| 0 |
| Ecosystem | 1 | 1 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Capabilities | 11 decomposed | 12 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Generates contextually relevant, multi-turn conversational responses using a transformer-based decoder architecture fine-tuned on instruction-following datasets. The model processes input tokens through 24 transformer layers with rotary positional embeddings (RoPE) and grouped-query attention (GQA) to reduce memory footprint, enabling efficient inference on consumer hardware while maintaining coherence across extended conversations.
Unique: Combines grouped-query attention (GQA) with rotary positional embeddings (RoPE) to achieve 3B-parameter efficiency without sacrificing multi-turn coherence — architectural choices that reduce KV cache memory by ~40% compared to standard attention while maintaining instruction-following quality through supervised fine-tuning on diverse instruction datasets
vs alternatives: Smaller and faster than Llama 2 7B (2.3x fewer parameters) while maintaining comparable instruction-following quality; more capable than Phi-2 on reasoning tasks due to larger training corpus and longer context window
Supports inference in multiple precision formats (fp16, int8, int4) through safetensors weight loading and compatibility with quantization frameworks like bitsandbytes and GPTQ. The model weights are stored in safetensors format (binary, memory-safe alternative to pickle) enabling fast loading and automatic dtype conversion, allowing developers to trade off between memory footprint and output quality based on hardware constraints.
Unique: Natively packaged in safetensors format (not pickle) with built-in compatibility for both bitsandbytes dynamic quantization and GPTQ static quantization, enabling zero-code-change switching between precision formats and eliminating deserialization security risks that plague traditional PyTorch checkpoints
vs alternatives: Safer and faster to load than Llama 2 (which uses pickle by default); more flexible than GGML-only models because it supports multiple quantization backends and can be re-quantized at runtime
Optimizes inference for consumer-grade hardware through quantization, attention optimizations (grouped-query attention), and efficient implementations that enable running on CPUs when GPUs are unavailable. The model can be deployed on laptops, edge devices, and servers without specialized hardware, with graceful degradation from GPU to CPU inference without code changes.
Unique: Combines grouped-query attention (reducing KV cache size) with quantization support and CPU-optimized inference frameworks (llama.cpp, ONNX Runtime) to enable practical inference on consumer CPUs — a design pattern that prioritizes accessibility over peak performance
vs alternatives: More practical on CPU than Llama 2 7B due to smaller parameter count; less capable than cloud-based APIs but enables offline operation and data privacy
Generates text incrementally via token-by-token streaming with support for temperature, top-k, top-p (nucleus sampling), and repetition penalty controls. The model outputs logits at each step, allowing downstream sampling strategies to be applied before token selection, enabling real-time response streaming to end-users and fine-grained control over generation diversity and coherence.
Unique: Exposes raw logits at each generation step with pluggable sampling strategies, allowing downstream frameworks to apply custom constraints (grammar-based, schema-based, or domain-specific) without modifying the model itself — a design pattern that separates generation from sampling logic
vs alternatives: More flexible than GPT-4 API (which only exposes temperature/top_p) because it provides raw logits; faster streaming than Llama 2 on CPU due to smaller parameter count and optimized attention implementation
Understands and responds to instructions in multiple languages (English, Chinese, Spanish, French, German, and others) through multilingual instruction-tuning, though with English as the primary training language. The model uses a shared vocabulary across languages and learned language-agnostic instruction representations, enabling cross-lingual transfer but with degraded performance on non-English languages compared to English.
Unique: Trained on instruction-following datasets across multiple languages with English as the primary language, using a shared vocabulary and learned language-agnostic instruction representations that enable cross-lingual transfer without language-specific model variants — a cost-effective approach that trades off non-English quality for deployment simplicity
vs alternatives: More practical than maintaining separate models per language; less capable on non-English than language-specific models like Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct-Chinese but sufficient for many multilingual applications
Accepts system prompts and role definitions that shape model behavior without fine-tuning, using a chat template that separates system instructions from user messages and model responses. The model processes the system prompt as context that influences all subsequent generations in a conversation, enabling dynamic behavior modification (e.g., 'act as a Python expert', 'respond in JSON format') without retraining.
