| Ecosystem | 1 | 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Capabilities | 5 decomposed | 9 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
This capability allows users to define and invoke functions based on a schema that supports multiple providers, such as OpenAI and Anthropic. It utilizes a registry pattern to manage function definitions and their associated metadata, enabling seamless integration and invocation of external APIs. This design choice allows for flexibility and extensibility, accommodating various service providers without significant changes to the core architecture.
Unique: Utilizes a schema-based approach to manage function definitions, allowing for easy integration of new providers without altering existing code.
vs alternatives: More flexible than traditional API wrappers, enabling dynamic function invocation across multiple AI models.
This capability manages the context and state across multiple function calls, ensuring that each call has access to relevant data from previous interactions. It employs a context management pattern that stores state information in memory, allowing for a more coherent and context-aware interaction with APIs. This design choice enhances the user experience by maintaining continuity across calls.
Unique: Implements a session-based context management system that retains state across multiple function calls, enhancing interaction continuity.
vs alternatives: Offers a more robust context management solution compared to simpler stateless function calls.
This capability allows for the dynamic resolution of API endpoints based on user-defined parameters or conditions. It uses a routing pattern that evaluates incoming requests and determines the appropriate API to call based on the context or input data. This flexibility enables developers to create adaptive applications that can switch between different services seamlessly.
Unique: Employs a routing mechanism that evaluates conditions at runtime to determine the appropriate API endpoint, enhancing flexibility.
vs alternatives: More adaptable than static API configurations, allowing for real-time decision-making based on user input.
This capability enables the processing and transformation of data across various formats, such as JSON, XML, and CSV. It utilizes a data transformation pipeline that converts input data into the required format for API calls or internal processing. This design choice allows for seamless integration with different data sources and enhances the versatility of the application.
Unique: Utilizes a modular transformation pipeline that can easily adapt to various data formats, enhancing integration capabilities.
vs alternatives: More versatile than single-format processors, allowing for seamless handling of multiple data types.
This capability provides real-time monitoring and logging of API interactions and system performance. It employs a logging framework that captures relevant metrics and events, allowing developers to track the health and performance of their applications. This design choice facilitates proactive troubleshooting and performance optimization.
Unique: Integrates a comprehensive logging framework that captures real-time metrics and events, enhancing visibility into application performance.
vs alternatives: More detailed than basic logging solutions, providing real-time insights into system health and performance.
Executes SQL queries against Supabase PostgreSQL instances through the Model Context Protocol, translating natural language or structured query requests into parameterized SQL statements. Uses MCP's tool-calling interface to expose database operations as callable functions with schema validation, enabling LLM agents to perform CRUD operations, joins, and aggregations with automatic connection pooling and credential management through Supabase client SDK.
Unique: Exposes Supabase PostgreSQL as MCP tools with automatic credential injection from Supabase client SDK, eliminating manual connection string management and enabling seamless LLM-to-database queries within Claude or compatible agents
vs alternatives: Tighter integration than generic SQL MCP servers because it leverages Supabase's built-in authentication and connection pooling rather than requiring separate database credential configuration
Exposes Supabase Auth session state and user metadata through MCP tools, allowing agents to inspect current authentication context, retrieve user profiles, and trigger auth-related operations. Integrates with Supabase's JWT-based auth system to validate sessions and access user claims without re-authenticating, using the Supabase client's built-in session management.
Unique: Integrates Supabase's JWT-based auth system directly into MCP tool interface, allowing agents to inspect and act on auth state without managing separate credential stores or re-authentication flows
vs alternatives: More seamless than generic auth MCP servers because it leverages Supabase's built-in session management and avoids redundant credential passing between agent and auth system
Invokes Supabase Edge Functions (serverless TypeScript/JavaScript functions) through MCP tools, passing parameters and receiving results with optional streaming support. Uses Supabase's edge function HTTP API to trigger functions with automatic authentication headers and response parsing, enabling agents to execute custom business logic without embedding it in the agent itself.
Supabase scores higher at 42/100 vs plantops-mcp-2 at 24/100. plantops-mcp-2 leads on ecosystem, while Supabase is stronger on quality.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
Unique: Exposes Supabase Edge Functions as MCP tools with automatic authentication and response parsing, allowing agents to invoke custom serverless logic without managing HTTP clients or credential injection
vs alternatives: More integrated than generic HTTP MCP tools because it handles Supabase-specific authentication, error handling, and response formatting automatically
Subscribes to real-time changes on Supabase tables through MCP's event streaming interface, using Supabase's PostgreSQL LISTEN/NOTIFY mechanism to push INSERT, UPDATE, and DELETE events to agents. Maintains persistent WebSocket connections and filters events by table and row-level policies, enabling agents to react to database changes without polling.
Unique: Bridges Supabase's PostgreSQL LISTEN/NOTIFY real-time system with MCP's tool interface, enabling agents to subscribe to database changes without managing WebSocket connections or event serialization
vs alternatives: More efficient than polling-based approaches because it uses Supabase's native real-time infrastructure rather than repeated database queries
Manages files in Supabase Storage buckets through MCP tools, supporting upload, download, list, and delete operations with automatic authentication and path-based access control. Uses Supabase's S3-compatible storage API with built-in support for public/private buckets and signed URLs for temporary access, enabling agents to handle file I/O without managing cloud storage credentials.
Unique: Exposes Supabase Storage's S3-compatible API as MCP tools with automatic authentication and signed URL generation, eliminating the need for agents to manage cloud storage credentials or generate temporary access tokens
vs alternatives: More integrated than generic S3 MCP tools because it leverages Supabase's built-in bucket policies and authentication rather than requiring separate AWS credentials
Performs semantic similarity searches on vector embeddings stored in Supabase PostgreSQL using pgvector extension, translating natural language queries into embedding vectors and executing cosine/L2 distance searches. Integrates with embedding providers (OpenAI, Cohere) or uses pre-computed embeddings, enabling agents to retrieve semantically similar documents or records without full-text search limitations.
Unique: Integrates pgvector directly into MCP tools with automatic embedding generation and distance calculation, enabling agents to perform semantic search without managing separate vector database infrastructure
vs alternatives: More efficient than external vector databases (Pinecone, Weaviate) for Supabase users because it colocates embeddings with relational data, reducing network latency and simplifying data synchronization
Exposes Supabase database schema information through MCP tools, allowing agents to discover table structures, column types, constraints, and relationships without manual schema documentation. Queries PostgreSQL information_schema and Supabase metadata tables to dynamically generate schema descriptions, enabling agents to construct valid queries and understand data relationships.
Unique: Queries Supabase's PostgreSQL information_schema directly through MCP tools, enabling agents to dynamically discover and adapt to database schemas without pre-configured schema definitions
vs alternatives: More flexible than static schema definitions because it reflects live database state, including recent migrations or schema changes
Enforces Supabase Row-Level Security policies within agent queries, ensuring that agents can only access rows permitted by RLS rules defined in the database. Evaluates policies based on authenticated user context (JWT claims, user ID) and applies WHERE clause filters automatically, preventing unauthorized data access at the database layer rather than application layer.
Unique: Delegates authorization enforcement to PostgreSQL RLS policies rather than implementing authorization in agent code, ensuring that data access rules are centralized and cannot be bypassed by agent logic
vs alternatives: More secure than application-level authorization because RLS is enforced at the database layer, preventing accidental data leaks even if agent code has bugs
+1 more capabilities