combines instance segmentation (80 object categories with boundaries) and semantic segmentation (171 stuff categories without boundaries) into single panoptic prediction task. Evaluation uses Panoptic Quality (PQ) metric decomposed into Segmentation Quality (SQ — IoU of matched predictions) and Recognition Quality (RQ — detection rate). Panoptic masks encode both category ID and instance ID, enabling evaluation of both 'what' (category) and 'which' (instance identity) predictions. Standardized evaluation protocol with server-side metric computation ensures consistent benchmarking across submissions.
Unique: Panoptic Quality metric with explicit SQ/RQ decomposition enables fine-grained analysis of segmentation vs recognition errors; unified instance+stuff evaluation in single task forces models to handle both prediction types efficiently
vs alternatives: More comprehensive than separate instance/semantic benchmarks; PQ metric better captures real-world scene understanding than independent metrics; standardized evaluation prevents metric gaming unlike custom evaluation scripts
Provides dense 2D-to-3D correspondence maps for human bodies, mapping each pixel in a person instance to a 3D human body model surface. Annotations include UV coordinates (parameterization of 3D body surface) and body part indices enabling pixel-level body surface understanding. DensePose enables training of models that predict where each image pixel corresponds to on a canonical 3D human body, useful for pose transfer, virtual try-on, and detailed human understanding. Available from 2020 dataset version onwards, extends keypoint annotations with dense surface coverage.
Unique: Dense 2D-to-3D surface correspondence enables pixel-level body understanding beyond skeleton keypoints; UV parameterization allows transfer of appearance and shape across different people and poses
vs alternatives: More detailed than keypoint-only annotations (17 joints vs millions of surface points); enables pose transfer unlike keypoint datasets; larger scale than DensePose-specific datasets
Provides standardized evaluation metrics for each task (Average Precision for detection, IoU for segmentation, OKS for keypoints, BLEU/METEOR/CIDEr for captions, PQ for panoptic) computed server-side on held-out test set. Leaderboard system accepts structured JSON result submissions in COCO format, validates format, computes metrics, and ranks submissions by primary metric. Evaluation infrastructure ensures consistent benchmarking across all submissions and prevents metric gaming through standardized computation. Metrics are task-specific: AP/AP50/AP75 for detection, mIoU for segmentation, OKS for keypoints, CIDEr for captions.
Unique: Server-side metric computation prevents metric gaming and ensures consistency; task-specific metrics (AP, OKS, CIDEr, PQ) are standardized across all submissions enabling fair comparison; public leaderboard provides transparency and reproducibility
vs alternatives: More rigorous than self-reported metrics (prevents cherry-picking); standardized evaluation prevents metric implementation variations unlike custom evaluation scripts; public leaderboard enables community comparison unlike proprietary benchmarks
+3 more capabilities