langsmith vs Supermaven — Comparison | Unfragile

langsmith vs Supermaven

Supermaven ranks higher at 71/100 vs langsmith at 27/100. Capability-level comparison backed by match graph evidence from real search data.

langsmith

Framework

/ 100

Free

Supermaven

Extension

/ 100

Free

From $10/mo

Feature	langsmith	Supermaven
Type	Framework	Extension
UnfragileRank	27/100	71/100
Adoption	0	1
Quality	0

langsmith Capabilities

decorator-based function tracing with @traceable

Automatically instruments Python functions and async coroutines with distributed tracing via the @traceable decorator, which wraps function execution to capture inputs, outputs, latency, and errors as hierarchical run records sent to LangSmith. The decorator uses Python's functools.wraps and async context managers to maintain execution context without modifying function signatures, supporting both sync and async functions with automatic parent-child run linking via context variables.

Unique: Uses Python context variables (contextvars) to maintain implicit parent-child run relationships across async boundaries without explicit run ID threading, combined with automatic serialization of function signatures and return types to JSON for platform ingestion.

vs alternatives: Simpler than manual RunTree management and less intrusive than OpenTelemetry instrumentation, while providing LangSmith-native run linking without external tracing infrastructure.

manual run tree construction and management via runtree

Provides a RunTree class for explicit, hierarchical tracing of execution flows where developers manually create parent and child run nodes, set inputs/outputs, and manage run lifecycle (create, update, end). RunTree supports both sync and async contexts, handles batched persistence to LangSmith via background threads, and enables fine-grained control over run metadata, tags, and custom fields for complex workflows that don't fit decorator patterns.

Unique: Implements a tree-based run model where each node is independently updateable and can have multiple children, with background batching via internal queue that defers persistence to avoid blocking application code, supporting both sync and async contexts via language-specific concurrency primitives.

vs alternatives: More flexible than decorator-based tracing for non-function workflows, and more lightweight than full OpenTelemetry instrumentation while still providing structured run hierarchy.

opentelemetry integration for standards-based observability

Provides optional OpenTelemetry (OTEL) integration that exports LangSmith traces to OTEL-compatible backends (Jaeger, Datadog, New Relic), enabling LLM traces to be correlated with infrastructure metrics and logs. Integration is opt-in via environment variables (OTEL_EXPORTER_OTLP_ENDPOINT) and automatically bridges LangSmith run metadata to OTEL span attributes, supporting both Python and JavaScript SDKs.

Unique: Implements optional OTEL bridge that automatically converts LangSmith runs to OTEL spans and exports to configured backends, enabling LLM traces to be correlated with infrastructure observability without duplicate instrumentation.

vs alternatives: Enables LLM tracing to integrate with existing OTEL infrastructure, avoiding vendor lock-in while maintaining LangSmith-native features.

prompt management and versioning via client api

Provides Client methods (create_prompt, get_prompt, list_prompts) to store, version, and retrieve prompt templates in LangSmith, enabling teams to manage prompts as first-class artifacts with version history and metadata. Prompts are stored server-side with optional tags and descriptions, supporting retrieval by name or ID, enabling prompt experimentation and A/B testing without code changes.

Unique: Implements prompts as versioned server-side resources with metadata and tags, enabling teams to manage prompt evolution without code changes and retrieve specific versions by ID.

vs alternatives: More integrated than external prompt management tools and more flexible than hardcoded prompts, providing LangSmith-native versioning without additional infrastructure.

automatic llm provider wrapping (openai, anthropic)

Provides pre-built wrapper functions (wrap_openai, wrap_anthropic) that intercept API calls to popular LLM providers, automatically capturing request/response payloads, token counts, and model metadata as LangSmith runs without modifying application code. Wrappers patch the provider's client classes at runtime, extracting structured data from API responses and linking runs to parent execution context via context variables.

Unique: Uses runtime monkey-patching of provider client methods combined with context variable inheritance to automatically link LLM calls to parent runs without requiring explicit run ID threading, extracting structured metadata from provider-specific response objects.

vs alternatives: Simpler than manual instrumentation and more provider-specific than generic OpenTelemetry, providing automatic token counting and cost tracking without application code changes.

dataset creation and example management

Provides Client methods (create_dataset, create_example, list_examples) to programmatically build and manage test datasets in LangSmith, storing input-output pairs with optional metadata and tags. Datasets are versioned collections of examples that serve as ground truth for evaluation runs, supporting batch example creation via list operations and lazy-loaded pagination for large datasets.

