| 0 |
| 1 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Capabilities | 6 decomposed | 11 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Whisper implements a fixed-size round-robin database that pre-allocates disk space for time-series metrics and overwrites oldest data when capacity is reached, eliminating dynamic allocation overhead. Data is written sequentially by the Carbon ingestion service into pre-defined storage slots indexed by timestamp, enabling predictable disk usage and O(1) write performance regardless of dataset age. The circular buffer design trades retention flexibility for guaranteed storage footprint and consistent write latency.
Unique: Uses fixed-size circular buffer design with pre-allocated disk space and sequential writes, eliminating dynamic allocation and enabling deterministic write performance — unlike traditional databases that grow dynamically and require compaction/vacuuming
vs alternatives: Provides guaranteed O(1) write latency and predictable disk footprint for long-term metric storage, whereas InfluxDB and Prometheus require active compaction and dynamic scaling to maintain performance
Whisper supports creating multiple aggregation levels (e.g., 1-minute raw data, 10-minute averages, 1-hour summaries) within a single database file, enabling efficient long-term storage by downsampling older data while preserving high-resolution recent data. Each retention tier is a separate round-robin buffer with different time granularity and aggregation function (average, sum, last, etc.), allowing queries to select appropriate resolution based on time range. This hierarchical approach reduces storage for historical data while maintaining query flexibility without requiring separate database files.
Unique: Implements multi-resolution storage within single database files using stacked round-robin buffers with configurable aggregation functions per tier, enabling space-efficient long-term retention without separate database files or external aggregation pipelines
vs alternatives: More storage-efficient than Prometheus for long-term retention because aggregation happens at write-time into fixed-size buffers, whereas Prometheus requires external tools like Thanos for downsampling and long-term storage
Whisper integrates with the Carbon service through a write API that accepts timestamped metric data and routes writes to appropriate storage slots based on metric name and timestamp. Carbon handles network protocol parsing (plaintext, pickle, AMQP) and metric name validation, then delegates to Whisper for storage, which maps timestamps to fixed storage offsets using modulo arithmetic on the circular buffer. This separation enables Carbon to handle protocol complexity while Whisper focuses on efficient storage, with no direct user-facing API — all writes flow through Carbon.
Unique: Delegates protocol handling to Carbon while Whisper focuses purely on storage, using timestamp-based modulo arithmetic for O(1) write routing without index lookups — enabling high-throughput ingestion without database overhead
vs alternatives: Simpler write path than InfluxDB (no query parsing, no schema validation at storage layer) but less flexible than Prometheus (no built-in scraping, requires external metric collection)
Whisper provides a read interface consumed by Graphite-web to retrieve time-series data for graph rendering and API responses. Queries specify metric name and time range, and Whisper maps the time range to storage offsets in the circular buffer, reading only the relevant data without scanning the entire file. Graphite-web handles query parsing, metric pattern matching, and result formatting (PNG, CSV, JSON, XML), while Whisper provides the low-level storage retrieval. This separation enables Graphite-web to support complex queries (wildcards, functions, aggregations) without Whisper needing to understand query semantics.
Unique: Provides time-range-based retrieval using circular buffer offset calculation, enabling efficient reads without index structures — Graphite-web handles all query complexity, keeping Whisper focused on fast storage access
vs alternatives: Simpler query interface than InfluxDB (no query language, no server-side aggregation) but requires external tool (Graphite-web) for complex queries, whereas Prometheus includes query language in storage layer
Whisper requires upfront schema definition specifying retention policies (how long to keep data at each resolution) and aggregation functions (how to downsample data between tiers). Schema is typically defined in a configuration file (storage-schemas.conf) that maps metric name patterns to retention/aggregation rules, which Carbon uses to create Whisper database files with matching structure. Once created, schema is immutable — changing retention or aggregation requires recreating the database file and losing historical data. This design trades flexibility for predictability: storage footprint and query performance are determined at schema definition time.
Unique: Requires upfront schema definition with immutable retention/aggregation configuration, enabling deterministic storage allocation and performance but requiring careful planning — unlike dynamic schema systems (InfluxDB, Prometheus) that adapt to incoming data
vs alternatives: Provides predictable storage costs and performance through schema-driven design, whereas Prometheus and InfluxDB require active management of retention policies and cardinality limits to prevent unbounded growth
Whisper stores each metric as a single binary file on disk containing a header (metadata about retention tiers and aggregation) followed by pre-allocated round-robin buffers. Files are created at metric creation time with full size allocated upfront, eliminating fragmentation and enabling direct offset calculation for reads/writes. The binary format is compact and uncompressed, optimized for sequential access patterns typical of time-series workloads. No indexing structures are maintained — metric discovery relies on filesystem directory scanning, making Whisper suitable for systems with moderate metric cardinality (thousands to tens of thousands) but not billions of unique metrics.
Unique: Uses single-file-per-metric design with pre-allocated binary storage and no indexing, enabling O(1) offset calculation for reads/writes but requiring filesystem-level metric discovery — simpler than database systems but less scalable than indexed storage
vs alternatives: Simpler operational model than InfluxDB or Prometheus (no compaction, no WAL management) but less efficient for high-cardinality metrics (billions of unique series) where filesystem overhead becomes prohibitive
Breaks text into individual sentences using a pluggable SentenceTokenizer component that handles edge cases like abbreviations, ellipses, and decimal points. The tokenizer uses pattern-based rules and optional NLTK integration to identify sentence boundaries without requiring external API calls, enabling offline processing of large text volumes.
