| 0 |
| 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Capabilities | 13 decomposed | 10 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Detects 30+ PII entity types (names, SSNs, credit cards, phone numbers, bitcoin wallets, etc.) in unstructured text using a pluggable recognizer system that combines NLP-based entity extraction, regex pattern matching, and machine learning models. The Analyzer component orchestrates multiple recognizers in sequence, applies context enhancement to reduce false positives, and returns scored entity matches with confidence levels and character offsets for precise redaction.
Unique: Combines three orthogonal detection strategies (NLP entity extraction via spaCy, regex pattern matching, and pluggable ML recognizers) in a single pipeline with context-aware scoring that reduces false positives by analyzing surrounding text — unlike single-strategy tools, this multi-method approach catches PII that any single technique would miss
vs alternatives: More accurate than regex-only solutions (e.g., simple pattern matchers) because context enhancement disambiguates false positives, and more extensible than closed ML models because custom recognizers can be injected without retraining
Provides an extensible architecture for building custom PII recognizers by implementing a base Recognizer interface and registering them with the Analyzer. Developers can create domain-specific recognizers using regex patterns, spaCy NLP pipelines, external ML models, or API calls (e.g., calling a custom ML service to detect proprietary entity types). The framework handles recognizer composition, scoring aggregation, and context passing without requiring framework modifications.
Unique: Implements a true plugin architecture where custom recognizers are first-class citizens in the detection pipeline — recognizers can be added/removed at runtime without recompiling, and the framework handles orchestration, scoring, and context passing transparently. This differs from monolithic tools where custom logic requires forking or wrapping the entire system.
vs alternatives: More flexible than closed-source DLP tools because custom recognizers integrate seamlessly with built-in ones, and more maintainable than regex-only solutions because recognizers can encapsulate complex logic (ML models, API calls, stateful processing)
Defines a standardized entity type taxonomy (PERSON, EMAIL, PHONE_NUMBER, CREDIT_CARD, SSN, LOCATION, ORGANIZATION, etc.) that is language-agnostic and extensible. Built-in recognizers target these entity types, and custom recognizers can define new types (e.g., EMPLOYEE_ID, MEDICAL_RECORD_NUMBER). Entity types are used for operator mapping (e.g., 'PERSON -> redact'), confidence thresholding, and filtering. The system supports entity type hierarchies (e.g., PERSON is a subtype of IDENTITY).
Unique: Provides a standardized, language-agnostic entity type taxonomy (30+ built-in types) that is extensible for custom types, enabling consistent PII policies across organizations and languages. This decouples entity types from recognizers and operators, allowing independent evolution of each component.
vs alternatives: More standardized than ad-hoc entity naming because built-in types ensure consistency, and more extensible than fixed taxonomies because custom types can be added without framework modifications
Provides pre-built Docker images for Analyzer, Anonymizer, and Image Redactor components that can be deployed as microservices. Includes Docker Compose configurations for local development and Kubernetes manifests for production deployments. Supports scaling individual components independently, health checks, and integration with container orchestration platforms. Enables rapid deployment without manual Python environment setup.
Unique: Provides pre-built Docker images and Kubernetes manifests for Analyzer, Anonymizer, and Image Redactor that can be deployed as independent microservices with built-in health checks and scaling — rather than requiring manual Docker setup, it includes production-ready configurations for container orchestration.
vs alternatives: More operationally efficient than manual Python deployments because containers provide reproducible environments, and more scalable than monolithic deployments because each component can be independently scaled based on load.
Supports PII detection across multiple languages (English, Spanish, Portuguese, French, German, Chinese, Dutch, Greek, Italian, Lithuanian, Norwegian, Polish, Romanian, Russian, Ukrainian) through pluggable spaCy language models. Allows users to specify language per analysis or auto-detect language. Supports custom NLP models by implementing a custom NLP engine interface. Enables language-specific context enhancement and recognizer rules.
Unique: Supports multiple languages through pluggable spaCy models and allows custom NLP engine implementations, enabling language-specific context enhancement and recognizer rules — rather than a single monolithic model, it uses language-specific models that can be swapped or customized per deployment.
vs alternatives: More flexible than fixed-language systems because custom NLP models can be integrated, and more accurate than language-agnostic detection because language-specific models understand linguistic nuances.
