| 1 |
| Ecosystem | 0 | 1 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Capabilities | 11 decomposed | 12 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Processes @mentions in Slack threads by reading only the conversation thread containing the mention, maintaining context from prior messages in that thread, and streaming responses back to Slack with millisecond-to-second latency. Uses OpenAI GPT (model version unclear, marketed as 'GPT-5.2') or Anthropic Claude 200K depending on token requirements, with automatic model switching when input exceeds 16K tokens. Supports simultaneous multiple requests unlike ChatGPT's sequential 50-per-3-hour rate limit.
Unique: Implements thread-scoped context reading (not workspace-wide) combined with automatic model switching based on token budget, allowing simultaneous parallel requests without per-user rate limiting — a design choice that prioritizes workspace-level throughput over individual user caps
vs alternatives: Faster than ChatGPT for workspace teams because it eliminates context-switching friction and removes per-user rate limits (50/3hr), but narrower than enterprise LLM platforms because it reads only thread context, not full workspace history
Extracts and analyzes content from diverse sources (web URLs, PDFs, Google Workspace files, YouTube captions, arXiv papers, Notion pages, uploaded files) by sending extracted text/metadata to LLM backend for analysis. Supports public HTTP/HTTPS URLs, direct PDF links, and OAuth-authenticated Google Docs/Sheets/Slides (per-user OAuth, not workspace service account). YouTube extraction includes standard videos, shorts, and live streams via caption parsing. File uploads support PDF, images, Excel, PowerPoint, Word, CSV, plain text, code files, audio, and video (formats unspecified).
Unique: Combines public URL parsing with OAuth-authenticated Google Workspace access and specialized extractors for YouTube captions and arXiv metadata, all within a single Slack command — a breadth-first approach that trades deep integration (e.g., workspace service accounts) for ease of use
vs alternatives: Broader source coverage than ChatGPT (includes YouTube, arXiv, Notion, Google Workspace) but shallower than enterprise document platforms because OAuth is per-user and no workspace-level service account support exists
Allows users to edit the original @mention message and automatically re-invoke Q with the modified input, enabling query refinement without re-typing. When a user edits a message that previously invoked Q, the system detects the edit and generates a new response based on the updated message content. This enables iterative refinement of questions within the same thread.
Unique: Implements automatic re-invocation on message edit rather than requiring explicit regenerate button, allowing seamless query refinement by editing the original message — a workflow optimization that reduces friction for iterative questioning
vs alternatives: More intuitive than ChatGPT's regenerate button because it leverages Slack's native edit affordance, but less discoverable because users may not realize editing triggers re-invocation
Stores and applies workspace-level instruction templates that are automatically injected into every Q response, allowing teams to define consistent guidelines for email tone, translation rules, content generation style, or coding standards. Templates are defined once in the Q settings panel and applied to all users in the workspace without per-user configuration. Instructions persist across conversations and are re-applied on every invocation.
Unique: Implements workspace-level instruction injection as a persistent configuration rather than per-request overrides, allowing teams to define once and apply globally — a centralized governance approach that differs from per-user or per-conversation customization
vs alternatives: Simpler than fine-tuning custom models because it requires no ML expertise, but less powerful than system prompts in ChatGPT API because it cannot be dynamically modified per-request or per-user
Augments Q responses with Google Search results by querying the Google Search API and including 3 results (Entry tier), 5 results (Standard tier), or 10 results (Premium tier) in the LLM context before generating responses. Search integration method (API vs. scraping), result ranking, freshness guarantees, and query construction logic are undocumented. Scope of search (web-wide vs. workspace-specific) is unclear.
Unique: Integrates web search as a tier-gated feature with configurable result limits rather than always-on or user-controlled search, allowing Q to supplement LLM knowledge with current web data without requiring user to manage search queries
vs alternatives: Simpler than ChatGPT's web browsing because search is automatic and transparent, but less flexible because users cannot control search parameters or restrict to specific sources
Provides post-generation response controls including stop (halt streaming mid-response), continue (extend response), regenerate (new response from same input), delete (remove response and save tokens), and edit-to-regenerate (modify original @mention message to re-invoke Q with new input). These controls allow users to optimize token usage and refine responses without re-typing queries. Delete action explicitly saves tokens by removing the response from context.
Unique: Implements response-level controls (stop, continue, regenerate, delete) as first-class Slack UI buttons rather than requiring text commands, combined with explicit token-saving semantics for delete — a UX-first approach that prioritizes discoverability over command-line efficiency
vs alternatives: More granular than ChatGPT's regenerate button because it includes stop, continue, and delete with token awareness, but less powerful than API-level control because users cannot adjust temperature, top-p, or other generation parameters
Supports input and output in 'almost all languages' (exact language list undocumented) with automatic detection of input language and generation of responses in the same language. Language support is claimed to be comprehensive but no specific language list, character encoding support, or RTL (right-to-left) language handling is documented. Implementation approach (language detection model, translation layer, or native multilingual LLM) is unknown.
Unique: Implements automatic language detection and response generation in the same language as input, without requiring explicit language selection — a zero-configuration approach that assumes users want responses in their input language
vs alternatives: Simpler than ChatGPT's language selection because it requires no user configuration, but less transparent than explicit language choice because detection failures are silent and may produce unexpected language outputs
Implements workspace-level billing where a single subscription covers all users in a Slack workspace, with admin controls to assign specific users to different subscription tiers (Entry, Standard, Premium). Billing is managed at the workspace level, not per-user, allowing teams to share a single subscription. Uninstalling the bot immediately cancels all subscriptions with no mid-term refund option. Free 14-day trial available without credit card; can re-trial for 7+ days after expiration by reinstalling.
