MS COCO (Common Objects in Context) ranks higher at 61/100 vs Qr-code-creator.io at 40/100. Capability-level comparison backed by match graph evidence from real search data.
| Feature | Qr-code-creator.io | MS COCO (Common Objects in Context) |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Web App | Dataset |
| UnfragileRank | 40/100 | 61/100 |
| Adoption | 0 | 1 |
| Quality | 1 | 1 |
| Ecosystem | 0 | 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Capabilities | 9 decomposed | 11 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Generates QR codes entirely client-side using JavaScript QR encoding libraries (likely qrcode.js or similar), eliminating server round-trips and enabling instant preview. The implementation encodes input strings into QR matrix data structures and renders them as canvas or SVG elements, supporting standard QR code versions (1-40) with automatic version selection based on data length and error correction level.
Unique: Fully client-side QR generation using canvas/SVG rendering eliminates latency and server dependencies entirely, contrasting with cloud-based competitors that require API calls for each code generation
vs alternatives: Faster than QR Code Generator Pro for single-code generation (no network latency) but lacks dynamic URL updating and analytics that enterprise tools provide
Provides UI controls to modify QR code appearance by adjusting foreground/background colors via color pickers and overlaying user-supplied logo images onto the QR matrix. The implementation preserves QR code scannability by embedding logos in the center white space (quiet zone) and maintaining sufficient contrast ratios; uses canvas compositing or SVG masking to blend logo images with the underlying QR pattern without corrupting critical data modules.
Unique: Implements logo embedding with automatic quiet-zone detection and contrast validation, preserving QR code scannability through canvas compositing rather than naive pixel overlay
vs alternatives: More accessible than command-line QR tools (visual UI vs. parameter flags) but less sophisticated than enterprise solutions that offer gradient fills, pattern overlays, and AI-powered logo placement optimization
Enables users to export generated QR codes as PNG, SVG, or other image formats through browser download APIs. The implementation uses canvas.toBlob() for raster formats and SVG serialization for vector output, allowing users to choose resolution/quality settings before download. Export pipeline includes metadata preservation (filename, timestamp) and supports batch export workflows through ZIP file generation.
Unique: Implements client-side ZIP generation for batch exports using JavaScript libraries, avoiding server-side processing and enabling instant multi-file downloads without backend infrastructure
vs alternatives: Faster than cloud-based competitors for single-file exports (no server processing) but lacks advanced compression and format conversion options available in professional design tools
Exposes QR code error correction level (L/M/Q/H) as a user-configurable parameter, allowing trade-offs between data capacity and scannability under damage/obstruction. The implementation passes the selected error correction level to the underlying QR encoding library, which adjusts the number of error correction codewords embedded in the QR matrix. Higher levels (Q/H) reduce available data capacity but enable scanning even with 25-30% of the code obscured or damaged.
Unique: Exposes error correction level as a first-class UI control with real-time QR code size preview, making the data capacity vs. robustness trade-off visible to non-technical users
vs alternatives: More transparent than competitors that hide error correction settings, but lacks predictive guidance on which level to select based on use case or environment
Provides instant visual feedback as users modify QR code parameters (text, colors, logo, error correction) through a live preview pane that updates synchronously with input changes. The implementation uses event listeners on form inputs (debounced to avoid excessive re-rendering) that trigger QR code regeneration and canvas/SVG re-rendering within 100-300ms of user input, creating a responsive WYSIWYG editing experience without page reloads.
Unique: Implements debounced input event listeners with sub-300ms QR code regeneration, creating responsive WYSIWYG editing without server round-trips or noticeable latency
vs alternatives: More responsive than cloud-based competitors requiring API calls per change, but less sophisticated than desktop design tools with full undo/redo and version history
Generates permanent QR codes that encode fixed URLs or text data directly into the QR matrix, with no capability to update the encoded data after generation. The implementation encodes the user-provided string into the QR matrix at generation time; once downloaded, the QR code is immutable and will always resolve to the original URL. This contrasts with dynamic QR codes that store redirect URLs on a server, allowing URL changes without regenerating the code.
