| Ecosystem |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Paid | Paid |
| Capabilities | 11 decomposed | 14 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Converts natural language questions into executable smart contract queries using LLM-based semantic parsing and contract ABI schema mapping. The system analyzes user intent, maps it to contract function signatures, and generates optimized query parameters without requiring developers to write low-level blockchain code. This reduces friction for Web3 developers unfamiliar with contract ABIs and RPC call semantics.
Unique: Uses contract ABI schema-aware LLM prompting with parameter validation against function signatures, ensuring generated queries are syntactically valid before execution — unlike generic LLM-to-SQL approaches that require post-hoc validation
vs alternatives: Faster developer onboarding than The Graph's GraphQL schema learning curve, and more flexible than hardcoded query templates since it adapts to arbitrary contract ABIs
Maintains a distributed cache of frequently-accessed blockchain state (balances, allowances, contract storage) with automatic invalidation on new block finality. Uses event-driven architecture to subscribe to contract logs and update cached state incrementally rather than re-scanning the entire chain. Implements multi-level caching (in-memory, Redis, persistent) with configurable TTLs to balance freshness vs query latency.
Unique: Event-driven incremental indexing with multi-level cache hierarchy (in-memory → Redis → persistent) and automatic reorg detection, rather than full-chain rescans like traditional RPC-based approaches or static snapshot indexing like The Graph
vs alternatives: Significantly faster query response times than direct RPC calls (10-100x improvement), and more cost-effective than running dedicated indexing nodes while maintaining real-time freshness guarantees
Maintains immutable audit logs of all blockchain data queries and modifications, tracking who accessed what data, when, and for what purpose. Links query results back to source transactions and blocks, enabling data lineage tracing. Integrates with compliance frameworks (SOX, HIPAA) to generate audit reports for regulatory purposes.
Unique: Immutable audit logs with data lineage tracing back to source transactions and compliance report generation, rather than basic query logging or manual audit trail maintenance
vs alternatives: Provides regulatory-grade audit trails that raw blockchain data access lacks, and automates compliance reporting that would otherwise require manual effort
Validates zero-knowledge proofs embedded in blockchain transactions to verify sensitive data (private balances, confidential transactions) without exposing the underlying plaintext. Implements proof verification circuits compatible with major ZK frameworks (Circom, Cairo, Noir) and validates proofs against on-chain commitment roots. Enables querying encrypted blockchain state while maintaining cryptographic privacy guarantees.
Unique: Integrates multiple ZK proof verification backends (Groth16, PLONK, custom circuits) with on-chain commitment validation, enabling privacy-preserving queries across heterogeneous ZK protocols rather than single-protocol support
vs alternatives: Enables privacy-preserving analytics on encrypted blockchain data that traditional indexers like The Graph cannot access, while maintaining cryptographic guarantees stronger than application-level encryption
Applies declarative validation rules to blockchain data before returning query results, ensuring type correctness, value bounds, and business logic invariants. Uses a schema definition language to specify expected data types, ranges, and relationships across contract state. Validates decoded contract storage and function outputs against these schemas, catching data corruption or contract bugs before they propagate to applications.
Unique: Declarative schema-based validation with automatic type binding generation for multiple languages, combined with on-chain state verification — unlike generic JSON schema validators that lack blockchain-specific invariant checking
vs alternatives: Catches contract state anomalies that raw RPC queries would miss, and provides stronger guarantees than application-level validation by validating at the data ingestion layer
Abstracts away chain-specific differences (RPC endpoints, block times, finality rules) and provides a unified query interface across Ethereum, Polygon, Arbitrum, Optimism, and other EVM chains. Handles chain-specific quirks (different block confirmation times, reorg depths) transparently and returns results with consistent schemas. Supports cross-chain state queries by coordinating requests across multiple chains and merging results.
Unique: Unified query abstraction with automatic chain-specific RPC routing and result schema normalization, handling finality and reorg semantics per-chain rather than exposing raw RPC differences to applications
vs alternatives: Eliminates boilerplate for multi-chain applications compared to managing separate RPC connections, and provides more consistent semantics than chain-specific indexers like The Graph (which requires separate subgraphs per chain)
Analyzes incoming queries and recommends optimizations (batching, caching, index selection) to minimize RPC calls and associated costs. Estimates gas costs and RPC provider fees before query execution and suggests alternative query patterns with lower costs. Uses historical query patterns and chain state analysis to predict optimal execution strategies.
Unique: Combines query analysis with RPC provider pricing models and historical execution patterns to generate cost-aware optimization recommendations, rather than generic query optimization that ignores blockchain-specific economics
vs alternatives: Provides cost visibility and optimization that raw RPC calls lack, and more accurate estimates than generic database query planners since it understands blockchain-specific cost drivers (block finality, reorg handling)
Stores sensitive blockchain metadata (private keys, transaction signing data, user identifiers) in encrypted vaults with encryption-at-rest and encryption-in-transit. Uses envelope encryption with key derivation from user credentials, ensuring PublicAI cannot access plaintext data. Integrates with hardware security modules (HSMs) for key management in enterprise deployments.
Unique: Envelope encryption with user-controlled key derivation and optional HSM integration, ensuring PublicAI cannot access plaintext even with database compromise — unlike application-level encryption that requires key management by users
vs alternatives: Provides stronger security guarantees than unencrypted storage, and more operational simplicity than client-side encryption since encryption/decryption is handled transparently by PublicAI
+3 more capabilities
Automatically loads and parses documents from diverse sources (PDFs, Word docs, HTML, Markdown, code files, databases) into a unified in-memory representation using format-specific loaders and node-based document abstractions. Each document is decomposed into Document objects containing metadata, content, and relationships, enabling downstream processing without format-specific handling in application code.
