Mistral Large 2407 ranks higher at 24/100 vs Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct at 23/100. Capability-level comparison backed by match graph evidence from real search data.
| Feature | Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct | Mistral Large 2407 |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Model | Model |
| UnfragileRank | 23/100 | 24/100 |
| Adoption | 0 | 0 |
| Quality | 0 | 0 |
| Ecosystem | 0 | 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Paid | Paid |
| Starting Price | $6.60e-7 per prompt token | $2.00e-6 per prompt token |
| Capabilities | 10 decomposed | 14 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Generates syntactically correct and semantically sound code across 40+ programming languages (Python, JavaScript, Java, C++, Go, Rust, etc.) using instruction-tuned transformer architecture trained on high-quality code corpora. The model applies chain-of-thought reasoning patterns during generation to decompose complex coding tasks into intermediate steps, improving correctness for multi-step algorithms and architectural decisions. Supports both function-level completion and full-file generation with context awareness up to 32K tokens.
Unique: Instruction-tuned specifically for code reasoning tasks with explicit chain-of-thought patterns baked into training, rather than generic LLM fine-tuning; 32B parameter scale balances quality with inference latency for real-time IDE integration
vs alternatives: Outperforms smaller code models (7B-13B) on complex multi-step algorithms while maintaining faster inference than 70B+ models; specialized code training gives better syntax accuracy than general-purpose LLMs like GPT-3.5
Analyzes existing code to explain logic, identify design patterns, and reason about correctness using transformer-based semantic understanding of code structure. The model recognizes architectural patterns (MVC, factory, observer, etc.), dependency relationships, and control flow without requiring explicit AST parsing, instead learning these patterns from training data. Produces explanations at multiple abstraction levels: line-by-line logic, function-level intent, and system-level architecture.
Unique: Trained on code reasoning tasks with explicit instruction tuning for explaining architectural patterns and design decisions, rather than treating code explanation as a secondary capability of a general LLM
vs alternatives: Provides deeper architectural reasoning than GPT-3.5 for code explanation due to specialized training; faster than human code review for initial understanding while maintaining accuracy on complex patterns
Identifies bugs, runtime errors, and logical flaws in code by analyzing error messages, stack traces, and code context together. The model correlates error symptoms with root causes using patterns learned from debugging datasets, then generates targeted fix suggestions with explanations of why the bug occurred. Supports both syntax errors (caught at parse time) and semantic/logic errors (runtime or behavioral issues), with suggestions ranging from one-line fixes to architectural refactors.
Unique: Instruction-tuned on debugging datasets to correlate error symptoms with root causes and generate targeted fixes, rather than treating debugging as a secondary code generation task
vs alternatives: More accurate than generic LLMs at diagnosing semantic bugs (not just syntax errors) due to specialized training; faster than traditional debuggers for initial hypothesis generation
Transforms code to improve readability, maintainability, and performance while preserving functionality. The model applies refactoring patterns (extract method, rename variables, simplify conditionals, etc.) learned from high-quality code examples, and suggests optimizations based on algorithmic complexity and language-specific idioms. Generates refactored code with explanations of trade-offs (e.g., readability vs. performance) and can target specific style guides or frameworks.
Unique: Trained on refactoring patterns and performance optimization heuristics specific to code, enabling context-aware suggestions that balance readability, maintainability, and performance
vs alternatives: More nuanced than automated linters (which enforce rules mechanically) by reasoning about intent and trade-offs; faster than manual code review for identifying refactoring opportunities
Generates unit tests, integration tests, and edge case test suites from code specifications or existing implementations. The model identifies critical paths, boundary conditions, and error scenarios using code analysis patterns, then generates test code in the appropriate framework (pytest, Jest, JUnit, etc.). Supports test-driven development workflows by generating tests from requirements before implementation, and can generate fixtures, mocks, and test data.
Unique: Instruction-tuned to generate tests that identify edge cases and boundary conditions through code analysis, rather than generating simple happy-path tests like generic code generators
vs alternatives: Generates more comprehensive test suites than basic code completion tools; faster than manual test writing while maintaining framework-specific idioms and best practices
Generates comprehensive documentation for APIs, functions, and classes by analyzing code signatures, implementations, and usage patterns. The model produces docstrings in multiple formats (JSDoc, Sphinx, Google-style, etc.), generates parameter descriptions with type information, and creates usage examples. Supports generating documentation from code-first or spec-first approaches, and can infer documentation from type hints and implementation details.
Unique: Trained on code documentation patterns to generate format-specific docstrings (JSDoc, Sphinx, etc.) with accurate parameter descriptions and usage examples, rather than generic text generation
vs alternatives: More accurate than simple comment generation tools by understanding code semantics; faster than manual documentation writing while maintaining consistency across formats
Analyzes code changes to identify potential issues, security vulnerabilities, performance problems, and style violations. The model applies code review heuristics learned from high-quality review datasets, checking for common anti-patterns, security risks (SQL injection, XSS, buffer overflows, etc.), and architectural concerns. Provides actionable feedback with severity levels and suggestions for improvement, supporting both automated pre-review scanning and interactive review assistance.
Unique: Instruction-tuned on code review datasets to identify security vulnerabilities, performance issues, and architectural concerns with severity assessment, rather than treating code review as a secondary capability
vs alternatives: Combines security analysis (like SAST tools) with architectural reasoning (like human reviewers) in a single model; faster than manual review for initial feedback while maintaining context awareness
Converts natural language specifications, requirements, or pseudocode into executable code while preserving intent and context. The model maps natural language descriptions to code constructs, infers data structures and algorithms from requirements, and generates idiomatic code in the target language. Supports iterative refinement through follow-up questions and clarifications, and can generate code at multiple abstraction levels (high-level architecture, detailed implementation, or specific functions).