Unique: Implements datasets as first-class LangSmith resources with server-side storage and versioning, supporting lazy-loaded pagination and batch example creation, enabling datasets to be shared across multiple evaluation runs and experiments without duplication.

vs alternatives: More integrated than external CSV/JSON storage and more flexible than hardcoded test cases, providing centralized dataset management with LangSmith-native versioning and reusability.

evaluation framework with runevaluator and experimentmanager

Provides an evaluation system where RunEvaluator classes score LLM outputs against ground truth examples, and ExperimentManager orchestrates batch evaluation runs across datasets. Evaluators implement a standard interface (evaluate method) that accepts run data and returns structured scores, supporting both synchronous and asynchronous evaluation logic. The framework batches evaluations, tracks results per example, and aggregates metrics for comparison across model versions.

Unique: Implements a pluggable evaluator interface where custom scoring logic is decoupled from orchestration, with ExperimentManager handling batching, result aggregation, and storage, enabling evaluators to be reused across multiple datasets and model versions.

vs alternatives: More flexible than hardcoded evaluation scripts and more integrated than external evaluation tools, providing LangSmith-native result tracking and comparison without data export.

asynchronous client with concurrent batch operations

Provides AsyncClient class that implements all Client operations (create_run, update_run, list_runs, create_dataset, etc.) as async/await coroutines, enabling concurrent execution of multiple API calls without blocking. Uses Python's asyncio library with connection pooling (httpx.AsyncClient) to efficiently handle high-throughput tracing and evaluation workloads, with automatic retry logic and exponential backoff for transient failures.

Unique: Mirrors the synchronous Client API exactly but uses asyncio and httpx.AsyncClient for non-blocking I/O, with automatic connection pooling and retry logic, enabling high-throughput tracing without thread overhead.

vs alternatives: More efficient than threading-based concurrency for I/O-bound operations, and more ergonomic than manual asyncio.gather() calls by providing a consistent async API.

+4 more capabilities

Supermaven Capabilities

codebase-aware inline code completion with 1m token context window

Generates single-line and multi-line code suggestions in real-time as developers type, using semantic indexing of the entire codebase to retrieve relevant type definitions, function signatures, and contextual patterns. The system maintains a 1M token context window (Pro/Team tiers) that enables suggestions informed by distant code definitions and cross-file dependencies, constructed via local codebase semantic search rather than simple token-based recency. Suggestions adapt to detected coding style on Pro/Team tiers through implicit pattern learning from recent edits.

Unique: 1M token context window with codebase-wide semantic indexing enables suggestions informed by distant code definitions and cross-file patterns, versus competitors (Copilot, Tabnine) that typically use fixed context windows (4K-32K tokens) or file-local context. Claimed 250ms latency suggests optimized retrieval pipeline, though indexing mechanism and performance at scale remain undisclosed.

vs alternatives: Larger context window than GitHub Copilot (8K-32K tokens) and faster latency than unnamed competitors (250ms vs 783ms claimed), enabling suggestions on large codebases with minimal typing delay; trade-off is cloud dependency and undisclosed free tier limitations.

multi-model conversational code chat with diff generation and application

Provides a separate chat interface supporting multiple LLM backends (GPT-4o, Claude 3.5 Sonnet, GPT-4, others) for conversational code assistance. Users attach files, reference recent edits, and trigger compiler diagnostic uploads; the system generates diffs and applies code changes directly to the editor. Model selection is per-conversation, and $5/month in credits (included in Pro/Team) covers external model API costs; overage pricing is undisclosed. Hotkey-driven workflow enables rapid context switching between inline completion and chat.

Unique: Multi-model chat interface with per-conversation model selection and integrated diff application, combined with compiler diagnostic auto-upload. Unlike Copilot Chat (single model per tier) or standalone ChatGPT, Supermaven Chat unifies multiple LLM backends in a single hotkey-driven workflow with direct editor integration for change application.

langsmith vs Supermaven

langsmith Capabilities

Supermaven Capabilities

Verdict

Company