Unique: Deliberately omits dynamic QR functionality and server-side redirection, keeping implementation lightweight and cost-free while accepting the trade-off of immutability
vs alternatives: Simpler and cheaper than dynamic QR services (no hosting costs or API calls) but lacks analytics, URL updating, and A/B testing capabilities that enterprise tools provide
Accepts a list or CSV file containing multiple URLs/text entries and generates QR codes for each row in a single operation. The implementation parses CSV input (comma or tab-separated), iterates through rows, generates QR codes for each entry, and either displays them in a gallery view or bundles them into a ZIP file for download. This enables users to create 10-100+ codes without manually entering each URL individually.
Unique: Implements client-side CSV parsing and batch QR generation with ZIP bundling, enabling bulk operations without server infrastructure or API rate limits
vs alternatives: More accessible than command-line tools (visual UI vs. scripts) but slower than enterprise platforms with server-side batch processing and deduplication
Allows users to specify output dimensions (pixel size, DPI for print) and QR code version (1-40, controlling the number of modules/cells) before generation. The implementation maps user-selected size preferences to QR version selection logic, ensuring the code is large enough to be scannable at the intended use case (business card, billboard, etc.). Users can specify output resolution in pixels or DPI, with the renderer scaling the QR matrix accordingly using canvas or SVG scaling.
Unique: Provides user-friendly size configuration (physical dimensions + DPI) that abstracts QR version selection, making print-ready QR code generation accessible to non-technical designers
vs alternatives: More intuitive than command-line tools requiring version/module parameters, but less sophisticated than professional design software with automatic size recommendations and print preview
+1 more capabilities
Provides 2.5 million manually-annotated object instances across 330,000 images with dual segmentation encoding: polygon coordinates for precise boundary definition and RLE (run-length encoding) for efficient storage and computation. Each instance includes bounding box coordinates in [x, y, width, height] format, category label from 80 object classes, and instance-level unique identifiers enabling per-object tracking and evaluation. Annotations are structured in JSON format with hierarchical organization linking images to annotations to categories, supporting both dense object scenes and sparse single-object images.
Unique: Dual segmentation encoding (polygon + RLE) in single dataset enables both precise boundary analysis and efficient computational workflows; 2.5M instances across 330K images provides scale unmatched by contemporaneous datasets (ImageNet had ~1.2M images, PASCAL VOC had ~11K images)
vs alternatives: Larger and more densely annotated than PASCAL VOC (11K images, ~6 objects/image) and more task-diverse than ImageNet (classification-only); RLE encoding enables 10-100x faster mask loading than polygon-only formats
Provides keypoint annotations for all people in images using a standardized 17-joint skeleton model (head, shoulders, elbows, wrists, hips, knees, ankles) with (x, y, visibility) tuples per joint. Visibility flag indicates whether keypoint is annotated (1), occluded (0), or outside image bounds (0). Keypoints are linked to parent person instances via instance ID, enabling pose estimation evaluation at both individual and crowd-level scales. Annotations follow COCO Keypoints task specification with consistent coordinate system across all 330K images.
Unique: Standardized 17-joint skeleton with explicit visibility flags enables robust evaluation of pose estimation under occlusion; linked to instance segmentation masks allows joint-level accuracy analysis within person bounding boxes
MS COCO (Common Objects in Context) scores higher at 61/100 vs Qr-code-creator.io at 40/100.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
vs alternatives: More comprehensive than OpenPose dataset (no visibility flags) and larger scale than Human3.6M (3.6M frames vs 330K images); visibility annotations enable explicit occlusion handling unlike MPII (which lacks visibility metadata)
COCO ecosystem includes community-created extensions (COCO-Stuff, COCO DensePose, COCO Panoptic) that extend base dataset with additional annotations while maintaining compatibility with COCO API and evaluation infrastructure. Extensions follow COCO format and evaluation standards, enabling seamless integration into existing pipelines. Community contributions are vetted and published as official COCO variants, ensuring quality and standardization. Variant creation process is documented, enabling researchers to create custom extensions.
Unique: Standardized extension process enables community contributions while maintaining compatibility; official variants (Stuff, DensePose, Panoptic) are vetted and published, ensuring quality and discoverability
vs alternatives: More extensible than fixed datasets; community variants enable specialized use cases without forking; standardized format prevents fragmentation unlike ad-hoc dataset variants
Provides 1.65 million image-caption pairs (5 captions × 330K images) with natural language descriptions written by human annotators. Each caption is a free-form English sentence describing objects, actions, and scene context without enforced length limits or structured templates. Captions are stored in JSON format linked to image IDs, enabling training of vision-language models for image captioning, visual question answering, and cross-modal retrieval. Multiple captions per image capture linguistic diversity and alternative descriptions of the same visual content.
