| 0 |
| 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Capabilities | 15 decomposed | 17 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Executes the same prompt across multiple LLM providers (OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, AWS Bedrock, Ollama, local models) in parallel, collecting structured outputs with metadata (latency, token counts, cost). Uses a provider registry pattern with pluggable provider implementations that normalize API differences into a unified interface, enabling side-by-side comparison of model behavior on identical inputs.
Unique: Uses a pluggable provider registry pattern where each provider (OpenAI, Anthropic, Bedrock, Ollama, HTTP, Python scripts) implements a normalized interface, allowing new providers to be added without modifying core evaluation logic. Tracks cost per provider using model-specific pricing tables, enabling ROI analysis across providers.
vs alternatives: Broader provider support (10+ integrations including local models) and native cost tracking than competitors like LangSmith or Weights & Biases, with zero-config local execution via Ollama
Defines test assertions (exact match, similarity, regex, LLM-based grading) that automatically evaluate whether model outputs meet criteria. Supports custom evaluator functions (JavaScript, Python, HTTP webhooks) that receive the prompt, output, and test case metadata, returning a pass/fail score and optional details. Assertions are composable and can be chained to create complex evaluation logic without writing test harnesses.
Unique: Supports four distinct assertion types (exact, similarity, regex, LLM-rubric) plus arbitrary custom evaluators (JS functions, Python scripts, HTTP webhooks), allowing teams to mix deterministic checks with LLM-based subjective evaluation in a single test suite. Custom evaluators receive full test context (prompt, output, variables, metadata) enabling sophisticated domain-specific grading.
vs alternatives: More flexible assertion model than basic string matching in competitors; native support for LLM-as-judge grading without requiring separate evaluation pipeline setup
Stores evaluation results in local SQLite database or cloud storage (AWS S3, Google Cloud Storage, etc.), enabling historical tracking of prompt quality over time. Results include full metadata (prompt, model, variables, outputs, scores, latency, cost). Enables trend analysis (e.g., 'pass rate improved 5% over last month') and regression detection by comparing against previous baselines.
Unique: Stores evaluation results in local SQLite or cloud storage with full metadata (prompt, model, variables, outputs, scores, latency, cost). Enables historical tracking and trend analysis. Results can be queried to detect regressions by comparing against previous baselines.
vs alternatives: Integrated persistence (not a separate tool); supports both local and cloud storage; enables historical tracking and regression detection without external databases
Provides native integration with AWS Bedrock (Claude, Llama, Mistral models), Google Vertex AI, Azure OpenAI, and other cloud providers. Handles authentication (IAM roles, API keys), model selection, and parameter mapping. Enables teams to test against cloud-hosted models without writing custom provider code. Supports streaming responses for real-time output evaluation.
Unique: Native integration with AWS Bedrock, Google Vertex AI, and Azure OpenAI with support for cloud provider authentication (IAM roles). Handles model selection, parameter mapping, and streaming responses. Enables teams to test cloud-hosted models without custom integration code.
vs alternatives: Broader cloud provider support than competitors; native IAM role support for better security; integrated streaming response handling
Executes Python scripts (3.7+) and Node.js scripts (18+) as providers, passing prompt and variables as command-line arguments or stdin. Scripts can implement arbitrary logic (e.g., calling local models, preprocessing inputs, routing to multiple models). Output is captured from stdout and parsed as JSON or plain text. Enables teams to test custom inference logic without modifying promptfoo.
Unique: Supports Python and Node.js scripts as first-class providers, receiving prompt and variables as command-line arguments or stdin. Scripts can implement arbitrary logic (preprocessing, routing, local model calls). Output is captured from stdout and parsed as JSON or plain text.
vs alternatives: More flexible than HTTP provider for local execution; enables testing of custom inference logic without external servers; supports both Python and Node.js
Provides native integration with Ollama (local LLM inference engine) and compatible local model servers (LLaMA.cpp, LocalAI). Connects to local HTTP endpoints, enabling teams to test open-source models (Llama, Mistral, etc.) without cloud API costs or latency. Supports model selection, parameter tuning, and streaming responses.
Unique: Native Ollama integration with support for local model servers (LLaMA.cpp, LocalAI). Connects to local HTTP endpoints, enabling zero-cost local inference. Supports model selection, parameter tuning, and streaming responses.
vs alternatives: Purpose-built for local model testing; enables cost-free evaluation of open-source models; supports multiple local model servers (Ollama, LLaMA.cpp, LocalAI)
Provides CLI and web UI search/filtering capabilities to navigate large evaluation result sets. Supports filtering by test case name, provider, model, pass/fail status, and custom metadata. Search uses full-text indexing for fast queries. Enables teams to quickly find specific test cases or failure patterns without manually reviewing all results.
Unique: Provides both CLI and web UI search/filtering with full-text indexing. Supports filtering by test case name, provider, model, status, and custom metadata. Enables fast navigation of large result sets without manual review.
vs alternatives: Integrated search (not a separate tool); supports both CLI and web UI; enables efficient navigation of large result sets
Generates adversarial test cases using attack strategies (jailbreaks, prompt injection, prompt leaking, toxicity, bias) to probe LLM vulnerabilities. Uses a plugin-based attack provider system where each strategy (e.g., 'crescendo jailbreak', 'SQL injection') generates variations of inputs designed to trigger unsafe behavior. Results are graded using guardrails (safety checks) to identify which attacks succeeded, producing a vulnerability report.