Unique: Implements a formal chat template that separates system instructions from user messages and model responses, allowing system prompts to be dynamically injected without fine-tuning while maintaining conversation context — a design pattern that enables prompt-based behavior customization at inference time
vs alternatives: More flexible than fixed-behavior models; less reliable than fine-tuned variants but faster to iterate on since system prompts can be changed without retraining
Maintains conversation context across up to 32,768 tokens (~25,000 words) using rotary positional embeddings (RoPE) that enable efficient long-context attention without quadratic memory scaling. The model can reference earlier messages in a conversation, retrieve relevant context from long documents, and generate coherent responses that depend on distant context, enabling multi-turn conversations and document-based Q&A without context truncation.
Unique: Uses rotary positional embeddings (RoPE) instead of absolute positional encodings, enabling efficient extrapolation to 32K tokens without retraining while maintaining attention quality — an architectural choice that avoids the quadratic memory scaling of standard attention and enables position interpolation for even longer contexts
vs alternatives: Longer context than Llama 2 7B (4K tokens) and comparable to Llama 2 70B (4K) but with 23x fewer parameters; shorter than Claude 3 (200K tokens) but sufficient for most document-based applications
Generates syntactically correct code across multiple programming languages (Python, JavaScript, Java, C++, SQL, etc.) through instruction-tuning on code datasets and code-specific training objectives. The model learns language-specific syntax, idioms, and common patterns, enabling it to complete code snippets, generate functions, and explain code without requiring external linters or syntax validators.
Unique: Trained on diverse code datasets with instruction-tuning for code-specific tasks (completion, explanation, translation), enabling syntax-aware generation without external parsing — a training approach that embeds programming language understanding directly into the model rather than relying on post-hoc validation
vs alternatives: More capable than GPT-2 on code generation; less capable than Copilot (which uses codebase context) but sufficient for standalone code generation and explanation tasks
+3 more capabilities
Crawls 11+ heterogeneous platforms (Zhihu, Weibo, Bilibili, Twitter, Reddit, HackerNews, etc.) and RSS feeds using platform-specific scrapers, normalizes disparate data schemas into a unified NewsItem model, and deduplicates content across sources using fuzzy title matching and URL canonicalization. The system maintains platform-specific metadata (rank, heat value, engagement metrics) while presenting a single normalized feed, enabling cross-platform trend detection that would be invisible within individual platform silos.
Unique: Implements platform-specific crawler modules with unified NewsItem schema and fuzzy deduplication across 11+ heterogeneous sources (Chinese + international), rather than relying on single-platform APIs or generic RSS parsing. Maintains platform-specific metadata (rank × 0.6 + frequency × 0.3 + platform hot value × 0.1) for weighted hotspot scoring.
vs alternatives: Covers more platforms (especially Chinese social media) with deeper metadata extraction than generic RSS aggregators, and provides unified deduplication across sources unlike single-platform monitoring tools.
Implements a multi-stage filtering pipeline that matches news items against user-defined keywords using regex patterns, required word lists, and excluded word lists. The system applies frequency-based scoring (keyword occurrence count) combined with platform hotspot weights to rank filtered results. Configuration is stored in frequency_words.txt with support for regex patterns, AND/OR/NOT boolean operators, and per-keyword weighting. Filtering occurs at collection time (reducing storage) and again at report generation time (enabling dynamic reconfiguration without re-crawling).
Unique: Combines regex pattern matching with frequency-based scoring and platform hotspot weighting (rank × 0.6 + frequency × 0.3 + platform hot value × 0.1) in a two-stage pipeline (collection-time and report-time filtering). Supports dynamic reconfiguration without re-crawling by applying filters at report generation.
TrendRadar scores higher at 58/100 vs Qwen2.5-3B-Instruct at 52/100. Qwen2.5-3B-Instruct leads on adoption, while TrendRadar is stronger on quality and ecosystem.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
vs alternatives: More flexible than simple keyword matching (supports regex and boolean logic) and more efficient than semantic filtering (no LLM overhead), making it suitable for real-time filtering at scale.
Detects newly emerged topics by comparing current crawl results against historical data stored in the system. Topics are marked as 🆕 (new) if they appear for the first time in the current crawl or if their hotspot rank increased significantly compared to previous crawls. The system tracks topic emergence velocity (how quickly a topic rises in rankings) and flags topics with unusual acceleration. New topic detection is performed at report generation time, enabling dynamic detection without re-crawling. The system maintains a historical hotspot index for comparison.
Unique: Detects new topics by comparing current hotspot rankings against historical data, marking topics with significant rank increases as 🆕. Tracks emergence velocity to distinguish breaking news from sustained trends.
vs alternatives: More efficient than semantic similarity detection (no LLM overhead) and more accurate than simple first-appearance detection (accounts for re-emerging topics), but requires historical baseline data.