Unique: 5 captions per image (vs 1 in most datasets) captures linguistic diversity and enables robust evaluation of caption generation variability; 1.65M caption-image pairs provide scale for training large vision-language models
vs alternatives: 5x more captions per image than Flickr30K (1 caption/image) enabling better linguistic diversity modeling; larger scale than Visual Genome (108K images) while maintaining natural language quality vs automated alt-text
Extends base 80 object categories with 91 additional 'stuff' categories (background materials, textures, regions like sky, grass, wall) enabling dense semantic segmentation of entire images. Stuff categories are annotated as pixel-level masks without instance boundaries — all sky pixels are labeled 'sky' regardless of continuity. COCO-Stuff combines instance segmentation (80 objects) with semantic segmentation (171 total categories including stuff), stored as single-channel PNG masks where pixel value encodes category ID. Enables panoptic segmentation evaluation combining instance and stuff predictions.
Unique: 171-category taxonomy combining 80 instance objects + 91 stuff categories enables panoptic segmentation in single dataset; pixel-level masks for stuff enable dense scene understanding without instance boundaries
vs alternatives: More comprehensive than ADE20K (150 categories) and larger scale than Cityscapes (5K images); unified instance+stuff annotation enables panoptic evaluation unlike separate semantic/instance datasets
Combines instance segmentation (80 object categories with boundaries) and semantic segmentation (171 stuff categories without boundaries) into single panoptic prediction task. Evaluation uses Panoptic Quality (PQ) metric decomposed into Segmentation Quality (SQ — IoU of matched predictions) and Recognition Quality (RQ — detection rate). Panoptic masks encode both category ID and instance ID, enabling evaluation of both 'what' (category) and 'which' (instance identity) predictions. Standardized evaluation protocol with server-side metric computation ensures consistent benchmarking across submissions.
Unique: Panoptic Quality metric with explicit SQ/RQ decomposition enables fine-grained analysis of segmentation vs recognition errors; unified instance+stuff evaluation in single task forces models to handle both prediction types efficiently
vs alternatives: More comprehensive than separate instance/semantic benchmarks; PQ metric better captures real-world scene understanding than independent metrics; standardized evaluation prevents metric gaming unlike custom evaluation scripts
Provides dense 2D-to-3D correspondence maps for human bodies, mapping each pixel in a person instance to a 3D human body model surface. Annotations include UV coordinates (parameterization of 3D body surface) and body part indices enabling pixel-level body surface understanding. DensePose enables training of models that predict where each image pixel corresponds to on a canonical 3D human body, useful for pose transfer, virtual try-on, and detailed human understanding. Available from 2020 dataset version onwards, extends keypoint annotations with dense surface coverage.
Unique: Dense 2D-to-3D surface correspondence enables pixel-level body understanding beyond skeleton keypoints; UV parameterization allows transfer of appearance and shape across different people and poses
vs alternatives: More detailed than keypoint-only annotations (17 joints vs millions of surface points); enables pose transfer unlike keypoint datasets; larger scale than DensePose-specific datasets
Provides standardized evaluation metrics for each task (Average Precision for detection, IoU for segmentation, OKS for keypoints, BLEU/METEOR/CIDEr for captions, PQ for panoptic) computed server-side on held-out test set. Leaderboard system accepts structured JSON result submissions in COCO format, validates format, computes metrics, and ranks submissions by primary metric. Evaluation infrastructure ensures consistent benchmarking across all submissions and prevents metric gaming through standardized computation. Metrics are task-specific: AP/AP50/AP75 for detection, mIoU for segmentation, OKS for keypoints, CIDEr for captions.
Unique: Server-side metric computation prevents metric gaming and ensures consistency; task-specific metrics (AP, OKS, CIDEr, PQ) are standardized across all submissions enabling fair comparison; public leaderboard provides transparency and reproducibility
vs alternatives: More rigorous than self-reported metrics (prevents cherry-picking); standardized evaluation prevents metric implementation variations unlike custom evaluation scripts; public leaderboard enables community comparison unlike proprietary benchmarks
+3 more capabilities