PromptLoop vs Power Query
Side-by-side comparison to help you choose.
| Feature | PromptLoop | Power Query |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Product | Product |
| UnfragileRank | 28/100 | 32/100 |
| Adoption | 0 | 0 |
| Quality | 0 | 1 |
| Ecosystem | 0 |
| 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Free | Paid |
| Capabilities | 11 decomposed | 18 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Executes LLM API calls directly within spreadsheet cells using a custom formula syntax (e.g., =PROMPTLOOP(prompt, model, parameters)), enabling users to process entire columns of data through language models without leaving their spreadsheet application. The system maintains bidirectional data binding between cells and API responses, automatically handling rate limiting, retry logic, and result caching to prevent duplicate API calls on formula recalculation.
Unique: Implements LLM execution as native spreadsheet formulas with automatic result caching and retry logic, eliminating the need for users to learn APIs or switch applications—the spreadsheet itself becomes the orchestration layer
vs alternatives: Faster context-switching than Zapier/Make (no workflow builder UI) and more accessible than Python scripts, but slower than dedicated batch processing APIs due to per-cell execution overhead
Abstracts API differences across OpenAI, Anthropic, Cohere, and other LLM providers through a unified parameter interface, allowing users to swap models (GPT-4, Claude, Command) within spreadsheet formulas without rewriting prompts or handling provider-specific authentication. The system translates common parameters (temperature, max_tokens, top_p) to provider-native formats and manages separate API keys per provider, enabling cost optimization by routing requests to the cheapest available model.
Unique: Implements a thin abstraction layer that translates unified parameter syntax to provider-native APIs, enabling model swapping without formula changes—similar to ORM patterns in databases but for LLM providers
vs alternatives: More flexible than single-provider tools (Copilot, ChatGPT) but less feature-complete than dedicated multi-provider frameworks (LangChain) due to spreadsheet formula constraints
Allows users to define custom functions (e.g., SENTIMENT_ANALYSIS, ENTITY_EXTRACTION) that encapsulate a prompt template, model selection, and output parsing logic. These functions can be reused across multiple spreadsheets and shared with team members, reducing duplication and enabling consistent prompt logic across projects. Functions support parameter binding, allowing callers to override specific aspects (model, temperature, output schema) without modifying the underlying prompt.
Unique: Implements user-defined functions as first-class abstractions in spreadsheets, enabling prompt logic encapsulation and reuse without requiring programming knowledge
vs alternatives: More accessible than LangChain's custom tools or OpenAI's custom GPTs but less flexible than general-purpose programming functions which support arbitrary logic and composition
Supports parameterized prompt templates using placeholder syntax (e.g., {{column_name}}, {{A1}}) that dynamically inject spreadsheet cell values into prompts at execution time. The system parses template strings, validates that referenced cells exist, and performs string interpolation before sending the final prompt to the LLM API, enabling reusable prompt patterns across multiple rows without manual editing.
Unique: Implements lightweight template substitution directly in spreadsheet formulas using cell references, avoiding the need for external template engines while maintaining spreadsheet-native data binding
vs alternatives: Simpler than Jinja2 or Handlebars templating but less powerful; more accessible to non-programmers than prompt frameworks like LangChain's PromptTemplate
Queues multiple LLM API calls triggered by spreadsheet formulas and executes them with configurable rate limiting (e.g., max 10 requests/second) and exponential backoff retry logic to handle transient API failures. The system tracks request state (pending, success, failed, retrying) per cell and prevents duplicate API calls if a formula is recalculated, using content-based deduplication to identify identical requests.
Unique: Implements transparent batch queuing and retry logic at the spreadsheet formula level, hiding API complexity from users while maintaining cell-level visibility into request state
vs alternatives: More user-friendly than raw API batch endpoints (no JSON formatting required) but less sophisticated than dedicated job orchestration systems (Temporal, Airflow) which offer fine-grained control and observability
Caches LLM API responses at the cell level using a content hash of the prompt as the cache key, preventing redundant API calls when formulas are recalculated or spreadsheets are reopened. Users can manually invalidate cache entries per cell or globally, and the system tracks cache hit/miss rates to show cost savings. Cache is persisted in PromptLoop's backend, not in the spreadsheet itself, enabling cache sharing across users editing the same sheet.
Unique: Implements transparent, content-addressed caching at the spreadsheet cell level with backend persistence, enabling cache sharing across users without requiring explicit cache management
vs alternatives: More convenient than manual result storage (copy-paste) but less flexible than application-level caching (Redis, Memcached) which supports TTL, invalidation policies, and distributed cache invalidation
Accepts a JSON schema definition from the user and validates LLM responses against that schema, extracting structured fields (e.g., sentiment, confidence, entities) from unstructured LLM output. The system uses schema-based prompting techniques (e.g., appending schema to the prompt or using function calling APIs) to encourage the LLM to output valid JSON, then parses and validates the response, returning individual fields as separate cell values or a single JSON object.
Unique: Integrates JSON schema validation directly into spreadsheet formulas, enabling structured data extraction without requiring users to write parsing logic or handle JSON manually
vs alternatives: More accessible than regex-based parsing or custom Python scripts but less flexible than dedicated data extraction tools (Zapier, Make) which support multiple output formats and error recovery strategies
Tracks API costs for each LLM call (based on token counts and provider pricing) and aggregates costs by model, provider, and time period. The system displays cost dashboards showing total spend, cost per row, and cost trends, enabling users to identify expensive operations and optimize spending. Cost data is tied to individual cells, allowing users to see which spreadsheet operations are most expensive.
Unique: Provides cell-level cost attribution and aggregation directly in spreadsheets, making API spending transparent without requiring external billing dashboards or manual cost calculation
vs alternatives: More granular than provider-native billing dashboards (which show account-level costs only) but less sophisticated than dedicated FinOps tools (Kubecost, CloudZero) which support complex cost allocation and chargeback models
+3 more capabilities
Construct data transformations through a visual, step-by-step interface without writing code. Users click through operations like filtering, sorting, and reshaping data, with each step automatically generating M language code in the background.
Automatically detect and assign appropriate data types (text, number, date, boolean) to columns based on content analysis. Reduces manual type-setting and catches data quality issues early.
Stack multiple datasets vertically to combine rows from different sources. Automatically aligns columns by name and handles mismatched schemas.
Split a single column into multiple columns based on delimiters, fixed widths, or patterns. Extracts structured data from unstructured text fields.
Convert data between wide and long formats. Pivot transforms rows into columns (aggregating values), while unpivot transforms columns into rows.
Identify and remove duplicate rows based on all columns or specific key columns. Keeps first or last occurrence based on user preference.
Detect, replace, and manage null or missing values in datasets. Options include removing rows, filling with defaults, or using formulas to impute values.
Power Query scores higher at 32/100 vs PromptLoop at 28/100. However, PromptLoop offers a free tier which may be better for getting started.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
Apply text operations like case conversion (upper, lower, proper), trimming whitespace, and text replacement. Standardizes text data for consistent analysis.
+10 more capabilities