SWE-bench_Verified vs vectra
Side-by-side comparison to help you choose.
| Feature | SWE-bench_Verified | vectra |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Dataset | Repository |
| UnfragileRank | 26/100 | 41/100 |
| Adoption | 0 | 0 |
| Quality | 0 | 0 |
| Ecosystem |
| 1 |
| 1 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Capabilities | 5 decomposed | 12 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Loads a curated dataset of 500 real GitHub issues paired with their ground-truth solutions, verified through human review and automated validation. The dataset is distributed in Parquet format optimized for streaming and batch processing, with built-in support for HuggingFace Datasets, Pandas, Polars, and MLCroissant libraries. Each record contains issue description, repository context, and verified fix code, enabling direct evaluation of code generation models on authentic software engineering tasks.
Unique: Combines human verification with automated validation to ensure ground-truth correctness — each fix is reviewed by domain experts and tested against original issue reproduction steps, unlike crowd-sourced datasets that rely solely on majority voting or automated heuristics
vs alternatives: More reliable than CodeSearchNet or GitHub-sourced datasets because verification eliminates incorrect or partial solutions, and more representative than synthetic benchmarks because tasks are extracted from real production issues with authentic complexity and edge cases
Exports verified task records from HuggingFace Hub to multiple serialization formats (Parquet, CSV, Arrow, JSON) with automatic schema preservation and type inference. Supports streaming export for large datasets and batch conversion pipelines using Pandas, Polars, or MLCroissant metadata standards. Enables seamless integration with downstream analysis tools, ML frameworks, and data warehouses without manual schema mapping.
Unique: Supports MLCroissant metadata generation alongside data export, enabling automatic dataset discovery and FAIR compliance — most benchmark datasets only provide raw data without machine-readable provenance, licensing, or schema documentation
vs alternatives: More flexible than direct HuggingFace Hub downloads because it enables format conversion and filtering at export time, reducing post-processing overhead compared to downloading full Parquet and manually converting in separate scripts
Filters and stratifies the 500 verified tasks by repository characteristics (language, size, test coverage), issue properties (complexity, category), and solution properties (lines changed, test pass rate) using declarative query syntax. Enables creation of balanced evaluation subsets for targeted model assessment — e.g., isolating tasks requiring specific capabilities or controlling for dataset bias. Supports both eager filtering (in-memory) and lazy evaluation (deferred computation) for memory-efficient processing.
Unique: Supports lazy evaluation through Polars and Arrow backends, enabling memory-efficient filtering of large stratified subsets without materializing intermediate results — most benchmark tools require eager filtering that loads entire dataset into memory
vs alternatives: More flexible than static benchmark splits because filtering is declarative and composable, allowing researchers to create custom evaluation sets on-the-fly rather than being limited to predefined train/test/validation partitions
Provides verified ground-truth solutions for each task with reproducible validation — each fix includes the exact test commands, expected outputs, and commit hashes needed to reproduce the solution in the original repository context. Enables deterministic evaluation by specifying exact Python versions, dependency versions, and environment configurations. Validation is performed through automated test execution against the original issue reproduction steps, ensuring solutions actually resolve the reported problem.
Unique: Includes exact test commands and commit hashes for reproducible validation in original repository context, unlike synthetic benchmarks that provide only expected outputs without ability to re-run tests in authentic development environments
vs alternatives: More rigorous than string-matching evaluation because it validates fixes by executing actual test suites, catching semantic errors and edge cases that string similarity metrics would miss
Provides standardized interfaces for integrating the benchmark into model evaluation pipelines, with built-in support for popular frameworks (HuggingFace Transformers, LangChain, LLaMA Index). Includes evaluation metrics (pass@k, exact match, test pass rate) and utilities for logging results to experiment tracking systems (Weights & Biases, MLflow). Enables end-to-end evaluation workflows from model inference through result aggregation and comparison.
Unique: Provides standardized evaluation interfaces compatible with HuggingFace Transformers and LangChain ecosystems, enabling plug-and-play integration with existing model evaluation infrastructure rather than requiring custom evaluation scripts
vs alternatives: More integrated than manual evaluation because it automates metric computation and experiment logging, reducing boilerplate code and enabling reproducible benchmarking across teams and environments
Stores vector embeddings and metadata in JSON files on disk while maintaining an in-memory index for fast similarity search. Uses a hybrid architecture where the file system serves as the persistent store and RAM holds the active search index, enabling both durability and performance without requiring a separate database server. Supports automatic index persistence and reload cycles.