Unique: Implements workspace-level billing with per-user tier assignment rather than per-user subscriptions, allowing teams to share a single subscription and assign users to different tiers — a cost-sharing model that differs from per-user SaaS pricing
vs alternatives: Cheaper for teams than individual ChatGPT subscriptions because costs are shared, but less flexible than usage-based billing because all users in a tier have identical limits regardless of actual consumption
+3 more capabilities
Sends text messages, media files, and formatted content to Telegram chats and channels through the Telegram Bot API. Implements message routing logic that resolves chat identifiers (numeric IDs, usernames, or channel handles) to API endpoints, handles message formatting (Markdown/HTML), and manages delivery confirmation through API response parsing. Supports batch message operations and message editing after delivery.
Unique: Wraps Telegram Bot API message endpoints as MCP tools, enabling LLM agents to send messages through a standardized tool-calling interface rather than direct API calls. Abstracts chat identifier resolution and message formatting into a single composable capability.
vs alternatives: Simpler integration than raw Telegram Bot API for MCP-based agents because it handles authentication and endpoint routing transparently, while maintaining full API feature support.
Retrieves message history from Telegram chats and channels by querying the Telegram Bot API for recent messages, with filtering by date range, sender, or message type. Implements pagination logic to handle large message sets and parses API responses into structured message objects containing sender info, timestamps, content, and media metadata. Supports reading from both private chats and public channels.
Unique: Exposes Telegram message retrieval as MCP tools with built-in pagination and filtering, allowing LLM agents to fetch and reason over chat history without managing API pagination or response parsing themselves. Structures raw API responses into agent-friendly formats.
vs alternatives: More accessible than direct Telegram Bot API calls for agents because it abstracts pagination and response normalization; simpler than building a custom Telegram client library for basic history needs.
Telegram MCP Server scores higher at 60/100 vs Q Slack Chatbot at 42/100.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
Integrates with Telegram's webhook system to receive real-time updates (messages, callbacks, edits) via HTTP POST requests. The MCP server can be configured to work with webhook-based bots (alternative to polling), receiving updates from Telegram's servers and routing them to connected LLM clients. Supports update filtering and acknowledgment.
Unique: Bridges Telegram's webhook system into MCP, enabling event-driven bot architectures. Handles webhook registration and update routing without requiring polling loops.
vs alternatives: Lower latency than polling because updates arrive immediately; more scalable than getUpdates polling because it eliminates constant API calls and reduces rate-limit pressure.
Translates Telegram Bot API errors and responses into structured MCP-compatible formats. The MCP server catches API failures (rate limits, invalid parameters, permission errors) and maps them to descriptive error objects that LLMs can reason about. Implements retry logic for transient failures and provides actionable error messages.
Unique: Implements error mapping layer that translates raw Telegram API errors into LLM-friendly error objects. Provides structured error information that LLMs can use for decision-making and recovery.
vs alternatives: More actionable than raw API errors because it provides context and recovery suggestions; more reliable than ignoring errors because it enables LLM agents to handle failures intelligently.
Registers custom bot commands (e.g., /start, /help, /custom) and routes incoming Telegram messages containing those commands to handler functions. Implements command parsing logic that extracts command names and arguments from message text, matches them against registered handlers, and invokes the appropriate handler with parsed parameters. Supports command help text generation and command discovery via /help.
Unique: Provides MCP-compatible command registration and dispatch, allowing agents to define Telegram bot commands as MCP tools rather than managing raw message parsing. Decouples command definition from message handling logic.
vs alternatives: Cleaner than raw message event handling because it abstracts command parsing and routing; more flexible than hardcoded command lists because handlers can be registered dynamically at runtime.
Fetches metadata about Telegram chats and channels including member counts, titles, descriptions, pinned messages, and permissions. Queries the Telegram Bot API for chat information and parses responses into structured objects. Supports both private chats and public channels, with different metadata availability depending on bot permissions and chat type.
Unique: Exposes Telegram chat metadata as queryable MCP tools, allowing agents to inspect chat state and permissions without direct API calls. Structures metadata into agent-friendly formats with permission flags.
vs alternatives: More convenient than raw API calls for agents because it abstracts permission checking and response normalization; enables agents to make permission-aware decisions before attempting actions.
Retrieves information about Telegram users and chat members including usernames, first/last names, profile pictures, and member status (admin, restricted, etc.). Queries the Telegram Bot API for user objects and member information, with support for looking up users by ID or username. Returns structured user profiles with permission and status flags.
Unique: Provides user and member lookup as MCP tools with structured output, enabling agents to make permission-aware and user-aware decisions. Abstracts API response parsing and permission flag interpretation.
vs alternatives: Simpler than raw API calls for agents because it returns normalized user objects with permission flags; enables agents to check user status without managing API response structure.
Edits or deletes previously sent messages in Telegram chats by message ID. Implements message lifecycle management through Telegram Bot API endpoints, supporting text content updates, media replacement, and inline keyboard modifications. Handles permission checks and error cases (e.g., message too old to edit, insufficient permissions).
Unique: Exposes message editing and deletion as MCP tools with built-in permission and time-window validation, allowing agents to manage message state without directly handling API constraints. Abstracts 48-hour edit window checks.
vs alternatives: More agent-friendly than raw API calls because it validates edit eligibility before attempting operations; enables agents to implement message lifecycle patterns without manual constraint checking.
+4 more capabilities