De-identifies detected PII entities using a pluggable operator framework that supports multiple anonymization strategies: replace (with fixed/random values), redact (mask with asterisks), hash (deterministic hashing for consistency), encrypt (reversible encryption with key management), mask (partial masking like XXX-XX-1234), and custom operators. The Anonymizer component applies operators to text based on entity type mappings, preserves non-PII content, and supports deanonymization for authorized users via encrypted operator state.
Unique: Supports both irreversible (redact, hash) and reversible (encrypt) anonymization in a unified framework, with operator composition per entity type — this allows fine-grained control (e.g., hash names but redact SSNs) and enables authorized deanonymization without re-processing. Most tools offer either redaction OR encryption, not both in a composable pipeline.
vs alternatives: More flexible than simple redaction tools because encrypt/hash operators enable analytics on anonymized data, and more practical than full encryption because selective operators preserve readability where privacy risk is low
Detects and redacts PII in image files (PNG, JPG) and medical DICOM images by extracting text via Optical Character Recognition (OCR), running the extracted text through the Analyzer to identify PII entities, and then redacting those regions in the original image using bounding boxes. The Image Redactor component handles image format conversion, OCR engine integration (Tesseract or cloud-based), and supports both text-based and visual redaction (blurring, pixelation) for DICOM images with medical-specific entity types.
Unique: Integrates OCR with the Analyzer pipeline to enable end-to-end image PII redaction, and includes specialized DICOM handling that preserves medical metadata while redacting patient identifiers — this is critical for healthcare because DICOM files contain structured metadata that must not be corrupted. Most image redaction tools are either generic (no DICOM support) or medical-specific (no general image support).
vs alternatives: More comprehensive than manual redaction because OCR + Analyzer catches PII automatically, and more privacy-preserving than simple blurring because it targets only detected PII regions rather than entire sections
Detects and anonymizes PII in structured datasets (CSV, JSON, Parquet, databases) by applying the Analyzer to column values, mapping detected entities to anonymization operators, and writing de-identified output in the same format. The Structured component handles schema inference, batch processing of large files, and supports both column-level (redact entire column) and cell-level (redact specific values) anonymization strategies. Integrates with PySpark for distributed processing of multi-gigabyte datasets.
Unique: Extends Presidio's text-based PII detection to structured data by applying the Analyzer to column values and supporting both column-level and cell-level anonymization strategies. Includes PySpark integration for distributed processing of large datasets without loading entire files into memory. Most tools handle either text OR structured data, not both in a unified framework.
vs alternatives: More flexible than SQL-based masking tools because it works with multiple file formats and supports custom recognizers, and more scalable than single-machine tools because PySpark enables processing of multi-terabyte datasets
+5 more capabilities
Aggregates 67 TB of source code from the Software Heritage archive, filtering for permissively licensed repositories (MIT, Apache 2.0, BSD, etc.) across 600+ programming languages. Uses automated license detection and validation to ensure legal compliance for model training. Implements a rigorous deduplication pipeline at file and repository levels to eliminate redundant training data and reduce dataset bloat.
Unique: Largest open-source code dataset at 67 TB with automated opt-out governance allowing repository owners to request removal, combined with rigorous deduplication and PII removal pipeline — no other public dataset offers this scale with legal compliance and community control mechanisms
vs alternatives: Larger and more legally compliant than GitHub's CodeSearchNet (14M files) or Google's BigQuery public datasets, with explicit opt-out governance vs. implicit inclusion, and covers 600+ languages vs. Codex training data's undisclosed language distribution
Implements a community-driven opt-out system where repository owners can request removal of their code from the dataset without legal takedown notices. Maintains a registry of excluded repositories and re-applies exclusions during dataset updates. Provides transparent governance documentation and a clear submission process for removal requests, balancing open access with creator rights.
Unique: First large-scale code dataset to implement opt-out governance at dataset level rather than relying solely on license compliance, with transparent registry and community submission process — shifts power from dataset creators to code contributors
vs alternatives: More respectful of creator autonomy than GitHub Copilot's training approach (no opt-out) or academic datasets (one-time snapshot), and more scalable than individual DMCA takedowns
The Stack v2 scores higher at 61/100 vs Presidio at 56/100.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
Automated pipeline that scans source code for personally identifiable information (email addresses, API keys, SSH keys, credit card patterns, phone numbers) and removes or redacts them before dataset release. Uses regex patterns, entropy-based detection for secrets, and heuristic rules to identify sensitive data. Operates at file level with configurable sensitivity thresholds to balance data utility against privacy risk.