Unique: Combines file-backed persistence with in-memory indexing, avoiding the complexity of running a separate database service while maintaining reasonable performance for small-to-medium datasets. Uses JSON serialization for human-readable storage and easy debugging.
vs alternatives: Lighter weight than Pinecone or Weaviate for local development, but trades scalability and concurrent access for simplicity and zero infrastructure overhead.
Implements vector similarity search using cosine distance calculation on normalized embeddings, with support for alternative distance metrics. Performs brute-force similarity computation across all indexed vectors, returning results ranked by distance score. Includes configurable thresholds to filter results below a minimum similarity threshold.
Unique: Implements pure cosine similarity without approximation layers, making it deterministic and debuggable but trading performance for correctness. Suitable for datasets where exact results matter more than speed.
vs alternatives: More transparent and easier to debug than approximate methods like HNSW, but significantly slower for large-scale retrieval compared to Pinecone or Milvus.
Accepts vectors of configurable dimensionality and automatically normalizes them for cosine similarity computation. Validates that all vectors have consistent dimensions and rejects mismatched vectors. Supports both pre-normalized and unnormalized input, with automatic L2 normalization applied during insertion.
vectra scores higher at 41/100 vs SWE-bench_Verified at 26/100.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
Unique: Automatically normalizes vectors during insertion, eliminating the need for users to handle normalization manually. Validates dimensionality consistency.
vs alternatives: More user-friendly than requiring manual normalization, but adds latency compared to accepting pre-normalized vectors.
Exports the entire vector database (embeddings, metadata, index) to standard formats (JSON, CSV) for backup, analysis, or migration. Imports vectors from external sources in multiple formats. Supports format conversion between JSON, CSV, and other serialization formats without losing data.
Unique: Supports multiple export/import formats (JSON, CSV) with automatic format detection, enabling interoperability with other tools and databases. No proprietary format lock-in.
vs alternatives: More portable than database-specific export formats, but less efficient than binary dumps. Suitable for small-to-medium datasets.
Implements BM25 (Okapi BM25) lexical search algorithm for keyword-based retrieval, then combines BM25 scores with vector similarity scores using configurable weighting to produce hybrid rankings. Tokenizes text fields during indexing and performs term frequency analysis at query time. Allows tuning the balance between semantic and lexical relevance.
Unique: Combines BM25 and vector similarity in a single ranking framework with configurable weighting, avoiding the need for separate lexical and semantic search pipelines. Implements BM25 from scratch rather than wrapping an external library.
vs alternatives: Simpler than Elasticsearch for hybrid search but lacks advanced features like phrase queries, stemming, and distributed indexing. Better integrated with vector search than bolting BM25 onto a pure vector database.
Supports filtering search results using a Pinecone-compatible query syntax that allows boolean combinations of metadata predicates (equality, comparison, range, set membership). Evaluates filter expressions against metadata objects during search, returning only vectors that satisfy the filter constraints. Supports nested metadata structures and multiple filter operators.
Unique: Implements Pinecone's filter syntax natively without requiring a separate query language parser, enabling drop-in compatibility for applications already using Pinecone. Filters are evaluated in-memory against metadata objects.
vs alternatives: More compatible with Pinecone workflows than generic vector databases, but lacks the performance optimizations of Pinecone's server-side filtering and index-accelerated predicates.
Integrates with multiple embedding providers (OpenAI, Azure OpenAI, local transformer models via Transformers.js) to generate vector embeddings from text. Abstracts provider differences behind a unified interface, allowing users to swap providers without changing application code. Handles API authentication, rate limiting, and batch processing for efficiency.
Unique: Provides a unified embedding interface supporting both cloud APIs and local transformer models, allowing users to choose between cost/privacy trade-offs without code changes. Uses Transformers.js for browser-compatible local embeddings.
vs alternatives: More flexible than single-provider solutions like LangChain's OpenAI embeddings, but less comprehensive than full embedding orchestration platforms. Local embedding support is unique for a lightweight vector database.
Runs entirely in the browser using IndexedDB for persistent storage, enabling client-side vector search without a backend server. Synchronizes in-memory index with IndexedDB on updates, allowing offline search and reducing server load. Supports the same API as the Node.js version for code reuse across environments.
Unique: Provides a unified API across Node.js and browser environments using IndexedDB for persistence, enabling code sharing and offline-first architectures. Avoids the complexity of syncing client-side and server-side indices.
vs alternatives: Simpler than building separate client and server vector search implementations, but limited by browser storage quotas and IndexedDB performance compared to server-side databases.
+4 more capabilities