Unique: Uses a pluggable SentenceTokenizer interface (per DeepWiki architecture) allowing swappable implementations (NLTK-based or pattern-based) without changing user code, combined with lazy evaluation of Sentence objects to defer POS tagging until accessed
vs alternatives: Simpler and more Pythonic than raw NLTK sentence tokenization while maintaining offline capability unlike spaCy's dependency on pre-trained models
Tokenizes text into individual words using a WordTokenizer component that preserves contractions, handles punctuation attachment, and creates Word objects with lazy-loaded morphological properties. The architecture defers expensive operations like lemmatization and inflection until explicitly accessed, reducing memory overhead for large texts.
Unique: Word objects are lazy-evaluated with on-demand morphological properties (lemma, singularize, pluralize) backed by the Pattern library, avoiding upfront computation of all morphological forms for every word in a document
vs alternatives: More memory-efficient than spaCy for word tokenization on large texts because it defers morphological analysis, and more Pythonic than NLTK's word_tokenize with built-in Word object methods
Provides a hierarchical object model where TextBlob contains Sentences, which contain Words, enabling intuitive navigation and analysis at multiple granularities. Users can access text at document, sentence, or word level through nested object properties, with each level providing relevant methods (e.g., .sentiment on TextBlob/Sentence, .lemma on Word). The architecture maintains bidirectional references between levels, enabling context-aware analysis.
textblob scores higher at 30/100 vs whisper at 20/100.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
Unique: Implements a hierarchical class structure (TextBlob → Sentence → Word) with intuitive property access at each level, enabling multi-granularity analysis through nested object navigation rather than manual string indexing or span tracking
vs alternatives: More intuitive than spaCy's token-based model because it preserves sentence boundaries as first-class objects, and more Pythonic than NLTK's tuple-based representations because it uses object properties instead of index access
Assigns grammatical parts of speech (noun, verb, adjective, etc.) to each word using a pluggable POS tagger component with multiple implementations: NLTKTagger (using NLTK's averaged perceptron model) and PatternTagger (using Pattern library's rules). The architecture allows runtime selection of taggers and custom implementations via dependency injection, enabling trade-offs between accuracy and speed.
Unique: Implements a pluggable tagger interface (per DeepWiki component system) allowing NLTKTagger and PatternTagger to be swapped at runtime via Blobber factory configuration, with lazy evaluation of tags only when .tags property is accessed on a Sentence
vs alternatives: More flexible than spaCy's fixed tagger because you can choose between speed (Pattern) and accuracy (NLTK) at runtime, and simpler than NLTK's direct API with Pythonic .tags property access
Extracts noun phrases (multi-word noun groups like 'the quick brown fox') from sentences using pluggable NP extractor components: FastNPExtractor (pattern-based using POS tag sequences) and ConllExtractor (statistical model trained on CoNLL data). The extractors operate on POS-tagged text and identify contiguous noun phrase chunks based on grammar patterns or learned models.
Unique: Provides two pluggable NP extractor implementations (FastNPExtractor and ConllExtractor) that can be swapped via Blobber configuration, with FastNPExtractor using hand-crafted POS tag regex patterns for speed and ConllExtractor using statistical sequence labeling for accuracy
vs alternatives: More accessible than spaCy's noun_chunks because it offers pattern-based extraction for quick prototyping, and more flexible than NLTK's ne_chunk because you can choose extraction strategy at runtime
Analyzes the emotional tone of text by computing two independent scores: polarity (ranging from -1.0 for negative to +1.0 for positive) and subjectivity (ranging from 0.0 for objective to 1.0 for subjective). The implementation uses a lexicon-based approach backed by the Pattern library, which maintains a dictionary of words with pre-computed sentiment scores and aggregates them across the text with optional intensity modifiers (negation, intensifiers).
Unique: Uses Pattern library's pre-computed sentiment lexicon with word-level polarity and subjectivity scores, aggregating them across the text with intensity modifiers (negation flips sign, intensifiers scale magnitude), avoiding the need for external APIs or model downloads
vs alternatives: Faster and more transparent than transformer-based sentiment models (BERT, RoBERTa) because it uses lexicon lookup instead of neural inference, and requires no model downloads or GPU; more accurate than simple keyword matching because it handles negation and intensifiers
Transforms words between different morphological forms (singular/plural, base/past tense, comparative/superlative) using rule-based morphological operations backed by the Pattern library. The Word class provides methods like .singularize(), .pluralize(), .lemmatize() that apply linguistic rules and exception dictionaries to generate correct inflected forms without requiring a full morphological analyzer.
Unique: Implements morphological transformations as methods on Word objects (singularize, pluralize, lemmatize) using Pattern library's rule-based system with exception dictionaries, enabling lazy evaluation and chaining of transformations without external API calls
vs alternatives: Simpler and faster than spaCy's lemmatization because it uses rule-based morphology instead of statistical models, and more accessible than NLTK's WordNetLemmatizer because it provides both lemmatization and inflection in a single interface
Corrects misspelled words by generating candidate corrections using edit distance (Levenshtein distance) and ranking them by word frequency in a reference corpus. The correct() method operates on TextBlob or Sentence objects and replaces misspelled words with the highest-ranked correction, using a pre-built frequency dictionary to prefer common words over rare ones.
Unique: Uses edit distance (Levenshtein) to generate candidate corrections and ranks them by word frequency from a pre-built corpus, avoiding the need for language models or external spell-check APIs while maintaining reasonable accuracy for common misspellings
vs alternatives: Faster and more transparent than neural spell-checkers because it uses edit distance heuristics instead of model inference, and more accessible than NLTK's spell-checking because it's built into the TextBlob API
+3 more capabilities