Unique: Implements a modular attack strategy system where each vulnerability type (jailbreak, injection, prompt leaking, toxicity, bias) is a pluggable provider that generates test cases. Strategies can be composed and parameterized (e.g., 'crescendo jailbreak with 5 iterations'), and results are graded against guardrails (safety checks) to produce a structured vulnerability report.
vs alternatives: Purpose-built red-teaming system integrated into evaluation pipeline (not a separate tool); supports custom attack strategies via plugins; generates reproducible adversarial test cases that can be version-controlled and shared
+7 more capabilities
Launches an interactive chat session in the terminal where developers type natural language prompts and receive code modifications in real-time. Aider maintains conversation context across multiple turns within a session, allowing iterative refinement of code changes through back-and-forth dialogue. The REPL integrates directly with the shell environment, requiring only `aider` command invocation in a git-initialized directory.
Unique: Aider's REPL is tightly coupled to git operations — every code change is automatically staged and can be committed with AI-generated messages, making the terminal session itself a version control workflow rather than just a chat interface
vs alternatives: Unlike Copilot Chat which requires VS Code, aider's terminal-native REPL works over SSH and in headless environments, making it the only AI pair programmer that integrates directly with shell-based development workflows
Automatically scans and indexes the entire local git repository to build an internal map of the codebase structure, file relationships, and code patterns. This map is used to provide the LLM with relevant context about the project without requiring developers to manually specify which files matter. The mapping mechanism reads git-tracked files and understands 100+ programming languages, enabling language-aware code generation across polyglot projects.
Unique: Aider's codebase map is automatically maintained and injected into every LLM request without user intervention, whereas competitors like GitHub Copilot require explicit file selection or rely on open-editor heuristics
vs alternatives: Aider's approach scales to larger projects than Copilot because it indexes the full git repo rather than just open files, enabling better understanding of project-wide patterns and dependencies
Implements prompt caching at the LLM provider level to reduce token consumption and latency for repeated requests. When the same codebase context or file content is used across multiple requests, aider caches the prompt tokens with the provider (e.g., OpenAI's prompt caching, Anthropic's prompt caching), avoiding re-processing of unchanged context. This reduces both API costs and response latency.
aider scores higher at 73/100 vs promptfoo at 58/100. promptfoo leads on adoption, while aider is stronger on ecosystem.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
Unique: Aider automatically leverages provider-level prompt caching without user configuration, transparently reducing costs and latency for repeated requests, whereas most developers manually manage context to optimize costs
vs alternatives: While other tools may support caching, aider's automatic caching of codebase context across requests is transparent and requires no user intervention, making it the easiest way to reduce costs on repeated coding tasks
Integrates with git to provide undo and rollback capabilities for AI-generated changes. Developers can use standard git commands (`git diff`, `git reset`, `git revert`) to inspect, modify, or undo aider's changes. Each aider request results in a git commit, making it easy to revert specific changes or cherry-pick modifications. This leverages git as the source of truth for change management.
Unique: Aider's undo mechanism is git-native rather than proprietary — developers use standard git commands to inspect and revert changes, making aider's changes fully auditable and reversible through familiar tools
vs alternatives: Unlike Copilot which stores changes in the editor and requires manual undo, aider's git-based approach provides atomic, traceable, and reversible changes that integrate with existing version control workflows
Allows developers to specify project-specific coding conventions, style guides, and architectural patterns that aider should follow when generating code. Conventions can be documented in configuration files or communicated in chat, and aider incorporates them into code generation to ensure consistency with existing code. This enables aider to match project style without explicit instruction for every request.
Unique: Aider's convention system allows developers to inject project-specific style rules into the code generation pipeline, ensuring consistency across AI-assisted changes without manual review, whereas competitors rely on post-generation linting
vs alternatives: While linters enforce style after generation, aider's convention specification guides generation itself, reducing the number of iterations needed to produce style-compliant code
Supports code generation across 100+ programming languages including Python, JavaScript, TypeScript, Rust, Go, C++, Java, Ruby, PHP, HTML, CSS, and many others. The codebase mapping and code generation logic is language-agnostic, allowing aider to work equally well in polyglot projects. Language detection is automatic based on file extensions and content.
Unique: Aider's language support is truly language-agnostic — the same codebase mapping and generation logic works across 100+ languages without language-specific plugins, whereas competitors often have better support for popular languages
vs alternatives: Unlike GitHub Copilot which has better support for popular languages, aider's architecture treats all languages equally, making it more suitable for polyglot projects and less common languages
Provides a web-based chat interface as an alternative to the terminal REPL, allowing developers to interact with aider through a browser. The web interface supports the same capabilities as the terminal (code generation, file editing, git integration) but with a GUI. Developers can copy code from the browser and paste it into their editor, or use the web interface for code review before applying changes.
Unique: Aider's web interface provides a GUI alternative to the terminal while maintaining the same underlying capabilities, whereas competitors like Copilot are IDE-first and don't offer standalone web access
vs alternatives: The web interface makes aider accessible to developers who avoid the terminal, and enables code review workflows where changes are reviewed in the browser before being applied to the local repo
Aider includes a help system (aider/website/docs) with context-aware documentation that can be queried from the CLI. The HelpCoder component assembles relevant documentation based on the user's question and provides targeted help without leaving the CLI. This enables developers to learn Aider's features and troubleshoot issues without switching to external documentation.
Unique: Integrates context-aware help directly into the CLI using HelpCoder, which assembles relevant documentation based on user queries without requiring external tools.
vs alternatives: More convenient than external documentation because help is available in the CLI, and more contextual than generic help because it's tailored to the user's question.
+9 more capabilities