Unique: Combines regex pattern matching, entropy-based secret detection, and heuristic rules in a unified pipeline with configurable sensitivity — more comprehensive than simple regex-only approaches, but trades off false positive rate against security coverage
vs alternatives: More thorough than GitHub's secret scanning (which only flags known patterns) because it includes entropy-based detection for unknown secret formats, but less accurate than specialized tools like TruffleHog due to language-agnostic approach
Indexes 67 TB of source code across 600+ programming languages with language-aware metadata (syntax, file extension, language family). Enables retrieval by language, license, repository, or code patterns. Uses Software Heritage's existing indexing infrastructure as foundation, augmented with language detection and classification. Supports both bulk download and filtered queries for specific language subsets.
Unique: Leverages Software Heritage's existing language detection and indexing infrastructure, then augments with BigCode-specific language classification and filtering — avoids reinventing language detection while providing dataset-specific query capabilities
vs alternatives: More comprehensive language coverage (600+ languages) than GitHub's Linguist (500+ languages) and more accessible than Software Heritage's raw API because it's pre-filtered for permissive licenses and deduplicated
Removes duplicate code files and repositories using content hashing (SHA-256 or similar) and fuzzy matching for near-duplicates. Operates in two stages: exact deduplication via hash matching, then fuzzy matching (e.g., Jaccard similarity or MinHash) to catch semantically identical code with minor formatting differences. Preserves one canonical copy of each unique code pattern while removing redundant training examples.
Unique: Two-stage deduplication combining exact hash matching with fuzzy similarity matching (likely MinHash or Jaccard) to catch both identical and near-identical code — more thorough than single-stage approaches but computationally expensive
vs alternatives: More aggressive deduplication than CodeSearchNet (which uses simple hash matching) because it catches near-duplicates, but less semantic than clone detection tools (which understand code structure) because it's content-based
Integrates with Software Heritage's comprehensive archive of 200+ million repositories and their full version control history. Extracts source code snapshots from Software Heritage's Git/Mercurial/SVN repositories, preserving repository metadata (commit history, author info, timestamps). Provides access to code at specific points in time, enabling historical analysis or training on code evolution patterns.
Unique: Leverages Software Heritage's universal code archive (200M+ repositories) as data source, providing access to code that would be impossible to collect via GitHub API alone — enables training on archived/deleted repositories and non-GitHub platforms (GitLab, Gitea, etc.)
vs alternatives: More comprehensive than GitHub-only datasets because it includes code from GitLab, Gitea, SourceForge, and other platforms archived by Software Heritage; more legally defensible than web scraping because it uses an established, community-maintained archive
Tracks and validates SPDX license identifiers for each repository, ensuring only permissively licensed code (MIT, Apache 2.0, BSD, etc.) is included. Maintains license metadata alongside code files, enabling downstream users to verify legal compliance. Implements license hierarchy and compatibility checking to handle dual-licensed or complex licensing scenarios.
Unique: Combines automated SPDX detection with manual review and maintains license metadata alongside code, enabling downstream users to verify compliance — more transparent than datasets that simply claim 'permissive licenses' without proof
vs alternatives: More legally rigorous than GitHub's CodeSearchNet (which doesn't validate licenses) and more transparent than Codex training data (which doesn't disclose license filtering at all)
Maintains versioned snapshots of the dataset (e.g., v2.0, v2.1) with documented changes between versions (new repositories added, deduplication improvements, PII removal updates). Provides checksums and manifests for reproducibility, enabling researchers to cite specific dataset versions and reproduce results. Tracks dataset lineage and transformation history.
Unique: Maintains semantic versioning and detailed changelogs for dataset releases, enabling researchers to cite specific versions and understand dataset evolution — more rigorous than one-off dataset releases without versioning
vs alternatives: More reproducible than academic datasets that are released once without versioning, and more transparent than commercial datasets (Codex) that don't disclose version history or changes
+2 more capabilities