Provides a web-based UI for editing TrendRadar configuration files (config.yaml, frequency_words.txt, timeline.yaml) with real-time validation and preview. The editor supports: (1) syntax highlighting for YAML and regex, (2) validation of keyword patterns (regex compilation check), (3) preview of filtered results based on current keyword configuration, (4) drag-and-drop channel configuration, (5) schedule preview (shows next 10 execution times). Changes are validated before saving, preventing configuration errors. The editor is optional; users can edit config files directly.
Unique: Provides web-based configuration editor with real-time validation, regex preview, and schedule visualization. Enables non-technical users to configure TrendRadar without editing YAML files.
vs alternatives: More user-friendly than manual YAML editing and provides validation feedback, but adds operational complexity compared to file-based configuration.
Integrates LiteLLM to provide vendor-agnostic AI analysis and summarization of filtered news items. Users configure their preferred LLM provider (OpenAI, Anthropic, Ollama, local models, etc.) once in config.yaml, and the system automatically routes analysis requests to that provider. The AI analysis capability includes: (1) automated summarization of long articles into key points, (2) sentiment analysis (positive/negative/neutral), (3) trend prediction based on historical patterns, and (4) custom analysis prompts. Analysis results are cached to avoid redundant API calls and can be pushed directly to notification channels.
Unique: Uses LiteLLM abstraction layer to support any LLM provider (OpenAI, Anthropic, Ollama, local models) with single configuration, enabling provider switching without code changes. Caches analysis results to reduce redundant API calls and costs.
vs alternatives: More flexible than hardcoded OpenAI integration (supports any LiteLLM provider) and cheaper than dedicated sentiment analysis APIs (can use local models), but slower than rule-based sentiment analysis.
Leverages LiteLLM to translate news content from source languages (primarily Chinese) to target languages (English, etc.) on-demand. The system detects source language automatically (via langdetect or similar), caches translations to avoid re-translating identical content, and batches translation requests to reduce API calls. Translations are stored alongside original content, enabling bilingual reports and multi-language notification delivery. Translation can be triggered at collection time (all news) or report time (only filtered news).
Unique: Implements provider-agnostic translation via LiteLLM with automatic language detection, content-based caching, and batch request optimization. Stores translations alongside originals for bilingual report generation.
vs alternatives: More flexible than dedicated translation APIs (supports any LiteLLM provider) and cheaper than commercial translation services when using local models, but slower than specialized translation APIs.
Implements a notification abstraction layer supporting 9+ delivery channels (WeChat, WeWork, Feishu, Telegram, Email, ntfy, Bark, Slack, etc.). Each channel has a provider-specific formatter that converts normalized news items into channel-appropriate messages (e.g., WeChat card format, Telegram markdown, email HTML). The system batches notifications atomically—all news items for a report are sent as a single batch to each channel, ensuring consistency and reducing API calls. Message formatting respects channel constraints (character limits, attachment limits, etc.) and supports templating for customization.
Unique: Implements atomic message batching across 9+ heterogeneous channels with provider-specific formatters and constraint-aware truncation. Single configuration enables simultaneous delivery to WeChat, WeWork, Feishu, Telegram, Email, ntfy, Bark, Slack, etc. without code changes.
vs alternatives: Supports more channels (especially Chinese platforms like WeWork, Feishu) than generic notification services, and batching reduces API calls and spam compared to per-item notifications.
Exposes TrendRadar's data and analysis capabilities as an MCP server, enabling AI agents and LLM applications to query trends, perform analysis, and generate insights through natural language. The MCP server implements tools for: (1) querying filtered news by keyword/date/platform, (2) retrieving trend statistics and hotspot rankings, (3) running custom analysis on news subsets, (4) generating reports in various formats. Clients (Claude, other LLM agents) can invoke these tools via MCP protocol, enabling conversational exploration of trends without direct database access. The server maintains state across multiple requests, allowing multi-turn conversations about trends.
Unique: Implements full MCP server exposing trend data and analysis tools to LLM agents, enabling conversational queries and multi-turn analysis workflows. Maintains state across requests and supports complex tool invocations (filtering, analysis, report generation).
vs alternatives: Enables conversational access to trends (vs. API-only access) and integrates with LLM agent workflows (vs. standalone tools), but adds operational complexity compared to simple REST APIs.
+4 more capabilities