Unique: Instruction-tuned to map natural language intent to idiomatic code constructs with context preservation, rather than treating NL-to-code as simple template substitution
vs alternatives: More accurate than generic code generators at preserving intent from natural language; enables non-technical stakeholders to participate in feature implementation
+2 more capabilities
Maintains conversation state across multiple turns using a transformer-based architecture with attention mechanisms that track dialogue history. The model processes the full conversation context (user messages, assistant responses, and implicit reasoning state) through its 141B parameter transformer to generate contextually coherent replies. Unlike stateless APIs, this implementation preserves semantic relationships across turns without explicit memory management, enabling complex multi-step reasoning within a single conversation thread.
Unique: 141B parameter scale with optimized attention patterns enables tracking complex multi-turn reasoning without explicit memory augmentation, using pure transformer architecture rather than hybrid memory-retrieval systems
vs alternatives: Larger parameter count than GPT-3.5 and comparable to GPT-4 enables deeper reasoning within conversation context, while remaining faster and cheaper than GPT-4 Turbo for most dialogue tasks
Generates syntactically correct code across 40+ programming languages by learning language-specific patterns during pretraining on diverse code repositories. The model uses transformer attention to understand code structure, variable scope, and API conventions, then generates completions that respect language semantics without explicit AST parsing. Supports both inline completion (filling gaps in existing code) and full function/module generation from natural language specifications.
Unique: Trained on diverse code repositories with language-agnostic transformer patterns, enabling generation across 40+ languages without language-specific fine-tuning, using unified attention mechanisms rather than language-specific decoders
vs alternatives: Outperforms Copilot on multi-language code generation and reasoning about code structure, while matching Claude's code quality on single-language tasks at lower latency
Mistral Large 2407 scores higher at 24/100 vs Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct at 23/100.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
Solves mathematical problems including algebra, calculus, geometry, and logic through learned mathematical reasoning patterns. The model can work through multi-step problems, show intermediate steps, and verify solutions. This is implemented through training on mathematical datasets and chain-of-thought reasoning that prioritizes step-by-step problem solving.
Unique: Trained on mathematical datasets with chain-of-thought reasoning to prioritize step-by-step problem solving, using attention mechanisms that track variable relationships and equation transformations
vs alternatives: Comparable to GPT-4 on mathematical reasoning, while maintaining lower cost; outperforms Llama 2 on complex multi-step problems due to larger parameter count and specialized training
Analyzes code for bugs, security issues, performance problems, and architectural concerns by understanding code semantics and common vulnerability patterns. The model can identify issues across multiple files, suggest fixes, and explain the reasoning behind recommendations. This is implemented through training on code repositories, security datasets, and best practices, combined with attention mechanisms that track variable flow and function calls.
Unique: Analyzes code semantics using learned patterns from diverse repositories, identifying bugs and architectural issues through attention mechanisms that track variable flow and function relationships, without explicit static analysis tools
vs alternatives: More comprehensive than linters for semantic issues, comparable to GPT-4 on code review quality, while maintaining lower latency and cost for most review tasks
Condenses long documents into summaries of varying lengths and focuses, preserving key information while removing redundancy. The model can generate executive summaries, detailed summaries, or summaries focused on specific topics by learning to identify important information and compress it. This is implemented through attention mechanisms that weight important tokens higher and training on summarization datasets.
Unique: Learns to identify important information through attention mechanisms that weight key tokens higher, enabling configurable summarization without explicit extractive or abstractive pipelines
vs alternatives: More flexible than extractive summarization tools, comparable to GPT-4 on abstractive summarization quality, while maintaining lower cost and faster inference
Identifies sentiment (positive, negative, neutral) and extracts opinions, emotions, or attitudes from text by learning sentiment patterns and linguistic markers. The model can provide fine-grained sentiment analysis (aspect-based sentiment, emotion classification) and explain the reasoning behind sentiment judgments. This is implemented through training on sentiment datasets and attention mechanisms that identify sentiment-bearing tokens.
Unique: Learns sentiment patterns from diverse datasets, enabling fine-grained sentiment analysis and emotion classification through attention mechanisms that identify sentiment-bearing tokens and contextual markers
vs alternatives: More nuanced than rule-based sentiment tools, comparable to specialized sentiment models on standard benchmarks, while providing better context-aware analysis than simple keyword matching
Generates valid JSON and structured data by constraining the output space to match provided schemas or format specifications. The model uses guided decoding (token-level constraints during generation) to ensure output conforms to specified JSON schemas, XML structures, or other formal formats. This prevents hallucinated fields, enforces type correctness, and guarantees parseable output without post-processing validation.
Unique: Implements token-level guided decoding that constrains generation to valid schema-conformant outputs during inference, rather than post-processing validation, ensuring zero invalid outputs without retry logic
vs alternatives: More reliable than Claude's JSON mode for complex nested schemas, and faster than GPT-4's structured outputs due to optimized constraint checking in the 141B parameter model
Decomposes complex problems into intermediate reasoning steps using learned patterns from chain-of-thought training data. The model generates explicit reasoning traces (showing work, considering alternatives, validating assumptions) before producing final answers. This is implemented through attention patterns that prioritize reasoning tokens and training objectives that reward step-by-step problem solving over direct answers.
Unique: Trained specifically on chain-of-thought datasets to prioritize reasoning steps, using attention mechanisms that weight intermediate reasoning tokens higher than direct answers, enabling more transparent problem-solving
vs alternatives: Comparable to GPT-4's reasoning on complex problems, while maintaining lower latency and cost; outperforms Llama 2 on multi-step reasoning due to larger parameter count and specialized training
+6 more capabilities