Unique: Provides a unified loader abstraction (BaseReader interface) that normalizes 100+ data source connectors into a single Document/Node API, eliminating format-specific branching logic in application code. Loaders are composable and chainable, allowing sequential transformations (e.g., load → split → extract metadata → embed).
vs alternatives: Broader out-of-the-box loader coverage than LangChain's document loaders and more structured node-based decomposition than raw text splitting, reducing boilerplate for multi-source RAG pipelines.
Splits documents into semantically coherent chunks using multiple strategies (character-based, token-aware, recursive, semantic) with configurable overlap and chunk size. Preserves document hierarchy and metadata through a node tree structure, enabling retrieval systems to maintain context relationships and enable hierarchical re-ranking or parent-document retrieval patterns.
Unique: Implements a node-tree abstraction that preserves document hierarchy and enables parent-document retrieval patterns. Supports multiple splitting strategies (recursive, semantic, code-aware) with pluggable custom splitters, and automatically propagates metadata through the node tree.
vs alternatives: More sophisticated than LangChain's text splitters because it preserves hierarchical relationships and supports semantic splitting; better for complex document structures than simple character-based splitting.
PublicAI scores higher at 44/100 vs LlamaIndex at 40/100.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
Processes documents containing mixed content (text, images, tables, code) by extracting and understanding each modality separately, then synthesizing information across modalities. Uses vision models for image understanding, specialized parsers for tables and code, and integrates results into a unified document representation for retrieval and generation.
Unique: Integrates vision models, table parsers, and code extractors into a unified multi-modal document processing pipeline that synthesizes information across modalities. Preserves modality-specific structure (table schemas, code formatting) while enabling cross-modal retrieval and generation.
vs alternatives: More comprehensive multi-modal support than text-only RAG; built-in vision integration reduces boilerplate for document understanding compared to manual vision API calls.
Enables streaming of LLM responses token-by-token and real-time retrieval updates, allowing applications to display partial results as they become available. Supports streaming from retrieval (progressive document discovery) and generation (token-by-token output) with backpressure handling and cancellation support for responsive user experiences.
Unique: Provides first-class streaming support for both retrieval and generation with automatic backpressure handling and cancellation. Enables progressive result display without custom async/streaming code in application layer.
vs alternatives: More integrated streaming support than manual LLM API streaming; built-in retrieval streaming and backpressure handling reduce complexity compared to custom streaming implementations.
Tracks API costs for LLM calls, embeddings, and other operations with per-query and per-session cost attribution. Provides cost optimization recommendations (e.g., batch processing, model selection, caching) and enables cost-aware query planning to balance quality and expense. Integrates with multiple LLM providers to normalize cost tracking across models.
Unique: Provides automatic cost tracking across multiple LLM providers with per-query attribution and cost optimization recommendations. Integrates with query execution to enable cost-aware planning without manual cost calculation.
vs alternatives: More integrated cost tracking than manual API billing review; built-in optimization recommendations reduce guesswork for cost reduction.
Enables building custom RAG pipelines by composing modular components (retrievers, synthesizers, agents, tools) through a declarative or programmatic API. Supports complex workflows with branching, loops, and conditional logic, with automatic dependency resolution and execution optimization. Pipelines are reusable, testable, and can be deployed as APIs or batch jobs.
Unique: Provides a flexible pipeline composition API supporting both declarative and programmatic definitions, with automatic dependency resolution and execution optimization. Enables complex workflows with branching and conditional logic without custom orchestration code.
vs alternatives: More flexible pipeline composition than fixed RAG architectures; better workflow support than manual component chaining.
Generates embeddings for documents/nodes using pluggable embedding providers (OpenAI, Hugging Face, local models) and stores them in a unified vector store interface that abstracts over multiple backends (Pinecone, Weaviate, Milvus, FAISS, Chroma, etc.). The abstraction layer enables switching vector stores without changing application code, and handles batching, retry logic, and metadata indexing.
Unique: Provides a unified VectorStore interface that abstracts 10+ vector database backends, enabling zero-code switching between providers. Handles embedding batching, retry logic, and metadata propagation automatically. Supports both cloud and local embedding models through a pluggable EmbedModel interface.
vs alternatives: Broader vector store coverage and more seamless provider switching than LangChain's vectorstore integrations; better abstraction consistency across backends than using raw vector store SDKs directly.
Retrieves semantically similar documents from vector stores using embedding-based similarity search, with optional re-ranking, filtering, and fusion strategies (hybrid search combining dense and sparse retrieval). Supports multiple retrieval modes (similarity, MMR, fusion) and enables custom retrieval logic through a pluggable Retriever interface that can combine multiple strategies.
Unique: Implements a pluggable Retriever abstraction supporting multiple retrieval strategies (similarity, MMR, fusion, custom) that can be composed and chained. Built-in support for re-ranking via LLM or cross-encoder, and hybrid search combining dense and sparse retrieval without custom integration code.
vs alternatives: More flexible retrieval composition than LangChain's retrievers; built-in re-ranking and fusion strategies reduce boilerplate for advanced retrieval pipelines.
+6 more capabilities